For every closed neighborhood $Delta_Xsubset D$ , Is there an entourage $U$ with $Usubseteq D$?












0












$begingroup$


Let $(X, mathcal{U})$ be an uniform space. It is known that every entourage $Uinmathcal{U}$ is a neighborhood of $Delta_X$, but the converse is not true, in general.



What can say about closed neighborhood of $Delta_X$? Is it true that for a closed neighborhood $Dneq Delta_X$ of $Delta_X$, there is $Uinmathcal{U}$ with $Usubseteq D$?



Thanks a lot.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Let $(X, mathcal{U})$ be an uniform space. It is known that every entourage $Uinmathcal{U}$ is a neighborhood of $Delta_X$, but the converse is not true, in general.



    What can say about closed neighborhood of $Delta_X$? Is it true that for a closed neighborhood $Dneq Delta_X$ of $Delta_X$, there is $Uinmathcal{U}$ with $Usubseteq D$?



    Thanks a lot.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Let $(X, mathcal{U})$ be an uniform space. It is known that every entourage $Uinmathcal{U}$ is a neighborhood of $Delta_X$, but the converse is not true, in general.



      What can say about closed neighborhood of $Delta_X$? Is it true that for a closed neighborhood $Dneq Delta_X$ of $Delta_X$, there is $Uinmathcal{U}$ with $Usubseteq D$?



      Thanks a lot.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let $(X, mathcal{U})$ be an uniform space. It is known that every entourage $Uinmathcal{U}$ is a neighborhood of $Delta_X$, but the converse is not true, in general.



      What can say about closed neighborhood of $Delta_X$? Is it true that for a closed neighborhood $Dneq Delta_X$ of $Delta_X$, there is $Uinmathcal{U}$ with $Usubseteq D$?



      Thanks a lot.







      general-topology uniform-spaces






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 6 at 11:33









      user479859user479859

      756




      756






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          No, that's not true in general. Consider $mathbb{R}$ with its standard uniform structure. Let$$D^star=left{(x,y)inmathbb{R}^2,middle|,-frac1{1+x^2}leqslant yleqslantfrac1{1+x^2}right}$$and let $D$ be what you obtain when you apply to $D^star$ a rotation of $fracpi4$ radians around the origin. Then $D$ is a closed neighborhood of $Delta_{mathbb R}$, but it contains no entourage.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            1












            $begingroup$

            Show that in a separated uniform space: If we have a neighbourhood $U$ of $Delta_X$ that is no entourage, then $overline{U}$ is a closed neighbourhood of $Delta_X$ that contains no entourage.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063743%2ffor-every-closed-neighborhood-delta-x-subset-d-is-there-an-entourage-u-wi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1












              $begingroup$

              No, that's not true in general. Consider $mathbb{R}$ with its standard uniform structure. Let$$D^star=left{(x,y)inmathbb{R}^2,middle|,-frac1{1+x^2}leqslant yleqslantfrac1{1+x^2}right}$$and let $D$ be what you obtain when you apply to $D^star$ a rotation of $fracpi4$ radians around the origin. Then $D$ is a closed neighborhood of $Delta_{mathbb R}$, but it contains no entourage.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                No, that's not true in general. Consider $mathbb{R}$ with its standard uniform structure. Let$$D^star=left{(x,y)inmathbb{R}^2,middle|,-frac1{1+x^2}leqslant yleqslantfrac1{1+x^2}right}$$and let $D$ be what you obtain when you apply to $D^star$ a rotation of $fracpi4$ radians around the origin. Then $D$ is a closed neighborhood of $Delta_{mathbb R}$, but it contains no entourage.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  No, that's not true in general. Consider $mathbb{R}$ with its standard uniform structure. Let$$D^star=left{(x,y)inmathbb{R}^2,middle|,-frac1{1+x^2}leqslant yleqslantfrac1{1+x^2}right}$$and let $D$ be what you obtain when you apply to $D^star$ a rotation of $fracpi4$ radians around the origin. Then $D$ is a closed neighborhood of $Delta_{mathbb R}$, but it contains no entourage.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  No, that's not true in general. Consider $mathbb{R}$ with its standard uniform structure. Let$$D^star=left{(x,y)inmathbb{R}^2,middle|,-frac1{1+x^2}leqslant yleqslantfrac1{1+x^2}right}$$and let $D$ be what you obtain when you apply to $D^star$ a rotation of $fracpi4$ radians around the origin. Then $D$ is a closed neighborhood of $Delta_{mathbb R}$, but it contains no entourage.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 6 at 11:44









                  José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

                  156k22126227




                  156k22126227























                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      Show that in a separated uniform space: If we have a neighbourhood $U$ of $Delta_X$ that is no entourage, then $overline{U}$ is a closed neighbourhood of $Delta_X$ that contains no entourage.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        Show that in a separated uniform space: If we have a neighbourhood $U$ of $Delta_X$ that is no entourage, then $overline{U}$ is a closed neighbourhood of $Delta_X$ that contains no entourage.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          1












                          1








                          1





                          $begingroup$

                          Show that in a separated uniform space: If we have a neighbourhood $U$ of $Delta_X$ that is no entourage, then $overline{U}$ is a closed neighbourhood of $Delta_X$ that contains no entourage.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Show that in a separated uniform space: If we have a neighbourhood $U$ of $Delta_X$ that is no entourage, then $overline{U}$ is a closed neighbourhood of $Delta_X$ that contains no entourage.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Jan 6 at 13:19









                          Henno BrandsmaHenno Brandsma

                          107k347114




                          107k347114






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063743%2ffor-every-closed-neighborhood-delta-x-subset-d-is-there-an-entourage-u-wi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

                              ts Property 'filter' does not exist on type '{}'

                              mat-slide-toggle shouldn't change it's state when I click cancel in confirmation window