Well-Ordering Irrationality












1












$begingroup$


Let $D$ be a positive integer and the let the square root of $D$ be a real number. Assuming that the square root of D is not an integer (i.e. $D$ is not a perfect square), use Well-Ordering to prove that there exists some integer $a$ such that $a < sqrt(D) < a+1.$



My proof attempt begins with assuming that the square root of D is not an integer and letting $a$ be the least integer that satisfies the inequality $a < $sqrt(D)$ < a + 1$, then I'm not sure what to do. My intuition tells me to square both sides, but then how would I proceed with the proof.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It is not clear from your definition of $a$ (the least integer satisfying $a<mathit{sqrt}(D)<a+1$) that such $a$ really exists. In fact, that is what you have to prove. Try to find another definition of $a$.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Elias
    Jan 31 at 7:40
















1












$begingroup$


Let $D$ be a positive integer and the let the square root of $D$ be a real number. Assuming that the square root of D is not an integer (i.e. $D$ is not a perfect square), use Well-Ordering to prove that there exists some integer $a$ such that $a < sqrt(D) < a+1.$



My proof attempt begins with assuming that the square root of D is not an integer and letting $a$ be the least integer that satisfies the inequality $a < $sqrt(D)$ < a + 1$, then I'm not sure what to do. My intuition tells me to square both sides, but then how would I proceed with the proof.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It is not clear from your definition of $a$ (the least integer satisfying $a<mathit{sqrt}(D)<a+1$) that such $a$ really exists. In fact, that is what you have to prove. Try to find another definition of $a$.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Elias
    Jan 31 at 7:40














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Let $D$ be a positive integer and the let the square root of $D$ be a real number. Assuming that the square root of D is not an integer (i.e. $D$ is not a perfect square), use Well-Ordering to prove that there exists some integer $a$ such that $a < sqrt(D) < a+1.$



My proof attempt begins with assuming that the square root of D is not an integer and letting $a$ be the least integer that satisfies the inequality $a < $sqrt(D)$ < a + 1$, then I'm not sure what to do. My intuition tells me to square both sides, but then how would I proceed with the proof.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $D$ be a positive integer and the let the square root of $D$ be a real number. Assuming that the square root of D is not an integer (i.e. $D$ is not a perfect square), use Well-Ordering to prove that there exists some integer $a$ such that $a < sqrt(D) < a+1.$



My proof attempt begins with assuming that the square root of D is not an integer and letting $a$ be the least integer that satisfies the inequality $a < $sqrt(D)$ < a + 1$, then I'm not sure what to do. My intuition tells me to square both sides, but then how would I proceed with the proof.







irrational-numbers rational-numbers well-orders






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 31 at 7:15









Sanjoy The ManjoySanjoy The Manjoy

502315




502315












  • $begingroup$
    It is not clear from your definition of $a$ (the least integer satisfying $a<mathit{sqrt}(D)<a+1$) that such $a$ really exists. In fact, that is what you have to prove. Try to find another definition of $a$.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Elias
    Jan 31 at 7:40


















  • $begingroup$
    It is not clear from your definition of $a$ (the least integer satisfying $a<mathit{sqrt}(D)<a+1$) that such $a$ really exists. In fact, that is what you have to prove. Try to find another definition of $a$.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Elias
    Jan 31 at 7:40
















$begingroup$
It is not clear from your definition of $a$ (the least integer satisfying $a<mathit{sqrt}(D)<a+1$) that such $a$ really exists. In fact, that is what you have to prove. Try to find another definition of $a$.
$endgroup$
– Peter Elias
Jan 31 at 7:40




$begingroup$
It is not clear from your definition of $a$ (the least integer satisfying $a<mathit{sqrt}(D)<a+1$) that such $a$ really exists. In fact, that is what you have to prove. Try to find another definition of $a$.
$endgroup$
– Peter Elias
Jan 31 at 7:40










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Let $A = { n in mathbb{N} ~| ~ sqrt{D} < n }$.



By the Archimedean property, the set $A$ is not the empty set,
and $A$ is a subset of $mathbb{N}$.



Thus by the well ordering principle, $A$ has the least element, say $alpha$.



The assumption for $D$ implies that $D in mathbb{N}$ and $D neq m^2$ for every $min mathbb{N}$.



Thus $D in mathbb{N}$ and $D neq 1^2$, i.e., $D neq 1$.
Hence $1<D$, so $1<sqrt{D}$.



Thus $1 notin A$.



(If $1 in A$, then $sqrt{D}<1$. Contradiction.)



Hence $alpha$ cannot be $1$, so $alpha in mathbb{N} -{1} = {2,3,4,ldots}$.



Thus $alpha -1 in mathbb{N}$.



Because $alpha$ is the least element of $A$, we know that $alpha -1 notin A$,
i.e. , $alpha-1 leq sqrt{D}$.



If $alpha -1 = sqrt{D}$, then $D = (alpha-1)^2$, and D becomes a perfect square. contradiction.



Hence $alpha -1 < sqrt{D}$. And with $sqrt{D}< alpha$, we can conclude that
$alpha -1 < sqrt{D} < alpha$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Why is it obvious that D is greater than 1? Since D belongs to the positive integers, D can equal 1 and then the proof fails
    $endgroup$
    – Sanjoy The Manjoy
    Jan 31 at 18:07












  • $begingroup$
    @SanjoyTheManjoy I edit my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Doyun Nam
    Feb 1 at 5:20












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3094607%2fwell-ordering-irrationality%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

Let $A = { n in mathbb{N} ~| ~ sqrt{D} < n }$.



By the Archimedean property, the set $A$ is not the empty set,
and $A$ is a subset of $mathbb{N}$.



Thus by the well ordering principle, $A$ has the least element, say $alpha$.



The assumption for $D$ implies that $D in mathbb{N}$ and $D neq m^2$ for every $min mathbb{N}$.



Thus $D in mathbb{N}$ and $D neq 1^2$, i.e., $D neq 1$.
Hence $1<D$, so $1<sqrt{D}$.



Thus $1 notin A$.



(If $1 in A$, then $sqrt{D}<1$. Contradiction.)



Hence $alpha$ cannot be $1$, so $alpha in mathbb{N} -{1} = {2,3,4,ldots}$.



Thus $alpha -1 in mathbb{N}$.



Because $alpha$ is the least element of $A$, we know that $alpha -1 notin A$,
i.e. , $alpha-1 leq sqrt{D}$.



If $alpha -1 = sqrt{D}$, then $D = (alpha-1)^2$, and D becomes a perfect square. contradiction.



Hence $alpha -1 < sqrt{D}$. And with $sqrt{D}< alpha$, we can conclude that
$alpha -1 < sqrt{D} < alpha$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Why is it obvious that D is greater than 1? Since D belongs to the positive integers, D can equal 1 and then the proof fails
    $endgroup$
    – Sanjoy The Manjoy
    Jan 31 at 18:07












  • $begingroup$
    @SanjoyTheManjoy I edit my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Doyun Nam
    Feb 1 at 5:20
















2












$begingroup$

Let $A = { n in mathbb{N} ~| ~ sqrt{D} < n }$.



By the Archimedean property, the set $A$ is not the empty set,
and $A$ is a subset of $mathbb{N}$.



Thus by the well ordering principle, $A$ has the least element, say $alpha$.



The assumption for $D$ implies that $D in mathbb{N}$ and $D neq m^2$ for every $min mathbb{N}$.



Thus $D in mathbb{N}$ and $D neq 1^2$, i.e., $D neq 1$.
Hence $1<D$, so $1<sqrt{D}$.



Thus $1 notin A$.



(If $1 in A$, then $sqrt{D}<1$. Contradiction.)



Hence $alpha$ cannot be $1$, so $alpha in mathbb{N} -{1} = {2,3,4,ldots}$.



Thus $alpha -1 in mathbb{N}$.



Because $alpha$ is the least element of $A$, we know that $alpha -1 notin A$,
i.e. , $alpha-1 leq sqrt{D}$.



If $alpha -1 = sqrt{D}$, then $D = (alpha-1)^2$, and D becomes a perfect square. contradiction.



Hence $alpha -1 < sqrt{D}$. And with $sqrt{D}< alpha$, we can conclude that
$alpha -1 < sqrt{D} < alpha$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Why is it obvious that D is greater than 1? Since D belongs to the positive integers, D can equal 1 and then the proof fails
    $endgroup$
    – Sanjoy The Manjoy
    Jan 31 at 18:07












  • $begingroup$
    @SanjoyTheManjoy I edit my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Doyun Nam
    Feb 1 at 5:20














2












2








2





$begingroup$

Let $A = { n in mathbb{N} ~| ~ sqrt{D} < n }$.



By the Archimedean property, the set $A$ is not the empty set,
and $A$ is a subset of $mathbb{N}$.



Thus by the well ordering principle, $A$ has the least element, say $alpha$.



The assumption for $D$ implies that $D in mathbb{N}$ and $D neq m^2$ for every $min mathbb{N}$.



Thus $D in mathbb{N}$ and $D neq 1^2$, i.e., $D neq 1$.
Hence $1<D$, so $1<sqrt{D}$.



Thus $1 notin A$.



(If $1 in A$, then $sqrt{D}<1$. Contradiction.)



Hence $alpha$ cannot be $1$, so $alpha in mathbb{N} -{1} = {2,3,4,ldots}$.



Thus $alpha -1 in mathbb{N}$.



Because $alpha$ is the least element of $A$, we know that $alpha -1 notin A$,
i.e. , $alpha-1 leq sqrt{D}$.



If $alpha -1 = sqrt{D}$, then $D = (alpha-1)^2$, and D becomes a perfect square. contradiction.



Hence $alpha -1 < sqrt{D}$. And with $sqrt{D}< alpha$, we can conclude that
$alpha -1 < sqrt{D} < alpha$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Let $A = { n in mathbb{N} ~| ~ sqrt{D} < n }$.



By the Archimedean property, the set $A$ is not the empty set,
and $A$ is a subset of $mathbb{N}$.



Thus by the well ordering principle, $A$ has the least element, say $alpha$.



The assumption for $D$ implies that $D in mathbb{N}$ and $D neq m^2$ for every $min mathbb{N}$.



Thus $D in mathbb{N}$ and $D neq 1^2$, i.e., $D neq 1$.
Hence $1<D$, so $1<sqrt{D}$.



Thus $1 notin A$.



(If $1 in A$, then $sqrt{D}<1$. Contradiction.)



Hence $alpha$ cannot be $1$, so $alpha in mathbb{N} -{1} = {2,3,4,ldots}$.



Thus $alpha -1 in mathbb{N}$.



Because $alpha$ is the least element of $A$, we know that $alpha -1 notin A$,
i.e. , $alpha-1 leq sqrt{D}$.



If $alpha -1 = sqrt{D}$, then $D = (alpha-1)^2$, and D becomes a perfect square. contradiction.



Hence $alpha -1 < sqrt{D}$. And with $sqrt{D}< alpha$, we can conclude that
$alpha -1 < sqrt{D} < alpha$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Feb 1 at 5:19

























answered Jan 31 at 7:54









Doyun NamDoyun Nam

66619




66619












  • $begingroup$
    Why is it obvious that D is greater than 1? Since D belongs to the positive integers, D can equal 1 and then the proof fails
    $endgroup$
    – Sanjoy The Manjoy
    Jan 31 at 18:07












  • $begingroup$
    @SanjoyTheManjoy I edit my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Doyun Nam
    Feb 1 at 5:20


















  • $begingroup$
    Why is it obvious that D is greater than 1? Since D belongs to the positive integers, D can equal 1 and then the proof fails
    $endgroup$
    – Sanjoy The Manjoy
    Jan 31 at 18:07












  • $begingroup$
    @SanjoyTheManjoy I edit my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Doyun Nam
    Feb 1 at 5:20
















$begingroup$
Why is it obvious that D is greater than 1? Since D belongs to the positive integers, D can equal 1 and then the proof fails
$endgroup$
– Sanjoy The Manjoy
Jan 31 at 18:07






$begingroup$
Why is it obvious that D is greater than 1? Since D belongs to the positive integers, D can equal 1 and then the proof fails
$endgroup$
– Sanjoy The Manjoy
Jan 31 at 18:07














$begingroup$
@SanjoyTheManjoy I edit my answer.
$endgroup$
– Doyun Nam
Feb 1 at 5:20




$begingroup$
@SanjoyTheManjoy I edit my answer.
$endgroup$
– Doyun Nam
Feb 1 at 5:20


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3094607%2fwell-ordering-irrationality%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

ts Property 'filter' does not exist on type '{}'

Notepad++ export/extract a list of installed plugins