The unit cube is the convex combination of its vertices
$begingroup$
I want to prove this statement:
$[0,1]^d = conv(v_1,...,v_n)$, with $n = 2^d$ and ${v_1,...,v_n} = {0,1}^d$.
Geometrically this is evident, I'm looking for a pure algebraic proof.
convex-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I want to prove this statement:
$[0,1]^d = conv(v_1,...,v_n)$, with $n = 2^d$ and ${v_1,...,v_n} = {0,1}^d$.
Geometrically this is evident, I'm looking for a pure algebraic proof.
convex-analysis
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think you need induction.
$endgroup$
– Wuestenfux
Jan 1 at 10:50
$begingroup$
@Wuestenfux why? it's just directly obvious.
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Jan 1 at 10:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I want to prove this statement:
$[0,1]^d = conv(v_1,...,v_n)$, with $n = 2^d$ and ${v_1,...,v_n} = {0,1}^d$.
Geometrically this is evident, I'm looking for a pure algebraic proof.
convex-analysis
$endgroup$
I want to prove this statement:
$[0,1]^d = conv(v_1,...,v_n)$, with $n = 2^d$ and ${v_1,...,v_n} = {0,1}^d$.
Geometrically this is evident, I'm looking for a pure algebraic proof.
convex-analysis
convex-analysis
asked Jan 1 at 10:47


Markus SteinerMarkus Steiner
785
785
$begingroup$
I think you need induction.
$endgroup$
– Wuestenfux
Jan 1 at 10:50
$begingroup$
@Wuestenfux why? it's just directly obvious.
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Jan 1 at 10:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think you need induction.
$endgroup$
– Wuestenfux
Jan 1 at 10:50
$begingroup$
@Wuestenfux why? it's just directly obvious.
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Jan 1 at 10:56
$begingroup$
I think you need induction.
$endgroup$
– Wuestenfux
Jan 1 at 10:50
$begingroup$
I think you need induction.
$endgroup$
– Wuestenfux
Jan 1 at 10:50
$begingroup$
@Wuestenfux why? it's just directly obvious.
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Jan 1 at 10:56
$begingroup$
@Wuestenfux why? it's just directly obvious.
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Jan 1 at 10:56
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
All right. In two parts:
First, that all convex combinations are contained in the cube. For each $i$, the $i$th coordinate $x_i$ is a convex combination of the $i$th coordinates of the vertices $v_j$, each of which is $0$ or $1$. Such a convex combination must lie in $[0,1]$. Repeat over all $i$, and the point lies in the unit cube ${x: x_iin [0,1]text{ for all }i}$.
Second, that all points in the cube are convex combinations. For this, we just find a convex combination explicitly. Index the vertices with subsets of ${1,2,dots,d}$; the vertex $v_S$ has $x_i=1$ if $iin S$ and $x_i=0$ otherwise.
Now, to reach a point $u_i$ with coordinates $u_i$, we give it coefficients as follows:
$$u = sum_{S} left(prod_{iin S}u_iright)left(prod_{inotin S}1-u_iright)v_S$$
Now, in order to extract a particular coordinate $u_k$, sort the $v_S$ by their $k$th coordinate. That coordinate is $1$ if $kin S$ and $0$ otherwise, so the nonzero terms always give us $u_k$ rather than $1-u_k$ in that product. Every other term in the product freely varies between the two possibilities, covering all $2^{d-1}$ options - and the sum of those products is therefore $1cdot 1cdots 1cdot u_kcdot 1cdots = u_k$. Done.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058383%2fthe-unit-cube-is-the-convex-combination-of-its-vertices%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
All right. In two parts:
First, that all convex combinations are contained in the cube. For each $i$, the $i$th coordinate $x_i$ is a convex combination of the $i$th coordinates of the vertices $v_j$, each of which is $0$ or $1$. Such a convex combination must lie in $[0,1]$. Repeat over all $i$, and the point lies in the unit cube ${x: x_iin [0,1]text{ for all }i}$.
Second, that all points in the cube are convex combinations. For this, we just find a convex combination explicitly. Index the vertices with subsets of ${1,2,dots,d}$; the vertex $v_S$ has $x_i=1$ if $iin S$ and $x_i=0$ otherwise.
Now, to reach a point $u_i$ with coordinates $u_i$, we give it coefficients as follows:
$$u = sum_{S} left(prod_{iin S}u_iright)left(prod_{inotin S}1-u_iright)v_S$$
Now, in order to extract a particular coordinate $u_k$, sort the $v_S$ by their $k$th coordinate. That coordinate is $1$ if $kin S$ and $0$ otherwise, so the nonzero terms always give us $u_k$ rather than $1-u_k$ in that product. Every other term in the product freely varies between the two possibilities, covering all $2^{d-1}$ options - and the sum of those products is therefore $1cdot 1cdots 1cdot u_kcdot 1cdots = u_k$. Done.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
All right. In two parts:
First, that all convex combinations are contained in the cube. For each $i$, the $i$th coordinate $x_i$ is a convex combination of the $i$th coordinates of the vertices $v_j$, each of which is $0$ or $1$. Such a convex combination must lie in $[0,1]$. Repeat over all $i$, and the point lies in the unit cube ${x: x_iin [0,1]text{ for all }i}$.
Second, that all points in the cube are convex combinations. For this, we just find a convex combination explicitly. Index the vertices with subsets of ${1,2,dots,d}$; the vertex $v_S$ has $x_i=1$ if $iin S$ and $x_i=0$ otherwise.
Now, to reach a point $u_i$ with coordinates $u_i$, we give it coefficients as follows:
$$u = sum_{S} left(prod_{iin S}u_iright)left(prod_{inotin S}1-u_iright)v_S$$
Now, in order to extract a particular coordinate $u_k$, sort the $v_S$ by their $k$th coordinate. That coordinate is $1$ if $kin S$ and $0$ otherwise, so the nonzero terms always give us $u_k$ rather than $1-u_k$ in that product. Every other term in the product freely varies between the two possibilities, covering all $2^{d-1}$ options - and the sum of those products is therefore $1cdot 1cdots 1cdot u_kcdot 1cdots = u_k$. Done.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
All right. In two parts:
First, that all convex combinations are contained in the cube. For each $i$, the $i$th coordinate $x_i$ is a convex combination of the $i$th coordinates of the vertices $v_j$, each of which is $0$ or $1$. Such a convex combination must lie in $[0,1]$. Repeat over all $i$, and the point lies in the unit cube ${x: x_iin [0,1]text{ for all }i}$.
Second, that all points in the cube are convex combinations. For this, we just find a convex combination explicitly. Index the vertices with subsets of ${1,2,dots,d}$; the vertex $v_S$ has $x_i=1$ if $iin S$ and $x_i=0$ otherwise.
Now, to reach a point $u_i$ with coordinates $u_i$, we give it coefficients as follows:
$$u = sum_{S} left(prod_{iin S}u_iright)left(prod_{inotin S}1-u_iright)v_S$$
Now, in order to extract a particular coordinate $u_k$, sort the $v_S$ by their $k$th coordinate. That coordinate is $1$ if $kin S$ and $0$ otherwise, so the nonzero terms always give us $u_k$ rather than $1-u_k$ in that product. Every other term in the product freely varies between the two possibilities, covering all $2^{d-1}$ options - and the sum of those products is therefore $1cdot 1cdots 1cdot u_kcdot 1cdots = u_k$. Done.
$endgroup$
All right. In two parts:
First, that all convex combinations are contained in the cube. For each $i$, the $i$th coordinate $x_i$ is a convex combination of the $i$th coordinates of the vertices $v_j$, each of which is $0$ or $1$. Such a convex combination must lie in $[0,1]$. Repeat over all $i$, and the point lies in the unit cube ${x: x_iin [0,1]text{ for all }i}$.
Second, that all points in the cube are convex combinations. For this, we just find a convex combination explicitly. Index the vertices with subsets of ${1,2,dots,d}$; the vertex $v_S$ has $x_i=1$ if $iin S$ and $x_i=0$ otherwise.
Now, to reach a point $u_i$ with coordinates $u_i$, we give it coefficients as follows:
$$u = sum_{S} left(prod_{iin S}u_iright)left(prod_{inotin S}1-u_iright)v_S$$
Now, in order to extract a particular coordinate $u_k$, sort the $v_S$ by their $k$th coordinate. That coordinate is $1$ if $kin S$ and $0$ otherwise, so the nonzero terms always give us $u_k$ rather than $1-u_k$ in that product. Every other term in the product freely varies between the two possibilities, covering all $2^{d-1}$ options - and the sum of those products is therefore $1cdot 1cdots 1cdot u_kcdot 1cdots = u_k$. Done.
answered Jan 1 at 11:32


jmerryjmerry
3,054412
3,054412
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058383%2fthe-unit-cube-is-the-convex-combination-of-its-vertices%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
I think you need induction.
$endgroup$
– Wuestenfux
Jan 1 at 10:50
$begingroup$
@Wuestenfux why? it's just directly obvious.
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Jan 1 at 10:56