Ratio of totient $varphi(n)/varphi(n+1)$












1












$begingroup$


Is there a general formula for the ratio of totients of two consecutive integers? It occurred to me in a different context, where I was trying to find a different way of estimating the probability of drawing a random rational number in the interval $(0,1)$. One could represent a rational number as an ordered pair of co-primes $(m,n)$ with $m<n$. Suppose we put a uniform, finitely additive measure on the set ${(m,n)inmathbb{N}_{>0}: m, n text{co-prime}, m<n}$. Then fixing $n$, there are only $varphi(n)$ many rational numbers with denominator $n$, which is what brought me to the question of $varphi(n)/varphi(n+1)$. Ideally it would be great if the formula could be a function of $n$ alone (sorry this might still be vague). Many thanks in advance for any help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You'll get a better response if you include context in your question. For example, how did this question occur to you? What have you tried? Also, most importantly, what sort of formula are you looking for? After all, $varphi(n)/varphi(n+1)$ is a formula.
    $endgroup$
    – jgon
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:48












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot! I have edited the question to include my motivations.
    $endgroup$
    – discretizer
    Dec 31 '18 at 22:13










  • $begingroup$
    I think the addition of motivation has significantly improved the question, and I've upvoted.
    $endgroup$
    – jgon
    Dec 31 '18 at 22:16
















1












$begingroup$


Is there a general formula for the ratio of totients of two consecutive integers? It occurred to me in a different context, where I was trying to find a different way of estimating the probability of drawing a random rational number in the interval $(0,1)$. One could represent a rational number as an ordered pair of co-primes $(m,n)$ with $m<n$. Suppose we put a uniform, finitely additive measure on the set ${(m,n)inmathbb{N}_{>0}: m, n text{co-prime}, m<n}$. Then fixing $n$, there are only $varphi(n)$ many rational numbers with denominator $n$, which is what brought me to the question of $varphi(n)/varphi(n+1)$. Ideally it would be great if the formula could be a function of $n$ alone (sorry this might still be vague). Many thanks in advance for any help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You'll get a better response if you include context in your question. For example, how did this question occur to you? What have you tried? Also, most importantly, what sort of formula are you looking for? After all, $varphi(n)/varphi(n+1)$ is a formula.
    $endgroup$
    – jgon
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:48












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot! I have edited the question to include my motivations.
    $endgroup$
    – discretizer
    Dec 31 '18 at 22:13










  • $begingroup$
    I think the addition of motivation has significantly improved the question, and I've upvoted.
    $endgroup$
    – jgon
    Dec 31 '18 at 22:16














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Is there a general formula for the ratio of totients of two consecutive integers? It occurred to me in a different context, where I was trying to find a different way of estimating the probability of drawing a random rational number in the interval $(0,1)$. One could represent a rational number as an ordered pair of co-primes $(m,n)$ with $m<n$. Suppose we put a uniform, finitely additive measure on the set ${(m,n)inmathbb{N}_{>0}: m, n text{co-prime}, m<n}$. Then fixing $n$, there are only $varphi(n)$ many rational numbers with denominator $n$, which is what brought me to the question of $varphi(n)/varphi(n+1)$. Ideally it would be great if the formula could be a function of $n$ alone (sorry this might still be vague). Many thanks in advance for any help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Is there a general formula for the ratio of totients of two consecutive integers? It occurred to me in a different context, where I was trying to find a different way of estimating the probability of drawing a random rational number in the interval $(0,1)$. One could represent a rational number as an ordered pair of co-primes $(m,n)$ with $m<n$. Suppose we put a uniform, finitely additive measure on the set ${(m,n)inmathbb{N}_{>0}: m, n text{co-prime}, m<n}$. Then fixing $n$, there are only $varphi(n)$ many rational numbers with denominator $n$, which is what brought me to the question of $varphi(n)/varphi(n+1)$. Ideally it would be great if the formula could be a function of $n$ alone (sorry this might still be vague). Many thanks in advance for any help.







number-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 31 '18 at 22:12







discretizer

















asked Dec 31 '18 at 21:42









discretizerdiscretizer

1397




1397








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You'll get a better response if you include context in your question. For example, how did this question occur to you? What have you tried? Also, most importantly, what sort of formula are you looking for? After all, $varphi(n)/varphi(n+1)$ is a formula.
    $endgroup$
    – jgon
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:48












