Mixing cacheFirst and networkOnly inside of a stream strategy never hits the network












0















I want to create a stream of HTML so that some of the stream sources are from the cache, but one is always pulled from the network. That one has a script tag in it that will always have the most up-to-date hash on it. So that way part of my page is cached by the sw but part is still following traditional cache busting patterns.



Code



 const partialStrategy = workbox.strategies['cacheFirst']({
cacheName: 'empath-static',
});

const fragmentStrategy = workbox.strategies.networkOnly();

workbox.routing.registerRoute(
routeTemplate('/pages/:domain/:container/:app'),
workbox.streams.strategy([
() => partialStrategy.makeRequest({ request: 'partials/head.html' }),
() => partialStrategy.makeRequest({ request: 'header/header.html' }),
({ params }) => fragmentStrategy.makeRequest({
request: `${params.domain}/${params.container}/${params.app}/${params.app}.html`,
}),
() => partialStrategy.makeRequest({ request: 'partials/foot.html' }),
])
);


However that source always seems to come from the browser cache (or at least I'm assuming its the browser cache since its not in Workbox's cache at all).



I don't see Workbox making an individual request for that data in the network tab (like appears in the workbox demo here).



Is there something special you have to do to make the stream always go get the data from the server?










share|improve this question





























    0















    I want to create a stream of HTML so that some of the stream sources are from the cache, but one is always pulled from the network. That one has a script tag in it that will always have the most up-to-date hash on it. So that way part of my page is cached by the sw but part is still following traditional cache busting patterns.



    Code



     const partialStrategy = workbox.strategies['cacheFirst']({
    cacheName: 'empath-static',
    });

    const fragmentStrategy = workbox.strategies.networkOnly();

    workbox.routing.registerRoute(
    routeTemplate('/pages/:domain/:container/:app'),
    workbox.streams.strategy([
    () => partialStrategy.makeRequest({ request: 'partials/head.html' }),
    () => partialStrategy.makeRequest({ request: 'header/header.html' }),
    ({ params }) => fragmentStrategy.makeRequest({
    request: `${params.domain}/${params.container}/${params.app}/${params.app}.html`,
    }),
    () => partialStrategy.makeRequest({ request: 'partials/foot.html' }),
    ])
    );


    However that source always seems to come from the browser cache (or at least I'm assuming its the browser cache since its not in Workbox's cache at all).



    I don't see Workbox making an individual request for that data in the network tab (like appears in the workbox demo here).



    Is there something special you have to do to make the stream always go get the data from the server?










    share|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0








      I want to create a stream of HTML so that some of the stream sources are from the cache, but one is always pulled from the network. That one has a script tag in it that will always have the most up-to-date hash on it. So that way part of my page is cached by the sw but part is still following traditional cache busting patterns.



      Code



       const partialStrategy = workbox.strategies['cacheFirst']({
      cacheName: 'empath-static',
      });

      const fragmentStrategy = workbox.strategies.networkOnly();

      workbox.routing.registerRoute(
      routeTemplate('/pages/:domain/:container/:app'),
      workbox.streams.strategy([
      () => partialStrategy.makeRequest({ request: 'partials/head.html' }),
      () => partialStrategy.makeRequest({ request: 'header/header.html' }),
      ({ params }) => fragmentStrategy.makeRequest({
      request: `${params.domain}/${params.container}/${params.app}/${params.app}.html`,
      }),
      () => partialStrategy.makeRequest({ request: 'partials/foot.html' }),
      ])
      );


      However that source always seems to come from the browser cache (or at least I'm assuming its the browser cache since its not in Workbox's cache at all).



      I don't see Workbox making an individual request for that data in the network tab (like appears in the workbox demo here).



      Is there something special you have to do to make the stream always go get the data from the server?










      share|improve this question
















      I want to create a stream of HTML so that some of the stream sources are from the cache, but one is always pulled from the network. That one has a script tag in it that will always have the most up-to-date hash on it. So that way part of my page is cached by the sw but part is still following traditional cache busting patterns.



      Code



       const partialStrategy = workbox.strategies['cacheFirst']({
      cacheName: 'empath-static',
      });

      const fragmentStrategy = workbox.strategies.networkOnly();

      workbox.routing.registerRoute(
      routeTemplate('/pages/:domain/:container/:app'),
      workbox.streams.strategy([
      () => partialStrategy.makeRequest({ request: 'partials/head.html' }),
      () => partialStrategy.makeRequest({ request: 'header/header.html' }),
      ({ params }) => fragmentStrategy.makeRequest({
      request: `${params.domain}/${params.container}/${params.app}/${params.app}.html`,
      }),
      () => partialStrategy.makeRequest({ request: 'partials/foot.html' }),
      ])
      );


      However that source always seems to come from the browser cache (or at least I'm assuming its the browser cache since its not in Workbox's cache at all).



      I don't see Workbox making an individual request for that data in the network tab (like appears in the workbox demo here).



      Is there something special you have to do to make the stream always go get the data from the server?







      javascript workbox






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 20 '18 at 2:20









      customcommander

      1,276719




      1,276719










      asked Nov 19 '18 at 21:44









      BradlyFBradlyF

      1




      1
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          I think your question boils down to taking this bit of code:



          ({ params }) => fragmentStrategy.makeRequest({
          request: `${params.domain}/${params.container}/${params.app}/${params.app}.html`,
          }),


          and making sure that it always skips the browser's HTTP cache and actually goes against the network. Is that correct?



          If so, the way to do that would be to pass in an actual Request object instead of a URL string for the named request parameter to makeRequest(). In that Request object, you can set the cache mode to 'no-store' to ensure that the HTTP cache is completely avoided.



          That would look something like:



          ({ params }) => {
          const noStoreRequest = new Request(
          `${params.domain}/${params.container}/${params.app}/${params.app}.html`,
          {cache: 'no-store'}
          );

          return fragmentStrategy.makeRequest({request: noStoreRequest});
          },





          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53383079%2fmixing-cachefirst-and-networkonly-inside-of-a-stream-strategy-never-hits-the-net%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            I think your question boils down to taking this bit of code:



            ({ params }) => fragmentStrategy.makeRequest({
            request: `${params.domain}/${params.container}/${params.app}/${params.app}.html`,
            }),


            and making sure that it always skips the browser's HTTP cache and actually goes against the network. Is that correct?



            If so, the way to do that would be to pass in an actual Request object instead of a URL string for the named request parameter to makeRequest(). In that Request object, you can set the cache mode to 'no-store' to ensure that the HTTP cache is completely avoided.



            That would look something like:



            ({ params }) => {
            const noStoreRequest = new Request(
            `${params.domain}/${params.container}/${params.app}/${params.app}.html`,
            {cache: 'no-store'}
            );

            return fragmentStrategy.makeRequest({request: noStoreRequest});
            },





            share|improve this answer




























              0














              I think your question boils down to taking this bit of code:



              ({ params }) => fragmentStrategy.makeRequest({
              request: `${params.domain}/${params.container}/${params.app}/${params.app}.html`,
              }),


              and making sure that it always skips the browser's HTTP cache and actually goes against the network. Is that correct?



              If so, the way to do that would be to pass in an actual Request object instead of a URL string for the named request parameter to makeRequest(). In that Request object, you can set the cache mode to 'no-store' to ensure that the HTTP cache is completely avoided.



              That would look something like:



              ({ params }) => {
              const noStoreRequest = new Request(
              `${params.domain}/${params.container}/${params.app}/${params.app}.html`,
              {cache: 'no-store'}
              );

              return fragmentStrategy.makeRequest({request: noStoreRequest});
              },





              share|improve this answer


























                0












                0








                0







                I think your question boils down to taking this bit of code:



                ({ params }) => fragmentStrategy.makeRequest({
                request: `${params.domain}/${params.container}/${params.app}/${params.app}.html`,
                }),


                and making sure that it always skips the browser's HTTP cache and actually goes against the network. Is that correct?



                If so, the way to do that would be to pass in an actual Request object instead of a URL string for the named request parameter to makeRequest(). In that Request object, you can set the cache mode to 'no-store' to ensure that the HTTP cache is completely avoided.



                That would look something like:



                ({ params }) => {
                const noStoreRequest = new Request(
                `${params.domain}/${params.container}/${params.app}/${params.app}.html`,
                {cache: 'no-store'}
                );

                return fragmentStrategy.makeRequest({request: noStoreRequest});
                },





                share|improve this answer













                I think your question boils down to taking this bit of code:



                ({ params }) => fragmentStrategy.makeRequest({
                request: `${params.domain}/${params.container}/${params.app}/${params.app}.html`,
                }),


                and making sure that it always skips the browser's HTTP cache and actually goes against the network. Is that correct?



                If so, the way to do that would be to pass in an actual Request object instead of a URL string for the named request parameter to makeRequest(). In that Request object, you can set the cache mode to 'no-store' to ensure that the HTTP cache is completely avoided.



                That would look something like:



                ({ params }) => {
                const noStoreRequest = new Request(
                `${params.domain}/${params.container}/${params.app}/${params.app}.html`,
                {cache: 'no-store'}
                );

                return fragmentStrategy.makeRequest({request: noStoreRequest});
                },






                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 20 '18 at 21:42









                Jeff PosnickJeff Posnick

                29.1k46092




                29.1k46092






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53383079%2fmixing-cachefirst-and-networkonly-inside-of-a-stream-strategy-never-hits-the-net%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

                    Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

                    A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$