Mixing
How to not use includeUncontrolled in clients.matchAll?
0
In a service worker, I'm querying for clients.
event.waitUntil(
clients.matchAll({includeUncontrolled: true, type: 'window'})
.then( windowClients => {
// ...
})
);
I can not figure out how to not use includeUncontrolled: true. Without it I get no results. I have tried using clients.claim() to no result.
self.addEventListener('activate', event => {
event.waitUntil(clients.claim());
});
How to get a page under the control of a service worker? navigator.serviceWorker.controller is also null / undefined.
service-worker progressive-web-apps web-push
asked Jan 2 at 6:49
douggarddouggard
4081821
add a comment |
0
In a service worker, I'm querying for clients.
event.waitUntil(
clients.matchAll({includeUncontrolled: true, type: 'window'})
.then( windowClients => {
// ...
})
);
I can not figure out how to not use includeUncontrolled: true. Without it I get no results. I have tried using clients.claim() to no result.
self.addEventListener('activate', event => {
event.waitUntil(clients.claim());
});
How to get a page under the control of a service worker? navigator.serviceWorker.controller is also null / undefined.
service-worker progressive-web-apps web-push
asked Jan 2 at 6:49
douggarddouggard
4081821
1
As far as I know,includeUncontrolledif set to true, the matching operation will return all service worker clients who share the same origin as the current service worker. Otherwise, it returns only the service worker clients controlled by the current service worker. There is no other alternative for this property.
– jess
Jan 2 at 13:44
Thanks! This is probably getting into service worker internals, but I wonder if the notification handling service worker will ever have clients, or if it is always a new instance.
– douggard
Jan 2 at 17:09
add a comment |
0
0
0
In a service worker, I'm querying for clients.
event.waitUntil(
clients.matchAll({includeUncontrolled: true, type: 'window'})
.then( windowClients => {
// ...
})
);
I can not figure out how to not use includeUncontrolled: true. Without it I get no results. I have tried using clients.claim() to no result.
self.addEventListener('activate', event => {
event.waitUntil(clients.claim());
});
How to get a page under the control of a service worker? navigator.serviceWorker.controller is also null / undefined.
service-worker progressive-web-apps web-push
asked Jan 2 at 6:49
douggarddouggard
4081821
In a service worker, I'm querying for clients.
event.waitUntil(
clients.matchAll({includeUncontrolled: true, type: 'window'})
.then( windowClients => {
// ...
})
);
I can not figure out how to not use includeUncontrolled: true. Without it I get no results. I have tried using clients.claim() to no result.
self.addEventListener('activate', event => {
event.waitUntil(clients.claim());
});
How to get a page under the control of a service worker? navigator.serviceWorker.controller is also null / undefined.
service-worker progressive-web-apps web-push
service-worker progressive-web-apps web-push
asked Jan 2 at 6:49
douggarddouggard
4081821
asked Jan 2 at 6:49
douggarddouggard
4081821
asked Jan 2 at 6:49
douggarddouggard
4081821
asked Jan 2 at 6:49
douggarddouggard
4081821
asked Jan 2 at 6:49
douggarddouggard
4081821
4081821
1
As far as I know,includeUncontrolledif set to true, the matching operation will return all service worker clients who share the same origin as the current service worker. Otherwise, it returns only the service worker clients controlled by the current service worker. There is no other alternative for this property.
– jess
Jan 2 at 13:44
Thanks! This is probably getting into service worker internals, but I wonder if the notification handling service worker will ever have clients, or if it is always a new instance.
– douggard
Jan 2 at 17:09
add a comment |
1
As far as I know,includeUncontrolledif set to true, the matching operation will return all service worker clients who share the same origin as the current service worker. Otherwise, it returns only the service worker clients controlled by the current service worker. There is no other alternative for this property.
– jess
Jan 2 at 13:44
Thanks! This is probably getting into service worker internals, but I wonder if the notification handling service worker will ever have clients, or if it is always a new instance.
– douggard
Jan 2 at 17:09
1
1
As far as I know,
includeUncontrolled if set to true, the matching operation will return all service worker clients who share the same origin as the current service worker. Otherwise, it returns only the service worker clients controlled by the current service worker. There is no other alternative for this property.– jess
Jan 2 at 13:44
As far as I know,
includeUncontrolled if set to true, the matching operation will return all service worker clients who share the same origin as the current service worker. Otherwise, it returns only the service worker clients controlled by the current service worker. There is no other alternative for this property.– jess
Jan 2 at 13:44
Thanks! This is probably getting into service worker internals, but I wonder if the notification handling service worker will ever have clients, or if it is always a new instance.
– douggard
Jan 2 at 17:09
Thanks! This is probably getting into service worker internals, but I wonder if the notification handling service worker will ever have clients, or if it is always a new instance.
– douggard
Jan 2 at 17:09
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54002334%2fhow-to-not-use-includeuncontrolled-in-clients-matchall%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54002334%2fhow-to-not-use-includeuncontrolled-in-clients-matchall%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
As far as I know,
includeUncontrolledif set to true, the matching operation will return all service worker clients who share the same origin as the current service worker. Otherwise, it returns only the service worker clients controlled by the current service worker. There is no other alternative for this property.– jess
Jan 2 at 13:44
Thanks! This is probably getting into service worker internals, but I wonder if the notification handling service worker will ever have clients, or if it is always a new instance.
– douggard
Jan 2 at 17:09