$ X_i $ is discrete random variable, Compute $ sum X_i = 97 $
$begingroup$
Let $ X_1, X_2, , dots , X_{10} $ be a discrete random variable with uniform distribution between $ 0 $ to $ 10 $. Compute $ P{ sum_{i=1}^{10} X_i = 97 } $, the variables are independent.
My attempt:
So I can either get 97 by having nine 10's and a 7, eight 10's and 9 & 8 or seven 10's and three 9's ?
$$ P{ sum_{i=1}^{10} X_i = 97 } = {10 choose 1 } cdot frac{1}{11}^{10} + {10 choose 2} cdot frac{1}{11}^{10} + {10 choose 3} cdot frac{1}{11}^{10} $$
probability uniform-distribution
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $ X_1, X_2, , dots , X_{10} $ be a discrete random variable with uniform distribution between $ 0 $ to $ 10 $. Compute $ P{ sum_{i=1}^{10} X_i = 97 } $, the variables are independent.
My attempt:
So I can either get 97 by having nine 10's and a 7, eight 10's and 9 & 8 or seven 10's and three 9's ?
$$ P{ sum_{i=1}^{10} X_i = 97 } = {10 choose 1 } cdot frac{1}{11}^{10} + {10 choose 2} cdot frac{1}{11}^{10} + {10 choose 3} cdot frac{1}{11}^{10} $$
probability uniform-distribution
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Well, you could consider the number of integer solutions to $$ x_1 + x_2 + ldots + x_{10} = 97 $$ You can do it with the stars and bars method.
$endgroup$
– Matti P.
Jan 3 at 9:54
$begingroup$
Yes at first I tried to use the formula of k objects into n bins but I have a limitation since I can only have up to 10 objects in each bin. Could you maybe guide me how to apply this limitation?
$endgroup$
– bm1125
Jan 3 at 9:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $ X_1, X_2, , dots , X_{10} $ be a discrete random variable with uniform distribution between $ 0 $ to $ 10 $. Compute $ P{ sum_{i=1}^{10} X_i = 97 } $, the variables are independent.
My attempt:
So I can either get 97 by having nine 10's and a 7, eight 10's and 9 & 8 or seven 10's and three 9's ?
$$ P{ sum_{i=1}^{10} X_i = 97 } = {10 choose 1 } cdot frac{1}{11}^{10} + {10 choose 2} cdot frac{1}{11}^{10} + {10 choose 3} cdot frac{1}{11}^{10} $$
probability uniform-distribution
$endgroup$
Let $ X_1, X_2, , dots , X_{10} $ be a discrete random variable with uniform distribution between $ 0 $ to $ 10 $. Compute $ P{ sum_{i=1}^{10} X_i = 97 } $, the variables are independent.
My attempt:
So I can either get 97 by having nine 10's and a 7, eight 10's and 9 & 8 or seven 10's and three 9's ?
$$ P{ sum_{i=1}^{10} X_i = 97 } = {10 choose 1 } cdot frac{1}{11}^{10} + {10 choose 2} cdot frac{1}{11}^{10} + {10 choose 3} cdot frac{1}{11}^{10} $$
probability uniform-distribution
probability uniform-distribution
asked Jan 3 at 9:53
bm1125bm1125
64016
64016
$begingroup$
Well, you could consider the number of integer solutions to $$ x_1 + x_2 + ldots + x_{10} = 97 $$ You can do it with the stars and bars method.
$endgroup$
– Matti P.
Jan 3 at 9:54
$begingroup$
Yes at first I tried to use the formula of k objects into n bins but I have a limitation since I can only have up to 10 objects in each bin. Could you maybe guide me how to apply this limitation?
$endgroup$
– bm1125
Jan 3 at 9:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well, you could consider the number of integer solutions to $$ x_1 + x_2 + ldots + x_{10} = 97 $$ You can do it with the stars and bars method.
$endgroup$
– Matti P.
Jan 3 at 9:54
$begingroup$
Yes at first I tried to use the formula of k objects into n bins but I have a limitation since I can only have up to 10 objects in each bin. Could you maybe guide me how to apply this limitation?
$endgroup$
– bm1125
Jan 3 at 9:58
$begingroup$
Well, you could consider the number of integer solutions to $$ x_1 + x_2 + ldots + x_{10} = 97 $$ You can do it with the stars and bars method.
$endgroup$
– Matti P.
Jan 3 at 9:54
$begingroup$
Well, you could consider the number of integer solutions to $$ x_1 + x_2 + ldots + x_{10} = 97 $$ You can do it with the stars and bars method.
$endgroup$
– Matti P.
Jan 3 at 9:54
$begingroup$
Yes at first I tried to use the formula of k objects into n bins but I have a limitation since I can only have up to 10 objects in each bin. Could you maybe guide me how to apply this limitation?
$endgroup$
– bm1125
Jan 3 at 9:58
$begingroup$
Yes at first I tried to use the formula of k objects into n bins but I have a limitation since I can only have up to 10 objects in each bin. Could you maybe guide me how to apply this limitation?
$endgroup$
– bm1125
Jan 3 at 9:58
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your solution is almost correct.
The correct solution is:$$11^{-10}left(frac{10!}{9!1!}+frac{10!}{8!1!1!}+frac{10!}{7!3!}right)$$
Observe that $8$ and $9$ are distinct numbers.
So e.g. $(10,10,9,10,10,10,10,10,8,10)$ and $(10,10,8,10,10,10,10,10,9,10)$ are distinct possibilities.
That is why $binom{10}{2}=frac{10!}{8!2!}$ must be replaced by $frac{10!}{8!1!1!}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So if I understand correctly, because I have two distinct numbers ($ 8,9 $) I had to multiply $ {10 choose 2} $ by $ 2! $ ?
$endgroup$
– bm1125
Jan 3 at 10:15
2
$begingroup$
That is a way to put it. Personally I would rather say that there are $frac{10!}{8!1!1!}$ (multinomial coefficient) ways to split up $10$ objects in $3$ separate groups consisting of $8$, $1$ and $1$ objects respectively.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Jan 3 at 10:18
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060409%2fx-i-is-discrete-random-variable-compute-sum-x-i-97%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your solution is almost correct.
The correct solution is:$$11^{-10}left(frac{10!}{9!1!}+frac{10!}{8!1!1!}+frac{10!}{7!3!}right)$$
Observe that $8$ and $9$ are distinct numbers.
So e.g. $(10,10,9,10,10,10,10,10,8,10)$ and $(10,10,8,10,10,10,10,10,9,10)$ are distinct possibilities.
That is why $binom{10}{2}=frac{10!}{8!2!}$ must be replaced by $frac{10!}{8!1!1!}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So if I understand correctly, because I have two distinct numbers ($ 8,9 $) I had to multiply $ {10 choose 2} $ by $ 2! $ ?
$endgroup$
– bm1125
Jan 3 at 10:15
2
$begingroup$
That is a way to put it. Personally I would rather say that there are $frac{10!}{8!1!1!}$ (multinomial coefficient) ways to split up $10$ objects in $3$ separate groups consisting of $8$, $1$ and $1$ objects respectively.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Jan 3 at 10:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your solution is almost correct.
The correct solution is:$$11^{-10}left(frac{10!}{9!1!}+frac{10!}{8!1!1!}+frac{10!}{7!3!}right)$$
Observe that $8$ and $9$ are distinct numbers.
So e.g. $(10,10,9,10,10,10,10,10,8,10)$ and $(10,10,8,10,10,10,10,10,9,10)$ are distinct possibilities.
That is why $binom{10}{2}=frac{10!}{8!2!}$ must be replaced by $frac{10!}{8!1!1!}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So if I understand correctly, because I have two distinct numbers ($ 8,9 $) I had to multiply $ {10 choose 2} $ by $ 2! $ ?
$endgroup$
– bm1125
Jan 3 at 10:15
2
$begingroup$
That is a way to put it. Personally I would rather say that there are $frac{10!}{8!1!1!}$ (multinomial coefficient) ways to split up $10$ objects in $3$ separate groups consisting of $8$, $1$ and $1$ objects respectively.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Jan 3 at 10:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your solution is almost correct.
The correct solution is:$$11^{-10}left(frac{10!}{9!1!}+frac{10!}{8!1!1!}+frac{10!}{7!3!}right)$$
Observe that $8$ and $9$ are distinct numbers.
So e.g. $(10,10,9,10,10,10,10,10,8,10)$ and $(10,10,8,10,10,10,10,10,9,10)$ are distinct possibilities.
That is why $binom{10}{2}=frac{10!}{8!2!}$ must be replaced by $frac{10!}{8!1!1!}$.
$endgroup$
Your solution is almost correct.
The correct solution is:$$11^{-10}left(frac{10!}{9!1!}+frac{10!}{8!1!1!}+frac{10!}{7!3!}right)$$
Observe that $8$ and $9$ are distinct numbers.
So e.g. $(10,10,9,10,10,10,10,10,8,10)$ and $(10,10,8,10,10,10,10,10,9,10)$ are distinct possibilities.
That is why $binom{10}{2}=frac{10!}{8!2!}$ must be replaced by $frac{10!}{8!1!1!}$.
edited Jan 3 at 10:13
answered Jan 3 at 10:03
drhabdrhab
98.9k544130
98.9k544130
$begingroup$
So if I understand correctly, because I have two distinct numbers ($ 8,9 $) I had to multiply $ {10 choose 2} $ by $ 2! $ ?
$endgroup$
– bm1125
Jan 3 at 10:15
2
$begingroup$
That is a way to put it. Personally I would rather say that there are $frac{10!}{8!1!1!}$ (multinomial coefficient) ways to split up $10$ objects in $3$ separate groups consisting of $8$, $1$ and $1$ objects respectively.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Jan 3 at 10:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So if I understand correctly, because I have two distinct numbers ($ 8,9 $) I had to multiply $ {10 choose 2} $ by $ 2! $ ?
$endgroup$
– bm1125
Jan 3 at 10:15
2
$begingroup$
That is a way to put it. Personally I would rather say that there are $frac{10!}{8!1!1!}$ (multinomial coefficient) ways to split up $10$ objects in $3$ separate groups consisting of $8$, $1$ and $1$ objects respectively.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Jan 3 at 10:18
$begingroup$
So if I understand correctly, because I have two distinct numbers ($ 8,9 $) I had to multiply $ {10 choose 2} $ by $ 2! $ ?
$endgroup$
– bm1125
Jan 3 at 10:15
$begingroup$
So if I understand correctly, because I have two distinct numbers ($ 8,9 $) I had to multiply $ {10 choose 2} $ by $ 2! $ ?
$endgroup$
– bm1125
Jan 3 at 10:15
2
2
$begingroup$
That is a way to put it. Personally I would rather say that there are $frac{10!}{8!1!1!}$ (multinomial coefficient) ways to split up $10$ objects in $3$ separate groups consisting of $8$, $1$ and $1$ objects respectively.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Jan 3 at 10:18
$begingroup$
That is a way to put it. Personally I would rather say that there are $frac{10!}{8!1!1!}$ (multinomial coefficient) ways to split up $10$ objects in $3$ separate groups consisting of $8$, $1$ and $1$ objects respectively.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Jan 3 at 10:18
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060409%2fx-i-is-discrete-random-variable-compute-sum-x-i-97%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Well, you could consider the number of integer solutions to $$ x_1 + x_2 + ldots + x_{10} = 97 $$ You can do it with the stars and bars method.
$endgroup$
– Matti P.
Jan 3 at 9:54
$begingroup$
Yes at first I tried to use the formula of k objects into n bins but I have a limitation since I can only have up to 10 objects in each bin. Could you maybe guide me how to apply this limitation?
$endgroup$
– bm1125
Jan 3 at 9:58