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot! I have edited the question to include my motivations.
    $endgroup$
    – discretizer
    Dec 31 '18 at 22:13










  • $begingroup$
    I think the addition of motivation has significantly improved the question, and I've upvoted.
    $endgroup$
    – jgon
    Dec 31 '18 at 22:16














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You'll get a better response if you include context in your question. For example, how did this question occur to you? What have you tried? Also, most importantly, what sort of formula are you looking for? After all, $varphi(n)/varphi(n+1)$ is a formula.
    $endgroup$
    – jgon
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:48












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot! I have edited the question to include my motivations.
    $endgroup$
    – discretizer
    Dec 31 '18 at 22:13










  • $begingroup$
    I think the addition of motivation has significantly improved the question, and I've upvoted.
    $endgroup$
    – jgon
    Dec 31 '18 at 22:16








1




1




$begingroup$
You'll get a better response if you include context in your question. For example, how did this question occur to you? What have you tried? Also, most importantly, what sort of formula are you looking for? After all, $varphi(n)/varphi(n+1)$ is a formula.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 31 '18 at 21:48






$begingroup$
You'll get a better response if you include context in your question. For example, how did this question occur to you? What have you tried? Also, most importantly, what sort of formula are you looking for? After all, $varphi(n)/varphi(n+1)$ is a formula.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 31 '18 at 21:48














$begingroup$
Thanks a lot! I have edited the question to include my motivations.
$endgroup$
– discretizer
Dec 31 '18 at 22:13




$begingroup$
Thanks a lot! I have edited the question to include my motivations.
$endgroup$
– discretizer
Dec 31 '18 at 22:13












$begingroup$
I think the addition of motivation has significantly improved the question, and I've upvoted.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 31 '18 at 22:16




$begingroup$
I think the addition of motivation has significantly improved the question, and I've upvoted.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 31 '18 at 22:16










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

If $;n=p_1^{a_1}cdotldotscdot p_m^{a_m};,;;p_i,,a_iinBbb N;,;;p_i$ primes, then we know that



$$phi(n)=nprod_{k=1}^mleft(1-frac1{p_k}right)$$



so you can then write



$$frac{phi(n)}{phi(n+1)}=frac n{n+1}prod_{pmid n,,qmid (n+1)}left(1-frac1pright)left(1-frac1qright)^{-1}$$



It doesn't really look very nice a formula, though...






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! Yes ideally I would like a formula that does not invoke facts about prime factorization of $n$, but that might be impossible...
    $endgroup$
    – discretizer
    Dec 31 '18 at 22:13










  • $begingroup$
    @discretizer I can nearly guarantee you it is impossible. There are a lot of open problems similar to this one.
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    Dec 31 '18 at 22:19










  • $begingroup$
    Happy New Year, my friend !
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Jan 1 at 6:26










  • $begingroup$
    @ClaudeLeibovici Bonne Anneé, mon ami !
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Jan 1 at 9:47











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058060%2fratio-of-totient-varphin-varphin1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

If $;n=p_1^{a_1}cdotldotscdot p_m^{a_m};,;;p_i,,a_iinBbb N;,;;p_i$ primes, then we know that



$$phi(n)=nprod_{k=1}^mleft(1-frac1{p_k}right)$$



so you can then write



$$frac{phi(n)}{phi(n+1)}=frac n{n+1}prod_{pmid n,,qmid (n+1)}left(1-frac1pright)left(1-frac1qright)^{-1}$$



It doesn't really look very nice a formula, though...






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! Yes ideally I would like a formula that does not invoke facts about prime factorization of $n$, but that might be impossible...
    $endgroup$
    – discretizer
    Dec 31 '18 at 22:13










  • $begingroup$
    @discretizer I can nearly guarantee you it is impossible. There are a lot of open problems similar to this one.
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    Dec 31 '18 at 22:19










  • $begingroup$
    Happy New Year, my friend !
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Jan 1 at 6:26










  • $begingroup$
    @ClaudeLeibovici Bonne Anneé, mon ami !
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Jan 1 at 9:47
















2












$begingroup$

If $;n=p_1^{a_1}cdotldotscdot p_m^{a_m};,;;p_i,,a_iinBbb N;,;;p_i$ primes, then we know that



$$phi(n)=nprod_{k=1}^mleft(1-frac1{p_k}right)$$



so you can then write



$$frac{phi(n)}{phi(n+1)}=frac n{n+1}prod_{pmid n,,qmid (n+1)}left(1-frac1pright)left(1-frac1qright)^{-1}$$



It doesn't really look very nice a formula, though...






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! Yes ideally I would like a formula that does not invoke facts about prime factorization of $n$, but that might be impossible...
    $endgroup$
    – discretizer
    Dec 31 '18 at 22:13










  • $begingroup$
    @discretizer I can nearly guarantee you it is impossible. There are a lot of open problems similar to this one.
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    Dec 31 '18 at 22:19










  • $begingroup$
    Happy New Year, my friend !
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Jan 1 at 6:26










  • $begingroup$
    @ClaudeLeibovici Bonne Anneé, mon ami !
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Jan 1 at 9:47














2












2








2





$begingroup$

If $;n=p_1^{a_1}cdotldotscdot p_m^{a_m};,;;p_i,,a_iinBbb N;,;;p_i$ primes, then we know that



$$phi(n)=nprod_{k=1}^mleft(1-frac1{p_k}right)$$



so you can then write



$$frac{phi(n)}{phi(n+1)}=frac n{n+1}prod_{pmid n,,qmid (n+1)}left(1-frac1pright)left(1-frac1qright)^{-1}$$



It doesn't really look very nice a formula, though...






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



If $;n=p_1^{a_1}cdotldotscdot p_m^{a_m};,;;p_i,,a_iinBbb N;,;;p_i$ primes, then we know that



$$phi(n)=nprod_{k=1}^mleft(1-frac1{p_k}right)$$



so you can then write



$$frac{phi(n)}{phi(n+1)}=frac n{n+1}prod_{pmid n,,qmid (n+1)}left(1-frac1pright)left(1-frac1qright)^{-1}$$



It doesn't really look very nice a formula, though...







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 31 '18 at 22:03









DonAntonioDonAntonio

177k1492225




177k1492225












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! Yes ideally I would like a formula that does not invoke facts about prime factorization of $n$, but that might be impossible...
    $endgroup$
    – discretizer
    Dec 31 '18 at 22:13










  • $begingroup$
    @discretizer I can nearly guarantee you it is impossible. There are a lot of open problems similar to this one.
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    Dec 31 '18 at 22:19










  • $begingroup$
    Happy New Year, my friend !
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Jan 1 at 6:26










  • $begingroup$
    @ClaudeLeibovici Bonne Anneé, mon ami !
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Jan 1 at 9:47


















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! Yes ideally I would like a formula that does not invoke facts about prime factorization of $n$, but that might be impossible...
    $endgroup$
    – discretizer
    Dec 31 '18 at 22:13










  • $begingroup$
    @discretizer I can nearly guarantee you it is impossible. There are a lot of open problems similar to this one.
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    Dec 31 '18 at 22:19










  • $begingroup$
    Happy New Year, my friend !
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Jan 1 at 6:26










  • $begingroup$
    @ClaudeLeibovici Bonne Anneé, mon ami !
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Jan 1 at 9:47
















$begingroup$
Thanks! Yes ideally I would like a formula that does not invoke facts about prime factorization of $n$, but that might be impossible...
$endgroup$
– discretizer
Dec 31 '18 at 22:13




$begingroup$
Thanks! Yes ideally I would like a formula that does not invoke facts about prime factorization of $n$, but that might be impossible...
$endgroup$
– discretizer
Dec 31 '18 at 22:13












$begingroup$
@discretizer I can nearly guarantee you it is impossible. There are a lot of open problems similar to this one.
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Dec 31 '18 at 22:19




$begingroup$
@discretizer I can nearly guarantee you it is impossible. There are a lot of open problems similar to this one.
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Dec 31 '18 at 22:19












$begingroup$
Happy New Year, my friend !
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 1 at 6:26




$begingroup$
Happy New Year, my friend !
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 1 at 6:26












$begingroup$
@ClaudeLeibovici Bonne Anneé, mon ami !
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Jan 1 at 9:47




$begingroup$
@ClaudeLeibovici Bonne Anneé, mon ami !
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Jan 1 at 9:47


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058060%2fratio-of-totient-varphin-varphin1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter