Prove by induction $(n+1) + (n + 2) +dots + (2n - 1 ) + (2n) = frac{n(3n + 1)}{2}$, $n geq 1$












0












$begingroup$



Prove by induction that
$(n+1) + (n + 2) +dots + (2n - 1 ) + (2n) = dfrac{n(3n + 1)}{2}$
for $n geq 1$.




I tried to add $(2(k+1)-1) + (2(k+1))$ to both sides and got stuck.



Any other ideas?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Don't forget that the first term changes as well.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 17 at 14:10
















0












$begingroup$



Prove by induction that
$(n+1) + (n + 2) +dots + (2n - 1 ) + (2n) = dfrac{n(3n + 1)}{2}$
for $n geq 1$.




I tried to add $(2(k+1)-1) + (2(k+1))$ to both sides and got stuck.



Any other ideas?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Don't forget that the first term changes as well.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 17 at 14:10














0












0








0





$begingroup$



Prove by induction that
$(n+1) + (n + 2) +dots + (2n - 1 ) + (2n) = dfrac{n(3n + 1)}{2}$
for $n geq 1$.




I tried to add $(2(k+1)-1) + (2(k+1))$ to both sides and got stuck.



Any other ideas?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





Prove by induction that
$(n+1) + (n + 2) +dots + (2n - 1 ) + (2n) = dfrac{n(3n + 1)}{2}$
for $n geq 1$.




I tried to add $(2(k+1)-1) + (2(k+1))$ to both sides and got stuck.



Any other ideas?







discrete-mathematics summation induction arithmetic-progressions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 17 at 14:13









Robert Z

98.6k1068139




98.6k1068139










asked Jan 17 at 14:04









VLadosVLados

1




1












  • $begingroup$
    Don't forget that the first term changes as well.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 17 at 14:10


















  • $begingroup$
    Don't forget that the first term changes as well.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 17 at 14:10
















$begingroup$
Don't forget that the first term changes as well.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 17 at 14:10




$begingroup$
Don't forget that the first term changes as well.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 17 at 14:10










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Yes, in the inductive step we start from
$$(n+1) + (n + 2) +dots+ (2n – 1 ) + (2n) = n(3n + 1)/2.$$
We add $ (2(n+1)-1) + (2(n+1))$ to both sides
AND we subtract $n+1$ from both sides.
Then we verify that the right hand side is equal to
$$ (n+1)(3(n+1) + 1)/2.$$
Can you take it form here?






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Yes, I was editing was answer. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Jan 17 at 14:11










  • $begingroup$
    Great!! Thank you
    $endgroup$
    – VLados
    Jan 17 at 14:11



















1












$begingroup$

If you want to be sneaky, show the easier $s(n) := sumlimits_{k=1}^n k = frac{n(n+1)}{2}$ and then subtract $s(n)$ from $s(2n)$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3077012%2fprove-by-induction-n1-n-2-dots-2n-1-2n-fracn3n-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Yes, in the inductive step we start from
    $$(n+1) + (n + 2) +dots+ (2n – 1 ) + (2n) = n(3n + 1)/2.$$
    We add $ (2(n+1)-1) + (2(n+1))$ to both sides
    AND we subtract $n+1$ from both sides.
    Then we verify that the right hand side is equal to
    $$ (n+1)(3(n+1) + 1)/2.$$
    Can you take it form here?






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Yes, I was editing was answer. Thanks!
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Z
      Jan 17 at 14:11










    • $begingroup$
      Great!! Thank you
      $endgroup$
      – VLados
      Jan 17 at 14:11
















    1












    $begingroup$

    Yes, in the inductive step we start from
    $$(n+1) + (n + 2) +dots+ (2n – 1 ) + (2n) = n(3n + 1)/2.$$
    We add $ (2(n+1)-1) + (2(n+1))$ to both sides
    AND we subtract $n+1$ from both sides.
    Then we verify that the right hand side is equal to
    $$ (n+1)(3(n+1) + 1)/2.$$
    Can you take it form here?






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Yes, I was editing was answer. Thanks!
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Z
      Jan 17 at 14:11










    • $begingroup$
      Great!! Thank you
      $endgroup$
      – VLados
      Jan 17 at 14:11














    1












    1








    1





    $begingroup$

    Yes, in the inductive step we start from
    $$(n+1) + (n + 2) +dots+ (2n – 1 ) + (2n) = n(3n + 1)/2.$$
    We add $ (2(n+1)-1) + (2(n+1))$ to both sides
    AND we subtract $n+1$ from both sides.
    Then we verify that the right hand side is equal to
    $$ (n+1)(3(n+1) + 1)/2.$$
    Can you take it form here?






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Yes, in the inductive step we start from
    $$(n+1) + (n + 2) +dots+ (2n – 1 ) + (2n) = n(3n + 1)/2.$$
    We add $ (2(n+1)-1) + (2(n+1))$ to both sides
    AND we subtract $n+1$ from both sides.
    Then we verify that the right hand side is equal to
    $$ (n+1)(3(n+1) + 1)/2.$$
    Can you take it form here?







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Jan 17 at 14:12

























    answered Jan 17 at 14:09









    Robert ZRobert Z

    98.6k1068139




    98.6k1068139












    • $begingroup$
      Yes, I was editing was answer. Thanks!
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Z
      Jan 17 at 14:11










    • $begingroup$
      Great!! Thank you
      $endgroup$
      – VLados
      Jan 17 at 14:11


















    • $begingroup$
      Yes, I was editing was answer. Thanks!
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Z
      Jan 17 at 14:11










    • $begingroup$
      Great!! Thank you
      $endgroup$
      – VLados
      Jan 17 at 14:11
















    $begingroup$
    Yes, I was editing was answer. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Jan 17 at 14:11




    $begingroup$
    Yes, I was editing was answer. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Jan 17 at 14:11












    $begingroup$
    Great!! Thank you
    $endgroup$
    – VLados
    Jan 17 at 14:11




    $begingroup$
    Great!! Thank you
    $endgroup$
    – VLados
    Jan 17 at 14:11











    1












    $begingroup$

    If you want to be sneaky, show the easier $s(n) := sumlimits_{k=1}^n k = frac{n(n+1)}{2}$ and then subtract $s(n)$ from $s(2n)$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      If you want to be sneaky, show the easier $s(n) := sumlimits_{k=1}^n k = frac{n(n+1)}{2}$ and then subtract $s(n)$ from $s(2n)$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        If you want to be sneaky, show the easier $s(n) := sumlimits_{k=1}^n k = frac{n(n+1)}{2}$ and then subtract $s(n)$ from $s(2n)$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        If you want to be sneaky, show the easier $s(n) := sumlimits_{k=1}^n k = frac{n(n+1)}{2}$ and then subtract $s(n)$ from $s(2n)$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 17 at 14:33









        KlausKlaus

        1,8179




        1,8179






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3077012%2fprove-by-induction-n1-n-2-dots-2n-1-2n-fracn3n-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith