Why does a meromorphic function in the (extended) complex plane have finitely many poles?
Let $f$ be meromorphic in $mathbb{C} cup {infty}$. Why must $f$ have only finitely many poles?
Edit: Renamed question following the comments.
complex-analysis
add a comment |
Let $f$ be meromorphic in $mathbb{C} cup {infty}$. Why must $f$ have only finitely many poles?
Edit: Renamed question following the comments.
complex-analysis
10
The title of the post asks a different question than the body and the question in the title is inaccurate: a meromorphic function in the complex plane MAY have infinitely many poles. The space $mathbb Ccup{infty}$ is usually called the extended complex plane or the Riemann sphere.
– Did
Oct 5 '11 at 9:12
1
As an explicit counterexample to the title question, consider $frac{1}{2 - e^z}$.
– Qiaochu Yuan
Oct 5 '11 at 15:22
add a comment |
Let $f$ be meromorphic in $mathbb{C} cup {infty}$. Why must $f$ have only finitely many poles?
Edit: Renamed question following the comments.
complex-analysis
Let $f$ be meromorphic in $mathbb{C} cup {infty}$. Why must $f$ have only finitely many poles?
Edit: Renamed question following the comments.
complex-analysis
complex-analysis
edited Oct 8 '11 at 6:20
asked Oct 5 '11 at 3:44
user1205
14828
14828
10
The title of the post asks a different question than the body and the question in the title is inaccurate: a meromorphic function in the complex plane MAY have infinitely many poles. The space $mathbb Ccup{infty}$ is usually called the extended complex plane or the Riemann sphere.
– Did
Oct 5 '11 at 9:12
1
As an explicit counterexample to the title question, consider $frac{1}{2 - e^z}$.
– Qiaochu Yuan
Oct 5 '11 at 15:22
add a comment |
10
The title of the post asks a different question than the body and the question in the title is inaccurate: a meromorphic function in the complex plane MAY have infinitely many poles. The space $mathbb Ccup{infty}$ is usually called the extended complex plane or the Riemann sphere.
– Did
Oct 5 '11 at 9:12
1
As an explicit counterexample to the title question, consider $frac{1}{2 - e^z}$.
– Qiaochu Yuan
Oct 5 '11 at 15:22
10
10
The title of the post asks a different question than the body and the question in the title is inaccurate: a meromorphic function in the complex plane MAY have infinitely many poles. The space $mathbb Ccup{infty}$ is usually called the extended complex plane or the Riemann sphere.
– Did
Oct 5 '11 at 9:12
The title of the post asks a different question than the body and the question in the title is inaccurate: a meromorphic function in the complex plane MAY have infinitely many poles. The space $mathbb Ccup{infty}$ is usually called the extended complex plane or the Riemann sphere.
– Did
Oct 5 '11 at 9:12
1
1
As an explicit counterexample to the title question, consider $frac{1}{2 - e^z}$.
– Qiaochu Yuan
Oct 5 '11 at 15:22
As an explicit counterexample to the title question, consider $frac{1}{2 - e^z}$.
– Qiaochu Yuan
Oct 5 '11 at 15:22
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
By definition a pole is an isolated singularity, and so each pole has a neighborhood containing no other poles besides itself. Thus the set of all poles is discrete.
The set of poles is also closed, since its complement, the set of points at which $f$ is holomorphic, is open. (Any point where $f$ is holomorphic has a neighborhood restricted to which $f$ is holomorphic.)
Since $mathbb C cup {infty}$ is compact, any discrete and closed subset is discrete and compact, hence finite.
(Note that the reasoning of the first two paragraphs applies to a meromorphic function on any open subset of the Riemann sphere. E.g. a meromorphic function on $mathbb C$ can have infinitely many poles, but they must form a closed and discrete subset of $mathbb C$, and hence there can only be finitely many in any given bounded subset, i.e. they must accumulate at $infty$. A typical example is given by $f(z) = 1/sin z$.)
As an exercise, extend this example and reasoning to show all nonconstant holomorphic maps between compact complex curves are finite (ie all fibers are finite sets).
– AnonymousCoward
Oct 5 '11 at 4:27
I guess this is if you are thinking of meromorphic functions as holomorphic maps to the Riemann sphere.
– AnonymousCoward
Oct 5 '11 at 4:30
here there is a proof in the first paragraph: math.wisc.edu/~dummit/sets/110b-1s.pdf
– wqr
Mar 29 '13 at 3:30
add a comment |
Poles are isolated singularities, therefore they are at most countable. (There exists an injective map between the isolated singularities and $mathbb{Q}^2$)
A meromorphic function $f$ in the extended complex plane either has pole at infinity or is holomorphic at infinity. In either case there is a radius $R$ large enough so that in the region $|z|>R$ there is at most one pole, which is at infinity.
We now consider the other poles which can only be in set $K={|z|leq R}$. Suppose there are countably infinite of them, then they form a bounded sequence in $mathbb{R}^2$. By Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem, there must be a convergent subsequence, which contradicts the fact that all poles are isolated singularities. So there can only be finite of them.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f69964%2fwhy-does-a-meromorphic-function-in-the-extended-complex-plane-have-finitely-ma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
By definition a pole is an isolated singularity, and so each pole has a neighborhood containing no other poles besides itself. Thus the set of all poles is discrete.
The set of poles is also closed, since its complement, the set of points at which $f$ is holomorphic, is open. (Any point where $f$ is holomorphic has a neighborhood restricted to which $f$ is holomorphic.)
Since $mathbb C cup {infty}$ is compact, any discrete and closed subset is discrete and compact, hence finite.
(Note that the reasoning of the first two paragraphs applies to a meromorphic function on any open subset of the Riemann sphere. E.g. a meromorphic function on $mathbb C$ can have infinitely many poles, but they must form a closed and discrete subset of $mathbb C$, and hence there can only be finitely many in any given bounded subset, i.e. they must accumulate at $infty$. A typical example is given by $f(z) = 1/sin z$.)
As an exercise, extend this example and reasoning to show all nonconstant holomorphic maps between compact complex curves are finite (ie all fibers are finite sets).
– AnonymousCoward
Oct 5 '11 at 4:27
I guess this is if you are thinking of meromorphic functions as holomorphic maps to the Riemann sphere.
– AnonymousCoward
Oct 5 '11 at 4:30
here there is a proof in the first paragraph: math.wisc.edu/~dummit/sets/110b-1s.pdf
– wqr
Mar 29 '13 at 3:30
add a comment |
By definition a pole is an isolated singularity, and so each pole has a neighborhood containing no other poles besides itself. Thus the set of all poles is discrete.
The set of poles is also closed, since its complement, the set of points at which $f$ is holomorphic, is open. (Any point where $f$ is holomorphic has a neighborhood restricted to which $f$ is holomorphic.)
Since $mathbb C cup {infty}$ is compact, any discrete and closed subset is discrete and compact, hence finite.
(Note that the reasoning of the first two paragraphs applies to a meromorphic function on any open subset of the Riemann sphere. E.g. a meromorphic function on $mathbb C$ can have infinitely many poles, but they must form a closed and discrete subset of $mathbb C$, and hence there can only be finitely many in any given bounded subset, i.e. they must accumulate at $infty$. A typical example is given by $f(z) = 1/sin z$.)
As an exercise, extend this example and reasoning to show all nonconstant holomorphic maps between compact complex curves are finite (ie all fibers are finite sets).
– AnonymousCoward
Oct 5 '11 at 4:27
I guess this is if you are thinking of meromorphic functions as holomorphic maps to the Riemann sphere.
– AnonymousCoward
Oct 5 '11 at 4:30
here there is a proof in the first paragraph: math.wisc.edu/~dummit/sets/110b-1s.pdf
– wqr
Mar 29 '13 at 3:30
add a comment |
By definition a pole is an isolated singularity, and so each pole has a neighborhood containing no other poles besides itself. Thus the set of all poles is discrete.
The set of poles is also closed, since its complement, the set of points at which $f$ is holomorphic, is open. (Any point where $f$ is holomorphic has a neighborhood restricted to which $f$ is holomorphic.)
Since $mathbb C cup {infty}$ is compact, any discrete and closed subset is discrete and compact, hence finite.
(Note that the reasoning of the first two paragraphs applies to a meromorphic function on any open subset of the Riemann sphere. E.g. a meromorphic function on $mathbb C$ can have infinitely many poles, but they must form a closed and discrete subset of $mathbb C$, and hence there can only be finitely many in any given bounded subset, i.e. they must accumulate at $infty$. A typical example is given by $f(z) = 1/sin z$.)
By definition a pole is an isolated singularity, and so each pole has a neighborhood containing no other poles besides itself. Thus the set of all poles is discrete.
The set of poles is also closed, since its complement, the set of points at which $f$ is holomorphic, is open. (Any point where $f$ is holomorphic has a neighborhood restricted to which $f$ is holomorphic.)
Since $mathbb C cup {infty}$ is compact, any discrete and closed subset is discrete and compact, hence finite.
(Note that the reasoning of the first two paragraphs applies to a meromorphic function on any open subset of the Riemann sphere. E.g. a meromorphic function on $mathbb C$ can have infinitely many poles, but they must form a closed and discrete subset of $mathbb C$, and hence there can only be finitely many in any given bounded subset, i.e. they must accumulate at $infty$. A typical example is given by $f(z) = 1/sin z$.)
edited Oct 5 '11 at 14:58
answered Oct 5 '11 at 3:55
Matt E
104k8217385
104k8217385
As an exercise, extend this example and reasoning to show all nonconstant holomorphic maps between compact complex curves are finite (ie all fibers are finite sets).
– AnonymousCoward
Oct 5 '11 at 4:27
I guess this is if you are thinking of meromorphic functions as holomorphic maps to the Riemann sphere.
– AnonymousCoward
Oct 5 '11 at 4:30
here there is a proof in the first paragraph: math.wisc.edu/~dummit/sets/110b-1s.pdf
– wqr
Mar 29 '13 at 3:30
add a comment |
As an exercise, extend this example and reasoning to show all nonconstant holomorphic maps between compact complex curves are finite (ie all fibers are finite sets).
– AnonymousCoward
Oct 5 '11 at 4:27
I guess this is if you are thinking of meromorphic functions as holomorphic maps to the Riemann sphere.
– AnonymousCoward
Oct 5 '11 at 4:30
here there is a proof in the first paragraph: math.wisc.edu/~dummit/sets/110b-1s.pdf
– wqr
Mar 29 '13 at 3:30
As an exercise, extend this example and reasoning to show all nonconstant holomorphic maps between compact complex curves are finite (ie all fibers are finite sets).
– AnonymousCoward
Oct 5 '11 at 4:27
As an exercise, extend this example and reasoning to show all nonconstant holomorphic maps between compact complex curves are finite (ie all fibers are finite sets).
– AnonymousCoward
Oct 5 '11 at 4:27
I guess this is if you are thinking of meromorphic functions as holomorphic maps to the Riemann sphere.
– AnonymousCoward
Oct 5 '11 at 4:30
I guess this is if you are thinking of meromorphic functions as holomorphic maps to the Riemann sphere.
– AnonymousCoward
Oct 5 '11 at 4:30
here there is a proof in the first paragraph: math.wisc.edu/~dummit/sets/110b-1s.pdf
– wqr
Mar 29 '13 at 3:30
here there is a proof in the first paragraph: math.wisc.edu/~dummit/sets/110b-1s.pdf
– wqr
Mar 29 '13 at 3:30
add a comment |
Poles are isolated singularities, therefore they are at most countable. (There exists an injective map between the isolated singularities and $mathbb{Q}^2$)
A meromorphic function $f$ in the extended complex plane either has pole at infinity or is holomorphic at infinity. In either case there is a radius $R$ large enough so that in the region $|z|>R$ there is at most one pole, which is at infinity.
We now consider the other poles which can only be in set $K={|z|leq R}$. Suppose there are countably infinite of them, then they form a bounded sequence in $mathbb{R}^2$. By Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem, there must be a convergent subsequence, which contradicts the fact that all poles are isolated singularities. So there can only be finite of them.
add a comment |
Poles are isolated singularities, therefore they are at most countable. (There exists an injective map between the isolated singularities and $mathbb{Q}^2$)
A meromorphic function $f$ in the extended complex plane either has pole at infinity or is holomorphic at infinity. In either case there is a radius $R$ large enough so that in the region $|z|>R$ there is at most one pole, which is at infinity.
We now consider the other poles which can only be in set $K={|z|leq R}$. Suppose there are countably infinite of them, then they form a bounded sequence in $mathbb{R}^2$. By Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem, there must be a convergent subsequence, which contradicts the fact that all poles are isolated singularities. So there can only be finite of them.
add a comment |
Poles are isolated singularities, therefore they are at most countable. (There exists an injective map between the isolated singularities and $mathbb{Q}^2$)
A meromorphic function $f$ in the extended complex plane either has pole at infinity or is holomorphic at infinity. In either case there is a radius $R$ large enough so that in the region $|z|>R$ there is at most one pole, which is at infinity.
We now consider the other poles which can only be in set $K={|z|leq R}$. Suppose there are countably infinite of them, then they form a bounded sequence in $mathbb{R}^2$. By Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem, there must be a convergent subsequence, which contradicts the fact that all poles are isolated singularities. So there can only be finite of them.
Poles are isolated singularities, therefore they are at most countable. (There exists an injective map between the isolated singularities and $mathbb{Q}^2$)
A meromorphic function $f$ in the extended complex plane either has pole at infinity or is holomorphic at infinity. In either case there is a radius $R$ large enough so that in the region $|z|>R$ there is at most one pole, which is at infinity.
We now consider the other poles which can only be in set $K={|z|leq R}$. Suppose there are countably infinite of them, then they form a bounded sequence in $mathbb{R}^2$. By Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem, there must be a convergent subsequence, which contradicts the fact that all poles are isolated singularities. So there can only be finite of them.
edited Nov 21 '18 at 3:21
answered Nov 21 '18 at 3:14
Tian He
277
277
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f69964%2fwhy-does-a-meromorphic-function-in-the-extended-complex-plane-have-finitely-ma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
10
The title of the post asks a different question than the body and the question in the title is inaccurate: a meromorphic function in the complex plane MAY have infinitely many poles. The space $mathbb Ccup{infty}$ is usually called the extended complex plane or the Riemann sphere.
– Did
Oct 5 '11 at 9:12
1
As an explicit counterexample to the title question, consider $frac{1}{2 - e^z}$.
– Qiaochu Yuan
Oct 5 '11 at 15:22