Prove $P_n(x) = sum_{k=0}^{n}b_k(x-b)^k $ satisfies $limlimits_{xto b}dfrac{f(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} = 0 $ iff...
Prove $P_n(x) = sum_{k=0}^{n}b_k(x-b)^k$ satisfies $$limlimits_{xto b}dfrac{f(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} = 0 $$ iff $P_n = T_n$ Where $T_n$ is the nth Taylor polynomial of $f$ about $b$.
I know from Taylor's Theorem that $$limlimits_{xto b}dfrac{f(x)-T_n(x,b)}{(x-b)^n} = 0$$ I can see the forward proof intuitively from Taylor's theorem, but intuition isn't reliable.
real-analysis limits polynomials
add a comment |
Prove $P_n(x) = sum_{k=0}^{n}b_k(x-b)^k$ satisfies $$limlimits_{xto b}dfrac{f(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} = 0 $$ iff $P_n = T_n$ Where $T_n$ is the nth Taylor polynomial of $f$ about $b$.
I know from Taylor's Theorem that $$limlimits_{xto b}dfrac{f(x)-T_n(x,b)}{(x-b)^n} = 0$$ I can see the forward proof intuitively from Taylor's theorem, but intuition isn't reliable.
real-analysis limits polynomials
add a comment |
Prove $P_n(x) = sum_{k=0}^{n}b_k(x-b)^k$ satisfies $$limlimits_{xto b}dfrac{f(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} = 0 $$ iff $P_n = T_n$ Where $T_n$ is the nth Taylor polynomial of $f$ about $b$.
I know from Taylor's Theorem that $$limlimits_{xto b}dfrac{f(x)-T_n(x,b)}{(x-b)^n} = 0$$ I can see the forward proof intuitively from Taylor's theorem, but intuition isn't reliable.
real-analysis limits polynomials
Prove $P_n(x) = sum_{k=0}^{n}b_k(x-b)^k$ satisfies $$limlimits_{xto b}dfrac{f(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} = 0 $$ iff $P_n = T_n$ Where $T_n$ is the nth Taylor polynomial of $f$ about $b$.
I know from Taylor's Theorem that $$limlimits_{xto b}dfrac{f(x)-T_n(x,b)}{(x-b)^n} = 0$$ I can see the forward proof intuitively from Taylor's theorem, but intuition isn't reliable.
real-analysis limits polynomials
real-analysis limits polynomials
asked Nov 20 '18 at 3:52
t.perez
599
599
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Hint: Assuming $f$ is $n+1$-th continuously differentiable, then
begin{align}
f(x)=& f(b)+f'(b)(x-b)+ldots+ frac{f^{(n)}(b)}{n!}(x-b)^n+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}\
=& T_n(x)+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}
end{align}
where $b<xi(x)<x$. By the hypothesis, we have
begin{align}
frac{f(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} = frac{T_n(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n}+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b).
end{align}
Since the left hand side tends to zero as $xrightarrow b$ then so does the right hand side. In particular, since
begin{align}
left|frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}right|leq M|x-b|rightarrow 0
end{align}
as $xrightarrow b$, then
begin{align}
frac{T_n(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} rightarrow 0
end{align}
as $xrightarrow b$.
Thank you so much, this is very helpful! How exactly does this prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$? I see the denominator in the last line tends to $0$, but couldnt that mean the numerator tends to anything? Could I use l'hopital to prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$ in the last step?
– t.perez
Nov 20 '18 at 4:47
@t.perez suppose they are not equal, then what can you conclude?
– Jacky Chong
Nov 20 '18 at 5:06
you could conclude that the limit DNE if they're not equal since the denominator would equal 0, so they must be equal. Does that sound correct?
– t.perez
Nov 20 '18 at 5:23
Seems like you got it.
– Jacky Chong
Nov 20 '18 at 5:23
thank you so much! you are very helpful
– t.perez
Nov 20 '18 at 5:31
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005910%2fprove-p-nx-sum-k-0nb-kx-bk-satisfies-lim-limits-x-to-b-dfrac%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Hint: Assuming $f$ is $n+1$-th continuously differentiable, then
begin{align}
f(x)=& f(b)+f'(b)(x-b)+ldots+ frac{f^{(n)}(b)}{n!}(x-b)^n+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}\
=& T_n(x)+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}
end{align}
where $b<xi(x)<x$. By the hypothesis, we have
begin{align}
frac{f(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} = frac{T_n(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n}+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b).
end{align}
Since the left hand side tends to zero as $xrightarrow b$ then so does the right hand side. In particular, since
begin{align}
left|frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}right|leq M|x-b|rightarrow 0
end{align}
as $xrightarrow b$, then
begin{align}
frac{T_n(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} rightarrow 0
end{align}
as $xrightarrow b$.
Thank you so much, this is very helpful! How exactly does this prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$? I see the denominator in the last line tends to $0$, but couldnt that mean the numerator tends to anything? Could I use l'hopital to prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$ in the last step?
– t.perez
Nov 20 '18 at 4:47
@t.perez suppose they are not equal, then what can you conclude?
– Jacky Chong
Nov 20 '18 at 5:06
you could conclude that the limit DNE if they're not equal since the denominator would equal 0, so they must be equal. Does that sound correct?
– t.perez
Nov 20 '18 at 5:23
Seems like you got it.
– Jacky Chong
Nov 20 '18 at 5:23
thank you so much! you are very helpful
– t.perez
Nov 20 '18 at 5:31
add a comment |
Hint: Assuming $f$ is $n+1$-th continuously differentiable, then
begin{align}
f(x)=& f(b)+f'(b)(x-b)+ldots+ frac{f^{(n)}(b)}{n!}(x-b)^n+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}\
=& T_n(x)+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}
end{align}
where $b<xi(x)<x$. By the hypothesis, we have
begin{align}
frac{f(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} = frac{T_n(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n}+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b).
end{align}
Since the left hand side tends to zero as $xrightarrow b$ then so does the right hand side. In particular, since
begin{align}
left|frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}right|leq M|x-b|rightarrow 0
end{align}
as $xrightarrow b$, then
begin{align}
frac{T_n(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} rightarrow 0
end{align}
as $xrightarrow b$.
Thank you so much, this is very helpful! How exactly does this prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$? I see the denominator in the last line tends to $0$, but couldnt that mean the numerator tends to anything? Could I use l'hopital to prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$ in the last step?
– t.perez
Nov 20 '18 at 4:47
@t.perez suppose they are not equal, then what can you conclude?
– Jacky Chong
Nov 20 '18 at 5:06
you could conclude that the limit DNE if they're not equal since the denominator would equal 0, so they must be equal. Does that sound correct?
– t.perez
Nov 20 '18 at 5:23
Seems like you got it.
– Jacky Chong
Nov 20 '18 at 5:23
thank you so much! you are very helpful
– t.perez
Nov 20 '18 at 5:31
add a comment |
Hint: Assuming $f$ is $n+1$-th continuously differentiable, then
begin{align}
f(x)=& f(b)+f'(b)(x-b)+ldots+ frac{f^{(n)}(b)}{n!}(x-b)^n+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}\
=& T_n(x)+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}
end{align}
where $b<xi(x)<x$. By the hypothesis, we have
begin{align}
frac{f(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} = frac{T_n(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n}+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b).
end{align}
Since the left hand side tends to zero as $xrightarrow b$ then so does the right hand side. In particular, since
begin{align}
left|frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}right|leq M|x-b|rightarrow 0
end{align}
as $xrightarrow b$, then
begin{align}
frac{T_n(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} rightarrow 0
end{align}
as $xrightarrow b$.
Hint: Assuming $f$ is $n+1$-th continuously differentiable, then
begin{align}
f(x)=& f(b)+f'(b)(x-b)+ldots+ frac{f^{(n)}(b)}{n!}(x-b)^n+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}\
=& T_n(x)+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}
end{align}
where $b<xi(x)<x$. By the hypothesis, we have
begin{align}
frac{f(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} = frac{T_n(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n}+frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b).
end{align}
Since the left hand side tends to zero as $xrightarrow b$ then so does the right hand side. In particular, since
begin{align}
left|frac{f^{(n+1)}(xi(x))}{(n+1)!}(x-b)^{n+1}right|leq M|x-b|rightarrow 0
end{align}
as $xrightarrow b$, then
begin{align}
frac{T_n(x)-P_n(x)}{(x-b)^n} rightarrow 0
end{align}
as $xrightarrow b$.
answered Nov 20 '18 at 4:33
Jacky Chong
17.7k21128
17.7k21128
Thank you so much, this is very helpful! How exactly does this prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$? I see the denominator in the last line tends to $0$, but couldnt that mean the numerator tends to anything? Could I use l'hopital to prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$ in the last step?
– t.perez
Nov 20 '18 at 4:47
@t.perez suppose they are not equal, then what can you conclude?
– Jacky Chong
Nov 20 '18 at 5:06
you could conclude that the limit DNE if they're not equal since the denominator would equal 0, so they must be equal. Does that sound correct?
– t.perez
Nov 20 '18 at 5:23
Seems like you got it.
– Jacky Chong
Nov 20 '18 at 5:23
thank you so much! you are very helpful
– t.perez
Nov 20 '18 at 5:31
add a comment |
Thank you so much, this is very helpful! How exactly does this prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$? I see the denominator in the last line tends to $0$, but couldnt that mean the numerator tends to anything? Could I use l'hopital to prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$ in the last step?
– t.perez
Nov 20 '18 at 4:47
@t.perez suppose they are not equal, then what can you conclude?
– Jacky Chong
Nov 20 '18 at 5:06
you could conclude that the limit DNE if they're not equal since the denominator would equal 0, so they must be equal. Does that sound correct?
– t.perez
Nov 20 '18 at 5:23
Seems like you got it.
– Jacky Chong
Nov 20 '18 at 5:23
thank you so much! you are very helpful
– t.perez
Nov 20 '18 at 5:31
Thank you so much, this is very helpful! How exactly does this prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$? I see the denominator in the last line tends to $0$, but couldnt that mean the numerator tends to anything? Could I use l'hopital to prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$ in the last step?
– t.perez
Nov 20 '18 at 4:47
Thank you so much, this is very helpful! How exactly does this prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$? I see the denominator in the last line tends to $0$, but couldnt that mean the numerator tends to anything? Could I use l'hopital to prove $T_n(x) = P_n(x)$ in the last step?
– t.perez
Nov 20 '18 at 4:47
@t.perez suppose they are not equal, then what can you conclude?
– Jacky Chong
Nov 20 '18 at 5:06
@t.perez suppose they are not equal, then what can you conclude?
– Jacky Chong
Nov 20 '18 at 5:06
you could conclude that the limit DNE if they're not equal since the denominator would equal 0, so they must be equal. Does that sound correct?
– t.perez
Nov 20 '18 at 5:23
you could conclude that the limit DNE if they're not equal since the denominator would equal 0, so they must be equal. Does that sound correct?
– t.perez
Nov 20 '18 at 5:23
Seems like you got it.
– Jacky Chong
Nov 20 '18 at 5:23
Seems like you got it.
– Jacky Chong
Nov 20 '18 at 5:23
thank you so much! you are very helpful
– t.perez
Nov 20 '18 at 5:31
thank you so much! you are very helpful
– t.perez
Nov 20 '18 at 5:31
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005910%2fprove-p-nx-sum-k-0nb-kx-bk-satisfies-lim-limits-x-to-b-dfrac%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown