Equivalent sets of wffs
$begingroup$
Propositional logic. Given two sets of wffs, $Sigma$ and $Gamma$, are the following definitions of equivalence between $Sigma$ and $Gamma$ .....equivalent?
$(SigmavDashGamma)land(GammavDashSigma)$
For all $alpha$, $(SigmavDashalpha)leftrightarrow(GammavDashalpha)$
I'm not looking for a proof, a just want to avoid engaging myself in a lost battle.
propositional-calculus
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Propositional logic. Given two sets of wffs, $Sigma$ and $Gamma$, are the following definitions of equivalence between $Sigma$ and $Gamma$ .....equivalent?
$(SigmavDashGamma)land(GammavDashSigma)$
For all $alpha$, $(SigmavDashalpha)leftrightarrow(GammavDashalpha)$
I'm not looking for a proof, a just want to avoid engaging myself in a lost battle.
propositional-calculus
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Propositional logic. Given two sets of wffs, $Sigma$ and $Gamma$, are the following definitions of equivalence between $Sigma$ and $Gamma$ .....equivalent?
$(SigmavDashGamma)land(GammavDashSigma)$
For all $alpha$, $(SigmavDashalpha)leftrightarrow(GammavDashalpha)$
I'm not looking for a proof, a just want to avoid engaging myself in a lost battle.
propositional-calculus
$endgroup$
Propositional logic. Given two sets of wffs, $Sigma$ and $Gamma$, are the following definitions of equivalence between $Sigma$ and $Gamma$ .....equivalent?
$(SigmavDashGamma)land(GammavDashSigma)$
For all $alpha$, $(SigmavDashalpha)leftrightarrow(GammavDashalpha)$
I'm not looking for a proof, a just want to avoid engaging myself in a lost battle.
propositional-calculus
propositional-calculus
asked Jan 25 at 19:49
PeptideChainPeptideChain
464311
464311
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Two sets of formulas are equivalent, if any formula of the one set is a consequence of the other and conversely.
Equivalently, they have the same models.
This means :
$text {for every } alpha in Gamma : Sigma vDash alpha$ and $text { for every } beta in Sigma : Gamma vDash beta$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is there any relation with the two expressions in the Q?
$endgroup$
– PeptideChain
Jan 25 at 20:12
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3087544%2fequivalent-sets-of-wffs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Two sets of formulas are equivalent, if any formula of the one set is a consequence of the other and conversely.
Equivalently, they have the same models.
This means :
$text {for every } alpha in Gamma : Sigma vDash alpha$ and $text { for every } beta in Sigma : Gamma vDash beta$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is there any relation with the two expressions in the Q?
$endgroup$
– PeptideChain
Jan 25 at 20:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Two sets of formulas are equivalent, if any formula of the one set is a consequence of the other and conversely.
Equivalently, they have the same models.
This means :
$text {for every } alpha in Gamma : Sigma vDash alpha$ and $text { for every } beta in Sigma : Gamma vDash beta$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is there any relation with the two expressions in the Q?
$endgroup$
– PeptideChain
Jan 25 at 20:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Two sets of formulas are equivalent, if any formula of the one set is a consequence of the other and conversely.
Equivalently, they have the same models.
This means :
$text {for every } alpha in Gamma : Sigma vDash alpha$ and $text { for every } beta in Sigma : Gamma vDash beta$.
$endgroup$
Two sets of formulas are equivalent, if any formula of the one set is a consequence of the other and conversely.
Equivalently, they have the same models.
This means :
$text {for every } alpha in Gamma : Sigma vDash alpha$ and $text { for every } beta in Sigma : Gamma vDash beta$.
answered Jan 25 at 19:57
Mauro ALLEGRANZAMauro ALLEGRANZA
67.3k449115
67.3k449115
$begingroup$
Is there any relation with the two expressions in the Q?
$endgroup$
– PeptideChain
Jan 25 at 20:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is there any relation with the two expressions in the Q?
$endgroup$
– PeptideChain
Jan 25 at 20:12
$begingroup$
Is there any relation with the two expressions in the Q?
$endgroup$
– PeptideChain
Jan 25 at 20:12
$begingroup$
Is there any relation with the two expressions in the Q?
$endgroup$
– PeptideChain
Jan 25 at 20:12
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3087544%2fequivalent-sets-of-wffs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown