Function in $L^2$ that doesn't vanishing












0












$begingroup$


Is this statement makes a sense: $fin L^2(0,1)$ such that $f(x)ne 0 ,forall xin (0,1)$ ?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    no.............
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Jan 1 at 11:23
















0












$begingroup$


Is this statement makes a sense: $fin L^2(0,1)$ such that $f(x)ne 0 ,forall xin (0,1)$ ?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    no.............
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Jan 1 at 11:23














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Is this statement makes a sense: $fin L^2(0,1)$ such that $f(x)ne 0 ,forall xin (0,1)$ ?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Is this statement makes a sense: $fin L^2(0,1)$ such that $f(x)ne 0 ,forall xin (0,1)$ ?







measure-theory lp-spaces almost-everywhere






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 1 at 11:19









GustaveGustave

720211




720211












  • $begingroup$
    no.............
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Jan 1 at 11:23


















  • $begingroup$
    no.............
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Jan 1 at 11:23
















$begingroup$
no.............
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Jan 1 at 11:23




$begingroup$
no.............
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Jan 1 at 11:23










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Not really. If $f$ was such a function, then define $g in L^2(0,1)$ as



$$g(x) = begin{cases} 0, text{if } x = frac12 \
f(x), text{ otherwise}end{cases}$$



Then $f = g$ almost everywhere so they are equal as elements of $L^2(0,1)$.



However, what does makes sense is to require that $f ne 0$ almost everywhere, i.e. there exists $N subseteq [0,1]$ such that $lambda(N) = 0$ and that $f(x)ne 0, forall x in [0,1]setminus N$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think it should be said that there is both a notion of $L^2$, the set of square integrable functions, and $L^2=(L^2,langlecdot,cdotrangle)$ the inner product space of square integrable functions. So the OP does make sense in the set, and also does not make sense in the inner product space.
    $endgroup$
    – InequalitiesEverywhere
    Jan 1 at 11:49













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058398%2ffunction-in-l2-that-doesnt-vanishing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

Not really. If $f$ was such a function, then define $g in L^2(0,1)$ as



$$g(x) = begin{cases} 0, text{if } x = frac12 \
f(x), text{ otherwise}end{cases}$$



Then $f = g$ almost everywhere so they are equal as elements of $L^2(0,1)$.



However, what does makes sense is to require that $f ne 0$ almost everywhere, i.e. there exists $N subseteq [0,1]$ such that $lambda(N) = 0$ and that $f(x)ne 0, forall x in [0,1]setminus N$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think it should be said that there is both a notion of $L^2$, the set of square integrable functions, and $L^2=(L^2,langlecdot,cdotrangle)$ the inner product space of square integrable functions. So the OP does make sense in the set, and also does not make sense in the inner product space.
    $endgroup$
    – InequalitiesEverywhere
    Jan 1 at 11:49


















3












$begingroup$

Not really. If $f$ was such a function, then define $g in L^2(0,1)$ as



$$g(x) = begin{cases} 0, text{if } x = frac12 \
f(x), text{ otherwise}end{cases}$$



Then $f = g$ almost everywhere so they are equal as elements of $L^2(0,1)$.



However, what does makes sense is to require that $f ne 0$ almost everywhere, i.e. there exists $N subseteq [0,1]$ such that $lambda(N) = 0$ and that $f(x)ne 0, forall x in [0,1]setminus N$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think it should be said that there is both a notion of $L^2$, the set of square integrable functions, and $L^2=(L^2,langlecdot,cdotrangle)$ the inner product space of square integrable functions. So the OP does make sense in the set, and also does not make sense in the inner product space.
    $endgroup$
    – InequalitiesEverywhere
    Jan 1 at 11:49
















3












3








3





$begingroup$

Not really. If $f$ was such a function, then define $g in L^2(0,1)$ as



$$g(x) = begin{cases} 0, text{if } x = frac12 \
f(x), text{ otherwise}end{cases}$$



Then $f = g$ almost everywhere so they are equal as elements of $L^2(0,1)$.



However, what does makes sense is to require that $f ne 0$ almost everywhere, i.e. there exists $N subseteq [0,1]$ such that $lambda(N) = 0$ and that $f(x)ne 0, forall x in [0,1]setminus N$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Not really. If $f$ was such a function, then define $g in L^2(0,1)$ as



$$g(x) = begin{cases} 0, text{if } x = frac12 \
f(x), text{ otherwise}end{cases}$$



Then $f = g$ almost everywhere so they are equal as elements of $L^2(0,1)$.



However, what does makes sense is to require that $f ne 0$ almost everywhere, i.e. there exists $N subseteq [0,1]$ such that $lambda(N) = 0$ and that $f(x)ne 0, forall x in [0,1]setminus N$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 1 at 11:26









mechanodroidmechanodroid

27.1k62446




27.1k62446








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think it should be said that there is both a notion of $L^2$, the set of square integrable functions, and $L^2=(L^2,langlecdot,cdotrangle)$ the inner product space of square integrable functions. So the OP does make sense in the set, and also does not make sense in the inner product space.
    $endgroup$
    – InequalitiesEverywhere
    Jan 1 at 11:49
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think it should be said that there is both a notion of $L^2$, the set of square integrable functions, and $L^2=(L^2,langlecdot,cdotrangle)$ the inner product space of square integrable functions. So the OP does make sense in the set, and also does not make sense in the inner product space.
    $endgroup$
    – InequalitiesEverywhere
    Jan 1 at 11:49










1




1




$begingroup$
I think it should be said that there is both a notion of $L^2$, the set of square integrable functions, and $L^2=(L^2,langlecdot,cdotrangle)$ the inner product space of square integrable functions. So the OP does make sense in the set, and also does not make sense in the inner product space.
$endgroup$
– InequalitiesEverywhere
Jan 1 at 11:49






$begingroup$
I think it should be said that there is both a notion of $L^2$, the set of square integrable functions, and $L^2=(L^2,langlecdot,cdotrangle)$ the inner product space of square integrable functions. So the OP does make sense in the set, and also does not make sense in the inner product space.
$endgroup$
– InequalitiesEverywhere
Jan 1 at 11:49




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058398%2ffunction-in-l2-that-doesnt-vanishing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

SQL update select statement

'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules