Compositions & Transpositions of permutations












0












$begingroup$


Consider the set of all permutations $S_n$.



Fix an element $tauin S_n$.



Then the sets ${sigmacirctaumid sigmain S_n}= {tau circsigmamid sigmain S_n}$ have exactly $n!$ elements.



I am confused what the above theorem stands for? How can ${sigmacirctau mid sigmain S_n}={tau circsigma mid sigma in S_n} = S_n$?



(This has been stated as an equivalence statement of the above theorem)? What is the logic behind? Does the term element above refer to a complete permutation? See link.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Consider the set of all permutations $S_n$.



    Fix an element $tauin S_n$.



    Then the sets ${sigmacirctaumid sigmain S_n}= {tau circsigmamid sigmain S_n}$ have exactly $n!$ elements.



    I am confused what the above theorem stands for? How can ${sigmacirctau mid sigmain S_n}={tau circsigma mid sigma in S_n} = S_n$?



    (This has been stated as an equivalence statement of the above theorem)? What is the logic behind? Does the term element above refer to a complete permutation? See link.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Consider the set of all permutations $S_n$.



      Fix an element $tauin S_n$.



      Then the sets ${sigmacirctaumid sigmain S_n}= {tau circsigmamid sigmain S_n}$ have exactly $n!$ elements.



      I am confused what the above theorem stands for? How can ${sigmacirctau mid sigmain S_n}={tau circsigma mid sigma in S_n} = S_n$?



      (This has been stated as an equivalence statement of the above theorem)? What is the logic behind? Does the term element above refer to a complete permutation? See link.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Consider the set of all permutations $S_n$.



      Fix an element $tauin S_n$.



      Then the sets ${sigmacirctaumid sigmain S_n}= {tau circsigmamid sigmain S_n}$ have exactly $n!$ elements.



      I am confused what the above theorem stands for? How can ${sigmacirctau mid sigmain S_n}={tau circsigma mid sigma in S_n} = S_n$?



      (This has been stated as an equivalence statement of the above theorem)? What is the logic behind? Does the term element above refer to a complete permutation? See link.







      group-theory permutation-cycles






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 16 at 23:38









      jordan_glen

      1




      1










      asked Jan 16 at 20:33









      Onkar SinghOnkar Singh

      297




      297






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          If $sigma in S_n$ then $sigma circ tau^{-1} in S_n$, and $tau^{-1} circ sigma in S_n$ so multiplying by $sigma$ on either side is a surjective map $S_n rightarrow S_n$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            The first thing you should note is that if $tau, sigma in S_n$, then $tau circ sigma in S_n$. This means that if you have two permutations, then their product is also a permutation of the same permutation group.



            You also know that $S_n$ has exactly $n!$ elements.



            Now imagine I give you a set $A$ where all of its elements are permutations from $S_n$. Mathematically speaking this means that $A subset S_n$.



            Now let's think about how many elements $A$ can have.



            If $A = S_n$, then $A$ contains all permutations from $S_n$. So how many elements does $A$ have? Exactly $n!$, since there are exactly $n!$ permutations in $S_n$.



            What if $A$ contains exactly $n!$ permutations from $S_n$? Then $A$ must contain all permutations from $S_n$, since there are only $n!$ elements in $S_n$. So $A = S_n$



            What I have shown is that any set $A$ that only contains permutations from $S_n$ has exactly $n!$ elements if and only if $A = S_n$.



            The key point here is that $A$ only has permutations from $S_n$ as its elements. And if it has $n!$ permutations (that is, all permutations) as its elements, then it must be equal to $S_n$ (and vice versa).



            This is essentially all the proposition says.



            The set $left{sigma circ tau : sigma in S_nright}$ is a subset of $S_n$, that is it only contains permutations from $S_n$. Why? See my first statement at the top of this post.



            So $left{sigma circ tau : sigma in S_nright} = S_n$ is equivalent to saying that $left{sigma circ tau : sigma in S_nright}$ has exactly $n!$ elements.



            The same holds for $left{tau circ sigma: sigma in S_nright} = S_n$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3076251%2fcompositions-transpositions-of-permutations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              0












              $begingroup$

              If $sigma in S_n$ then $sigma circ tau^{-1} in S_n$, and $tau^{-1} circ sigma in S_n$ so multiplying by $sigma$ on either side is a surjective map $S_n rightarrow S_n$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                If $sigma in S_n$ then $sigma circ tau^{-1} in S_n$, and $tau^{-1} circ sigma in S_n$ so multiplying by $sigma$ on either side is a surjective map $S_n rightarrow S_n$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  If $sigma in S_n$ then $sigma circ tau^{-1} in S_n$, and $tau^{-1} circ sigma in S_n$ so multiplying by $sigma$ on either side is a surjective map $S_n rightarrow S_n$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  If $sigma in S_n$ then $sigma circ tau^{-1} in S_n$, and $tau^{-1} circ sigma in S_n$ so multiplying by $sigma$ on either side is a surjective map $S_n rightarrow S_n$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 16 at 20:48









                  Anthony TerAnthony Ter

                  36116




                  36116























                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      The first thing you should note is that if $tau, sigma in S_n$, then $tau circ sigma in S_n$. This means that if you have two permutations, then their product is also a permutation of the same permutation group.



                      You also know that $S_n$ has exactly $n!$ elements.



                      Now imagine I give you a set $A$ where all of its elements are permutations from $S_n$. Mathematically speaking this means that $A subset S_n$.



                      Now let's think about how many elements $A$ can have.



                      If $A = S_n$, then $A$ contains all permutations from $S_n$. So how many elements does $A$ have? Exactly $n!$, since there are exactly $n!$ permutations in $S_n$.



                      What if $A$ contains exactly $n!$ permutations from $S_n$? Then $A$ must contain all permutations from $S_n$, since there are only $n!$ elements in $S_n$. So $A = S_n$



                      What I have shown is that any set $A$ that only contains permutations from $S_n$ has exactly $n!$ elements if and only if $A = S_n$.



                      The key point here is that $A$ only has permutations from $S_n$ as its elements. And if it has $n!$ permutations (that is, all permutations) as its elements, then it must be equal to $S_n$ (and vice versa).



                      This is essentially all the proposition says.



                      The set $left{sigma circ tau : sigma in S_nright}$ is a subset of $S_n$, that is it only contains permutations from $S_n$. Why? See my first statement at the top of this post.



                      So $left{sigma circ tau : sigma in S_nright} = S_n$ is equivalent to saying that $left{sigma circ tau : sigma in S_nright}$ has exactly $n!$ elements.



                      The same holds for $left{tau circ sigma: sigma in S_nright} = S_n$






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        The first thing you should note is that if $tau, sigma in S_n$, then $tau circ sigma in S_n$. This means that if you have two permutations, then their product is also a permutation of the same permutation group.



                        You also know that $S_n$ has exactly $n!$ elements.



                        Now imagine I give you a set $A$ where all of its elements are permutations from $S_n$. Mathematically speaking this means that $A subset S_n$.



                        Now let's think about how many elements $A$ can have.



                        If $A = S_n$, then $A$ contains all permutations from $S_n$. So how many elements does $A$ have? Exactly $n!$, since there are exactly $n!$ permutations in $S_n$.



                        What if $A$ contains exactly $n!$ permutations from $S_n$? Then $A$ must contain all permutations from $S_n$, since there are only $n!$ elements in $S_n$. So $A = S_n$



                        What I have shown is that any set $A$ that only contains permutations from $S_n$ has exactly $n!$ elements if and only if $A = S_n$.



                        The key point here is that $A$ only has permutations from $S_n$ as its elements. And if it has $n!$ permutations (that is, all permutations) as its elements, then it must be equal to $S_n$ (and vice versa).



                        This is essentially all the proposition says.



                        The set $left{sigma circ tau : sigma in S_nright}$ is a subset of $S_n$, that is it only contains permutations from $S_n$. Why? See my first statement at the top of this post.



                        So $left{sigma circ tau : sigma in S_nright} = S_n$ is equivalent to saying that $left{sigma circ tau : sigma in S_nright}$ has exactly $n!$ elements.



                        The same holds for $left{tau circ sigma: sigma in S_nright} = S_n$






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          The first thing you should note is that if $tau, sigma in S_n$, then $tau circ sigma in S_n$. This means that if you have two permutations, then their product is also a permutation of the same permutation group.



                          You also know that $S_n$ has exactly $n!$ elements.



                          Now imagine I give you a set $A$ where all of its elements are permutations from $S_n$. Mathematically speaking this means that $A subset S_n$.



                          Now let's think about how many elements $A$ can have.



                          If $A = S_n$, then $A$ contains all permutations from $S_n$. So how many elements does $A$ have? Exactly $n!$, since there are exactly $n!$ permutations in $S_n$.



                          What if $A$ contains exactly $n!$ permutations from $S_n$? Then $A$ must contain all permutations from $S_n$, since there are only $n!$ elements in $S_n$. So $A = S_n$



                          What I have shown is that any set $A$ that only contains permutations from $S_n$ has exactly $n!$ elements if and only if $A = S_n$.



                          The key point here is that $A$ only has permutations from $S_n$ as its elements. And if it has $n!$ permutations (that is, all permutations) as its elements, then it must be equal to $S_n$ (and vice versa).



                          This is essentially all the proposition says.



                          The set $left{sigma circ tau : sigma in S_nright}$ is a subset of $S_n$, that is it only contains permutations from $S_n$. Why? See my first statement at the top of this post.



                          So $left{sigma circ tau : sigma in S_nright} = S_n$ is equivalent to saying that $left{sigma circ tau : sigma in S_nright}$ has exactly $n!$ elements.



                          The same holds for $left{tau circ sigma: sigma in S_nright} = S_n$






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          The first thing you should note is that if $tau, sigma in S_n$, then $tau circ sigma in S_n$. This means that if you have two permutations, then their product is also a permutation of the same permutation group.



                          You also know that $S_n$ has exactly $n!$ elements.



                          Now imagine I give you a set $A$ where all of its elements are permutations from $S_n$. Mathematically speaking this means that $A subset S_n$.



                          Now let's think about how many elements $A$ can have.



                          If $A = S_n$, then $A$ contains all permutations from $S_n$. So how many elements does $A$ have? Exactly $n!$, since there are exactly $n!$ permutations in $S_n$.



                          What if $A$ contains exactly $n!$ permutations from $S_n$? Then $A$ must contain all permutations from $S_n$, since there are only $n!$ elements in $S_n$. So $A = S_n$



                          What I have shown is that any set $A$ that only contains permutations from $S_n$ has exactly $n!$ elements if and only if $A = S_n$.



                          The key point here is that $A$ only has permutations from $S_n$ as its elements. And if it has $n!$ permutations (that is, all permutations) as its elements, then it must be equal to $S_n$ (and vice versa).



                          This is essentially all the proposition says.



                          The set $left{sigma circ tau : sigma in S_nright}$ is a subset of $S_n$, that is it only contains permutations from $S_n$. Why? See my first statement at the top of this post.



                          So $left{sigma circ tau : sigma in S_nright} = S_n$ is equivalent to saying that $left{sigma circ tau : sigma in S_nright}$ has exactly $n!$ elements.



                          The same holds for $left{tau circ sigma: sigma in S_nright} = S_n$







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Jan 16 at 23:05







                          user635162





































                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3076251%2fcompositions-transpositions-of-permutations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

                              Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

                              A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$