What do underscores mean in anonymous functions?
I have the method below which I am trying to understand
def method1[A](
messageCallback: String => A,
failureCallback: Throwable => Unit = (_: Throwable) => Unit
) = {}
What does the (_: Throwable) => Unit)
mean?
I understand that it's the default function literal but I don't understand the underscore.
scala lambda functional-programming anonymous-function
add a comment |
I have the method below which I am trying to understand
def method1[A](
messageCallback: String => A,
failureCallback: Throwable => Unit = (_: Throwable) => Unit
) = {}
What does the (_: Throwable) => Unit)
mean?
I understand that it's the default function literal but I don't understand the underscore.
scala lambda functional-programming anonymous-function
2
_
means anything. In this case in particular the idea is, given any parameter just ignore it. And the body of the function just returns Unit - in other words the default is an empty callback that does nothing rewarding of the value passed to the callback function.
– Luis Miguel Mejía Suárez
Jan 2 at 17:42
add a comment |
I have the method below which I am trying to understand
def method1[A](
messageCallback: String => A,
failureCallback: Throwable => Unit = (_: Throwable) => Unit
) = {}
What does the (_: Throwable) => Unit)
mean?
I understand that it's the default function literal but I don't understand the underscore.
scala lambda functional-programming anonymous-function
I have the method below which I am trying to understand
def method1[A](
messageCallback: String => A,
failureCallback: Throwable => Unit = (_: Throwable) => Unit
) = {}
What does the (_: Throwable) => Unit)
mean?
I understand that it's the default function literal but I don't understand the underscore.
scala lambda functional-programming anonymous-function
scala lambda functional-programming anonymous-function
edited Jan 3 at 1:34
Andrey Tyukin
30.2k42351
30.2k42351
asked Jan 2 at 17:07
CrtCrt
2,39822636
2,39822636
2
_
means anything. In this case in particular the idea is, given any parameter just ignore it. And the body of the function just returns Unit - in other words the default is an empty callback that does nothing rewarding of the value passed to the callback function.
– Luis Miguel Mejía Suárez
Jan 2 at 17:42
add a comment |
2
_
means anything. In this case in particular the idea is, given any parameter just ignore it. And the body of the function just returns Unit - in other words the default is an empty callback that does nothing rewarding of the value passed to the callback function.
– Luis Miguel Mejía Suárez
Jan 2 at 17:42
2
2
_
means anything. In this case in particular the idea is, given any parameter just ignore it. And the body of the function just returns Unit - in other words the default is an empty callback that does nothing rewarding of the value passed to the callback function.– Luis Miguel Mejía Suárez
Jan 2 at 17:42
_
means anything. In this case in particular the idea is, given any parameter just ignore it. And the body of the function just returns Unit - in other words the default is an empty callback that does nothing rewarding of the value passed to the callback function.– Luis Miguel Mejía Suárez
Jan 2 at 17:42
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
It's a default implementation of a function. It's so simple that its signature looks almost the same as implementation itself; its signature is Throwable => Unit
, and it is implemented with the trivial body (_: Throwable) => Unit
. It means "take some Throwable at input and just don't return anything".
It's the same as implementing it as (a: Throwable) => Unit
, but then compiler would complain that a
is unused.
Another alternative for the same thing is (a: Throwable) => ()
.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54010388%2fwhat-do-underscores-mean-in-anonymous-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It's a default implementation of a function. It's so simple that its signature looks almost the same as implementation itself; its signature is Throwable => Unit
, and it is implemented with the trivial body (_: Throwable) => Unit
. It means "take some Throwable at input and just don't return anything".
It's the same as implementing it as (a: Throwable) => Unit
, but then compiler would complain that a
is unused.
Another alternative for the same thing is (a: Throwable) => ()
.
add a comment |
It's a default implementation of a function. It's so simple that its signature looks almost the same as implementation itself; its signature is Throwable => Unit
, and it is implemented with the trivial body (_: Throwable) => Unit
. It means "take some Throwable at input and just don't return anything".
It's the same as implementing it as (a: Throwable) => Unit
, but then compiler would complain that a
is unused.
Another alternative for the same thing is (a: Throwable) => ()
.
add a comment |
It's a default implementation of a function. It's so simple that its signature looks almost the same as implementation itself; its signature is Throwable => Unit
, and it is implemented with the trivial body (_: Throwable) => Unit
. It means "take some Throwable at input and just don't return anything".
It's the same as implementing it as (a: Throwable) => Unit
, but then compiler would complain that a
is unused.
Another alternative for the same thing is (a: Throwable) => ()
.
It's a default implementation of a function. It's so simple that its signature looks almost the same as implementation itself; its signature is Throwable => Unit
, and it is implemented with the trivial body (_: Throwable) => Unit
. It means "take some Throwable at input and just don't return anything".
It's the same as implementing it as (a: Throwable) => Unit
, but then compiler would complain that a
is unused.
Another alternative for the same thing is (a: Throwable) => ()
.
edited Jan 2 at 17:56
answered Jan 2 at 17:42
sloucslouc
5,7542829
5,7542829
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54010388%2fwhat-do-underscores-mean-in-anonymous-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
_
means anything. In this case in particular the idea is, given any parameter just ignore it. And the body of the function just returns Unit - in other words the default is an empty callback that does nothing rewarding of the value passed to the callback function.– Luis Miguel Mejía Suárez
Jan 2 at 17:42