prove that [p!/(p-4)!] + 1 is a perfect square for all natural p.












-3












$begingroup$


one can observe that $[p!/(p-4)!] + 1$ is basically the product of four consecutive integers plus one.Since this is
$$
begin{eqnarray} p(p+1)(p+2)(p+3)+1 & = &(p^2+3p)(p^2+3p+2)+1 \
& = & [(p^2+3p+1)−1][(p^2+3p+1)+1]+1 \
& = & (p^2+3p+1)^2 end{eqnarray} $$

which is a perfect square for all natural $p$ but my teacher says that there is a more elegant method of doing it, help in any form would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Did you say n when you meant to say p in your title?
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    Jan 28 at 14:19










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE! Did you mean for all natural $p$?
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Jan 28 at 14:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are you sure that it is $p(p+1)(p+2)(p+3)+1$ and not $p(p-1)(p-2)(p-3)+1$?
    $endgroup$
    – user 170039
    Jan 28 at 14:20






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You are using $p$ and $n$ in confusing ways, Your target seems to be the product of four consecutive integers plus one. But these integers are named inconsistently.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Jan 28 at 14:24






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Your computation appears to be working with $frac {(p+4)!}{p!}+1$ instead of what you wrote. Doesn't change much, but it makes your post unhelpfully confusing.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 28 at 14:24


















-3












$begingroup$


one can observe that $[p!/(p-4)!] + 1$ is basically the product of four consecutive integers plus one.Since this is
$$
begin{eqnarray} p(p+1)(p+2)(p+3)+1 & = &(p^2+3p)(p^2+3p+2)+1 \
& = & [(p^2+3p+1)−1][(p^2+3p+1)+1]+1 \
& = & (p^2+3p+1)^2 end{eqnarray} $$

which is a perfect square for all natural $p$ but my teacher says that there is a more elegant method of doing it, help in any form would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Did you say n when you meant to say p in your title?
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    Jan 28 at 14:19










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE! Did you mean for all natural $p$?
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Jan 28 at 14:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are you sure that it is $p(p+1)(p+2)(p+3)+1$ and not $p(p-1)(p-2)(p-3)+1$?
    $endgroup$
    – user 170039
    Jan 28 at 14:20






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You are using $p$ and $n$ in confusing ways, Your target seems to be the product of four consecutive integers plus one. But these integers are named inconsistently.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Jan 28 at 14:24






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Your computation appears to be working with $frac {(p+4)!}{p!}+1$ instead of what you wrote. Doesn't change much, but it makes your post unhelpfully confusing.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 28 at 14:24
















-3












-3








-3





$begingroup$


one can observe that $[p!/(p-4)!] + 1$ is basically the product of four consecutive integers plus one.Since this is
$$
begin{eqnarray} p(p+1)(p+2)(p+3)+1 & = &(p^2+3p)(p^2+3p+2)+1 \
& = & [(p^2+3p+1)−1][(p^2+3p+1)+1]+1 \
& = & (p^2+3p+1)^2 end{eqnarray} $$

which is a perfect square for all natural $p$ but my teacher says that there is a more elegant method of doing it, help in any form would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




one can observe that $[p!/(p-4)!] + 1$ is basically the product of four consecutive integers plus one.Since this is
$$
begin{eqnarray} p(p+1)(p+2)(p+3)+1 & = &(p^2+3p)(p^2+3p+2)+1 \
& = & [(p^2+3p+1)−1][(p^2+3p+1)+1]+1 \
& = & (p^2+3p+1)^2 end{eqnarray} $$

which is a perfect square for all natural $p$ but my teacher says that there is a more elegant method of doing it, help in any form would be appreciated.







factorial factoring square-numbers






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 28 at 14:25







Mary Tom

















asked Jan 28 at 14:12









Mary TomMary Tom

326




326












  • $begingroup$
    Did you say n when you meant to say p in your title?
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    Jan 28 at 14:19










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE! Did you mean for all natural $p$?
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Jan 28 at 14:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are you sure that it is $p(p+1)(p+2)(p+3)+1$ and not $p(p-1)(p-2)(p-3)+1$?
    $endgroup$
    – user 170039
    Jan 28 at 14:20






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You are using $p$ and $n$ in confusing ways, Your target seems to be the product of four consecutive integers plus one. But these integers are named inconsistently.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Jan 28 at 14:24






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Your computation appears to be working with $frac {(p+4)!}{p!}+1$ instead of what you wrote. Doesn't change much, but it makes your post unhelpfully confusing.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 28 at 14:24




















