Surface integral of a vector valued function












0












$begingroup$


The value of the surface integral $$ iint_S(xhat{i}+yhat{j})cdot hat{n}~dA $$ evaluated over the surface of a cube having sides of length $a$ is ($hat{n}$ is unit normal vector)
begin{align*}
iint_S(xhat{i}+yhat{j})cdot hat{n}~dA &= iiint_V 2 ~dV text{(divergence theorem)}\
&=2a^3
end{align*}

but the answer is $0$, I don't know where I am doing the mistake.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Why do you think the answer should be $0$?
    $endgroup$
    – Andrei
    Jan 20 at 16:57










  • $begingroup$
    No I am not thinking, but the answer provided is zero and in the answer book it is written that $iint_S(xhat{i}+yhat{j})hat{n}~dA=iint_S(xhat{i}+yhat{j})(hat{i}~dx+hat{j}~dy)$ and proceeded.
    $endgroup$
    – XYZABC
    Jan 20 at 16:59
















0












$begingroup$


The value of the surface integral $$ iint_S(xhat{i}+yhat{j})cdot hat{n}~dA $$ evaluated over the surface of a cube having sides of length $a$ is ($hat{n}$ is unit normal vector)
begin{align*}
iint_S(xhat{i}+yhat{j})cdot hat{n}~dA &= iiint_V 2 ~dV text{(divergence theorem)}\
&=2a^3
end{align*}

but the answer is $0$, I don't know where I am doing the mistake.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Why do you think the answer should be $0$?
    $endgroup$
    – Andrei
    Jan 20 at 16:57










  • $begingroup$
    No I am not thinking, but the answer provided is zero and in the answer book it is written that $iint_S(xhat{i}+yhat{j})hat{n}~dA=iint_S(xhat{i}+yhat{j})(hat{i}~dx+hat{j}~dy)$ and proceeded.
    $endgroup$
    – XYZABC
    Jan 20 at 16:59














0












0








0





$begingroup$


The value of the surface integral $$ iint_S(xhat{i}+yhat{j})cdot hat{n}~dA $$ evaluated over the surface of a cube having sides of length $a$ is ($hat{n}$ is unit normal vector)
begin{align*}
iint_S(xhat{i}+yhat{j})cdot hat{n}~dA &= iiint_V 2 ~dV text{(divergence theorem)}\
&=2a^3
end{align*}

but the answer is $0$, I don't know where I am doing the mistake.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




The value of the surface integral $$ iint_S(xhat{i}+yhat{j})cdot hat{n}~dA $$ evaluated over the surface of a cube having sides of length $a$ is ($hat{n}$ is unit normal vector)
begin{align*}
iint_S(xhat{i}+yhat{j})cdot hat{n}~dA &= iiint_V 2 ~dV text{(divergence theorem)}\
&=2a^3
end{align*}

but the answer is $0$, I don't know where I am doing the mistake.







real-analysis surface-integrals






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 20 at 16:48









XYZABCXYZABC

344110




344110












  • $begingroup$
    Why do you think the answer should be $0$?
    $endgroup$
    – Andrei
    Jan 20 at 16:57










  • $begingroup$
    No I am not thinking, but the answer provided is zero and in the answer book it is written that $iint_S(xhat{i}+yhat{j})hat{n}~dA=iint_S(xhat{i}+yhat{j})(hat{i}~dx+hat{j}~dy)$ and proceeded.
    $endgroup$
    – XYZABC
    Jan 20 at 16:59


















  • $begingroup$
    Why do you think the answer should be $0$?
    $endgroup$
    – Andrei
    Jan 20 at 16:57










  • $begingroup$
    No I am not thinking, but the answer provided is zero and in the answer book it is written that $iint_S(xhat{i}+yhat{j})hat{n}~dA=iint_S(xhat{i}+yhat{j})(hat{i}~dx+hat{j}~dy)$ and proceeded.
    $endgroup$
    – XYZABC
    Jan 20 at 16:59
















$begingroup$
Why do you think the answer should be $0$?
$endgroup$
– Andrei
Jan 20 at 16:57




$begingroup$
Why do you think the answer should be $0$?
$endgroup$
– Andrei
Jan 20 at 16:57












$begingroup$
No I am not thinking, but the answer provided is zero and in the answer book it is written that $iint_S(xhat{i}+yhat{j})hat{n}~dA=iint_S(xhat{i}+yhat{j})(hat{i}~dx+hat{j}~dy)$ and proceeded.
$endgroup$
– XYZABC
Jan 20 at 16:59




$begingroup$
No I am not thinking, but the answer provided is zero and in the answer book it is written that $iint_S(xhat{i}+yhat{j})hat{n}~dA=iint_S(xhat{i}+yhat{j})(hat{i}~dx+hat{j}~dy)$ and proceeded.
$endgroup$
– XYZABC
Jan 20 at 16:59










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

The answer in the book is wrong. Without loss of generality, just to simplify calculations, let's choose one of the vertices at the origin, with faces perpendicular to the axes at $0$ and $a$. The faces perpendicular to $z$ axis have the normal either $hat j$ or $-hat j$, so they will not contribute to the surface integral. Let's choose the faces perpendicular to the $x$ axis. At $x=0$, the normal is $-hat i$, so the integrand is $-x=0$, therefore no contribution either. Now at $x=a$, the normal is $hat n=hat i$, and the integrand is $x=a$. Integral over the area of the side will yield $acdot a^2=a^3$. You can repeat the same for $y$ axis, with contributions $0$ and $a^3$, so the final integral will be the sum of contributions at $x=0$, $x=a$, $y=0$, $y=a$, $z=0$, $z=a$: $$ iint_S(xhat{i}+yhat{j})cdot hat{n}~dA =0+a^3+0+a^3+0+0=2a^3$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080809%2fsurface-integral-of-a-vector-valued-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    The answer in the book is wrong. Without loss of generality, just to simplify calculations, let's choose one of the vertices at the origin, with faces perpendicular to the axes at $0$ and $a$. The faces perpendicular to $z$ axis have the normal either $hat j$ or $-hat j$, so they will not contribute to the surface integral. Let's choose the faces perpendicular to the $x$ axis. At $x=0$, the normal is $-hat i$, so the integrand is $-x=0$, therefore no contribution either. Now at $x=a$, the normal is $hat n=hat i$, and the integrand is $x=a$. Integral over the area of the side will yield $acdot a^2=a^3$. You can repeat the same for $y$ axis, with contributions $0$ and $a^3$, so the final integral will be the sum of contributions at $x=0$, $x=a$, $y=0$, $y=a$, $z=0$, $z=a$: $$ iint_S(xhat{i}+yhat{j})cdot hat{n}~dA =0+a^3+0+a^3+0+0=2a^3$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      The answer in the book is wrong. Without loss of generality, just to simplify calculations, let's choose one of the vertices at the origin, with faces perpendicular to the axes at $0$ and $a$. The faces perpendicular to $z$ axis have the normal either $hat j$ or $-hat j$, so they will not contribute to the surface integral. Let's choose the faces perpendicular to the $x$ axis. At $x=0$, the normal is $-hat i$, so the integrand is $-x=0$, therefore no contribution either. Now at $x=a$, the normal is $hat n=hat i$, and the integrand is $x=a$. Integral over the area of the side will yield $acdot a^2=a^3$. You can repeat the same for $y$ axis, with contributions $0$ and $a^3$, so the final integral will be the sum of contributions at $x=0$, $x=a$, $y=0$, $y=a$, $z=0$, $z=a$: $$ iint_S(xhat{i}+yhat{j})cdot hat{n}~dA =0+a^3+0+a^3+0+0=2a^3$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        The answer in the book is wrong. Without loss of generality, just to simplify calculations, let's choose one of the vertices at the origin, with faces perpendicular to the axes at $0$ and $a$. The faces perpendicular to $z$ axis have the normal either $hat j$ or $-hat j$, so they will not contribute to the surface integral. Let's choose the faces perpendicular to the $x$ axis. At $x=0$, the normal is $-hat i$, so the integrand is $-x=0$, therefore no contribution either. Now at $x=a$, the normal is $hat n=hat i$, and the integrand is $x=a$. Integral over the area of the side will yield $acdot a^2=a^3$. You can repeat the same for $y$ axis, with contributions $0$ and $a^3$, so the final integral will be the sum of contributions at $x=0$, $x=a$, $y=0$, $y=a$, $z=0$, $z=a$: $$ iint_S(xhat{i}+yhat{j})cdot hat{n}~dA =0+a^3+0+a^3+0+0=2a^3$$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The answer in the book is wrong. Without loss of generality, just to simplify calculations, let's choose one of the vertices at the origin, with faces perpendicular to the axes at $0$ and $a$. The faces perpendicular to $z$ axis have the normal either $hat j$ or $-hat j$, so they will not contribute to the surface integral. Let's choose the faces perpendicular to the $x$ axis. At $x=0$, the normal is $-hat i$, so the integrand is $-x=0$, therefore no contribution either. Now at $x=a$, the normal is $hat n=hat i$, and the integrand is $x=a$. Integral over the area of the side will yield $acdot a^2=a^3$. You can repeat the same for $y$ axis, with contributions $0$ and $a^3$, so the final integral will be the sum of contributions at $x=0$, $x=a$, $y=0$, $y=a$, $z=0$, $z=a$: $$ iint_S(xhat{i}+yhat{j})cdot hat{n}~dA =0+a^3+0+a^3+0+0=2a^3$$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 20 at 17:13









        AndreiAndrei

        12.6k21128




        12.6k21128






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080809%2fsurface-integral-of-a-vector-valued-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith