$int_{-infty}^{infty} frac{sin(x)}{x} dx $ with integration by parts?
$begingroup$
The integral of the Sinc function over $mathbb{R}$ is well-known, $$int_{-infty}^{infty} frac{sin(x)}{x} dx = pi$$But if I try to evaluate this using integration by parts, I get $$int_{-infty}^{infty} frac{sin(x)}{x} dx = left.-frac{cos(x)}{x} right|_{-infty}^{infty} - int_{-infty}^{infty} frac{cos(x)}{x^2} dx$$ The first part is $0$, and the second part diverges.
What's going on? Is integration by parts just not kosher here? If so, why not?
improper-integrals fake-proofs
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The integral of the Sinc function over $mathbb{R}$ is well-known, $$int_{-infty}^{infty} frac{sin(x)}{x} dx = pi$$But if I try to evaluate this using integration by parts, I get $$int_{-infty}^{infty} frac{sin(x)}{x} dx = left.-frac{cos(x)}{x} right|_{-infty}^{infty} - int_{-infty}^{infty} frac{cos(x)}{x^2} dx$$ The first part is $0$, and the second part diverges.
What's going on? Is integration by parts just not kosher here? If so, why not?
improper-integrals fake-proofs
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The integral of the Sinc function over $mathbb{R}$ is well-known, $$int_{-infty}^{infty} frac{sin(x)}{x} dx = pi$$But if I try to evaluate this using integration by parts, I get $$int_{-infty}^{infty} frac{sin(x)}{x} dx = left.-frac{cos(x)}{x} right|_{-infty}^{infty} - int_{-infty}^{infty} frac{cos(x)}{x^2} dx$$ The first part is $0$, and the second part diverges.
What's going on? Is integration by parts just not kosher here? If so, why not?
improper-integrals fake-proofs
$endgroup$
The integral of the Sinc function over $mathbb{R}$ is well-known, $$int_{-infty}^{infty} frac{sin(x)}{x} dx = pi$$But if I try to evaluate this using integration by parts, I get $$int_{-infty}^{infty} frac{sin(x)}{x} dx = left.-frac{cos(x)}{x} right|_{-infty}^{infty} - int_{-infty}^{infty} frac{cos(x)}{x^2} dx$$ The first part is $0$, and the second part diverges.
What's going on? Is integration by parts just not kosher here? If so, why not?
improper-integrals fake-proofs
improper-integrals fake-proofs
edited Jan 28 '13 at 6:08
AndrewG
asked Jan 28 '13 at 5:59


AndrewGAndrewG
1,6551033
1,6551033
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The definite integration by parts formula
$$int_a^b f(x) g(x) dx = F(x) g(x)bigg|_a^b - int_a^b F(x) g'(x) dx$$
is justified by the product rule for derivative and the fundamental theorem of calculus
$$int_a^b (F g)'(x) dx = F(x) g(x) bigg|_a^b $$
But the "fine print" there is that $F(x) g(x)$ is assumed to be continuously differentiable on the interval
$(a,b)$ and continuous on $[a,b]$. In this case with $F(x) = -cos(x)$ and $g(x) = 1/x$,
$F(x) g(x)$ is undefined at $x=0$, and no definition of it there will make it continuous at $x=0$, let alone differentiable. So you can't use the integration by
parts formula for this integral on any interval containing $0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The issue is the discontinuity at $0$ in the cosine terms when you perform the partial integration, which is overlooked if you integrate over $mathbb{R}$. To get around this, consider:
$$int_{-infty}^{infty}frac{sin x}{x}dx=2int_0^{infty}frac{sin x}{x}dx$$
By parts:
$$int_{0}^{infty} frac{sin(x)}{x} dx = left.-frac{cos(x)}{x} right|_{0}^{infty} - int_{0}^{infty} frac{cos(x)}{x^2} dx$$
And here, both terms on the RHS diverge. No contradiction.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
There is a discontinuity in $cos(x)/x$, though not in $sin(x)/x$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 28 '13 at 6:26
$begingroup$
@RobertIsrael I thought the OP meant a discontinuity at zero of the function $sin x/x$.
$endgroup$
– user38268
Jan 28 '13 at 6:27
$begingroup$
@BenjaLim Sorry I realise that wasn't absolutely clear in my original post.
$endgroup$
– L. F.
Jan 28 '13 at 6:45
$begingroup$
@L.F., this proof is not accurate. You can not integrate by parts since you have an integrand that is not convergent. If the denominator was $x^{-2}$, than okay, but this is not the case.
$endgroup$
– Jeff Faraci
Dec 15 '13 at 3:44
$begingroup$
@Jeff I haven't proved anything $-$ please re-read the question.
$endgroup$
– L. F.
Dec 15 '13 at 3:48
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
As others have already discussed, integrating by parts with $u=frac1x$ and $v=-cos(x)$ fails due to the singularity at $0$. Here, I thought it would be instructive to present an integration by parts scheme that circumvents the difficulty of the singularity at $0$. To that end, we proceed.
Let $I$ be the integral given by
$$I=int_0^infty frac{sin(x)}{x},dxtag1$$
Enforcing the substitution with $u=frac1x$ and $v=1-cos(x)$ (instead of $displaystyle v=-cos(x)$) in $(1)$ yields
$$begin{align}
I&=left.left(frac{1-cos(x)}{x}right)right|_0^infty+int_0^infty frac{1-cos(x)}{x^2},dx\\
&=2int_0^infty left(frac{sin(x/2)}{x}right)^2,dx\\
&=int_0^infty left(frac{sin(x)}{x}right)^2,dxtag2
end{align}$$
While $(2)$ does not lead immediately to a value for $I$ it does reveal the interesting identity
$$int_0^inftyfrac{sin(x)}{x},dx=int_0^infty left(frac{sin(x)}{x}right)^2,dx$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f288692%2fint-infty-infty-frac-sinxx-dx-with-integration-by-parts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The definite integration by parts formula
$$int_a^b f(x) g(x) dx = F(x) g(x)bigg|_a^b - int_a^b F(x) g'(x) dx$$
is justified by the product rule for derivative and the fundamental theorem of calculus
$$int_a^b (F g)'(x) dx = F(x) g(x) bigg|_a^b $$
But the "fine print" there is that $F(x) g(x)$ is assumed to be continuously differentiable on the interval
$(a,b)$ and continuous on $[a,b]$. In this case with $F(x) = -cos(x)$ and $g(x) = 1/x$,
$F(x) g(x)$ is undefined at $x=0$, and no definition of it there will make it continuous at $x=0$, let alone differentiable. So you can't use the integration by
parts formula for this integral on any interval containing $0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The definite integration by parts formula
$$int_a^b f(x) g(x) dx = F(x) g(x)bigg|_a^b - int_a^b F(x) g'(x) dx$$
is justified by the product rule for derivative and the fundamental theorem of calculus
$$int_a^b (F g)'(x) dx = F(x) g(x) bigg|_a^b $$
But the "fine print" there is that $F(x) g(x)$ is assumed to be continuously differentiable on the interval
$(a,b)$ and continuous on $[a,b]$. In this case with $F(x) = -cos(x)$ and $g(x) = 1/x$,
$F(x) g(x)$ is undefined at $x=0$, and no definition of it there will make it continuous at $x=0$, let alone differentiable. So you can't use the integration by
parts formula for this integral on any interval containing $0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The definite integration by parts formula
$$int_a^b f(x) g(x) dx = F(x) g(x)bigg|_a^b - int_a^b F(x) g'(x) dx$$
is justified by the product rule for derivative and the fundamental theorem of calculus
$$int_a^b (F g)'(x) dx = F(x) g(x) bigg|_a^b $$
But the "fine print" there is that $F(x) g(x)$ is assumed to be continuously differentiable on the interval
$(a,b)$ and continuous on $[a,b]$. In this case with $F(x) = -cos(x)$ and $g(x) = 1/x$,
$F(x) g(x)$ is undefined at $x=0$, and no definition of it there will make it continuous at $x=0$, let alone differentiable. So you can't use the integration by
parts formula for this integral on any interval containing $0$.