  • $begingroup$
    Did you say n when you meant to say p in your title?
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    Jan 28 at 14:19










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE! Did you mean for all natural $p$?
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Jan 28 at 14:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are you sure that it is $p(p+1)(p+2)(p+3)+1$ and not $p(p-1)(p-2)(p-3)+1$?
    $endgroup$
    – user 170039
    Jan 28 at 14:20






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You are using $p$ and $n$ in confusing ways, Your target seems to be the product of four consecutive integers plus one. But these integers are named inconsistently.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Jan 28 at 14:24






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Your computation appears to be working with $frac {(p+4)!}{p!}+1$ instead of what you wrote. Doesn't change much, but it makes your post unhelpfully confusing.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 28 at 14:24


















$begingroup$
Did you say n when you meant to say p in your title?
$endgroup$
– Mark
Jan 28 at 14:19




$begingroup$
Did you say n when you meant to say p in your title?
$endgroup$
– Mark
Jan 28 at 14:19












$begingroup$
Welcome to MSE! Did you mean for all natural $p$?
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Jan 28 at 14:19




$begingroup$
Welcome to MSE! Did you mean for all natural $p$?
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Jan 28 at 14:19




1




1




$begingroup$
Are you sure that it is $p(p+1)(p+2)(p+3)+1$ and not $p(p-1)(p-2)(p-3)+1$?
$endgroup$
– user 170039
Jan 28 at 14:20




$begingroup$
Are you sure that it is $p(p+1)(p+2)(p+3)+1$ and not $p(p-1)(p-2)(p-3)+1$?
$endgroup$
– user 170039
Jan 28 at 14:20




1




1




$begingroup$
You are using $p$ and $n$ in confusing ways, Your target seems to be the product of four consecutive integers plus one. But these integers are named inconsistently.
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
Jan 28 at 14:24




$begingroup$
You are using $p$ and $n$ in confusing ways, Your target seems to be the product of four consecutive integers plus one. But these integers are named inconsistently.
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
Jan 28 at 14:24




3




3




$begingroup$
Your computation appears to be working with $frac {(p+4)!}{p!}+1$ instead of what you wrote. Doesn't change much, but it makes your post unhelpfully confusing.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 28 at 14:24






$begingroup$
Your computation appears to be working with $frac {(p+4)!}{p!}+1$ instead of what you wrote. Doesn't change much, but it makes your post unhelpfully confusing.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 28 at 14:24












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Only thing I can see:



Note that $p(p-3)=p^2-3p$ and $(p-1)(p-2)=p^2-3p+2$. It follows that we can write your expression as
$$(p^2-3p)^2+2(p^2-3p)+1=m^2+2m+1=(m+1)^2$$
Where we have introduced $m=p^2-3p$ ,






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    some of my classmates have done it like that.
    $endgroup$
    – Mary Tom
    Jan 28 at 14:24












  • $begingroup$
    This is pretty much the same as has been done in the question with a change of sign. Introducing $m$ makes it a little clearer.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Jan 28 at 14:26










  • $begingroup$
    is there any other way?
    $endgroup$
    – Mary Tom
    Jan 28 at 14:27










  • $begingroup$
    @MarkBennet Maybe so. The point I was trying to make (maybe unsuccessfully, and maybe it wasn't all that good a point to begin with) was that it all hinges on the fact that $p^2-3p$ appears twice in the product. If it's unhelpful, I'll gladly delete.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 28 at 14:28










  • $begingroup$
    @lulu no, helpful, definitely.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Jan 28 at 14:32



















1












$begingroup$

Slightly different approach... where $p=q+3$



$$S_q=frac{(p)!}{(p-4)!}+1=frac{(q+3)!}{(q-1)!} + 1=q(q+1)(q+2)(q+3)+1$$



Let $q=a-frac{3}{2}$



Then



$$S_q=left(a-frac{3}{2}right)left(a-frac{1}{2}right)left(a+frac{1}{2}right)left(a+frac{3}{2}right)+1$$



$$S_q=left(a^2-frac{3^2}{2^2}right)left(a^2-frac{1}{2^2}right)+1$$



$$S_q=a^4-frac{10}{4}a^2+frac{3^2}{4^2}+1$$



$$S_q=a^4-frac{10}{4}a^2+frac{5^2}{4^2}$$



$$S_q=left(a^2-frac{5}{4} right)^2$$



$$S_q=left((q+3/2)^2-frac{5}{4} right)^2$$



$$S_p=left((p-3/2)^2-frac{5}{4} right)^2$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I think this is what my teacher expected.
    $endgroup$
    – Mary Tom
    Jan 28 at 15:38










  • $begingroup$
    @MaryTom It then takes just a little bit of thought to know that if an integer is the square of a rational number, it is the square of an integer. Or to expand the expression in the bracket and see that it is an integer. It is not quite immediately obvious that the expression in the final bracket is an integer.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Jan 28 at 16:51












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3090905%2fprove-that-p-p-4-1-is-a-perfect-square-for-all-natural-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

Only thing I can see:



Note that $p(p-3)=p^2-3p$ and $(p-1)(p-2)=p^2-3p+2$. It follows that we can write your expression as
$$(p^2-3p)^2+2(p^2-3p)+1=m^2+2m+1=(m+1)^2$$
Where we have introduced $m=p^2-3p$ ,






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    some of my classmates have done it like that.
    $endgroup$
    – Mary Tom
    Jan 28 at 14:24












  • $begingroup$
    This is pretty much the same as has been done in the question with a change of sign. Introducing $m$ makes it a little clearer.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Jan 28 at 14:26










  • $begingroup$
    is there any other way?
    $endgroup$
    – Mary Tom
    Jan 28 at 14:27










  • $begingroup$
    @MarkBennet Maybe so. The point I was trying to make (maybe unsuccessfully, and maybe it wasn't all that good a point to begin with) was that it all hinges on the fact that $p^2-3p$ appears twice in the product. If it's unhelpful, I'll gladly delete.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 28 at 14:28










  • $begingroup$
    @lulu no, helpful, definitely.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Jan 28 at 14:32
















3












$begingroup$

Only thing I can see:



Note that $p(p-3)=p^2-3p$ and $(p-1)(p-2)=p^2-3p+2$. It follows that we can write your expression as
$$(p^2-3p)^2+2(p^2-3p)+1=m^2+2m+1=(m+1)^2$$
Where we have introduced $m=p^2-3p$ ,






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    some of my classmates have done it like that.
    $endgroup$
    – Mary Tom
    Jan 28 at 14:24












  • $begingroup$
    This is pretty much the same as has been done in the question with a change of sign. Introducing $m$ makes it a little clearer.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Jan 28 at 14:26










  • $begingroup$
    is there any other way?
    $endgroup$
    – Mary Tom
    Jan 28 at 14:27










  • $begingroup$
    @MarkBennet Maybe so. The point I was trying to make (maybe unsuccessfully, and maybe it wasn't all that good a point to begin with) was that it all hinges on the fact that $p^2-3p$ appears twice in the product. If it's unhelpful, I'll gladly delete.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 28 at 14:28










  • $begingroup$
    @lulu no, helpful, definitely.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Jan 28 at 14:32














3












3








3





$begingroup$

Only thing I can see:



Note that $p(p-3)=p^2-3p$ and $(p-1)(p-2)=p^2-3p+2$. It follows that we can write your expression as
$$(p^2-3p)^2+2(p^2-3p)+1=m^2+2m+1=(m+1)^2$$
Where we have introduced $m=p^2-3p$ ,






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Only thing I can see:



Note that $p(p-3)=p^2-3p$ and $(p-1)(p-2)=p^2-3p+2$. It follows that we can write your expression as
$$(p^2-3p)^2+2(p^2-3p)+1=m^2+2m+1=(m+1)^2$$
Where we have introduced $m=p^2-3p$ ,







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 28 at 14:23









lulululu

43.2k25080




43.2k25080












  • $begingroup$
    some of my classmates have done it like that.
    $endgroup$
    – Mary Tom
    Jan 28 at 14:24












  • $begingroup$
    This is pretty much the same as has been done in the question with a change of sign. Introducing $m$ makes it a little clearer.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Jan 28 at 14:26










  • $begingroup$
    is there any other way?
    $endgroup$
    – Mary Tom
    Jan 28 at 14:27










  • $begingroup$
    @MarkBennet Maybe so. The point I was trying to make (maybe unsuccessfully, and maybe it wasn't all that good a point to begin with) was that it all hinges on the fact that $p^2-3p$ appears twice in the product. If it's unhelpful, I'll gladly delete.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 28 at 14:28










  • $begingroup$
    @lulu no, helpful, definitely.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Jan 28 at 14:32


















  • $begingroup$
    some of my classmates have done it like that.
    $endgroup$
    – Mary Tom
    Jan 28 at 14:24












  • $begingroup$
    This is pretty much the same as has been done in the question with a change of sign. Introducing $m$ makes it a little clearer.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Jan 28 at 14:26










  • $begingroup$
    is there any other way?
    $endgroup$
    – Mary Tom
    Jan 28 at 14:27










  • $begingroup$
    @MarkBennet Maybe so. The point I was trying to make (maybe unsuccessfully, and maybe it wasn't all that good a point to begin with) was that it all hinges on the fact that $p^2-3p$ appears twice in the product. If it's unhelpful, I'll gladly delete.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 28 at 14:28










  • $begingroup$
    @lulu no, helpful, definitely.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Jan 28 at 14:32
















$begingroup$
some of my classmates have done it like that.
$endgroup$
– Mary Tom
Jan 28 at 14:24






$begingroup$
some of my classmates have done it like that.
$endgroup$
– Mary Tom
Jan 28 at 14:24














$begingroup$
This is pretty much the same as has been done in the question with a change of sign. Introducing $m$ makes it a little clearer.
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
Jan 28 at 14:26




$begingroup$
This is pretty much the same as has been done in the question with a change of sign. Introducing $m$ makes it a little clearer.
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
Jan 28 at 14:26












$begingroup$
is there any other way?
$endgroup$
– Mary Tom
Jan 28 at 14:27




$begingroup$
is there any other way?
$endgroup$
– Mary Tom
Jan 28 at 14:27












$begingroup$
@MarkBennet Maybe so. The point I was trying to make (maybe unsuccessfully, and maybe it wasn't all that good a point to begin with) was that it all hinges on the fact that $p^2-3p$ appears twice in the product. If it's unhelpful, I'll gladly delete.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 28 at 14:28




$begingroup$
@MarkBennet Maybe so. The point I was trying to make (maybe unsuccessfully, and maybe it wasn't all that good a point to begin with) was that it all hinges on the fact that $p^2-3p$ appears twice in the product. If it's unhelpful, I'll gladly delete.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 28 at 14:28












$begingroup$
@lulu no, helpful, definitely.
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
Jan 28 at 14:32




$begingroup$
@lulu no, helpful, definitely.
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
Jan 28 at 14:32











1












$begingroup$

Slightly different approach... where $p=q+3$



$$S_q=frac{(p)!}{(p-4)!}+1=frac{(q+3)!}{(q-1)!} + 1=q(q+1)(q+2)(q+3)+1$$



Let $q=a-frac{3}{2}$



Then



$$S_q=left(a-frac{3}{2}right)left(a-frac{1}{2}right)left(a+frac{1}{2}right)left(a+frac{3}{2}right)+1$$



$$S_q=left(a^2-frac{3^2}{2^2}right)left(a^2-frac{1}{2^2}right)+1$$



$$S_q=a^4-frac{10}{4}a^2+frac{3^2}{4^2}+1$$



$$S_q=a^4-frac{10}{4}a^2+frac{5^2}{4^2}$$



$$S_q=left(a^2-frac{5}{4} right)^2$$



$$S_q=left((q+3/2)^2-frac{5}{4} right)^2$$



$$S_p=left((p-3/2)^2-frac{5}{4} right)^2$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I think this is what my teacher expected.
    $endgroup$
    – Mary Tom
    Jan 28 at 15:38










  • $begingroup$
    @MaryTom It then takes just a little bit of thought to know that if an integer is the square of a rational number, it is the square of an integer. Or to expand the expression in the bracket and see that it is an integer. It is not quite immediately obvious that the expression in the final bracket is an integer.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Jan 28 at 16:51
















1












$begingroup$

Slightly different approach... where $p=q+3$



$$S_q=frac{(p)!}{(p-4)!}+1=frac{(q+3)!}{(q-1)!} + 1=q(q+1)(q+2)(q+3)+1$$



Let $q=a-frac{3}{2}$



Then



$$S_q=left(a-frac{3}{2}right)left(a-frac{1}{2}right)left(a+frac{1}{2}right)left(a+frac{3}{2}right)+1$$



$$S_q=left(a^2-frac{3^2}{2^2}right)left(a^2-frac{1}{2^2}right)+1$$



$$S_q=a^4-frac{10}{4}a^2+frac{3^2}{4^2}+1$$



$$S_q=a^4-frac{10}{4}a^2+frac{5^2}{4^2}$$



$$S_q=left(a^2-frac{5}{4} right)^2$$



$$S_q=left((q+3/2)^2-frac{5}{4} right)^2$$



$$S_p=left((p-3/2)^2-frac{5}{4} right)^2$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I think this is what my teacher expected.
    $endgroup$
    – Mary Tom
    Jan 28 at 15:38










  • $begingroup$
    @MaryTom It then takes just a little bit of thought to know that if an integer is the square of a rational number, it is the square of an integer. Or to expand the expression in the bracket and see that it is an integer. It is not quite immediately obvious that the expression in the final bracket is an integer.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Jan 28 at 16:51














1












1








1





$begingroup$

Slightly different approach... where $p=q+3$



$$S_q=frac{(p)!}{(p-4)!}+1=frac{(q+3)!}{(q-1)!} + 1=q(q+1)(q+2)(q+3)+1$$



Let $q=a-frac{3}{2}$



Then



$$S_q=left(a-frac{3}{2}right)left(a-frac{1}{2}right)left(a+frac{1}{2}right)left(a+frac{3}{2}right)+1$$



$$S_q=left(a^2-frac{3^2}{2^2}right)left(a^2-frac{1}{2^2}right)+1$$



$$S_q=a^4-frac{10}{4}a^2+frac{3^2}{4^2}+1$$



$$S_q=a^4-frac{10}{4}a^2+frac{5^2}{4^2}$$



$$S_q=left(a^2-frac{5}{4} right)^2$$



$$S_q=left((q+3/2)^2-frac{5}{4} right)^2$$



$$S_p=left((p-3/2)^2-frac{5}{4} right)^2$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Slightly different approach... where $p=q+3$



$$S_q=frac{(p)!}{(p-4)!}+1=frac{(q+3)!}{(q-1)!} + 1=q(q+1)(q+2)(q+3)+1$$



Let $q=a-frac{3}{2}$



Then



$$S_q=left(a-frac{3}{2}right)left(a-frac{1}{2}right)left(a+frac{1}{2}right)left(a+frac{3}{2}right)+1$$



$$S_q=left(a^2-frac{3^2}{2^2}right)left(a^2-frac{1}{2^2}right)+1$$



$$S_q=a^4-frac{10}{4}a^2+frac{3^2}{4^2}+1$$



$$S_q=a^4-frac{10}{4}a^2+frac{5^2}{4^2}$$



$$S_q=left(a^2-frac{5}{4} right)^2$$



$$S_q=left((q+3/2)^2-frac{5}{4} right)^2$$



$$S_p=left((p-3/2)^2-frac{5}{4} right)^2$$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jan 28 at 15:21

























answered Jan 28 at 15:07









James ArathoonJames Arathoon

1,608423




1,608423












  • $begingroup$
    I think this is what my teacher expected.
    $endgroup$
    – Mary Tom
    Jan 28 at 15:38










  • $begingroup$
    @MaryTom It then takes just a little bit of thought to know that if an integer is the square of a rational number, it is the square of an integer. Or to expand the expression in the bracket and see that it is an integer. It is not quite immediately obvious that the expression in the final bracket is an integer.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Jan 28 at 16:51


















  • $begingroup$
    I think this is what my teacher expected.
    $endgroup$
    – Mary Tom
    Jan 28 at 15:38










  • $begingroup$
    @MaryTom It then takes just a little bit of thought to know that if an integer is the square of a rational number, it is the square of an integer. Or to expand the expression in the bracket and see that it is an integer. It is not quite immediately obvious that the expression in the final bracket is an integer.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Jan 28 at 16:51
















$begingroup$
I think this is what my teacher expected.
$endgroup$
– Mary Tom
Jan 28 at 15:38




$begingroup$
I think this is what my teacher expected.
$endgroup$
– Mary Tom
Jan 28 at 15:38












$begingroup$
@MaryTom It then takes just a little bit of thought to know that if an integer is the square of a rational number, it is the square of an integer. Or to expand the expression in the bracket and see that it is an integer. It is not quite immediately obvious that the expression in the final bracket is an integer.
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
Jan 28 at 16:51




$begingroup$
@MaryTom It then takes just a little bit of thought to know that if an integer is the square of a rational number, it is the square of an integer. Or to expand the expression in the bracket and see that it is an integer. It is not quite immediately obvious that the expression in the final bracket is an integer.
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
Jan 28 at 16:51


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3090905%2fprove-that-p-p-4-1-is-a-perfect-square-for-all-natural-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$