Mixing
Finite element method for nonlinear differential equation
$begingroup$
I encounter this problem $$frac{df(u(x))}{dx} = g(x)$$ with $$u(0) = u(1) = 0$$ I first convert it to weak form $f(u(x))v(x)]^1_0 - int^{1}_0 frac{dv(x)}{dx}f(u(x))dx =- int^{1}_0 frac{dv(x)}{dx}f(u(x))dx = int^{1}_0v(x)g(x)dx $ by multiplying a test function $v(x)$. Then how should I write it in matrix form? The right hand side does not depend on $u$ explicit.
Thanks in advance.
ordinary-differential-equations numerical-methods finite-element-method galerkin-methods
asked Jan 6 at 10:59
metricspacemetricspace
408210
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I encounter this problem $$frac{df(u(x))}{dx} = g(x)$$ with $$u(0) = u(1) = 0$$ I first convert it to weak form $f(u(x))v(x)]^1_0 - int^{1}_0 frac{dv(x)}{dx}f(u(x))dx =- int^{1}_0 frac{dv(x)}{dx}f(u(x))dx = int^{1}_0v(x)g(x)dx $ by multiplying a test function $v(x)$. Then how should I write it in matrix form? The right hand side does not depend on $u$ explicit.
Thanks in advance.
ordinary-differential-equations numerical-methods finite-element-method galerkin-methods
asked Jan 6 at 10:59
metricspacemetricspace
408210
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Set $G(x)=f(0)+int_0^xg(s),ds$, then you just have to solve the inverse function problem $f(u(x))=G(x)$ using Newton and some version of path-following. There is no reason why a first order ODE should satisfy two boundary conditions.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Jan 6 at 11:15
$begingroup$
@LutzL variable is x! Sorry about that.
$endgroup$
– metricspace
Jan 6 at 19:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I encounter this problem $$frac{df(u(x))}{dx} = g(x)$$ with $$u(0) = u(1) = 0$$ I first convert it to weak form $f(u(x))v(x)]^1_0 - int^{1}_0 frac{dv(x)}{dx}f(u(x))dx =- int^{1}_0 frac{dv(x)}{dx}f(u(x))dx = int^{1}_0v(x)g(x)dx $ by multiplying a test function $v(x)$. Then how should I write it in matrix form? The right hand side does not depend on $u$ explicit.
Thanks in advance.
ordinary-differential-equations numerical-methods finite-element-method galerkin-methods
asked Jan 6 at 10:59
metricspacemetricspace
408210
$endgroup$
I encounter this problem $$frac{df(u(x))}{dx} = g(x)$$ with $$u(0) = u(1) = 0$$ I first convert it to weak form $f(u(x))v(x)]^1_0 - int^{1}_0 frac{dv(x)}{dx}f(u(x))dx =- int^{1}_0 frac{dv(x)}{dx}f(u(x))dx = int^{1}_0v(x)g(x)dx $ by multiplying a test function $v(x)$. Then how should I write it in matrix form? The right hand side does not depend on $u$ explicit.
Thanks in advance.
ordinary-differential-equations numerical-methods finite-element-method galerkin-methods
ordinary-differential-equations numerical-methods finite-element-method galerkin-methods
asked Jan 6 at 10:59
metricspacemetricspace
408210
asked Jan 6 at 10:59
metricspacemetricspace
408210
edited Jan 6 at 19:42
metricspace
asked Jan 6 at 10:59
metricspacemetricspace
408210
asked Jan 6 at 10:59
metricspacemetricspace
408210
asked Jan 6 at 10:59
metricspacemetricspace
408210
408210
$begingroup$
Set $G(x)=f(0)+int_0^xg(s),ds$, then you just have to solve the inverse function problem $f(u(x))=G(x)$ using Newton and some version of path-following. There is no reason why a first order ODE should satisfy two boundary conditions.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Jan 6 at 11:15
$begingroup$
@LutzL variable is x! Sorry about that.
$endgroup$
– metricspace
Jan 6 at 19:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Set $G(x)=f(0)+int_0^xg(s),ds$, then you just have to solve the inverse function problem $f(u(x))=G(x)$ using Newton and some version of path-following. There is no reason why a first order ODE should satisfy two boundary conditions.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Jan 6 at 11:15
$begingroup$
@LutzL variable is x! Sorry about that.
$endgroup$
– metricspace
Jan 6 at 19:43
$begingroup$
Set $G(x)=f(0)+int_0^xg(s),ds$, then you just have to solve the inverse function problem $f(u(x))=G(x)$ using Newton and some version of path-following. There is no reason why a first order ODE should satisfy two boundary conditions.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Jan 6 at 11:15
$begingroup$
Set $G(x)=f(0)+int_0^xg(s),ds$, then you just have to solve the inverse function problem $f(u(x))=G(x)$ using Newton and some version of path-following. There is no reason why a first order ODE should satisfy two boundary conditions.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Jan 6 at 11:15
$begingroup$
@LutzL variable is x! Sorry about that.
$endgroup$
– metricspace
Jan 6 at 19:43
$begingroup$
@LutzL variable is x! Sorry about that.
$endgroup$
– metricspace
Jan 6 at 19:43
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063715%2ffinite-element-method-for-nonlinear-differential-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063715%2ffinite-element-method-for-nonlinear-differential-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Set $G(x)=f(0)+int_0^xg(s),ds$, then you just have to solve the inverse function problem $f(u(x))=G(x)$ using Newton and some version of path-following. There is no reason why a first order ODE should satisfy two boundary conditions.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Jan 6 at 11:15
$begingroup$
@LutzL variable is x! Sorry about that.
$endgroup$
– metricspace
Jan 6 at 19:43