Number of ordered partitions of N into K distinct parts modulo P












0












$begingroup$


I've come across a combinatorics problem where I'm fairly certain that a solution exists, yet I'm unable to find it.



I'm trying to find the number of vectors $(x_1,x_2,...,x_n)$ such that



$sum x_i = 0 mod P$ for some sufficiently large prime $P$ (i.e the resulting formula should hold for all but some finite number of $P$) and



$x_i neq x_j, 1 leq i < j leq n$.



The answer should be $(p-1)(p-2)...(p-n+1)$.
What I would like to do is find a combinatorial proof of the number of partitions. However, I'm stumped.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I've come across a combinatorics problem where I'm fairly certain that a solution exists, yet I'm unable to find it.



    I'm trying to find the number of vectors $(x_1,x_2,...,x_n)$ such that



    $sum x_i = 0 mod P$ for some sufficiently large prime $P$ (i.e the resulting formula should hold for all but some finite number of $P$) and



    $x_i neq x_j, 1 leq i < j leq n$.



    The answer should be $(p-1)(p-2)...(p-n+1)$.
    What I would like to do is find a combinatorial proof of the number of partitions. However, I'm stumped.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I've come across a combinatorics problem where I'm fairly certain that a solution exists, yet I'm unable to find it.



      I'm trying to find the number of vectors $(x_1,x_2,...,x_n)$ such that



      $sum x_i = 0 mod P$ for some sufficiently large prime $P$ (i.e the resulting formula should hold for all but some finite number of $P$) and



      $x_i neq x_j, 1 leq i < j leq n$.



      The answer should be $(p-1)(p-2)...(p-n+1)$.
      What I would like to do is find a combinatorial proof of the number of partitions. However, I'm stumped.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I've come across a combinatorics problem where I'm fairly certain that a solution exists, yet I'm unable to find it.



      I'm trying to find the number of vectors $(x_1,x_2,...,x_n)$ such that



      $sum x_i = 0 mod P$ for some sufficiently large prime $P$ (i.e the resulting formula should hold for all but some finite number of $P$) and



      $x_i neq x_j, 1 leq i < j leq n$.



      The answer should be $(p-1)(p-2)...(p-n+1)$.
      What I would like to do is find a combinatorial proof of the number of partitions. However, I'm stumped.







      combinatorics discrete-mathematics order-theory integer-partitions






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 17 at 14:58







      Sven Svensson

















      asked Jan 2 at 15:46









      Sven SvenssonSven Svensson

      133




      133






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Here is a simple combinatorial proof that does not use hyperplanes.



          The number of vectors in $mathbb F_p^n$ whose entries are pairwise different is $p(p-1)(p-2)cdots(p-n+1)$. Given such a vector, $defx{{bf x}}x$, let $f(x)$ be the vector obtained by adding one to each entry. As long as $n$ and $p$ are corprime, which occurs whenever $p>n$, the sums of the entries of the vectors $$x,f(x),f^2(x),dots,f^{p-1}(x)$$ will each have a different remainder modulo $p$. Therefore, exactly one of them will have a sum whose remainder is zero. Since the set of all vectors with pairwise different entries are partitioned into groups like this, the number of such vectors whose sum congruent to zero is $1/p$ times the total number, which is $(p-1)(p-2)dots(p-n+1)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059633%2fnumber-of-ordered-partitions-of-n-into-k-distinct-parts-modulo-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            Here is a simple combinatorial proof that does not use hyperplanes.



            The number of vectors in $mathbb F_p^n$ whose entries are pairwise different is $p(p-1)(p-2)cdots(p-n+1)$. Given such a vector, $defx{{bf x}}x$, let $f(x)$ be the vector obtained by adding one to each entry. As long as $n$ and $p$ are corprime, which occurs whenever $p>n$, the sums of the entries of the vectors $$x,f(x),f^2(x),dots,f^{p-1}(x)$$ will each have a different remainder modulo $p$. Therefore, exactly one of them will have a sum whose remainder is zero. Since the set of all vectors with pairwise different entries are partitioned into groups like this, the number of such vectors whose sum congruent to zero is $1/p$ times the total number, which is $(p-1)(p-2)dots(p-n+1)$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Here is a simple combinatorial proof that does not use hyperplanes.



              The number of vectors in $mathbb F_p^n$ whose entries are pairwise different is $p(p-1)(p-2)cdots(p-n+1)$. Given such a vector, $defx{{bf x}}x$, let $f(x)$ be the vector obtained by adding one to each entry. As long as $n$ and $p$ are corprime, which occurs whenever $p>n$, the sums of the entries of the vectors $$x,f(x),f^2(x),dots,f^{p-1}(x)$$ will each have a different remainder modulo $p$. Therefore, exactly one of them will have a sum whose remainder is zero. Since the set of all vectors with pairwise different entries are partitioned into groups like this, the number of such vectors whose sum congruent to zero is $1/p$ times the total number, which is $(p-1)(p-2)dots(p-n+1)$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Here is a simple combinatorial proof that does not use hyperplanes.



                The number of vectors in $mathbb F_p^n$ whose entries are pairwise different is $p(p-1)(p-2)cdots(p-n+1)$. Given such a vector, $defx{{bf x}}x$, let $f(x)$ be the vector obtained by adding one to each entry. As long as $n$ and $p$ are corprime, which occurs whenever $p>n$, the sums of the entries of the vectors $$x,f(x),f^2(x),dots,f^{p-1}(x)$$ will each have a different remainder modulo $p$. Therefore, exactly one of them will have a sum whose remainder is zero. Since the set of all vectors with pairwise different entries are partitioned into groups like this, the number of such vectors whose sum congruent to zero is $1/p$ times the total number, which is $(p-1)(p-2)dots(p-n+1)$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Here is a simple combinatorial proof that does not use hyperplanes.



                The number of vectors in $mathbb F_p^n$ whose entries are pairwise different is $p(p-1)(p-2)cdots(p-n+1)$. Given such a vector, $defx{{bf x}}x$, let $f(x)$ be the vector obtained by adding one to each entry. As long as $n$ and $p$ are corprime, which occurs whenever $p>n$, the sums of the entries of the vectors $$x,f(x),f^2(x),dots,f^{p-1}(x)$$ will each have a different remainder modulo $p$. Therefore, exactly one of them will have a sum whose remainder is zero. Since the set of all vectors with pairwise different entries are partitioned into groups like this, the number of such vectors whose sum congruent to zero is $1/p$ times the total number, which is $(p-1)(p-2)dots(p-n+1)$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 2 at 18:18









                Mike EarnestMike Earnest

                23.7k12051




                23.7k12051






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059633%2fnumber-of-ordered-partitions-of-n-into-k-distinct-parts-modulo-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

                    android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

                    WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]