Numerically solve Lotka-Volterra equations using Euler-Cromer












0












$begingroup$


I am trying to solve this coupled pair of equations
$$
{dxover dt}=alpha x - beta xy,\
{dyover dt}=delta xy - gamma y
$$

using the numerical method Euler-Cromer. It doesn't matter which method, as long as it is symplectic. But I'm lost on how to use this method for a system that doesn't have a Hamiltonian (or does it?), at least isn't mechanical. Is it possible to solve this using Euler-Cromer? I am looking for something like a recurrence relation so that I can calculate each new value from the old.



Best regards //










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I am trying to solve this coupled pair of equations
    $$
    {dxover dt}=alpha x - beta xy,\
    {dyover dt}=delta xy - gamma y
    $$

    using the numerical method Euler-Cromer. It doesn't matter which method, as long as it is symplectic. But I'm lost on how to use this method for a system that doesn't have a Hamiltonian (or does it?), at least isn't mechanical. Is it possible to solve this using Euler-Cromer? I am looking for something like a recurrence relation so that I can calculate each new value from the old.



    Best regards //










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I am trying to solve this coupled pair of equations
      $$
      {dxover dt}=alpha x - beta xy,\
      {dyover dt}=delta xy - gamma y
      $$

      using the numerical method Euler-Cromer. It doesn't matter which method, as long as it is symplectic. But I'm lost on how to use this method for a system that doesn't have a Hamiltonian (or does it?), at least isn't mechanical. Is it possible to solve this using Euler-Cromer? I am looking for something like a recurrence relation so that I can calculate each new value from the old.



      Best regards //










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I am trying to solve this coupled pair of equations
      $$
      {dxover dt}=alpha x - beta xy,\
      {dyover dt}=delta xy - gamma y
      $$

      using the numerical method Euler-Cromer. It doesn't matter which method, as long as it is symplectic. But I'm lost on how to use this method for a system that doesn't have a Hamiltonian (or does it?), at least isn't mechanical. Is it possible to solve this using Euler-Cromer? I am looking for something like a recurrence relation so that I can calculate each new value from the old.



      Best regards //







      ordinary-differential-equations numerical-methods nonlinear-system






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 16 at 17:13









      LutzL

      58.9k42056




      58.9k42056










      asked Jan 16 at 16:56









      SimpleProgrammer SimpleProgrammer

      668




      668






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          As
          $$
          frac{dx}{x}(δx−γ)=frac{dy}{y}(α−βy)
          $$

          there is indeed a first integral
          $$
          F(x,y)=δx-γln|x|+βy-αln|y|
          $$



          Taking this as a Hamiltonian for a potentially different time scale results in the system
          begin{align}
          frac{dx}{ds}&=-F_y=fracαy-β&&=frac{αx-βxy}{xy}\
          frac{dy}{ds}&=~~~F_x=δ-fracγx&&=frac{δxy-γy}{xy}\
          end{align}

          so that for $xy>0$ the relation between the time scales is $frac{dt}{ds}=frac1{xy}$
          To this Hamiltonian system you can apply the symplectic Euler method, which should yield orbits that are closer to closed than the simple application of Euler. With some more effort in the initial step one can easily modify this method to leapfrog Verlet, which has even better theoretical properties. To get not only the curve but the solution, you also need to integrate the equation for $t$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3075976%2fnumerically-solve-lotka-volterra-equations-using-euler-cromer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            As
            $$
            frac{dx}{x}(δx−γ)=frac{dy}{y}(α−βy)
            $$

            there is indeed a first integral
            $$
            F(x,y)=δx-γln|x|+βy-αln|y|
            $$



            Taking this as a Hamiltonian for a potentially different time scale results in the system
            begin{align}
            frac{dx}{ds}&=-F_y=fracαy-β&&=frac{αx-βxy}{xy}\
            frac{dy}{ds}&=~~~F_x=δ-fracγx&&=frac{δxy-γy}{xy}\
            end{align}

            so that for $xy>0$ the relation between the time scales is $frac{dt}{ds}=frac1{xy}$
            To this Hamiltonian system you can apply the symplectic Euler method, which should yield orbits that are closer to closed than the simple application of Euler. With some more effort in the initial step one can easily modify this method to leapfrog Verlet, which has even better theoretical properties. To get not only the curve but the solution, you also need to integrate the equation for $t$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              As
              $$
              frac{dx}{x}(δx−γ)=frac{dy}{y}(α−βy)
              $$

              there is indeed a first integral
              $$
              F(x,y)=δx-γln|x|+βy-αln|y|
              $$



              Taking this as a Hamiltonian for a potentially different time scale results in the system
              begin{align}
              frac{dx}{ds}&=-F_y=fracαy-β&&=frac{αx-βxy}{xy}\
              frac{dy}{ds}&=~~~F_x=δ-fracγx&&=frac{δxy-γy}{xy}\
              end{align}

              so that for $xy>0$ the relation between the time scales is $frac{dt}{ds}=frac1{xy}$
              To this Hamiltonian system you can apply the symplectic Euler method, which should yield orbits that are closer to closed than the simple application of Euler. With some more effort in the initial step one can easily modify this method to leapfrog Verlet, which has even better theoretical properties. To get not only the curve but the solution, you also need to integrate the equation for $t$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                As
                $$
                frac{dx}{x}(δx−γ)=frac{dy}{y}(α−βy)
                $$

                there is indeed a first integral
                $$
                F(x,y)=δx-γln|x|+βy-αln|y|
                $$



                Taking this as a Hamiltonian for a potentially different time scale results in the system
                begin{align}
                frac{dx}{ds}&=-F_y=fracαy-β&&=frac{αx-βxy}{xy}\
                frac{dy}{ds}&=~~~F_x=δ-fracγx&&=frac{δxy-γy}{xy}\
                end{align}

                so that for $xy>0$ the relation between the time scales is $frac{dt}{ds}=frac1{xy}$
                To this Hamiltonian system you can apply the symplectic Euler method, which should yield orbits that are closer to closed than the simple application of Euler. With some more effort in the initial step one can easily modify this method to leapfrog Verlet, which has even better theoretical properties. To get not only the curve but the solution, you also need to integrate the equation for $t$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                As
                $$
                frac{dx}{x}(δx−γ)=frac{dy}{y}(α−βy)
                $$

                there is indeed a first integral
                $$
                F(x,y)=δx-γln|x|+βy-αln|y|
                $$



                Taking this as a Hamiltonian for a potentially different time scale results in the system
                begin{align}
                frac{dx}{ds}&=-F_y=fracαy-β&&=frac{αx-βxy}{xy}\
                frac{dy}{ds}&=~~~F_x=δ-fracγx&&=frac{δxy-γy}{xy}\
                end{align}

                so that for $xy>0$ the relation between the time scales is $frac{dt}{ds}=frac1{xy}$
                To this Hamiltonian system you can apply the symplectic Euler method, which should yield orbits that are closer to closed than the simple application of Euler. With some more effort in the initial step one can easily modify this method to leapfrog Verlet, which has even better theoretical properties. To get not only the curve but the solution, you also need to integrate the equation for $t$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 16 at 17:35









                LutzLLutzL

                58.9k42056




                58.9k42056






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3075976%2fnumerically-solve-lotka-volterra-equations-using-euler-cromer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                    How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                    in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith