Why is this an open condition of vector bundles?












0












$begingroup$


Let $S$ be a smooth projective K3 surface. Let $E$ be a vector bundle on $S$ of rank $r+1$ with determinant $L$ such that



a) $H^i(S,E) =0$ for $i=1,2$ and
b) there exists a $Vin G(r+1, H^0(S,E))$ such that the degeneracy locus of $Votimes O_Srightarrow E$ is a smooth curve $C$ in $|L|$.



The claim is that the above is an open condition that is such bundles $E$ form an open subset in a family of vector bundles. How is that? Why are (a) and (b) open conditions.



I have other simpler doubts. Is the morphism $Votimes O_Srightarrow E$ always injective? Also how do we know that $G(r+1,H^0(S,E))$ is non-empty?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Let $S$ be a smooth projective K3 surface. Let $E$ be a vector bundle on $S$ of rank $r+1$ with determinant $L$ such that



    a) $H^i(S,E) =0$ for $i=1,2$ and
    b) there exists a $Vin G(r+1, H^0(S,E))$ such that the degeneracy locus of $Votimes O_Srightarrow E$ is a smooth curve $C$ in $|L|$.



    The claim is that the above is an open condition that is such bundles $E$ form an open subset in a family of vector bundles. How is that? Why are (a) and (b) open conditions.



    I have other simpler doubts. Is the morphism $Votimes O_Srightarrow E$ always injective? Also how do we know that $G(r+1,H^0(S,E))$ is non-empty?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Let $S$ be a smooth projective K3 surface. Let $E$ be a vector bundle on $S$ of rank $r+1$ with determinant $L$ such that



      a) $H^i(S,E) =0$ for $i=1,2$ and
      b) there exists a $Vin G(r+1, H^0(S,E))$ such that the degeneracy locus of $Votimes O_Srightarrow E$ is a smooth curve $C$ in $|L|$.



      The claim is that the above is an open condition that is such bundles $E$ form an open subset in a family of vector bundles. How is that? Why are (a) and (b) open conditions.



      I have other simpler doubts. Is the morphism $Votimes O_Srightarrow E$ always injective? Also how do we know that $G(r+1,H^0(S,E))$ is non-empty?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let $S$ be a smooth projective K3 surface. Let $E$ be a vector bundle on $S$ of rank $r+1$ with determinant $L$ such that



      a) $H^i(S,E) =0$ for $i=1,2$ and
      b) there exists a $Vin G(r+1, H^0(S,E))$ such that the degeneracy locus of $Votimes O_Srightarrow E$ is a smooth curve $C$ in $|L|$.



      The claim is that the above is an open condition that is such bundles $E$ form an open subset in a family of vector bundles. How is that? Why are (a) and (b) open conditions.



      I have other simpler doubts. Is the morphism $Votimes O_Srightarrow E$ always injective? Also how do we know that $G(r+1,H^0(S,E))$ is non-empty?







      algebraic-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 6 at 11:01









      user52991user52991

      336310




      336310






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Condition (a) is open by semi-continuity theorem. To check openness of (b) consider a vector bundle $E$ on $S times B$ (where $B$ is an arbitrary base scheme) and rank $r+1$ vector subbundle $V$ in $p_*E$ (where $p colon S times B to B$ is a projection). By adjunction there is a natural morphism $p^*V to E$. Let $C$ be its cokernel and $Z subset S times B$ its support. Then the subscheme of $B$ over which the fibers of $Z$ are $ge 2$-dimensional is closed, and the subscheme where the fibers are 0-dimensional is empty. Therefore, the subscheme $B_1 subset B$ over which the fibers are 1-dimensional is open. Finally, the subscheme of $B_1$ over which the fibers are smooth is open as well.



          Surely we don't know that $Gr(r+1,H^0(S,E))$ is non-empty. But if it is empty the corresponding subscheme in $B$ is empty as well, but it is still open.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063717%2fwhy-is-this-an-open-condition-of-vector-bundles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            Condition (a) is open by semi-continuity theorem. To check openness of (b) consider a vector bundle $E$ on $S times B$ (where $B$ is an arbitrary base scheme) and rank $r+1$ vector subbundle $V$ in $p_*E$ (where $p colon S times B to B$ is a projection). By adjunction there is a natural morphism $p^*V to E$. Let $C$ be its cokernel and $Z subset S times B$ its support. Then the subscheme of $B$ over which the fibers of $Z$ are $ge 2$-dimensional is closed, and the subscheme where the fibers are 0-dimensional is empty. Therefore, the subscheme $B_1 subset B$ over which the fibers are 1-dimensional is open. Finally, the subscheme of $B_1$ over which the fibers are smooth is open as well.



            Surely we don't know that $Gr(r+1,H^0(S,E))$ is non-empty. But if it is empty the corresponding subscheme in $B$ is empty as well, but it is still open.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              2












              $begingroup$

              Condition (a) is open by semi-continuity theorem. To check openness of (b) consider a vector bundle $E$ on $S times B$ (where $B$ is an arbitrary base scheme) and rank $r+1$ vector subbundle $V$ in $p_*E$ (where $p colon S times B to B$ is a projection). By adjunction there is a natural morphism $p^*V to E$. Let $C$ be its cokernel and $Z subset S times B$ its support. Then the subscheme of $B$ over which the fibers of $Z$ are $ge 2$-dimensional is closed, and the subscheme where the fibers are 0-dimensional is empty. Therefore, the subscheme $B_1 subset B$ over which the fibers are 1-dimensional is open. Finally, the subscheme of $B_1$ over which the fibers are smooth is open as well.



              Surely we don't know that $Gr(r+1,H^0(S,E))$ is non-empty. But if it is empty the corresponding subscheme in $B$ is empty as well, but it is still open.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                Condition (a) is open by semi-continuity theorem. To check openness of (b) consider a vector bundle $E$ on $S times B$ (where $B$ is an arbitrary base scheme) and rank $r+1$ vector subbundle $V$ in $p_*E$ (where $p colon S times B to B$ is a projection). By adjunction there is a natural morphism $p^*V to E$. Let $C$ be its cokernel and $Z subset S times B$ its support. Then the subscheme of $B$ over which the fibers of $Z$ are $ge 2$-dimensional is closed, and the subscheme where the fibers are 0-dimensional is empty. Therefore, the subscheme $B_1 subset B$ over which the fibers are 1-dimensional is open. Finally, the subscheme of $B_1$ over which the fibers are smooth is open as well.



                Surely we don't know that $Gr(r+1,H^0(S,E))$ is non-empty. But if it is empty the corresponding subscheme in $B$ is empty as well, but it is still open.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Condition (a) is open by semi-continuity theorem. To check openness of (b) consider a vector bundle $E$ on $S times B$ (where $B$ is an arbitrary base scheme) and rank $r+1$ vector subbundle $V$ in $p_*E$ (where $p colon S times B to B$ is a projection). By adjunction there is a natural morphism $p^*V to E$. Let $C$ be its cokernel and $Z subset S times B$ its support. Then the subscheme of $B$ over which the fibers of $Z$ are $ge 2$-dimensional is closed, and the subscheme where the fibers are 0-dimensional is empty. Therefore, the subscheme $B_1 subset B$ over which the fibers are 1-dimensional is open. Finally, the subscheme of $B_1$ over which the fibers are smooth is open as well.



                Surely we don't know that $Gr(r+1,H^0(S,E))$ is non-empty. But if it is empty the corresponding subscheme in $B$ is empty as well, but it is still open.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 6 at 12:48









                SashaSasha

                4,618139




                4,618139






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063717%2fwhy-is-this-an-open-condition-of-vector-bundles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

                    SQL update select statement

                    'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules