Example of algebra which is not σ-algebra.












21












$begingroup$


I have troubles with constructing of an example of algebra of sets which is not σ-algebra. Could you please help me with this?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    21












    $begingroup$


    I have troubles with constructing of an example of algebra of sets which is not σ-algebra. Could you please help me with this?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      21












      21








      21


      13



      $begingroup$


      I have troubles with constructing of an example of algebra of sets which is not σ-algebra. Could you please help me with this?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I have troubles with constructing of an example of algebra of sets which is not σ-algebra. Could you please help me with this?







      measure-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 9 '12 at 17:18









      Mihran HovsepyanMihran Hovsepyan

      224127




      224127






















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          24












          $begingroup$

          Let $X$ be an infinite set, and $mathcal A$ be the collection of all subsets of $X$ which are finite or have finite complement. Then $mathcal A$ is an algebra of sets which is not a $sigma$-algebra.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            But proving this is not sigma algebra would require that every infinite set has a countable subset(as much I know proof) but which require Axiom of Countable choice(CC). Or is there proof without using CC
            $endgroup$
            – Sushil
            Oct 5 '14 at 15:26










          • $begingroup$
            Let $X$ be the set of natural numbers. Let $A_n$ be the set of even numbers up to and including $2n$. Then the countable union of the $A_n$ is the set of all even numbers, which is infinite and has an infinite complement: the set of all odd numbers. Cool :)
            $endgroup$
            – Michael
            Oct 15 '15 at 15:39





















          8












          $begingroup$

          Let $L$ be the collection of all finite disjoint unions of all intervals of the form:



          $(−infty, a], (a, b], (b, infty), emptyset, mathbf{R}$.



          Then $L$ is an algebra over $mathbf{R}$, but not a σ-algebra because



          union of sets $left{(0,frac{i-1}{i}]right}$ for all $i ge 1 = (0, 1) notin L $.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            For example, let $mathbb{R}^{[0,+infty)}$ denote the set of all the real value functions on $[0,+infty)$. Consider the so called n-dimensional cylinder set, defined as
            begin{equation*}
            C_{t_1,t_2,ldots, t_n,B}={fin mathbb{R}^{[0,+infty)}:(f(t_1),f(t_2),ldots, f(t_n))in B},
            end{equation*}
            where $Binmathcal{B}^d$ is a Borel set and $Csubseteq mathbb{R}^{[0,+infty)}$. Then the set $mathcal{C}'$ of all the cylinders $C$, that is,
            begin{equation*}
            mathcal{C}'={C_{t_1,t_2,ldots t_n,B}, forall ngeq 1, forall (t,t_1,t_2,ldots,t_n), forall Bin mathcal{B}^n }
            end{equation*}
            is an algebra but not $sigma$ - algebra.
            Anyway it is well known that there exists the smallest $sigma$ - algebra containing $mathcal{C}'$, but this is another story.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$





















              0












              $begingroup$

              As another example which supports the first answer above, let $Omega $ $=$ $(0,1]$, and let $mathcal{F}$
              contain $varnothing $, all $(a,b]$ with $a,b$ $in $ $mathbb{Q}$, $a,b in [0,1]$ $a$ $<$ $b$, and all finite unions of $(a,b]$. Let $[z]$ round $z$ to the nearest integer. Then $mathcal{F}$ is a
              field by straightforward verification. It is not a $sigma $-field: let $A_{n}=(a_{n},1]$ with $a_{n}$ $=$ $%
              10^{n}/[10^{n}pi ]$, hence $A_{n}$ $in $ $mathcal{F}$ but $cup
              _{n=1}^{infty }A_{n}$ $=$ $(pi ,1]$ $notin $ $mathcal{F}$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













                Your Answer





                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                });
                });
                }, "mathjax-editing");

                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "69"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });














                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f233702%2fexample-of-algebra-which-is-not-%25cf%2583-algebra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes








                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                24












                $begingroup$

                Let $X$ be an infinite set, and $mathcal A$ be the collection of all subsets of $X$ which are finite or have finite complement. Then $mathcal A$ is an algebra of sets which is not a $sigma$-algebra.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  But proving this is not sigma algebra would require that every infinite set has a countable subset(as much I know proof) but which require Axiom of Countable choice(CC). Or is there proof without using CC
                  $endgroup$
                  – Sushil
                  Oct 5 '14 at 15:26










                • $begingroup$
                  Let $X$ be the set of natural numbers. Let $A_n$ be the set of even numbers up to and including $2n$. Then the countable union of the $A_n$ is the set of all even numbers, which is infinite and has an infinite complement: the set of all odd numbers. Cool :)
                  $endgroup$
                  – Michael
                  Oct 15 '15 at 15:39


















                24












                $begingroup$

                Let $X$ be an infinite set, and $mathcal A$ be the collection of all subsets of $X$ which are finite or have finite complement. Then $mathcal A$ is an algebra of sets which is not a $sigma$-algebra.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  But proving this is not sigma algebra would require that every infinite set has a countable subset(as much I know proof) but which require Axiom of Countable choice(CC). Or is there proof without using CC
                  $endgroup$
                  – Sushil
                  Oct 5 '14 at 15:26










                • $begingroup$
                  Let $X$ be the set of natural numbers. Let $A_n$ be the set of even numbers up to and including $2n$. Then the countable union of the $A_n$ is the set of all even numbers, which is infinite and has an infinite complement: the set of all odd numbers. Cool :)
                  $endgroup$
                  – Michael
                  Oct 15 '15 at 15:39
















                24












                24








                24





                $begingroup$

                Let $X$ be an infinite set, and $mathcal A$ be the collection of all subsets of $X$ which are finite or have finite complement. Then $mathcal A$ is an algebra of sets which is not a $sigma$-algebra.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Let $X$ be an infinite set, and $mathcal A$ be the collection of all subsets of $X$ which are finite or have finite complement. Then $mathcal A$ is an algebra of sets which is not a $sigma$-algebra.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 9 '12 at 17:33









                AndrewAndrew

                9,28311931




                9,28311931












                • $begingroup$
                  But proving this is not sigma algebra would require that every infinite set has a countable subset(as much I know proof) but which require Axiom of Countable choice(CC). Or is there proof without using CC
                  $endgroup$
                  – Sushil
                  Oct 5 '14 at 15:26










                • $begingroup$
                  Let $X$ be the set of natural numbers. Let $A_n$ be the set of even numbers up to and including $2n$. Then the countable union of the $A_n$ is the set of all even numbers, which is infinite and has an infinite complement: the set of all odd numbers. Cool :)
                  $endgroup$
                  – Michael
                  Oct 15 '15 at 15:39




















                • $begingroup$
                  But proving this is not sigma algebra would require that every infinite set has a countable subset(as much I know proof) but which require Axiom of Countable choice(CC). Or is there proof without using CC
                  $endgroup$
                  – Sushil
                  Oct 5 '14 at 15:26










                • $begingroup$
                  Let $X$ be the set of natural numbers. Let $A_n$ be the set of even numbers up to and including $2n$. Then the countable union of the $A_n$ is the set of all even numbers, which is infinite and has an infinite complement: the set of all odd numbers. Cool :)
                  $endgroup$
                  – Michael
                  Oct 15 '15 at 15:39


















                $begingroup$
                But proving this is not sigma algebra would require that every infinite set has a countable subset(as much I know proof) but which require Axiom of Countable choice(CC). Or is there proof without using CC
                $endgroup$
                – Sushil
                Oct 5 '14 at 15:26




                $begingroup$
                But proving this is not sigma algebra would require that every infinite set has a countable subset(as much I know proof) but which require Axiom of Countable choice(CC). Or is there proof without using CC
                $endgroup$
                – Sushil
                Oct 5 '14 at 15:26












                $begingroup$
                Let $X$ be the set of natural numbers. Let $A_n$ be the set of even numbers up to and including $2n$. Then the countable union of the $A_n$ is the set of all even numbers, which is infinite and has an infinite complement: the set of all odd numbers. Cool :)
                $endgroup$
                – Michael
                Oct 15 '15 at 15:39






                $begingroup$
                Let $X$ be the set of natural numbers. Let $A_n$ be the set of even numbers up to and including $2n$. Then the countable union of the $A_n$ is the set of all even numbers, which is infinite and has an infinite complement: the set of all odd numbers. Cool :)
                $endgroup$
                – Michael
                Oct 15 '15 at 15:39













                8












                $begingroup$

                Let $L$ be the collection of all finite disjoint unions of all intervals of the form:



                $(−infty, a], (a, b], (b, infty), emptyset, mathbf{R}$.



                Then $L$ is an algebra over $mathbf{R}$, but not a σ-algebra because



                union of sets $left{(0,frac{i-1}{i}]right}$ for all $i ge 1 = (0, 1) notin L $.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$


















                  8












                  $begingroup$

                  Let $L$ be the collection of all finite disjoint unions of all intervals of the form:



                  $(−infty, a], (a, b], (b, infty), emptyset, mathbf{R}$.



                  Then $L$ is an algebra over $mathbf{R}$, but not a σ-algebra because



                  union of sets $left{(0,frac{i-1}{i}]right}$ for all $i ge 1 = (0, 1) notin L $.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$
















                    8












                    8








                    8





                    $begingroup$

                    Let $L$ be the collection of all finite disjoint unions of all intervals of the form:



                    $(−infty, a], (a, b], (b, infty), emptyset, mathbf{R}$.



                    Then $L$ is an algebra over $mathbf{R}$, but not a σ-algebra because



                    union of sets $left{(0,frac{i-1}{i}]right}$ for all $i ge 1 = (0, 1) notin L $.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    Let $L$ be the collection of all finite disjoint unions of all intervals of the form:



                    $(−infty, a], (a, b], (b, infty), emptyset, mathbf{R}$.



                    Then $L$ is an algebra over $mathbf{R}$, but not a σ-algebra because



                    union of sets $left{(0,frac{i-1}{i}]right}$ for all $i ge 1 = (0, 1) notin L $.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Jan 20 at 14:48









                    pointguard0

                    1,50211021




                    1,50211021










                    answered Oct 5 '14 at 15:23









                    SushilSushil

                    1,035927




                    1,035927























                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        For example, let $mathbb{R}^{[0,+infty)}$ denote the set of all the real value functions on $[0,+infty)$. Consider the so called n-dimensional cylinder set, defined as
                        begin{equation*}
                        C_{t_1,t_2,ldots, t_n,B}={fin mathbb{R}^{[0,+infty)}:(f(t_1),f(t_2),ldots, f(t_n))in B},
                        end{equation*}
                        where $Binmathcal{B}^d$ is a Borel set and $Csubseteq mathbb{R}^{[0,+infty)}$. Then the set $mathcal{C}'$ of all the cylinders $C$, that is,
                        begin{equation*}
                        mathcal{C}'={C_{t_1,t_2,ldots t_n,B}, forall ngeq 1, forall (t,t_1,t_2,ldots,t_n), forall Bin mathcal{B}^n }
                        end{equation*}
                        is an algebra but not $sigma$ - algebra.
                        Anyway it is well known that there exists the smallest $sigma$ - algebra containing $mathcal{C}'$, but this is another story.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          For example, let $mathbb{R}^{[0,+infty)}$ denote the set of all the real value functions on $[0,+infty)$. Consider the so called n-dimensional cylinder set, defined as
                          begin{equation*}
                          C_{t_1,t_2,ldots, t_n,B}={fin mathbb{R}^{[0,+infty)}:(f(t_1),f(t_2),ldots, f(t_n))in B},
                          end{equation*}
                          where $Binmathcal{B}^d$ is a Borel set and $Csubseteq mathbb{R}^{[0,+infty)}$. Then the set $mathcal{C}'$ of all the cylinders $C$, that is,
                          begin{equation*}
                          mathcal{C}'={C_{t_1,t_2,ldots t_n,B}, forall ngeq 1, forall (t,t_1,t_2,ldots,t_n), forall Bin mathcal{B}^n }
                          end{equation*}
                          is an algebra but not $sigma$ - algebra.
                          Anyway it is well known that there exists the smallest $sigma$ - algebra containing $mathcal{C}'$, but this is another story.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            For example, let $mathbb{R}^{[0,+infty)}$ denote the set of all the real value functions on $[0,+infty)$. Consider the so called n-dimensional cylinder set, defined as
                            begin{equation*}
                            C_{t_1,t_2,ldots, t_n,B}={fin mathbb{R}^{[0,+infty)}:(f(t_1),f(t_2),ldots, f(t_n))in B},
                            end{equation*}
                            where $Binmathcal{B}^d$ is a Borel set and $Csubseteq mathbb{R}^{[0,+infty)}$. Then the set $mathcal{C}'$ of all the cylinders $C$, that is,
                            begin{equation*}
                            mathcal{C}'={C_{t_1,t_2,ldots t_n,B}, forall ngeq 1, forall (t,t_1,t_2,ldots,t_n), forall Bin mathcal{B}^n }
                            end{equation*}
                            is an algebra but not $sigma$ - algebra.
                            Anyway it is well known that there exists the smallest $sigma$ - algebra containing $mathcal{C}'$, but this is another story.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            For example, let $mathbb{R}^{[0,+infty)}$ denote the set of all the real value functions on $[0,+infty)$. Consider the so called n-dimensional cylinder set, defined as
                            begin{equation*}
                            C_{t_1,t_2,ldots, t_n,B}={fin mathbb{R}^{[0,+infty)}:(f(t_1),f(t_2),ldots, f(t_n))in B},
                            end{equation*}
                            where $Binmathcal{B}^d$ is a Borel set and $Csubseteq mathbb{R}^{[0,+infty)}$. Then the set $mathcal{C}'$ of all the cylinders $C$, that is,
                            begin{equation*}
                            mathcal{C}'={C_{t_1,t_2,ldots t_n,B}, forall ngeq 1, forall (t,t_1,t_2,ldots,t_n), forall Bin mathcal{B}^n }
                            end{equation*}
                            is an algebra but not $sigma$ - algebra.
                            Anyway it is well known that there exists the smallest $sigma$ - algebra containing $mathcal{C}'$, but this is another story.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Nov 15 '12 at 21:33









                            the_elderthe_elder

                            1048




                            1048























                                0












                                $begingroup$

                                As another example which supports the first answer above, let $Omega $ $=$ $(0,1]$, and let $mathcal{F}$
                                contain $varnothing $, all $(a,b]$ with $a,b$ $in $ $mathbb{Q}$, $a,b in [0,1]$ $a$ $<$ $b$, and all finite unions of $(a,b]$. Let $[z]$ round $z$ to the nearest integer. Then $mathcal{F}$ is a
                                field by straightforward verification. It is not a $sigma $-field: let $A_{n}=(a_{n},1]$ with $a_{n}$ $=$ $%
                                10^{n}/[10^{n}pi ]$, hence $A_{n}$ $in $ $mathcal{F}$ but $cup
                                _{n=1}^{infty }A_{n}$ $=$ $(pi ,1]$ $notin $ $mathcal{F}$.






                                share|cite|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$


















                                  0












                                  $begingroup$

                                  As another example which supports the first answer above, let $Omega $ $=$ $(0,1]$, and let $mathcal{F}$
                                  contain $varnothing $, all $(a,b]$ with $a,b$ $in $ $mathbb{Q}$, $a,b in [0,1]$ $a$ $<$ $b$, and all finite unions of $(a,b]$. Let $[z]$ round $z$ to the nearest integer. Then $mathcal{F}$ is a
                                  field by straightforward verification. It is not a $sigma $-field: let $A_{n}=(a_{n},1]$ with $a_{n}$ $=$ $%
                                  10^{n}/[10^{n}pi ]$, hence $A_{n}$ $in $ $mathcal{F}$ but $cup
                                  _{n=1}^{infty }A_{n}$ $=$ $(pi ,1]$ $notin $ $mathcal{F}$.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$
















                                    0












                                    0








                                    0





                                    $begingroup$

                                    As another example which supports the first answer above, let $Omega $ $=$ $(0,1]$, and let $mathcal{F}$
                                    contain $varnothing $, all $(a,b]$ with $a,b$ $in $ $mathbb{Q}$, $a,b in [0,1]$ $a$ $<$ $b$, and all finite unions of $(a,b]$. Let $[z]$ round $z$ to the nearest integer. Then $mathcal{F}$ is a
                                    field by straightforward verification. It is not a $sigma $-field: let $A_{n}=(a_{n},1]$ with $a_{n}$ $=$ $%
                                    10^{n}/[10^{n}pi ]$, hence $A_{n}$ $in $ $mathcal{F}$ but $cup
                                    _{n=1}^{infty }A_{n}$ $=$ $(pi ,1]$ $notin $ $mathcal{F}$.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$



                                    As another example which supports the first answer above, let $Omega $ $=$ $(0,1]$, and let $mathcal{F}$
                                    contain $varnothing $, all $(a,b]$ with $a,b$ $in $ $mathbb{Q}$, $a,b in [0,1]$ $a$ $<$ $b$, and all finite unions of $(a,b]$. Let $[z]$ round $z$ to the nearest integer. Then $mathcal{F}$ is a
                                    field by straightforward verification. It is not a $sigma $-field: let $A_{n}=(a_{n},1]$ with $a_{n}$ $=$ $%
                                    10^{n}/[10^{n}pi ]$, hence $A_{n}$ $in $ $mathcal{F}$ but $cup
                                    _{n=1}^{infty }A_{n}$ $=$ $(pi ,1]$ $notin $ $mathcal{F}$.







                                    share|cite|improve this answer












                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer










                                    answered Aug 22 '13 at 13:18









                                    JBHJBH

                                    212




                                    212






























                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded




















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid



                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                        Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f233702%2fexample-of-algebra-which-is-not-%25cf%2583-algebra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                                        How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                                        Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory