Prove $P_n(x) = sum_{k=0}^{n}b_k(x-b)^k $ satisfies $limlimits_{xto b}dfrac{f(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} = 0 $ iff...












0














Prove $P_n(x) = sum_{k=0}^{n}b_k(x-b)^k$ satisfies $$limlimits_{xto b}dfrac{f(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} = 0 $$ iff $P_n = T_n$ Where $T_n$ is the nth Taylor polynomial of $f$ about $b$.



I know from Taylor's Theorem that $$limlimits_{xto b}dfrac{f(x)-T_n(x,b)}{(x-b)^n} = 0$$ I can see the forward proof intuitively from Taylor's theorem, but intuition isn't reliable.










share|cite|improve this question



























    0














    Prove $P_n(x) = sum_{k=0}^{n}b_k(x-b)^k$ satisfies $$limlimits_{xto b}dfrac{f(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} = 0 $$ iff $P_n = T_n$ Where $T_n$ is the nth Taylor polynomial of $f$ about $b$.



    I know from Taylor's Theorem that $$limlimits_{xto b}dfrac{f(x)-T_n(x,b)}{(x-b)^n} = 0$$ I can see the forward proof intuitively from Taylor's theorem, but intuition isn't reliable.










    share|cite|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0


      1





      Prove $P_n(x) = sum_{k=0}^{n}b_k(x-b)^k$ satisfies $$limlimits_{xto b}dfrac{f(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} = 0 $$ iff $P_n = T_n$ Where $T_n$ is the nth Taylor polynomial of $f$ about $b$.



      I know from Taylor's Theorem that $$limlimits_{xto b}dfrac{f(x)-T_n(x,b)}{(x-b)^n} = 0$$ I can see the forward proof intuitively from Taylor's theorem, but intuition isn't reliable.










      share|cite|improve this question













      Prove $P_n(x) = sum_{k=0}^{n}b_k(x-b)^k$ satisfies $$limlimits_{xto b}dfrac{f(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} = 0 $$ iff $P_n = T_n$ Where $T_n$ is the nth Taylor polynomial of $f$ about $b$.



      I know from Taylor's Theorem that $$limlimits_{xto b}dfrac{f(x)-T_n(x,b)}{(x-b)^n} = 0$$ I can see the forward proof intuitively from Taylor's theorem, but intuition isn't reliable.







      real-analysis limits polynomials






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 20 '18 at 3:52









      t.perez

      599




      599






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Hint: Assuming $f$ is $n+1$-th continuously differentiable, then
          begin{align}
          f(x)=& f(b)+f'(b)(x-b)+ldots+ frac{f^{(n)}(b)}{n!}(x-b)^n+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}\
          =& T_n(x)+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}
          end{align}

          where $b<xi(x)<x$. By the hypothesis, we have
          begin{align}
          frac{f(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} = frac{T_n(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n}+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b).
          end{align}

          Since the left hand side tends to zero as $xrightarrow b$ then so does the right hand side. In particular, since
          begin{align}
          left|frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}right|leq M|x-b|rightarrow 0
          end{align}

          as $xrightarrow b$, then
          begin{align}
          frac{T_n(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} rightarrow 0
          end{align}

          as $xrightarrow b$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thank you so much, this is very helpful! How exactly does this prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$? I see the denominator in the last line tends to $0$, but couldnt that mean the numerator tends to anything? Could I use l'hopital to prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$ in the last step?
            – t.perez
            Nov 20 '18 at 4:47










          • @t.perez suppose they are not equal, then what can you conclude?
            – Jacky Chong
            Nov 20 '18 at 5:06










          • you could conclude that the limit DNE if they're not equal since the denominator would equal 0, so they must be equal. Does that sound correct?
            – t.perez
            Nov 20 '18 at 5:23










          • Seems like you got it.
            – Jacky Chong
            Nov 20 '18 at 5:23










          • thank you so much! you are very helpful
            – t.perez
            Nov 20 '18 at 5:31











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005910%2fprove-p-nx-sum-k-0nb-kx-bk-satisfies-lim-limits-x-to-b-dfrac%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          Hint: Assuming $f$ is $n+1$-th continuously differentiable, then
          begin{align}
          f(x)=& f(b)+f'(b)(x-b)+ldots+ frac{f^{(n)}(b)}{n!}(x-b)^n+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}\
          =& T_n(x)+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}
          end{align}

          where $b<xi(x)<x$. By the hypothesis, we have
          begin{align}
          frac{f(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} = frac{T_n(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n}+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b).
          end{align}

          Since the left hand side tends to zero as $xrightarrow b$ then so does the right hand side. In particular, since
          begin{align}
          left|frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}right|leq M|x-b|rightarrow 0
          end{align}

          as $xrightarrow b$, then
          begin{align}
          frac{T_n(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} rightarrow 0
          end{align}

          as $xrightarrow b$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thank you so much, this is very helpful! How exactly does this prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$? I see the denominator in the last line tends to $0$, but couldnt that mean the numerator tends to anything? Could I use l'hopital to prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$ in the last step?
            – t.perez
            Nov 20 '18 at 4:47










          • @t.perez suppose they are not equal, then what can you conclude?
            – Jacky Chong
            Nov 20 '18 at 5:06










          • you could conclude that the limit DNE if they're not equal since the denominator would equal 0, so they must be equal. Does that sound correct?
            – t.perez
            Nov 20 '18 at 5:23










          • Seems like you got it.
            – Jacky Chong
            Nov 20 '18 at 5:23










          • thank you so much! you are very helpful
            – t.perez
            Nov 20 '18 at 5:31
















          1














          Hint: Assuming $f$ is $n+1$-th continuously differentiable, then
          begin{align}
          f(x)=& f(b)+f'(b)(x-b)+ldots+ frac{f^{(n)}(b)}{n!}(x-b)^n+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}\
          =& T_n(x)+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}
          end{align}

          where $b<xi(x)<x$. By the hypothesis, we have
          begin{align}
          frac{f(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} = frac{T_n(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n}+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b).
          end{align}

          Since the left hand side tends to zero as $xrightarrow b$ then so does the right hand side. In particular, since
          begin{align}
          left|frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}right|leq M|x-b|rightarrow 0
          end{align}

          as $xrightarrow b$, then
          begin{align}
          frac{T_n(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} rightarrow 0
          end{align}

          as $xrightarrow b$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thank you so much, this is very helpful! How exactly does this prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$? I see the denominator in the last line tends to $0$, but couldnt that mean the numerator tends to anything? Could I use l'hopital to prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$ in the last step?
            – t.perez
            Nov 20 '18 at 4:47










          • @t.perez suppose they are not equal, then what can you conclude?
            – Jacky Chong
            Nov 20 '18 at 5:06










          • you could conclude that the limit DNE if they're not equal since the denominator would equal 0, so they must be equal. Does that sound correct?
            – t.perez
            Nov 20 '18 at 5:23










          • Seems like you got it.
            – Jacky Chong
            Nov 20 '18 at 5:23










          • thank you so much! you are very helpful
            – t.perez
            Nov 20 '18 at 5:31














          1












          1








          1






          Hint: Assuming $f$ is $n+1$-th continuously differentiable, then
          begin{align}
          f(x)=& f(b)+f'(b)(x-b)+ldots+ frac{f^{(n)}(b)}{n!}(x-b)^n+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}\
          =& T_n(x)+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}
          end{align}

          where $b<xi(x)<x$. By the hypothesis, we have
          begin{align}
          frac{f(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} = frac{T_n(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n}+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b).
          end{align}

          Since the left hand side tends to zero as $xrightarrow b$ then so does the right hand side. In particular, since
          begin{align}
          left|frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}right|leq M|x-b|rightarrow 0
          end{align}

          as $xrightarrow b$, then
          begin{align}
          frac{T_n(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} rightarrow 0
          end{align}

          as $xrightarrow b$.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Hint: Assuming $f$ is $n+1$-th continuously differentiable, then
          begin{align}
          f(x)=& f(b)+f'(b)(x-b)+ldots+ frac{f^{(n)}(b)}{n!}(x-b)^n+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}\
          =& T_n(x)+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}
          end{align}

          where $b<xi(x)<x$. By the hypothesis, we have
          begin{align}
          frac{f(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} = frac{T_n(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n}+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b).
          end{align}

          Since the left hand side tends to zero as $xrightarrow b$ then so does the right hand side. In particular, since
          begin{align}
          left|frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}right|leq M|x-b|rightarrow 0
          end{align}

          as $xrightarrow b$, then
          begin{align}
          frac{T_n(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} rightarrow 0
          end{align}

          as $xrightarrow b$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 20 '18 at 4:33









          Jacky Chong

          17.7k21128




          17.7k21128












          • Thank you so much, this is very helpful! How exactly does this prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$? I see the denominator in the last line tends to $0$, but couldnt that mean the numerator tends to anything? Could I use l'hopital to prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$ in the last step?
            – t.perez
            Nov 20 '18 at 4:47










          • @t.perez suppose they are not equal, then what can you conclude?
            – Jacky Chong
            Nov 20 '18 at 5:06










          • you could conclude that the limit DNE if they're not equal since the denominator would equal 0, so they must be equal. Does that sound correct?
            – t.perez
            Nov 20 '18 at 5:23










          • Seems like you got it.
            – Jacky Chong
            Nov 20 '18 at 5:23










          • thank you so much! you are very helpful
            – t.perez
            Nov 20 '18 at 5:31


















          • Thank you so much, this is very helpful! How exactly does this prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$? I see the denominator in the last line tends to $0$, but couldnt that mean the numerator tends to anything? Could I use l'hopital to prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$ in the last step?
            – t.perez
            Nov 20 '18 at 4:47










          • @t.perez suppose they are not equal, then what can you conclude?
            – Jacky Chong
            Nov 20 '18 at 5:06










          • you could conclude that the limit DNE if they're not equal since the denominator would equal 0, so they must be equal. Does that sound correct?
            – t.perez
            Nov 20 '18 at 5:23










          • Seems like you got it.
            – Jacky Chong
            Nov 20 '18 at 5:23










          • thank you so much! you are very helpful
            – t.perez
            Nov 20 '18 at 5:31
















          Thank you so much, this is very helpful! How exactly does this prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$? I see the denominator in the last line tends to $0$, but couldnt that mean the numerator tends to anything? Could I use l'hopital to prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$ in the last step?
          – t.perez
          Nov 20 '18 at 4:47




          Thank you so much, this is very helpful! How exactly does this prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$? I see the denominator in the last line tends to $0$, but couldnt that mean the numerator tends to anything? Could I use l'hopital to prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$ in the last step?
          – t.perez
          Nov 20 '18 at 4:47












          @t.perez suppose they are not equal, then what can you conclude?
          – Jacky Chong
          Nov 20 '18 at 5:06




          @t.perez suppose they are not equal, then what can you conclude?
          – Jacky Chong
          Nov 20 '18 at 5:06












          you could conclude that the limit DNE if they're not equal since the denominator would equal 0, so they must be equal. Does that sound correct?
          – t.perez
          Nov 20 '18 at 5:23




          you could conclude that the limit DNE if they're not equal since the denominator would equal 0, so they must be equal. Does that sound correct?
          – t.perez
          Nov 20 '18 at 5:23












          Seems like you got it.
          – Jacky Chong
          Nov 20 '18 at 5:23




          Seems like you got it.
          – Jacky Chong
          Nov 20 '18 at 5:23












          thank you so much! you are very helpful
          – t.perez
          Nov 20 '18 at 5:31




          thank you so much! you are very helpful
          – t.perez
          Nov 20 '18 at 5:31


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005910%2fprove-p-nx-sum-k-0nb-kx-bk-satisfies-lim-limits-x-to-b-dfrac%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

          Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

          A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$