Maximize $b^Tx$ subject to $x in C(a) := {x in mathbb R^p | |a+x|_2 le r,;|x|_infty le epsilon}$
$begingroup$
Let $r,epsilon > 0$ and $a, b in mathbb R^p$ with $|a|_2 le r$. Define the set $C(a) := {x in mathbb R^p | |x+a|_2 le r,;|x|_infty le epsilon}$. Note that $C(a)$ is non-empty (it contains the origin $x=0$, at least).
Question
(A) What is an analytic solution to the problem $sup_{x in C(a)} b^Tx$ ?
(B) Same question with $|a|_2 = r$ and $C(a) := {x in mathbb R^p | |x+a|_2 = r,;|x|_infty le epsilon}$
convex-analysis convex-optimization convex-geometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $r,epsilon > 0$ and $a, b in mathbb R^p$ with $|a|_2 le r$. Define the set $C(a) := {x in mathbb R^p | |x+a|_2 le r,;|x|_infty le epsilon}$. Note that $C(a)$ is non-empty (it contains the origin $x=0$, at least).
Question
(A) What is an analytic solution to the problem $sup_{x in C(a)} b^Tx$ ?
(B) Same question with $|a|_2 = r$ and $C(a) := {x in mathbb R^p | |x+a|_2 = r,;|x|_infty le epsilon}$
convex-analysis convex-optimization convex-geometry
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You realize that $C(a)$ can be empty?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Jan 20 at 17:03
$begingroup$
Indeed, good catch. Fixed (i.e you may assume $C(a)$ is non-empty).
$endgroup$
– dohmatob
Jan 20 at 17:07
1
$begingroup$
Can we assume that $|a|_2 leq r$?
$endgroup$
– littleO
Jan 20 at 17:17
$begingroup$
Hum, good point. Yes, you may.
$endgroup$
– dohmatob
Jan 20 at 17:22
$begingroup$
have you considered the dual problem yet?
$endgroup$
– LinAlg
Jan 22 at 18:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $r,epsilon > 0$ and $a, b in mathbb R^p$ with $|a|_2 le r$. Define the set $C(a) := {x in mathbb R^p | |x+a|_2 le r,;|x|_infty le epsilon}$. Note that $C(a)$ is non-empty (it contains the origin $x=0$, at least).
Question
(A) What is an analytic solution to the problem $sup_{x in C(a)} b^Tx$ ?
(B) Same question with $|a|_2 = r$ and $C(a) := {x in mathbb R^p | |x+a|_2 = r,;|x|_infty le epsilon}$
convex-analysis convex-optimization convex-geometry
$endgroup$
Let $r,epsilon > 0$ and $a, b in mathbb R^p$ with $|a|_2 le r$. Define the set $C(a) := {x in mathbb R^p | |x+a|_2 le r,;|x|_infty le epsilon}$. Note that $C(a)$ is non-empty (it contains the origin $x=0$, at least).
Question
(A) What is an analytic solution to the problem $sup_{x in C(a)} b^Tx$ ?
(B) Same question with $|a|_2 = r$ and $C(a) := {x in mathbb R^p | |x+a|_2 = r,;|x|_infty le epsilon}$
convex-analysis convex-optimization convex-geometry
convex-analysis convex-optimization convex-geometry
edited Jan 23 at 5:41
dohmatob
asked Jan 20 at 16:46


dohmatobdohmatob
3,672629
3,672629
1
$begingroup$
You realize that $C(a)$ can be empty?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Jan 20 at 17:03
$begingroup$
Indeed, good catch. Fixed (i.e you may assume $C(a)$ is non-empty).
$endgroup$
– dohmatob
Jan 20 at 17:07
1
$begingroup$
Can we assume that $|a|_2 leq r$?
$endgroup$
– littleO
Jan 20 at 17:17
$begingroup$
Hum, good point. Yes, you may.
$endgroup$
– dohmatob
Jan 20 at 17:22
$begingroup$
have you considered the dual problem yet?
$endgroup$
– LinAlg
Jan 22 at 18:54
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
You realize that $C(a)$ can be empty?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Jan 20 at 17:03
$begingroup$
Indeed, good catch. Fixed (i.e you may assume $C(a)$ is non-empty).
$endgroup$
– dohmatob
Jan 20 at 17:07
1
$begingroup$
Can we assume that $|a|_2 leq r$?
$endgroup$
– littleO
Jan 20 at 17:17
$begingroup$
Hum, good point. Yes, you may.
$endgroup$
– dohmatob
Jan 20 at 17:22
$begingroup$
have you considered the dual problem yet?
$endgroup$
– LinAlg
Jan 22 at 18:54
1
1
$begingroup$
You realize that $C(a)$ can be empty?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Jan 20 at 17:03
$begingroup$
You realize that $C(a)$ can be empty?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Jan 20 at 17:03
$begingroup$
Indeed, good catch. Fixed (i.e you may assume $C(a)$ is non-empty).
$endgroup$
– dohmatob
Jan 20 at 17:07
$begingroup$
Indeed, good catch. Fixed (i.e you may assume $C(a)$ is non-empty).
$endgroup$
– dohmatob
Jan 20 at 17:07
1
1
$begingroup$
Can we assume that $|a|_2 leq r$?
$endgroup$
– littleO
Jan 20 at 17:17
$begingroup$
Can we assume that $|a|_2 leq r$?
$endgroup$
– littleO
Jan 20 at 17:17
$begingroup$
Hum, good point. Yes, you may.
$endgroup$
– dohmatob
Jan 20 at 17:22
$begingroup$
Hum, good point. Yes, you may.
$endgroup$
– dohmatob
Jan 20 at 17:22
$begingroup$
have you considered the dual problem yet?
$endgroup$
– LinAlg
Jan 22 at 18:54
$begingroup$
have you considered the dual problem yet?
$endgroup$
– LinAlg
Jan 22 at 18:54
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The general answer will be very complicated. But here is a special case. You can see $C(a)$ as the intersection of two balls: $X=B_{|cdot|_2}(-a, r)$ and $Y=B_{|cdot|_infty}(0, epsilon)$. If $Ysubseteq X$ then we can forget about $X$. For every $1leq ileq d$ let $s_iin{-1,0,1}$ denote the sign of $a_i$. Then $x=(s_1epsilon,s_2epsilon,...,s_depsilon)$ is optimal.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes, things are trivial if $X subseteq Y$ or $Y subseteq X$. The problem only becomes remotely interesting when neither one of $X$ or $Y$ is contained in the other.
$endgroup$
– dohmatob
Jan 20 at 17:38
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080805%2fmaximize-btx-subject-to-x-in-ca-x-in-mathbb-rp-ax-2-le-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The general answer will be very complicated. But here is a special case. You can see $C(a)$ as the intersection of two balls: $X=B_{|cdot|_2}(-a, r)$ and $Y=B_{|cdot|_infty}(0, epsilon)$. If $Ysubseteq X$ then we can forget about $X$. For every $1leq ileq d$ let $s_iin{-1,0,1}$ denote the sign of $a_i$. Then $x=(s_1epsilon,s_2epsilon,...,s_depsilon)$ is optimal.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes, things are trivial if $X subseteq Y$ or $Y subseteq X$. The problem only becomes remotely interesting when neither one of $X$ or $Y$ is contained in the other.
$endgroup$
– dohmatob
Jan 20 at 17:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The general answer will be very complicated. But here is a special case. You can see $C(a)$ as the intersection of two balls: $X=B_{|cdot|_2}(-a, r)$ and $Y=B_{|cdot|_infty}(0, epsilon)$. If $Ysubseteq X$ then we can forget about $X$. For every $1leq ileq d$ let $s_iin{-1,0,1}$ denote the sign of $a_i$. Then $x=(s_1epsilon,s_2epsilon,...,s_depsilon)$ is optimal.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes, things are trivial if $X subseteq Y$ or $Y subseteq X$. The problem only becomes remotely interesting when neither one of $X$ or $Y$ is contained in the other.
$endgroup$
– dohmatob
Jan 20 at 17:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The general answer will be very complicated. But here is a special case. You can see $C(a)$ as the intersection of two balls: $X=B_{|cdot|_2}(-a, r)$ and $Y=B_{|cdot|_infty}(0, epsilon)$. If $Ysubseteq X$ then we can forget about $X$. For every $1leq ileq d$ let $s_iin{-1,0,1}$ denote the sign of $a_i$. Then $x=(s_1epsilon,s_2epsilon,...,s_depsilon)$ is optimal.
$endgroup$
The general answer will be very complicated. But here is a special case. You can see $C(a)$ as the intersection of two balls: $X=B_{|cdot|_2}(-a, r)$ and $Y=B_{|cdot|_infty}(0, epsilon)$. If $Ysubseteq X$ then we can forget about $X$. For every $1leq ileq d$ let $s_iin{-1,0,1}$ denote the sign of $a_i$. Then $x=(s_1epsilon,s_2epsilon,...,s_depsilon)$ is optimal.
answered Jan 20 at 17:23
SmileyCraftSmileyCraft
3,526518
3,526518
$begingroup$
Yes, things are trivial if $X subseteq Y$ or $Y subseteq X$. The problem only becomes remotely interesting when neither one of $X$ or $Y$ is contained in the other.
$endgroup$
– dohmatob
Jan 20 at 17:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, things are trivial if $X subseteq Y$ or $Y subseteq X$. The problem only becomes remotely interesting when neither one of $X$ or $Y$ is contained in the other.
$endgroup$
– dohmatob
Jan 20 at 17:38
$begingroup$
Yes, things are trivial if $X subseteq Y$ or $Y subseteq X$. The problem only becomes remotely interesting when neither one of $X$ or $Y$ is contained in the other.
$endgroup$
– dohmatob
Jan 20 at 17:38
$begingroup$
Yes, things are trivial if $X subseteq Y$ or $Y subseteq X$. The problem only becomes remotely interesting when neither one of $X$ or $Y$ is contained in the other.
$endgroup$
– dohmatob
Jan 20 at 17:38
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080805%2fmaximize-btx-subject-to-x-in-ca-x-in-mathbb-rp-ax-2-le-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
You realize that $C(a)$ can be empty?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Jan 20 at 17:03
$begingroup$
Indeed, good catch. Fixed (i.e you may assume $C(a)$ is non-empty).
$endgroup$
– dohmatob
Jan 20 at 17:07
1
$begingroup$
Can we assume that $|a|_2 leq r$?
$endgroup$
– littleO
Jan 20 at 17:17
$begingroup$
Hum, good point. Yes, you may.
$endgroup$
– dohmatob
Jan 20 at 17:22
$begingroup$
have you considered the dual problem yet?
$endgroup$
– LinAlg
Jan 22 at 18:54