Applying Law of Cosines to get Polarization Identity












0












$begingroup$


I am teaching myself some basic linear algebra using MATH51 textbook and I got to a problem which states following:




The parallelogram in R3 formed by two 3-vectors v and w. The vectors
on the diagonals of the parallelogram are v - w and v + w.



For the case n = 2, apply the Law of Cosines to each of the triangles
made by cutting theparallelogram in half along a diagonal (regard the
chosen diagonal as the side opposite the “angle” being used in the Law
of Cosines) to establish the polarization identity.




After some Googling I got some intution (although not a clear one) to use dot product of v and w, the thing is dot product operation has not been introduced yet. Is there any way to use Law of Cosines to get Polarization Identity without using dot product?



I am including a screenshot with the entire problem and a diagram for better illustration.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I am teaching myself some basic linear algebra using MATH51 textbook and I got to a problem which states following:




    The parallelogram in R3 formed by two 3-vectors v and w. The vectors
    on the diagonals of the parallelogram are v - w and v + w.



    For the case n = 2, apply the Law of Cosines to each of the triangles
    made by cutting theparallelogram in half along a diagonal (regard the
    chosen diagonal as the side opposite the “angle” being used in the Law
    of Cosines) to establish the polarization identity.




    After some Googling I got some intution (although not a clear one) to use dot product of v and w, the thing is dot product operation has not been introduced yet. Is there any way to use Law of Cosines to get Polarization Identity without using dot product?



    I am including a screenshot with the entire problem and a diagram for better illustration.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I am teaching myself some basic linear algebra using MATH51 textbook and I got to a problem which states following:




      The parallelogram in R3 formed by two 3-vectors v and w. The vectors
      on the diagonals of the parallelogram are v - w and v + w.



      For the case n = 2, apply the Law of Cosines to each of the triangles
      made by cutting theparallelogram in half along a diagonal (regard the
      chosen diagonal as the side opposite the “angle” being used in the Law
      of Cosines) to establish the polarization identity.




      After some Googling I got some intution (although not a clear one) to use dot product of v and w, the thing is dot product operation has not been introduced yet. Is there any way to use Law of Cosines to get Polarization Identity without using dot product?



      I am including a screenshot with the entire problem and a diagram for better illustration.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I am teaching myself some basic linear algebra using MATH51 textbook and I got to a problem which states following:




      The parallelogram in R3 formed by two 3-vectors v and w. The vectors
      on the diagonals of the parallelogram are v - w and v + w.



      For the case n = 2, apply the Law of Cosines to each of the triangles
      made by cutting theparallelogram in half along a diagonal (regard the
      chosen diagonal as the side opposite the “angle” being used in the Law
      of Cosines) to establish the polarization identity.




      After some Googling I got some intution (although not a clear one) to use dot product of v and w, the thing is dot product operation has not been introduced yet. Is there any way to use Law of Cosines to get Polarization Identity without using dot product?



      I am including a screenshot with the entire problem and a diagram for better illustration.







      linear-algebra






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 22 at 18:06









      MitoMito

      31




      31






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          @Mito
          What is called "polarization identity" in your book is usually called parallelogram identity (the polarization identity has to do with recovering the dot product from the length). You have two triangles. One has sides $||v||$, $||w||$ and $||v+w||$ and the other one has sides $||v||$, $||w||$ and $||v-w||$. Since they form a parallelogram, the angles opposite to $||v-w||$ and $||v+w||$ are supplementary so they have opposite cosines. When you apply the law of cosines you get
          $$
          ||v-w||^2=||v||^2+||w||^2-2||v|||w||cos A
          $$

          and
          $$
          ||v+w||^2=||v||^2+||w||^2-2||v|||w||cos (pi - A)=||v||^2+||w||^2+2||v|||w||cos A
          $$

          By adding these two you get what you need.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3083488%2fapplying-law-of-cosines-to-get-polarization-identity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            @Mito
            What is called "polarization identity" in your book is usually called parallelogram identity (the polarization identity has to do with recovering the dot product from the length). You have two triangles. One has sides $||v||$, $||w||$ and $||v+w||$ and the other one has sides $||v||$, $||w||$ and $||v-w||$. Since they form a parallelogram, the angles opposite to $||v-w||$ and $||v+w||$ are supplementary so they have opposite cosines. When you apply the law of cosines you get
            $$
            ||v-w||^2=||v||^2+||w||^2-2||v|||w||cos A
            $$

            and
            $$
            ||v+w||^2=||v||^2+||w||^2-2||v|||w||cos (pi - A)=||v||^2+||w||^2+2||v|||w||cos A
            $$

            By adding these two you get what you need.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              @Mito
              What is called "polarization identity" in your book is usually called parallelogram identity (the polarization identity has to do with recovering the dot product from the length). You have two triangles. One has sides $||v||$, $||w||$ and $||v+w||$ and the other one has sides $||v||$, $||w||$ and $||v-w||$. Since they form a parallelogram, the angles opposite to $||v-w||$ and $||v+w||$ are supplementary so they have opposite cosines. When you apply the law of cosines you get
              $$
              ||v-w||^2=||v||^2+||w||^2-2||v|||w||cos A
              $$

              and
              $$
              ||v+w||^2=||v||^2+||w||^2-2||v|||w||cos (pi - A)=||v||^2+||w||^2+2||v|||w||cos A
              $$

              By adding these two you get what you need.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                @Mito
                What is called "polarization identity" in your book is usually called parallelogram identity (the polarization identity has to do with recovering the dot product from the length). You have two triangles. One has sides $||v||$, $||w||$ and $||v+w||$ and the other one has sides $||v||$, $||w||$ and $||v-w||$. Since they form a parallelogram, the angles opposite to $||v-w||$ and $||v+w||$ are supplementary so they have opposite cosines. When you apply the law of cosines you get
                $$
                ||v-w||^2=||v||^2+||w||^2-2||v|||w||cos A
                $$

                and
                $$
                ||v+w||^2=||v||^2+||w||^2-2||v|||w||cos (pi - A)=||v||^2+||w||^2+2||v|||w||cos A
                $$

                By adding these two you get what you need.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                @Mito
                What is called "polarization identity" in your book is usually called parallelogram identity (the polarization identity has to do with recovering the dot product from the length). You have two triangles. One has sides $||v||$, $||w||$ and $||v+w||$ and the other one has sides $||v||$, $||w||$ and $||v-w||$. Since they form a parallelogram, the angles opposite to $||v-w||$ and $||v+w||$ are supplementary so they have opposite cosines. When you apply the law of cosines you get
                $$
                ||v-w||^2=||v||^2+||w||^2-2||v|||w||cos A
                $$

                and
                $$
                ||v+w||^2=||v||^2+||w||^2-2||v|||w||cos (pi - A)=||v||^2+||w||^2+2||v|||w||cos A
                $$

                By adding these two you get what you need.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 22 at 18:15









                GReyesGReyes

                1,93515




                1,93515






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3083488%2fapplying-law-of-cosines-to-get-polarization-identity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                    How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                    in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith