Maximize $b^Tx$ subject to $x in C(a) := {x in mathbb R^p | |a+x|_2 le r,;|x|_infty le epsilon}$












1












$begingroup$


Let $r,epsilon > 0$ and $a, b in mathbb R^p$ with $|a|_2 le r$. Define the set $C(a) := {x in mathbb R^p | |x+a|_2 le r,;|x|_infty le epsilon}$. Note that $C(a)$ is non-empty (it contains the origin $x=0$, at least).



Question





  • (A) What is an analytic solution to the problem $sup_{x in C(a)} b^Tx$ ?


  • (B) Same question with $|a|_2 = r$ and $C(a) := {x in mathbb R^p | |x+a|_2 = r,;|x|_infty le epsilon}$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You realize that $C(a)$ can be empty?
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Jan 20 at 17:03










  • $begingroup$
    Indeed, good catch. Fixed (i.e you may assume $C(a)$ is non-empty).
    $endgroup$
    – dohmatob
    Jan 20 at 17:07








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can we assume that $|a|_2 leq r$?
    $endgroup$
    – littleO
    Jan 20 at 17:17










  • $begingroup$
    Hum, good point. Yes, you may.
    $endgroup$
    – dohmatob
    Jan 20 at 17:22










  • $begingroup$
    have you considered the dual problem yet?
    $endgroup$
    – LinAlg
    Jan 22 at 18:54
















1












$begingroup$


Let $r,epsilon > 0$ and $a, b in mathbb R^p$ with $|a|_2 le r$. Define the set $C(a) := {x in mathbb R^p | |x+a|_2 le r,;|x|_infty le epsilon}$. Note that $C(a)$ is non-empty (it contains the origin $x=0$, at least).



Question





  • (A) What is an analytic solution to the problem $sup_{x in C(a)} b^Tx$ ?


  • (B) Same question with $|a|_2 = r$ and $C(a) := {x in mathbb R^p | |x+a|_2 = r,;|x|_infty le epsilon}$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You realize that $C(a)$ can be empty?
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Jan 20 at 17:03










  • $begingroup$
    Indeed, good catch. Fixed (i.e you may assume $C(a)$ is non-empty).
    $endgroup$
    – dohmatob
    Jan 20 at 17:07








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can we assume that $|a|_2 leq r$?
    $endgroup$
    – littleO
    Jan 20 at 17:17










  • $begingroup$
    Hum, good point. Yes, you may.
    $endgroup$
    – dohmatob
    Jan 20 at 17:22










  • $begingroup$
    have you considered the dual problem yet?
    $endgroup$
    – LinAlg
    Jan 22 at 18:54














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Let $r,epsilon > 0$ and $a, b in mathbb R^p$ with $|a|_2 le r$. Define the set $C(a) := {x in mathbb R^p | |x+a|_2 le r,;|x|_infty le epsilon}$. Note that $C(a)$ is non-empty (it contains the origin $x=0$, at least).



Question





  • (A) What is an analytic solution to the problem $sup_{x in C(a)} b^Tx$ ?


  • (B) Same question with $|a|_2 = r$ and $C(a) := {x in mathbb R^p | |x+a|_2 = r,;|x|_infty le epsilon}$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $r,epsilon > 0$ and $a, b in mathbb R^p$ with $|a|_2 le r$. Define the set $C(a) := {x in mathbb R^p | |x+a|_2 le r,;|x|_infty le epsilon}$. Note that $C(a)$ is non-empty (it contains the origin $x=0$, at least).



Question





  • (A) What is an analytic solution to the problem $sup_{x in C(a)} b^Tx$ ?


  • (B) Same question with $|a|_2 = r$ and $C(a) := {x in mathbb R^p | |x+a|_2 = r,;|x|_infty le epsilon}$







convex-analysis convex-optimization convex-geometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 23 at 5:41







dohmatob

















asked Jan 20 at 16:46









dohmatobdohmatob

3,672629




3,672629








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You realize that $C(a)$ can be empty?
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Jan 20 at 17:03










  • $begingroup$
    Indeed, good catch. Fixed (i.e you may assume $C(a)$ is non-empty).
    $endgroup$
    – dohmatob
    Jan 20 at 17:07








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can we assume that $|a|_2 leq r$?
    $endgroup$
    – littleO
    Jan 20 at 17:17










  • $begingroup$
    Hum, good point. Yes, you may.
    $endgroup$
    – dohmatob
    Jan 20 at 17:22










  • $begingroup$
    have you considered the dual problem yet?
    $endgroup$
    – LinAlg
    Jan 22 at 18:54














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You realize that $C(a)$ can be empty?
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Jan 20 at 17:03










  • $begingroup$
    Indeed, good catch. Fixed (i.e you may assume $C(a)$ is non-empty).
    $endgroup$
    – dohmatob
    Jan 20 at 17:07








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can we assume that $|a|_2 leq r$?
    $endgroup$
    – littleO
    Jan 20 at 17:17










  • $begingroup$
    Hum, good point. Yes, you may.
    $endgroup$
    – dohmatob
    Jan 20 at 17:22










  • $begingroup$
    have you considered the dual problem yet?
    $endgroup$
    – LinAlg
    Jan 22 at 18:54








1




1




$begingroup$
You realize that $C(a)$ can be empty?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Jan 20 at 17:03




$begingroup$
You realize that $C(a)$ can be empty?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Jan 20 at 17:03












$begingroup$
Indeed, good catch. Fixed (i.e you may assume $C(a)$ is non-empty).
$endgroup$
– dohmatob
Jan 20 at 17:07






$begingroup$
Indeed, good catch. Fixed (i.e you may assume $C(a)$ is non-empty).
$endgroup$
– dohmatob
Jan 20 at 17:07






1




1




$begingroup$
Can we assume that $|a|_2 leq r$?
$endgroup$
– littleO
Jan 20 at 17:17




$begingroup$
Can we assume that $|a|_2 leq r$?
$endgroup$
– littleO
Jan 20 at 17:17












$begingroup$
Hum, good point. Yes, you may.
$endgroup$
– dohmatob
Jan 20 at 17:22




$begingroup$
Hum, good point. Yes, you may.
$endgroup$
– dohmatob
Jan 20 at 17:22












$begingroup$
have you considered the dual problem yet?
$endgroup$
– LinAlg
Jan 22 at 18:54




$begingroup$
have you considered the dual problem yet?
$endgroup$
– LinAlg
Jan 22 at 18:54










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

The general answer will be very complicated. But here is a special case. You can see $C(a)$ as the intersection of two balls: $X=B_{|cdot|_2}(-a, r)$ and $Y=B_{|cdot|_infty}(0, epsilon)$. If $Ysubseteq X$ then we can forget about $X$. For every $1leq ileq d$ let $s_iin{-1,0,1}$ denote the sign of $a_i$. Then $x=(s_1epsilon,s_2epsilon,...,s_depsilon)$ is optimal.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Yes, things are trivial if $X subseteq Y$ or $Y subseteq X$. The problem only becomes remotely interesting when neither one of $X$ or $Y$ is contained in the other.
    $endgroup$
    – dohmatob
    Jan 20 at 17:38











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080805%2fmaximize-btx-subject-to-x-in-ca-x-in-mathbb-rp-ax-2-le-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

The general answer will be very complicated. But here is a special case. You can see $C(a)$ as the intersection of two balls: $X=B_{|cdot|_2}(-a, r)$ and $Y=B_{|cdot|_infty}(0, epsilon)$. If $Ysubseteq X$ then we can forget about $X$. For every $1leq ileq d$ let $s_iin{-1,0,1}$ denote the sign of $a_i$. Then $x=(s_1epsilon,s_2epsilon,...,s_depsilon)$ is optimal.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Yes, things are trivial if $X subseteq Y$ or $Y subseteq X$. The problem only becomes remotely interesting when neither one of $X$ or $Y$ is contained in the other.
    $endgroup$
    – dohmatob
    Jan 20 at 17:38
















1












$begingroup$

The general answer will be very complicated. But here is a special case. You can see $C(a)$ as the intersection of two balls: $X=B_{|cdot|_2}(-a, r)$ and $Y=B_{|cdot|_infty}(0, epsilon)$. If $Ysubseteq X$ then we can forget about $X$. For every $1leq ileq d$ let $s_iin{-1,0,1}$ denote the sign of $a_i$. Then $x=(s_1epsilon,s_2epsilon,...,s_depsilon)$ is optimal.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Yes, things are trivial if $X subseteq Y$ or $Y subseteq X$. The problem only becomes remotely interesting when neither one of $X$ or $Y$ is contained in the other.
    $endgroup$
    – dohmatob
    Jan 20 at 17:38














1












1








1





$begingroup$

The general answer will be very complicated. But here is a special case. You can see $C(a)$ as the intersection of two balls: $X=B_{|cdot|_2}(-a, r)$ and $Y=B_{|cdot|_infty}(0, epsilon)$. If $Ysubseteq X$ then we can forget about $X$. For every $1leq ileq d$ let $s_iin{-1,0,1}$ denote the sign of $a_i$. Then $x=(s_1epsilon,s_2epsilon,...,s_depsilon)$ is optimal.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The general answer will be very complicated. But here is a special case. You can see $C(a)$ as the intersection of two balls: $X=B_{|cdot|_2}(-a, r)$ and $Y=B_{|cdot|_infty}(0, epsilon)$. If $Ysubseteq X$ then we can forget about $X$. For every $1leq ileq d$ let $s_iin{-1,0,1}$ denote the sign of $a_i$. Then $x=(s_1epsilon,s_2epsilon,...,s_depsilon)$ is optimal.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 20 at 17:23









SmileyCraftSmileyCraft

3,526518




3,526518












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, things are trivial if $X subseteq Y$ or $Y subseteq X$. The problem only becomes remotely interesting when neither one of $X$ or $Y$ is contained in the other.
    $endgroup$
    – dohmatob
    Jan 20 at 17:38


















  • $begingroup$
    Yes, things are trivial if $X subseteq Y$ or $Y subseteq X$. The problem only becomes remotely interesting when neither one of $X$ or $Y$ is contained in the other.
    $endgroup$
    – dohmatob
    Jan 20 at 17:38
















$begingroup$
Yes, things are trivial if $X subseteq Y$ or $Y subseteq X$. The problem only becomes remotely interesting when neither one of $X$ or $Y$ is contained in the other.
$endgroup$
– dohmatob
Jan 20 at 17:38




$begingroup$
Yes, things are trivial if $X subseteq Y$ or $Y subseteq X$. The problem only becomes remotely interesting when neither one of $X$ or $Y$ is contained in the other.
$endgroup$
– dohmatob
Jan 20 at 17:38


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080805%2fmaximize-btx-subject-to-x-in-ca-x-in-mathbb-rp-ax-2-le-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith