Dialogflow chatbot async
I am using Dialogflow with the the V2 C# client library
. When the user provides the Chatbot with an address, I use a web-hook to send the address to my back-end.
My back-end then validates the address and does some other things (my back-end takes about 2 seconds).
However, I would like the chatbot to respond to the user with something along the lines of "Give me a second and I will validate the address you provided me" before my back-end has finished.
Then once my back-end has finished, respond to the user with the results of the address validation. I don't want to accept input during the 2 seconds my back-end is processing.
In summary, I would like to know, what is the best way to acknowledge a user's input with a message, not accept any further input until my back-end processing is complete and then finally responding to the user with the results of my back-end?
google-cloud-platform backend webhooks dialogflow chatbot
add a comment |
I am using Dialogflow with the the V2 C# client library
. When the user provides the Chatbot with an address, I use a web-hook to send the address to my back-end.
My back-end then validates the address and does some other things (my back-end takes about 2 seconds).
However, I would like the chatbot to respond to the user with something along the lines of "Give me a second and I will validate the address you provided me" before my back-end has finished.
Then once my back-end has finished, respond to the user with the results of the address validation. I don't want to accept input during the 2 seconds my back-end is processing.
In summary, I would like to know, what is the best way to acknowledge a user's input with a message, not accept any further input until my back-end processing is complete and then finally responding to the user with the results of my back-end?
google-cloud-platform backend webhooks dialogflow chatbot
add a comment |
I am using Dialogflow with the the V2 C# client library
. When the user provides the Chatbot with an address, I use a web-hook to send the address to my back-end.
My back-end then validates the address and does some other things (my back-end takes about 2 seconds).
However, I would like the chatbot to respond to the user with something along the lines of "Give me a second and I will validate the address you provided me" before my back-end has finished.
Then once my back-end has finished, respond to the user with the results of the address validation. I don't want to accept input during the 2 seconds my back-end is processing.
In summary, I would like to know, what is the best way to acknowledge a user's input with a message, not accept any further input until my back-end processing is complete and then finally responding to the user with the results of my back-end?
google-cloud-platform backend webhooks dialogflow chatbot
I am using Dialogflow with the the V2 C# client library
. When the user provides the Chatbot with an address, I use a web-hook to send the address to my back-end.
My back-end then validates the address and does some other things (my back-end takes about 2 seconds).
However, I would like the chatbot to respond to the user with something along the lines of "Give me a second and I will validate the address you provided me" before my back-end has finished.
Then once my back-end has finished, respond to the user with the results of the address validation. I don't want to accept input during the 2 seconds my back-end is processing.
In summary, I would like to know, what is the best way to acknowledge a user's input with a message, not accept any further input until my back-end processing is complete and then finally responding to the user with the results of my back-end?
google-cloud-platform backend webhooks dialogflow chatbot
google-cloud-platform backend webhooks dialogflow chatbot
edited Nov 20 '18 at 4:54
KGR
324316
324316
asked Nov 20 '18 at 4:32
Harry StuartHarry Stuart
32429
32429
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You need to manage this via contexts
. If you are using Dialogflow SDK instead of the UI, you could control all of this via code which is more convenient.
If you are using the GUI, set an input_context
and give it some lifetime as you see fit. On your web-hook's successful resolution, update or cancel respective input_context
via an output_context
to demonstrate completeness of a request.
By using contexts
event if user asks any other question, you will not loose previous question and its answer will still be rendered to user.
Disengaging the chatbot by not taking any questions might not be a good user experience. If you really wanted to do it, you will need some JS to help you create a loading/processing sort of icon on your bot's interface for specific intents
while you programatically control the mute & unmute commands on the UI.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53386282%2fdialogflow-chatbot-async%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You need to manage this via contexts
. If you are using Dialogflow SDK instead of the UI, you could control all of this via code which is more convenient.
If you are using the GUI, set an input_context
and give it some lifetime as you see fit. On your web-hook's successful resolution, update or cancel respective input_context
via an output_context
to demonstrate completeness of a request.
By using contexts
event if user asks any other question, you will not loose previous question and its answer will still be rendered to user.
Disengaging the chatbot by not taking any questions might not be a good user experience. If you really wanted to do it, you will need some JS to help you create a loading/processing sort of icon on your bot's interface for specific intents
while you programatically control the mute & unmute commands on the UI.
add a comment |
You need to manage this via contexts
. If you are using Dialogflow SDK instead of the UI, you could control all of this via code which is more convenient.
If you are using the GUI, set an input_context
and give it some lifetime as you see fit. On your web-hook's successful resolution, update or cancel respective input_context
via an output_context
to demonstrate completeness of a request.
By using contexts
event if user asks any other question, you will not loose previous question and its answer will still be rendered to user.
Disengaging the chatbot by not taking any questions might not be a good user experience. If you really wanted to do it, you will need some JS to help you create a loading/processing sort of icon on your bot's interface for specific intents
while you programatically control the mute & unmute commands on the UI.
add a comment |
You need to manage this via contexts
. If you are using Dialogflow SDK instead of the UI, you could control all of this via code which is more convenient.
If you are using the GUI, set an input_context
and give it some lifetime as you see fit. On your web-hook's successful resolution, update or cancel respective input_context
via an output_context
to demonstrate completeness of a request.
By using contexts
event if user asks any other question, you will not loose previous question and its answer will still be rendered to user.
Disengaging the chatbot by not taking any questions might not be a good user experience. If you really wanted to do it, you will need some JS to help you create a loading/processing sort of icon on your bot's interface for specific intents
while you programatically control the mute & unmute commands on the UI.
You need to manage this via contexts
. If you are using Dialogflow SDK instead of the UI, you could control all of this via code which is more convenient.
If you are using the GUI, set an input_context
and give it some lifetime as you see fit. On your web-hook's successful resolution, update or cancel respective input_context
via an output_context
to demonstrate completeness of a request.
By using contexts
event if user asks any other question, you will not loose previous question and its answer will still be rendered to user.
Disengaging the chatbot by not taking any questions might not be a good user experience. If you really wanted to do it, you will need some JS to help you create a loading/processing sort of icon on your bot's interface for specific intents
while you programatically control the mute & unmute commands on the UI.
answered Nov 20 '18 at 5:35
Pruthvi KumarPruthvi Kumar
58719
58719
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53386282%2fdialogflow-chatbot-async%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown