Equivalent sets of wffs












1












$begingroup$


Propositional logic. Given two sets of wffs, $Sigma$ and $Gamma$, are the following definitions of equivalence between $Sigma$ and $Gamma$ .....equivalent?




  1. $(SigmavDashGamma)land(GammavDashSigma)$


  2. For all $alpha$, $(SigmavDashalpha)leftrightarrow(GammavDashalpha)$



I'm not looking for a proof, a just want to avoid engaging myself in a lost battle.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Propositional logic. Given two sets of wffs, $Sigma$ and $Gamma$, are the following definitions of equivalence between $Sigma$ and $Gamma$ .....equivalent?




    1. $(SigmavDashGamma)land(GammavDashSigma)$


    2. For all $alpha$, $(SigmavDashalpha)leftrightarrow(GammavDashalpha)$



    I'm not looking for a proof, a just want to avoid engaging myself in a lost battle.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Propositional logic. Given two sets of wffs, $Sigma$ and $Gamma$, are the following definitions of equivalence between $Sigma$ and $Gamma$ .....equivalent?




      1. $(SigmavDashGamma)land(GammavDashSigma)$


      2. For all $alpha$, $(SigmavDashalpha)leftrightarrow(GammavDashalpha)$



      I'm not looking for a proof, a just want to avoid engaging myself in a lost battle.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Propositional logic. Given two sets of wffs, $Sigma$ and $Gamma$, are the following definitions of equivalence between $Sigma$ and $Gamma$ .....equivalent?




      1. $(SigmavDashGamma)land(GammavDashSigma)$


      2. For all $alpha$, $(SigmavDashalpha)leftrightarrow(GammavDashalpha)$



      I'm not looking for a proof, a just want to avoid engaging myself in a lost battle.







      propositional-calculus






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 25 at 19:49









      PeptideChainPeptideChain

      464311




      464311






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Two sets of formulas are equivalent, if any formula of the one set is a consequence of the other and conversely.



          Equivalently, they have the same models.



          This means :




          $text {for every } alpha in Gamma : Sigma vDash alpha$ and $text { for every } beta in Sigma : Gamma vDash beta$.







          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Is there any relation with the two expressions in the Q?
            $endgroup$
            – PeptideChain
            Jan 25 at 20:12











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3087544%2fequivalent-sets-of-wffs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          Two sets of formulas are equivalent, if any formula of the one set is a consequence of the other and conversely.



          Equivalently, they have the same models.



          This means :




          $text {for every } alpha in Gamma : Sigma vDash alpha$ and $text { for every } beta in Sigma : Gamma vDash beta$.







          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Is there any relation with the two expressions in the Q?
            $endgroup$
            – PeptideChain
            Jan 25 at 20:12
















          1












          $begingroup$

          Two sets of formulas are equivalent, if any formula of the one set is a consequence of the other and conversely.



          Equivalently, they have the same models.



          This means :




          $text {for every } alpha in Gamma : Sigma vDash alpha$ and $text { for every } beta in Sigma : Gamma vDash beta$.







          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Is there any relation with the two expressions in the Q?
            $endgroup$
            – PeptideChain
            Jan 25 at 20:12














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Two sets of formulas are equivalent, if any formula of the one set is a consequence of the other and conversely.



          Equivalently, they have the same models.



          This means :




          $text {for every } alpha in Gamma : Sigma vDash alpha$ and $text { for every } beta in Sigma : Gamma vDash beta$.







          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Two sets of formulas are equivalent, if any formula of the one set is a consequence of the other and conversely.



          Equivalently, they have the same models.



          This means :




          $text {for every } alpha in Gamma : Sigma vDash alpha$ and $text { for every } beta in Sigma : Gamma vDash beta$.








          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 25 at 19:57









          Mauro ALLEGRANZAMauro ALLEGRANZA

          67.3k449115




          67.3k449115












          • $begingroup$
            Is there any relation with the two expressions in the Q?
            $endgroup$
            – PeptideChain
            Jan 25 at 20:12


















          • $begingroup$
            Is there any relation with the two expressions in the Q?
            $endgroup$
            – PeptideChain
            Jan 25 at 20:12
















          $begingroup$
          Is there any relation with the two expressions in the Q?
          $endgroup$
          – PeptideChain
          Jan 25 at 20:12




          $begingroup$
          Is there any relation with the two expressions in the Q?
          $endgroup$
          – PeptideChain
          Jan 25 at 20:12


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3087544%2fequivalent-sets-of-wffs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

          android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

          WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]