$endgroup$
The definite integration by parts formula
$$int_a^b f(x) g(x) dx = F(x) g(x)bigg|_a^b - int_a^b F(x) g'(x) dx$$
is justified by the product rule for derivative and the fundamental theorem of calculus
$$int_a^b (F g)'(x) dx = F(x) g(x) bigg|_a^b $$
But the "fine print" there is that $F(x) g(x)$ is assumed to be continuously differentiable on the interval
$(a,b)$ and continuous on $[a,b]$. In this case with $F(x) = -cos(x)$ and $g(x) = 1/x$,
$F(x) g(x)$ is undefined at $x=0$, and no definition of it there will make it continuous at $x=0$, let alone differentiable. So you can't use the integration by
parts formula for this integral on any interval containing $0$.
answered Jan 28 '13 at 6:56
Robert IsraelRobert Israel
330k23219473
330k23219473
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The issue is the discontinuity at $0$ in the cosine terms when you perform the partial integration, which is overlooked if you integrate over $mathbb{R}$. To get around this, consider:
$$int_{-infty}^{infty}frac{sin x}{x}dx=2int_0^{infty}frac{sin x}{x}dx$$
By parts:
$$int_{0}^{infty} frac{sin(x)}{x} dx = left.-frac{cos(x)}{x} right|_{0}^{infty} - int_{0}^{infty} frac{cos(x)}{x^2} dx$$
And here, both terms on the RHS diverge. No contradiction.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
There is a discontinuity in $cos(x)/x$, though not in $sin(x)/x$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 28 '13 at 6:26
$begingroup$
@RobertIsrael I thought the OP meant a discontinuity at zero of the function $sin x/x$.
$endgroup$
– user38268
Jan 28 '13 at 6:27
$begingroup$
@BenjaLim Sorry I realise that wasn't absolutely clear in my original post.
$endgroup$
– L. F.
Jan 28 '13 at 6:45
$begingroup$
@L.F., this proof is not accurate. You can not integrate by parts since you have an integrand that is not convergent. If the denominator was $x^{-2}$, than okay, but this is not the case.
$endgroup$
– Jeff Faraci
Dec 15 '13 at 3:44
$begingroup$
@Jeff I haven't proved anything $-$ please re-read the question.
$endgroup$
– L. F.
Dec 15 '13 at 3:48
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
The issue is the discontinuity at $0$ in the cosine terms when you perform the partial integration, which is overlooked if you integrate over $mathbb{R}$. To get around this, consider:
$$int_{-infty}^{infty}frac{sin x}{x}dx=2int_0^{infty}frac{sin x}{x}dx$$
By parts:
$$int_{0}^{infty} frac{sin(x)}{x} dx = left.-frac{cos(x)}{x} right|_{0}^{infty} - int_{0}^{infty} frac{cos(x)}{x^2} dx$$
And here, both terms on the RHS diverge. No contradiction.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
There is a discontinuity in $cos(x)/x$, though not in $sin(x)/x$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 28 '13 at 6:26
$begingroup$
@RobertIsrael I thought the OP meant a discontinuity at zero of the function $sin x/x$.
$endgroup$
– user38268
Jan 28 '13 at 6:27
$begingroup$
@BenjaLim Sorry I realise that wasn't absolutely clear in my original post.
$endgroup$
– L. F.
Jan 28 '13 at 6:45
$begingroup$
@L.F., this proof is not accurate. You can not integrate by parts since you have an integrand that is not convergent. If the denominator was $x^{-2}$, than okay, but this is not the case.
$endgroup$
– Jeff Faraci
Dec 15 '13 at 3:44
$begingroup$
@Jeff I haven't proved anything $-$ please re-read the question.
$endgroup$
– L. F.
Dec 15 '13 at 3:48
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
The issue is the discontinuity at $0$ in the cosine terms when you perform the partial integration, which is overlooked if you integrate over $mathbb{R}$. To get around this, consider:
$$int_{-infty}^{infty}frac{sin x}{x}dx=2int_0^{infty}frac{sin x}{x}dx$$
By parts:
$$int_{0}^{infty} frac{sin(x)}{x} dx = left.-frac{cos(x)}{x} right|_{0}^{infty} - int_{0}^{infty} frac{cos(x)}{x^2} dx$$
And here, both terms on the RHS diverge. No contradiction.
$endgroup$
The issue is the discontinuity at $0$ in the cosine terms when you perform the partial integration, which is overlooked if you integrate over $mathbb{R}$. To get around this, consider:
$$int_{-infty}^{infty}frac{sin x}{x}dx=2int_0^{infty}frac{sin x}{x}dx$$
By parts:
$$int_{0}^{infty} frac{sin(x)}{x} dx = left.-frac{cos(x)}{x} right|_{0}^{infty} - int_{0}^{infty} frac{cos(x)}{x^2} dx$$
And here, both terms on the RHS diverge. No contradiction.
edited Jan 28 '13 at 6:33
answered Jan 28 '13 at 6:22


L. F.L. F.
7,67032045
7,67032045
$begingroup$
There is a discontinuity in $cos(x)/x$, though not in $sin(x)/x$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 28 '13 at 6:26
$begingroup$
@RobertIsrael I thought the OP meant a discontinuity at zero of the function $sin x/x$.
$endgroup$
– user38268
Jan 28 '13 at 6:27
$begingroup$
@BenjaLim Sorry I realise that wasn't absolutely clear in my original post.
$endgroup$
– L. F.
Jan 28 '13 at 6:45
$begingroup$
@L.F., this proof is not accurate. You can not integrate by parts since you have an integrand that is not convergent. If the denominator was $x^{-2}$, than okay, but this is not the case.
$endgroup$
– Jeff Faraci
Dec 15 '13 at 3:44
$begingroup$
@Jeff I haven't proved anything $-$ please re-read the question.
$endgroup$
– L. F.
Dec 15 '13 at 3:48
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
There is a discontinuity in $cos(x)/x$, though not in $sin(x)/x$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 28 '13 at 6:26
$begingroup$
@RobertIsrael I thought the OP meant a discontinuity at zero of the function $sin x/x$.
$endgroup$
– user38268
Jan 28 '13 at 6:27
$begingroup$
@BenjaLim Sorry I realise that wasn't absolutely clear in my original post.
$endgroup$
– L. F.
Jan 28 '13 at 6:45
$begingroup$
@L.F., this proof is not accurate. You can not integrate by parts since you have an integrand that is not convergent. If the denominator was $x^{-2}$, than okay, but this is not the case.
$endgroup$
– Jeff Faraci
Dec 15 '13 at 3:44
$begingroup$
@Jeff I haven't proved anything $-$ please re-read the question.
$endgroup$
– L. F.
Dec 15 '13 at 3:48
$begingroup$
There is a discontinuity in $cos(x)/x$, though not in $sin(x)/x$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 28 '13 at 6:26
$begingroup$
There is a discontinuity in $cos(x)/x$, though not in $sin(x)/x$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 28 '13 at 6:26
$begingroup$
@RobertIsrael I thought the OP meant a discontinuity at zero of the function $sin x/x$.
$endgroup$
– user38268
Jan 28 '13 at 6:27
$begingroup$
@RobertIsrael I thought the OP meant a discontinuity at zero of the function $sin x/x$.
$endgroup$
– user38268
Jan 28 '13 at 6:27
$begingroup$
@BenjaLim Sorry I realise that wasn't absolutely clear in my original post.
$endgroup$
– L. F.
Jan 28 '13 at 6:45
$begingroup$
@BenjaLim Sorry I realise that wasn't absolutely clear in my original post.
$endgroup$
– L. F.
Jan 28 '13 at 6:45
$begingroup$
@L.F., this proof is not accurate. You can not integrate by parts since you have an integrand that is not convergent. If the denominator was $x^{-2}$, than okay, but this is not the case.
$endgroup$
– Jeff Faraci
Dec 15 '13 at 3:44
$begingroup$
@L.F., this proof is not accurate. You can not integrate by parts since you have an integrand that is not convergent. If the denominator was $x^{-2}$, than okay, but this is not the case.
$endgroup$
– Jeff Faraci
Dec 15 '13 at 3:44
$begingroup$
@Jeff I haven't proved anything $-$ please re-read the question.
$endgroup$
– L. F.
Dec 15 '13 at 3:48
$begingroup$
@Jeff I haven't proved anything $-$ please re-read the question.
$endgroup$
– L. F.
Dec 15 '13 at 3:48
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
As others have already discussed, integrating by parts with $u=frac1x$ and $v=-cos(x)$ fails due to the singularity at $0$. Here, I thought it would be instructive to present an integration by parts scheme that circumvents the difficulty of the singularity at $0$. To that end, we proceed.
Let $I$ be the integral given by
$$I=int_0^infty frac{sin(x)}{x},dxtag1$$
Enforcing the substitution with $u=frac1x$ and $v=1-cos(x)$ (instead of $displaystyle v=-cos(x)$) in $(1)$ yields
$$begin{align}
I&=left.left(frac{1-cos(x)}{x}right)right|_0^infty+int_0^infty frac{1-cos(x)}{x^2},dx\\
&=2int_0^infty left(frac{sin(x/2)}{x}right)^2,dx\\
&=int_0^infty left(frac{sin(x)}{x}right)^2,dxtag2
end{align}$$
While $(2)$ does not lead immediately to a value for $I$ it does reveal the interesting identity
$$int_0^inftyfrac{sin(x)}{x},dx=int_0^infty left(frac{sin(x)}{x}right)^2,dx$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As others have already discussed, integrating by parts with $u=frac1x$ and $v=-cos(x)$ fails due to the singularity at $0$. Here, I thought it would be instructive to present an integration by parts scheme that circumvents the difficulty of the singularity at $0$. To that end, we proceed.
Let $I$ be the integral given by
$$I=int_0^infty frac{sin(x)}{x},dxtag1$$
Enforcing the substitution with $u=frac1x$ and $v=1-cos(x)$ (instead of $displaystyle v=-cos(x)$) in $(1)$ yields
$$begin{align}
I&=left.left(frac{1-cos(x)}{x}right)right|_0^infty+int_0^infty frac{1-cos(x)}{x^2},dx\\
&=2int_0^infty left(frac{sin(x/2)}{x}right)^2,dx\\
&=int_0^infty left(frac{sin(x)}{x}right)^2,dxtag2
end{align}$$
While $(2)$ does not lead immediately to a value for $I$ it does reveal the interesting identity
$$int_0^inftyfrac{sin(x)}{x},dx=int_0^infty left(frac{sin(x)}{x}right)^2,dx$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As others have already discussed, integrating by parts with $u=frac1x$ and $v=-cos(x)$ fails due to the singularity at $0$. Here, I thought it would be instructive to present an integration by parts scheme that circumvents the difficulty of the singularity at $0$. To that end, we proceed.
Let $I$ be the integral given by
$$I=int_0^infty frac{sin(x)}{x},dxtag1$$
Enforcing the substitution with $u=frac1x$ and $v=1-cos(x)$ (instead of $displaystyle v=-cos(x)$) in $(1)$ yields
$$begin{align}
I&=left.left(frac{1-cos(x)}{x}right)right|_0^infty+int_0^infty frac{1-cos(x)}{x^2},dx\\
&=2int_0^infty left(frac{sin(x/2)}{x}right)^2,dx\\
&=int_0^infty left(frac{sin(x)}{x}right)^2,dxtag2
end{align}$$
While $(2)$ does not lead immediately to a value for $I$ it does reveal the interesting identity
$$int_0^inftyfrac{sin(x)}{x},dx=int_0^infty left(frac{sin(x)}{x}right)^2,dx$$
$endgroup$
As others have already discussed, integrating by parts with $u=frac1x$ and $v=-cos(x)$ fails due to the singularity at $0$. Here, I thought it would be instructive to present an integration by parts scheme that circumvents the difficulty of the singularity at $0$. To that end, we proceed.
Let $I$ be the integral given by
$$I=int_0^infty frac{sin(x)}{x},dxtag1$$
Enforcing the substitution with $u=frac1x$ and $v=1-cos(x)$ (instead of $displaystyle v=-cos(x)$) in $(1)$ yields
$$begin{align}
I&=left.left(frac{1-cos(x)}{x}right)right|_0^infty+int_0^infty frac{1-cos(x)}{x^2},dx\\
&=2int_0^infty left(frac{sin(x/2)}{x}right)^2,dx\\
&=int_0^infty left(frac{sin(x)}{x}right)^2,dxtag2
end{align}$$
While $(2)$ does not lead immediately to a value for $I$ it does reveal the interesting identity
$$int_0^inftyfrac{sin(x)}{x},dx=int_0^infty left(frac{sin(x)}{x}right)^2,dx$$
answered Jan 30 at 18:36
Mark ViolaMark Viola
134k1278177
134k1278177
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f288692%2fint-infty-infty-frac-sinxx-dx-with-integration-by-parts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown