Mixing
Can “strong” be used as a noun?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
I see the word "strong" refers to a group of army in two contexts:
In this post:
We're now a sub of nearly six hundred thousand strong
In this context the word "strong" refers to the subscribers of the subreddit.
In this game:
Here we go loading up for a huge strong
Here the word refers to a group of army about to be dropped to the opponent's base.
But Oxford Dictionaries doesn't count this as a meaning of the word. Is this the case the dictionary hasn't caught up the usage of the word? Can it be used as a noun?
meaning-in-context
asked Jan 30 at 16:00
OokerOoker
1,17652142
add a comment |
I see the word "strong" refers to a group of army in two contexts:
In this post:
We're now a sub of nearly six hundred thousand strong
In this context the word "strong" refers to the subscribers of the subreddit.
In this game:
Here we go loading up for a huge strong
Here the word refers to a group of army about to be dropped to the opponent's base.
But Oxford Dictionaries doesn't count this as a meaning of the word. Is this the case the dictionary hasn't caught up the usage of the word? Can it be used as a noun?
meaning-in-context
asked Jan 30 at 16:00
OokerOoker
1,17652142
6
You seem to have overlooked something in your Oxford dictionaries link, namely sense four: "Used after a number to indicate the size of a group. ‘a hostile crowd several thousands strong’"
– phoog
Jan 30 at 19:43
At a point prior to the word in question, they are talking about fighting off brute force attacks. In fact, if you go to 38:18 (and look at the closed captioning), what's said is "comes down to fantastic sized storms he might..." It makes more sense that they are continuing to talk about storms but that the word is simply garbled.
– Jason Bassford
Feb 3 at 4:51
add a comment |
I see the word "strong" refers to a group of army in two contexts:
In this post:
We're now a sub of nearly six hundred thousand strong
In this context the word "strong" refers to the subscribers of the subreddit.
In this game:
Here we go loading up for a huge strong
Here the word refers to a group of army about to be dropped to the opponent's base.
But Oxford Dictionaries doesn't count this as a meaning of the word. Is this the case the dictionary hasn't caught up the usage of the word? Can it be used as a noun?
meaning-in-context
asked Jan 30 at 16:00
OokerOoker
1,17652142
I see the word "strong" refers to a group of army in two contexts:
In this post:
We're now a sub of nearly six hundred thousand strong
In this context the word "strong" refers to the subscribers of the subreddit.
In this game:
Here we go loading up for a huge strong
Here the word refers to a group of army about to be dropped to the opponent's base.
But Oxford Dictionaries doesn't count this as a meaning of the word. Is this the case the dictionary hasn't caught up the usage of the word? Can it be used as a noun?
meaning-in-context
meaning-in-context
asked Jan 30 at 16:00
OokerOoker
1,17652142
asked Jan 30 at 16:00
OokerOoker
1,17652142
asked Jan 30 at 16:00
OokerOoker
1,17652142
asked Jan 30 at 16:00
OokerOoker
1,17652142
asked Jan 30 at 16:00
OokerOoker
1,17652142
1,17652142
6
You seem to have overlooked something in your Oxford dictionaries link, namely sense four: "Used after a number to indicate the size of a group. ‘a hostile crowd several thousands strong’"
– phoog
Jan 30 at 19:43
At a point prior to the word in question, they are talking about fighting off brute force attacks. In fact, if you go to 38:18 (and look at the closed captioning), what's said is "comes down to fantastic sized storms he might..." It makes more sense that they are continuing to talk about storms but that the word is simply garbled.
– Jason Bassford
Feb 3 at 4:51
add a comment |
6
You seem to have overlooked something in your Oxford dictionaries link, namely sense four: "Used after a number to indicate the size of a group. ‘a hostile crowd several thousands strong’"
– phoog
Jan 30 at 19:43
At a point prior to the word in question, they are talking about fighting off brute force attacks. In fact, if you go to 38:18 (and look at the closed captioning), what's said is "comes down to fantastic sized storms he might..." It makes more sense that they are continuing to talk about storms but that the word is simply garbled.
– Jason Bassford
Feb 3 at 4:51
6
6
You seem to have overlooked something in your Oxford dictionaries link, namely sense four: "Used after a number to indicate the size of a group. ‘a hostile crowd several thousands strong’"
– phoog
Jan 30 at 19:43
You seem to have overlooked something in your Oxford dictionaries link, namely sense four: "Used after a number to indicate the size of a group. ‘a hostile crowd several thousands strong’"
– phoog
Jan 30 at 19:43
At a point prior to the word in question, they are talking about fighting off brute force attacks. In fact, if you go to 38:18 (and look at the closed captioning), what's said is "comes down to fantastic sized storms he might..." It makes more sense that they are continuing to talk about storms but that the word is simply garbled.
– Jason Bassford
Feb 3 at 4:51
At a point prior to the word in question, they are talking about fighting off brute force attacks. In fact, if you go to 38:18 (and look at the closed captioning), what's said is "comes down to fantastic sized storms he might..." It makes more sense that they are continuing to talk about storms but that the word is simply garbled.
– Jason Bassford
Feb 3 at 4:51
add a comment |
9 Answers
9
active
oldest
votes
In your first example, "strong" is an adjective. The writer is not saying that the "sub" is made up of 600,000 "strongs". He's saying that it is strong. How strong? 600,000 strong. It's like saying "Bob is six feet tall" or "The river is 20 miles long." He is attaching a number to an adjective.
I have no idea what the writer in the second example is trying to say. Perhaps he didn't finish the sentence; he meant "loading up for a huge strong ATTACK" or some such. As given, the quote is not grammatically correct and doesn't make sense.
I don't recall ever reading or hearing "strong" used as a noun in a coherent sentence.
answered Jan 30 at 16:27
JayJay
46.9k14496
21
Strong can be a nominalized adjective that is used as though it is a noun. Example: "We accept the rich and the poor. We accept the weak and the strong." It truly is an adjective, but works like a noun. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominalized_adjective
– Keeta
Jan 30 at 17:37
16
@Keeta - You can tell it's still an adjective because it can be modified with adverbs: "We accept the unfortunately weak and the exceptionally strong," or take adjectival suffixes like superlatives: "We accept the weakest and the strongest." Both of these are forbidden for nouns.
– Canadian Yankee
Jan 30 at 17:43
2
@Keeta: The nominalized adjective requires a determiner. The quick and the dead.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 30 at 18:34
15
"of 600,000 strong" is incorrect, however. It should be "we are a sub of 600,000," full stop, or else "the sub is 600,000 strong." This incorrect "of 600,000 strong" is becoming more common because the idiom itself is somewhat uncommon.
– phoog
Jan 30 at 19:33
5
'Strong' can be used as a noun: the strong of a sword, more commonly known by the French term 'forte', is the one third of the blade that's closest to the hilt. That's a very specialised use, however.
– Galastel
Jan 30 at 19:35
|
show 5 more comments
Although "strong" may look like a noun in "... a hundred thousand strong", it still acts as an adjective phrase modifying "sub". This idiomatic expression is much the same as any other adjective such as "many" or "large":
The khan's army was large
The khan's army was a hundred thousand strong.
"Strong" does sound like a noun in the second sentence, but if so is probably jargon specific to players of Starcraft. That being said, it's possible the commentator misspoke and meant to say "throng", or that it's a slang abbreviation for "a strong counterattack".
Or (as choster mentions) it could be "drop" -- the video is edited at that point so the word is garbled. That sounds more reasonable for the context.
Otherwise I can think of no common use of "strong" as a noun, although of course you can always make up your own if it fits the context.
answered Jan 30 at 16:16
AndrewAndrew
71.2k679156
I can confirm that it is not a jargon in StarCraft at all
– Ooker
Jan 30 at 16:55
@Ooker: "jargon" is uncountable.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 30 at 17:06
The word the commentator uses is unintelligible. tromp ?
– Mazura
Jan 30 at 17:22
4
@Mazura From my StarCraft experience, I would venture drop.
– choster
Jan 30 at 18:57
1
@choster it could be "drop". The video is edited at that point so it's garbled.
– Andrew
Jan 30 at 21:55
|
show 3 more comments
I'm not able to comment, so I'm putting this in an answer.
In your second source, the caster actually says "loading up for a huge DROP". A drop being a piece of jargon referring to the fact that these units will shortly be dropped into the opponent's base. I can see how if you are primed to hear strong, you might hear strong instead.
answered Jan 30 at 18:38
AGFAGF
891
1
@Ooker who wrote the transcript? If this is from YouTube, take it from me that their subtitles are not infallible. I see plenty of mistakes especially if the audio is of a somewhat poor/inferior quality
– Mari-Lou A
Jan 31 at 12:20
2
@Ooker, i think what you hear as an s is just the g which is lengthened to show excitement.
– Carsten S
Jan 31 at 17:47
1
@Ooker As stated previously, both commentators go on to clearly use the word "drop" multiple times in the following 30 seconds or so. Given that "strong" makes no sense here but "drop" does, it's difficult to justify your hard-line position on this.
– GalacticCowboy
Feb 1 at 3:17
1
@Ooker FWIW I just listened to it again on a different system - cheap tablet speakers instead of headphones - and I do get a hint of an /s/ there but as Carsten says, it's early enough that it's more properly a slurred g (almost an /sh/) in "huge"
– GalacticCowboy
Feb 1 at 3:23
1
@GalacticCowboy it seems that it is actually "huge drop". The "huge" is stressed so /g/ combines with /d/ to become an /s/. Meanwhile, "drop" is spoken fleetingly, so maybe the /p/ sound is swallowed.
– Ooker
Feb 1 at 3:59
|
show 7 more comments
In the first example, "of six hundred thousand strong" is incorrect. It should be
We're now a sub of nearly six hundred thousand.
It could also be
We're now a sub that is nearly six hundred thousand strong
The construction "of 600,000 strong" is becoming more common because the idiom itself is somewhat uncommon, but it is not the traditional form of this expression.
I also note that you seem to have overlooked something in your Oxford dictionaries link, namely sense four:
Used after a number to indicate the size of a group.
‘a hostile crowd several thousands strong’
answered Jan 30 at 19:37
phoogphoog
41126
You're right, I was just looking for the noun section of the word, and not really for it carefully.
– Ooker
Jan 30 at 22:22
add a comment |
Just as in "ten foot tall" the word tall means "in height", and in the phrase "six feet deep" the word deep means "in depth", in the phrase "an army ten-thousand strong" the word strong means "in strength".
Strong is misused in your second example.
edited Jan 30 at 17:03
Ooker
1,17652142
answered Jan 30 at 16:51
TᴚoɯɐuoTᴚoɯɐuo
114k788182
should it be "ten-thousand people strong"? Btw, why do we have "ten foot tall" but "six feet deep"?
– Ooker
Jan 30 at 16:57
It can also be "six foot deep".
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 30 at 17:04
1
@Ooker "We" are obviously "people" so there is no need to say something obvious by repeating the word in "10,000 people strong".
– alephzero
Jan 30 at 17:14
3
I think there is a difference in usage between between "foot" and "feet" at least in British English. In a phrase linked to what it described by the verb "to be," feet is more common than foot - i.e. "The wall was ten feet tall" not "ten foot tall". But if the phrase is acting like an adjective preceding a noun, foot sounds right and feet sounds wrong - "The garden was surrounded by a ten foot [high] wall" not "a ten feet wall". The reason might be that "The garden" is singular, but "feet" is plural and therefore sets the reader off in the wrong direction to understand the whole sentence.
– alephzero
Jan 30 at 17:20
1
@alephzero As an American, I can say that I've heard "a ten foot wall" very often and would consider it correct.
– user45266
Jan 31 at 4:28
|
show 2 more comments
Yes.
It is common for the two halves of the length of a sword's blade to be described as the 'forte' and the 'foible', or the 'strong' and the 'weak'. When parrying, the strong of your own blade should be used against the opponent's weak.
Fencers of all stripes will as happily refer to a sword's 'forte' or 'strong' as an actual thing as they would it's grip or guard. (Grip and guard, interestingly, being both nouns and verbs.)
Use of the English or not depends on whether the individual prefers their turn of phrase at that moment to be functional or flowery. But, yes - if grip, guard, or pommel can be a noun then so can strong.
answered Jan 31 at 11:21
Grimm The OpinerGrimm The Opiner
1304
add a comment |
In the second example, it seems that it is actually "huge drop". The "huge" is stressed so /g/ combines with /d/ to become an /s/. Meanwhile, "drop" is spoken fleetingly, so maybe the /p/ sound is swallowed.
Just my guess.
answered Feb 1 at 3:59
OokerOoker
1,17652142
add a comment |
Yes, it can be used as a noun, but not in the examples you give.
In instances like "the strong eat the weak" or "only the strong survive" it is a nominalized adjective. As wikipedia notes, this is "an adjective that has undergone nominalization, and is thus used as a noun." Nominalized adjectives are commonly used to indicate a specific group of people, such as the rich, the poor, the weak, or the strong.
The entry for nominalization explains a bit about the process and includes more examples if you'd like further reading.
answered Jan 31 at 15:11
Curious_FlyerCurious_Flyer
1565
add a comment |
It seems like everyone kind of beat this to the ground.
If you can put 'the' in front of a word, it is a NOUN.
If you can say that he/she/it is ___. Then it is an ADJECTIVE.
answered Jan 31 at 8:30
JamesJames
813
"The bold and the beautiful" Are they nouns or adjectives or both? Have you ever watched the "The bold and the beautiful"? Is "The" a noun then?
– Mari-Lou A
Jan 31 at 12:07
In this case, Bold and Beautiful are used as nouns. 'The' is an article, not a noun.
– James
Jan 31 at 13:05
I'm just saying to be careful about stating things as absolute truths. Add "normally" and no one will mutter a word.
– Mari-Lou A
Jan 31 at 13:16
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194710%2fcan-strong-be-used-as-a-noun%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
9 Answers
9
active
oldest
votes
9 Answers
9
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
In your first example, "strong" is an adjective. The writer is not saying that the "sub" is made up of 600,000 "strongs". He's saying that it is strong. How strong? 600,000 strong. It's like saying "Bob is six feet tall" or "The river is 20 miles long." He is attaching a number to an adjective.
I have no idea what the writer in the second example is trying to say. Perhaps he didn't finish the sentence; he meant "loading up for a huge strong ATTACK" or some such. As given, the quote is not grammatically correct and doesn't make sense.
I don't recall ever reading or hearing "strong" used as a noun in a coherent sentence.
answered Jan 30 at 16:27
JayJay
46.9k14496
21
Strong can be a nominalized adjective that is used as though it is a noun. Example: "We accept the rich and the poor. We accept the weak and the strong." It truly is an adjective, but works like a noun. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominalized_adjective
– Keeta
Jan 30 at 17:37
16
@Keeta - You can tell it's still an adjective because it can be modified with adverbs: "We accept the unfortunately weak and the exceptionally strong," or take adjectival suffixes like superlatives: "We accept the weakest and the strongest." Both of these are forbidden for nouns.
– Canadian Yankee
Jan 30 at 17:43
2
@Keeta: The nominalized adjective requires a determiner. The quick and the dead.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 30 at 18:34
15
"of 600,000 strong" is incorrect, however. It should be "we are a sub of 600,000," full stop, or else "the sub is 600,000 strong." This incorrect "of 600,000 strong" is becoming more common because the idiom itself is somewhat uncommon.
– phoog
Jan 30 at 19:33
5
'Strong' can be used as a noun: the strong of a sword, more commonly known by the French term 'forte', is the one third of the blade that's closest to the hilt. That's a very specialised use, however.
– Galastel
Jan 30 at 19:35
|
show 5 more comments
In your first example, "strong" is an adjective. The writer is not saying that the "sub" is made up of 600,000 "strongs". He's saying that it is strong. How strong? 600,000 strong. It's like saying "Bob is six feet tall" or "The river is 20 miles long." He is attaching a number to an adjective.
I have no idea what the writer in the second example is trying to say. Perhaps he didn't finish the sentence; he meant "loading up for a huge strong ATTACK" or some such. As given, the quote is not grammatically correct and doesn't make sense.
I don't recall ever reading or hearing "strong" used as a noun in a coherent sentence.
answered Jan 30 at 16:27
JayJay
46.9k14496
21
Strong can be a nominalized adjective that is used as though it is a noun. Example: "We accept the rich and the poor. We accept the weak and the strong." It truly is an adjective, but works like a noun. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominalized_adjective
– Keeta
Jan 30 at 17:37
16
@Keeta - You can tell it's still an adjective because it can be modified with adverbs: "We accept the unfortunately weak and the exceptionally strong," or take adjectival suffixes like superlatives: "We accept the weakest and the strongest." Both of these are forbidden for nouns.
– Canadian Yankee
Jan 30 at 17:43
2
@Keeta: The nominalized adjective requires a determiner. The quick and the dead.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 30 at 18:34
15
"of 600,000 strong" is incorrect, however. It should be "we are a sub of 600,000," full stop, or else "the sub is 600,000 strong." This incorrect "of 600,000 strong" is becoming more common because the idiom itself is somewhat uncommon.
– phoog
Jan 30 at 19:33
5
'Strong' can be used as a noun: the strong of a sword, more commonly known by the French term 'forte', is the one third of the blade that's closest to the hilt. That's a very specialised use, however.
– Galastel
Jan 30 at 19:35
|
show 5 more comments
In your first example, "strong" is an adjective. The writer is not saying that the "sub" is made up of 600,000 "strongs". He's saying that it is strong. How strong? 600,000 strong. It's like saying "Bob is six feet tall" or "The river is 20 miles long." He is attaching a number to an adjective.
I have no idea what the writer in the second example is trying to say. Perhaps he didn't finish the sentence; he meant "loading up for a huge strong ATTACK" or some such. As given, the quote is not grammatically correct and doesn't make sense.
I don't recall ever reading or hearing "strong" used as a noun in a coherent sentence.
answered Jan 30 at 16:27
JayJay
46.9k14496
In your first example, "strong" is an adjective. The writer is not saying that the "sub" is made up of 600,000 "strongs". He's saying that it is strong. How strong? 600,000 strong. It's like saying "Bob is six feet tall" or "The river is 20 miles long." He is attaching a number to an adjective.
I have no idea what the writer in the second example is trying to say. Perhaps he didn't finish the sentence; he meant "loading up for a huge strong ATTACK" or some such. As given, the quote is not grammatically correct and doesn't make sense.
I don't recall ever reading or hearing "strong" used as a noun in a coherent sentence.
answered Jan 30 at 16:27
JayJay
46.9k14496
answered Jan 30 at 16:27
JayJay
46.9k14496
answered Jan 30 at 16:27
JayJay
46.9k14496
answered Jan 30 at 16:27
JayJay
46.9k14496
46.9k14496
21
Strong can be a nominalized adjective that is used as though it is a noun. Example: "We accept the rich and the poor. We accept the weak and the strong." It truly is an adjective, but works like a noun. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominalized_adjective
– Keeta
Jan 30 at 17:37
16
@Keeta - You can tell it's still an adjective because it can be modified with adverbs: "We accept the unfortunately weak and the exceptionally strong," or take adjectival suffixes like superlatives: "We accept the weakest and the strongest." Both of these are forbidden for nouns.
– Canadian Yankee
Jan 30 at 17:43
2
@Keeta: The nominalized adjective requires a determiner. The quick and the dead.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 30 at 18:34
15
"of 600,000 strong" is incorrect, however. It should be "we are a sub of 600,000," full stop, or else "the sub is 600,000 strong." This incorrect "of 600,000 strong" is becoming more common because the idiom itself is somewhat uncommon.
– phoog
Jan 30 at 19:33
5
'Strong' can be used as a noun: the strong of a sword, more commonly known by the French term 'forte', is the one third of the blade that's closest to the hilt. That's a very specialised use, however.
– Galastel
Jan 30 at 19:35
|
show 5 more comments
21
Strong can be a nominalized adjective that is used as though it is a noun. Example: "We accept the rich and the poor. We accept the weak and the strong." It truly is an adjective, but works like a noun. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominalized_adjective
– Keeta
Jan 30 at 17:37
16
@Keeta - You can tell it's still an adjective because it can be modified with adverbs: "We accept the unfortunately weak and the exceptionally strong," or take adjectival suffixes like superlatives: "We accept the weakest and the strongest." Both of these are forbidden for nouns.
– Canadian Yankee
Jan 30 at 17:43
2
@Keeta: The nominalized adjective requires a determiner. The quick and the dead.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 30 at 18:34
15
"of 600,000 strong" is incorrect, however. It should be "we are a sub of 600,000," full stop, or else "the sub is 600,000 strong." This incorrect "of 600,000 strong" is becoming more common because the idiom itself is somewhat uncommon.
– phoog
Jan 30 at 19:33
5
'Strong' can be used as a noun: the strong of a sword, more commonly known by the French term 'forte', is the one third of the blade that's closest to the hilt. That's a very specialised use, however.
– Galastel
Jan 30 at 19:35
21
21
Strong can be a nominalized adjective that is used as though it is a noun. Example: "We accept the rich and the poor. We accept the weak and the strong." It truly is an adjective, but works like a noun. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominalized_adjective
– Keeta
Jan 30 at 17:37
Strong can be a nominalized adjective that is used as though it is a noun. Example: "We accept the rich and the poor. We accept the weak and the strong." It truly is an adjective, but works like a noun. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominalized_adjective
– Keeta
Jan 30 at 17:37
16
16
@Keeta - You can tell it's still an adjective because it can be modified with adverbs: "We accept the unfortunately weak and the exceptionally strong," or take adjectival suffixes like superlatives: "We accept the weakest and the strongest." Both of these are forbidden for nouns.
– Canadian Yankee
Jan 30 at 17:43
@Keeta - You can tell it's still an adjective because it can be modified with adverbs: "We accept the unfortunately weak and the exceptionally strong," or take adjectival suffixes like superlatives: "We accept the weakest and the strongest." Both of these are forbidden for nouns.
– Canadian Yankee
Jan 30 at 17:43
2
2
@Keeta: The nominalized adjective requires a determiner. The quick and the dead.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 30 at 18:34
@Keeta: The nominalized adjective requires a determiner. The quick and the dead.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 30 at 18:34
15
15
"of 600,000 strong" is incorrect, however. It should be "we are a sub of 600,000," full stop, or else "the sub is 600,000 strong." This incorrect "of 600,000 strong" is becoming more common because the idiom itself is somewhat uncommon.
– phoog
Jan 30 at 19:33
"of 600,000 strong" is incorrect, however. It should be "we are a sub of 600,000," full stop, or else "the sub is 600,000 strong." This incorrect "of 600,000 strong" is becoming more common because the idiom itself is somewhat uncommon.
– phoog
Jan 30 at 19:33
5
5
'Strong' can be used as a noun: the strong of a sword, more commonly known by the French term 'forte', is the one third of the blade that's closest to the hilt. That's a very specialised use, however.
– Galastel
Jan 30 at 19:35
'Strong' can be used as a noun: the strong of a sword, more commonly known by the French term 'forte', is the one third of the blade that's closest to the hilt. That's a very specialised use, however.
– Galastel
Jan 30 at 19:35
|
show 5 more comments
Although "strong" may look like a noun in "... a hundred thousand strong", it still acts as an adjective phrase modifying "sub". This idiomatic expression is much the same as any other adjective such as "many" or "large":
The khan's army was large
The khan's army was a hundred thousand strong.
"Strong" does sound like a noun in the second sentence, but if so is probably jargon specific to players of Starcraft. That being said, it's possible the commentator misspoke and meant to say "throng", or that it's a slang abbreviation for "a strong counterattack".
Or (as choster mentions) it could be "drop" -- the video is edited at that point so the word is garbled. That sounds more reasonable for the context.
Otherwise I can think of no common use of "strong" as a noun, although of course you can always make up your own if it fits the context.
answered Jan 30 at 16:16
AndrewAndrew
71.2k679156
I can confirm that it is not a jargon in StarCraft at all
– Ooker
Jan 30 at 16:55
@Ooker: "jargon" is uncountable.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 30 at 17:06
The word the commentator uses is unintelligible. tromp ?
– Mazura
Jan 30 at 17:22
4
@Mazura From my StarCraft experience, I would venture drop.
– choster
Jan 30 at 18:57
1
@choster it could be "drop". The video is edited at that point so it's garbled.
– Andrew
Jan 30 at 21:55
|
show 3 more comments
Although "strong" may look like a noun in "... a hundred thousand strong", it still acts as an adjective phrase modifying "sub". This idiomatic expression is much the same as any other adjective such as "many" or "large":
The khan's army was large
The khan's army was a hundred thousand strong.
"Strong" does sound like a noun in the second sentence, but if so is probably jargon specific to players of Starcraft. That being said, it's possible the commentator misspoke and meant to say "throng", or that it's a slang abbreviation for "a strong counterattack".
Or (as choster mentions) it could be "drop" -- the video is edited at that point so the word is garbled. That sounds more reasonable for the context.
Otherwise I can think of no common use of "strong" as a noun, although of course you can always make up your own if it fits the context.
answered Jan 30 at 16:16
AndrewAndrew
71.2k679156
I can confirm that it is not a jargon in StarCraft at all
– Ooker
Jan 30 at 16:55
@Ooker: "jargon" is uncountable.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 30 at 17:06
The word the commentator uses is unintelligible. tromp ?
– Mazura
Jan 30 at 17:22
4
@Mazura From my StarCraft experience, I would venture drop.
– choster
Jan 30 at 18:57
1
@choster it could be "drop". The video is edited at that point so it's garbled.
– Andrew
Jan 30 at 21:55
|
show 3 more comments
Although "strong" may look like a noun in "... a hundred thousand strong", it still acts as an adjective phrase modifying "sub". This idiomatic expression is much the same as any other adjective such as "many" or "large":
The khan's army was large
The khan's army was a hundred thousand strong.
"Strong" does sound like a noun in the second sentence, but if so is probably jargon specific to players of Starcraft. That being said, it's possible the commentator misspoke and meant to say "throng", or that it's a slang abbreviation for "a strong counterattack".
Or (as choster mentions) it could be "drop" -- the video is edited at that point so the word is garbled. That sounds more reasonable for the context.
Otherwise I can think of no common use of "strong" as a noun, although of course you can always make up your own if it fits the context.
answered Jan 30 at 16:16
AndrewAndrew
71.2k679156
Although "strong" may look like a noun in "... a hundred thousand strong", it still acts as an adjective phrase modifying "sub". This idiomatic expression is much the same as any other adjective such as "many" or "large":
The khan's army was large
The khan's army was a hundred thousand strong.
"Strong" does sound like a noun in the second sentence, but if so is probably jargon specific to players of Starcraft. That being said, it's possible the commentator misspoke and meant to say "throng", or that it's a slang abbreviation for "a strong counterattack".
Or (as choster mentions) it could be "drop" -- the video is edited at that point so the word is garbled. That sounds more reasonable for the context.
Otherwise I can think of no common use of "strong" as a noun, although of course you can always make up your own if it fits the context.
answered Jan 30 at 16:16
AndrewAndrew
71.2k679156
edited Jan 30 at 21:56
answered Jan 30 at 16:16
AndrewAndrew
71.2k679156
answered Jan 30 at 16:16
AndrewAndrew
71.2k679156
answered Jan 30 at 16:16
AndrewAndrew
71.2k679156
71.2k679156
I can confirm that it is not a jargon in StarCraft at all
– Ooker
Jan 30 at 16:55
@Ooker: "jargon" is uncountable.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 30 at 17:06
The word the commentator uses is unintelligible. tromp ?
– Mazura
Jan 30 at 17:22
4
@Mazura From my StarCraft experience, I would venture drop.
– choster
Jan 30 at 18:57
1
@choster it could be "drop". The video is edited at that point so it's garbled.
– Andrew
Jan 30 at 21:55
|
show 3 more comments
I can confirm that it is not a jargon in StarCraft at all
– Ooker
Jan 30 at 16:55
@Ooker: "jargon" is uncountable.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 30 at 17:06
The word the commentator uses is unintelligible. tromp ?
– Mazura
Jan 30 at 17:22
4
@Mazura From my StarCraft experience, I would venture drop.
– choster
Jan 30 at 18:57
1
@choster it could be "drop". The video is edited at that point so it's garbled.
– Andrew
Jan 30 at 21:55
I can confirm that it is not a jargon in StarCraft at all
– Ooker
Jan 30 at 16:55
I can confirm that it is not a jargon in StarCraft at all
– Ooker
Jan 30 at 16:55
@Ooker: "jargon" is uncountable.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 30 at 17:06
@Ooker: "jargon" is uncountable.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 30 at 17:06
The word the commentator uses is unintelligible. tromp ?
– Mazura
Jan 30 at 17:22
The word the commentator uses is unintelligible. tromp ?
– Mazura
Jan 30 at 17:22
4
4
@Mazura From my StarCraft experience, I would venture drop.
– choster
Jan 30 at 18:57
@Mazura From my StarCraft experience, I would venture drop.
– choster
Jan 30 at 18:57
1
1
@choster it could be "drop". The video is edited at that point so it's garbled.
– Andrew
Jan 30 at 21:55
@choster it could be "drop". The video is edited at that point so it's garbled.
– Andrew
Jan 30 at 21:55
|
show 3 more comments
I'm not able to comment, so I'm putting this in an answer.
In your second source, the caster actually says "loading up for a huge DROP". A drop being a piece of jargon referring to the fact that these units will shortly be dropped into the opponent's base. I can see how if you are primed to hear strong, you might hear strong instead.
answered Jan 30 at 18:38
AGFAGF
891
1
@Ooker who wrote the transcript? If this is from YouTube, take it from me that their subtitles are not infallible. I see plenty of mistakes especially if the audio is of a somewhat poor/inferior quality
– Mari-Lou A
Jan 31 at 12:20
2
@Ooker, i think what you hear as an s is just the g which is lengthened to show excitement.
– Carsten S
Jan 31 at 17:47
1
@Ooker As stated previously, both commentators go on to clearly use the word "drop" multiple times in the following 30 seconds or so. Given that "strong" makes no sense here but "drop" does, it's difficult to justify your hard-line position on this.
– GalacticCowboy
Feb 1 at 3:17
1
@Ooker FWIW I just listened to it again on a different system - cheap tablet speakers instead of headphones - and I do get a hint of an /s/ there but as Carsten says, it's early enough that it's more properly a slurred g (almost an /sh/) in "huge"
– GalacticCowboy
Feb 1 at 3:23
1
@GalacticCowboy it seems that it is actually "huge drop". The "huge" is stressed so /g/ combines with /d/ to become an /s/. Meanwhile, "drop" is spoken fleetingly, so maybe the /p/ sound is swallowed.
– Ooker
Feb 1 at 3:59
|
show 7 more comments
I'm not able to comment, so I'm putting this in an answer.
In your second source, the caster actually says "loading up for a huge DROP". A drop being a piece of jargon referring to the fact that these units will shortly be dropped into the opponent's base. I can see how if you are primed to hear strong, you might hear strong instead.
answered Jan 30 at 18:38
AGFAGF
891
1
@Ooker who wrote the transcript? If this is from YouTube, take it from me that their subtitles are not infallible. I see plenty of mistakes especially if the audio is of a somewhat poor/inferior quality
– Mari-Lou A
Jan 31 at 12:20
2
@Ooker, i think what you hear as an s is just the g which is lengthened to show excitement.
– Carsten S
Jan 31 at 17:47
1
@Ooker As stated previously, both commentators go on to clearly use the word "drop" multiple times in the following 30 seconds or so. Given that "strong" makes no sense here but "drop" does, it's difficult to justify your hard-line position on this.
– GalacticCowboy
Feb 1 at 3:17
1
@Ooker FWIW I just listened to it again on a different system - cheap tablet speakers instead of headphones - and I do get a hint of an /s/ there but as Carsten says, it's early enough that it's more properly a slurred g (almost an /sh/) in "huge"
– GalacticCowboy
Feb 1 at 3:23
1
@GalacticCowboy it seems that it is actually "huge drop". The "huge" is stressed so /g/ combines with /d/ to become an /s/. Meanwhile, "drop" is spoken fleetingly, so maybe the /p/ sound is swallowed.
– Ooker
Feb 1 at 3:59
|
show 7 more comments
I'm not able to comment, so I'm putting this in an answer.
In your second source, the caster actually says "loading up for a huge DROP". A drop being a piece of jargon referring to the fact that these units will shortly be dropped into the opponent's base. I can see how if you are primed to hear strong, you might hear strong instead.
answered Jan 30 at 18:38
AGFAGF
891
I'm not able to comment, so I'm putting this in an answer.
In your second source, the caster actually says "loading up for a huge DROP". A drop being a piece of jargon referring to the fact that these units will shortly be dropped into the opponent's base. I can see how if you are primed to hear strong, you might hear strong instead.
answered Jan 30 at 18:38
AGFAGF
891
answered Jan 30 at 18:38
AGFAGF
891
answered Jan 30 at 18:38
AGFAGF
891
answered Jan 30 at 18:38
AGFAGF
891
891
1
@Ooker who wrote the transcript? If this is from YouTube, take it from me that their subtitles are not infallible. I see plenty of mistakes especially if the audio is of a somewhat poor/inferior quality
– Mari-Lou A
Jan 31 at 12:20
2
@Ooker, i think what you hear as an s is just the g which is lengthened to show excitement.
– Carsten S
Jan 31 at 17:47
1
@Ooker As stated previously, both commentators go on to clearly use the word "drop" multiple times in the following 30 seconds or so. Given that "strong" makes no sense here but "drop" does, it's difficult to justify your hard-line position on this.
– GalacticCowboy
Feb 1 at 3:17
1
@Ooker FWIW I just listened to it again on a different system - cheap tablet speakers instead of headphones - and I do get a hint of an /s/ there but as Carsten says, it's early enough that it's more properly a slurred g (almost an /sh/) in "huge"
– GalacticCowboy
Feb 1 at 3:23
1
@GalacticCowboy it seems that it is actually "huge drop". The "huge" is stressed so /g/ combines with /d/ to become an /s/. Meanwhile, "drop" is spoken fleetingly, so maybe the /p/ sound is swallowed.
– Ooker
Feb 1 at 3:59
|
show 7 more comments
1
@Ooker who wrote the transcript? If this is from YouTube, take it from me that their subtitles are not infallible. I see plenty of mistakes especially if the audio is of a somewhat poor/inferior quality
– Mari-Lou A
Jan 31 at 12:20
2
@Ooker, i think what you hear as an s is just the g which is lengthened to show excitement.
– Carsten S
Jan 31 at 17:47
1
@Ooker As stated previously, both commentators go on to clearly use the word "drop" multiple times in the following 30 seconds or so. Given that "strong" makes no sense here but "drop" does, it's difficult to justify your hard-line position on this.
– GalacticCowboy
Feb 1 at 3:17
1
@Ooker FWIW I just listened to it again on a different system - cheap tablet speakers instead of headphones - and I do get a hint of an /s/ there but as Carsten says, it's early enough that it's more properly a slurred g (almost an /sh/) in "huge"
– GalacticCowboy
Feb 1 at 3:23
1
@GalacticCowboy it seems that it is actually "huge drop". The "huge" is stressed so /g/ combines with /d/ to become an /s/. Meanwhile, "drop" is spoken fleetingly, so maybe the /p/ sound is swallowed.
– Ooker
Feb 1 at 3:59
1
1
@Ooker who wrote the transcript? If this is from YouTube, take it from me that their subtitles are not infallible. I see plenty of mistakes especially if the audio is of a somewhat poor/inferior quality
– Mari-Lou A
Jan 31 at 12:20
@Ooker who wrote the transcript? If this is from YouTube, take it from me that their subtitles are not infallible. I see plenty of mistakes especially if the audio is of a somewhat poor/inferior quality
– Mari-Lou A
Jan 31 at 12:20
2
2
@Ooker, i think what you hear as an s is just the g which is lengthened to show excitement.
– Carsten S
Jan 31 at 17:47
@Ooker, i think what you hear as an s is just the g which is lengthened to show excitement.
– Carsten S
Jan 31 at 17:47
1
1
@Ooker As stated previously, both commentators go on to clearly use the word "drop" multiple times in the following 30 seconds or so. Given that "strong" makes no sense here but "drop" does, it's difficult to justify your hard-line position on this.
– GalacticCowboy
Feb 1 at 3:17
@Ooker As stated previously, both commentators go on to clearly use the word "drop" multiple times in the following 30 seconds or so. Given that "strong" makes no sense here but "drop" does, it's difficult to justify your hard-line position on this.
– GalacticCowboy
Feb 1 at 3:17
1
1
@Ooker FWIW I just listened to it again on a different system - cheap tablet speakers instead of headphones - and I do get a hint of an /s/ there but as Carsten says, it's early enough that it's more properly a slurred g (almost an /sh/) in "huge"
– GalacticCowboy
Feb 1 at 3:23
@Ooker FWIW I just listened to it again on a different system - cheap tablet speakers instead of headphones - and I do get a hint of an /s/ there but as Carsten says, it's early enough that it's more properly a slurred g (almost an /sh/) in "huge"
– GalacticCowboy
Feb 1 at 3:23
1
1
@GalacticCowboy it seems that it is actually "huge drop". The "huge" is stressed so /g/ combines with /d/ to become an /s/. Meanwhile, "drop" is spoken fleetingly, so maybe the /p/ sound is swallowed.
– Ooker
Feb 1 at 3:59
@GalacticCowboy it seems that it is actually "huge drop". The "huge" is stressed so /g/ combines with /d/ to become an /s/. Meanwhile, "drop" is spoken fleetingly, so maybe the /p/ sound is swallowed.
– Ooker
Feb 1 at 3:59
|
show 7 more comments
In the first example, "of six hundred thousand strong" is incorrect. It should be
We're now a sub of nearly six hundred thousand.
It could also be
We're now a sub that is nearly six hundred thousand strong
The construction "of 600,000 strong" is becoming more common because the idiom itself is somewhat uncommon, but it is not the traditional form of this expression.
I also note that you seem to have overlooked something in your Oxford dictionaries link, namely sense four:
Used after a number to indicate the size of a group.
‘a hostile crowd several thousands strong’
answered Jan 30 at 19:37
phoogphoog
41126
You're right, I was just looking for the noun section of the word, and not really for it carefully.
– Ooker
Jan 30 at 22:22
add a comment |
In the first example, "of six hundred thousand strong" is incorrect. It should be
We're now a sub of nearly six hundred thousand.
It could also be
We're now a sub that is nearly six hundred thousand strong
The construction "of 600,000 strong" is becoming more common because the idiom itself is somewhat uncommon, but it is not the traditional form of this expression.
I also note that you seem to have overlooked something in your Oxford dictionaries link, namely sense four:
Used after a number to indicate the size of a group.
‘a hostile crowd several thousands strong’
answered Jan 30 at 19:37
phoogphoog
41126
You're right, I was just looking for the noun section of the word, and not really for it carefully.
– Ooker
Jan 30 at 22:22
add a comment |
In the first example, "of six hundred thousand strong" is incorrect. It should be
We're now a sub of nearly six hundred thousand.
It could also be
We're now a sub that is nearly six hundred thousand strong
The construction "of 600,000 strong" is becoming more common because the idiom itself is somewhat uncommon, but it is not the traditional form of this expression.
I also note that you seem to have overlooked something in your Oxford dictionaries link, namely sense four:
Used after a number to indicate the size of a group.
‘a hostile crowd several thousands strong’
answered Jan 30 at 19:37
phoogphoog
41126
In the first example, "of six hundred thousand strong" is incorrect. It should be
We're now a sub of nearly six hundred thousand.
It could also be
We're now a sub that is nearly six hundred thousand strong
The construction "of 600,000 strong" is becoming more common because the idiom itself is somewhat uncommon, but it is not the traditional form of this expression.
I also note that you seem to have overlooked something in your Oxford dictionaries link, namely sense four:
Used after a number to indicate the size of a group.
‘a hostile crowd several thousands strong’
answered Jan 30 at 19:37
phoogphoog
41126
edited Jan 30 at 19:46
answered Jan 30 at 19:37
phoogphoog
41126
answered Jan 30 at 19:37
phoogphoog
41126
answered Jan 30 at 19:37
phoogphoog
41126
41126
You're right, I was just looking for the noun section of the word, and not really for it carefully.
– Ooker
Jan 30 at 22:22
add a comment |
You're right, I was just looking for the noun section of the word, and not really for it carefully.
– Ooker
Jan 30 at 22:22
You're right, I was just looking for the noun section of the word, and not really for it carefully.
– Ooker
Jan 30 at 22:22
You're right, I was just looking for the noun section of the word, and not really for it carefully.
– Ooker
Jan 30 at 22:22
add a comment |
Just as in "ten foot tall" the word tall means "in height", and in the phrase "six feet deep" the word deep means "in depth", in the phrase "an army ten-thousand strong" the word strong means "in strength".
Strong is misused in your second example.
edited Jan 30 at 17:03
Ooker
1,17652142
answered Jan 30 at 16:51
TᴚoɯɐuoTᴚoɯɐuo
114k788182
should it be "ten-thousand people strong"? Btw, why do we have "ten foot tall" but "six feet deep"?
– Ooker
Jan 30 at 16:57
It can also be "six foot deep".
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 30 at 17:04
1
@Ooker "We" are obviously "people" so there is no need to say something obvious by repeating the word in "10,000 people strong".
– alephzero
Jan 30 at 17:14
3
I think there is a difference in usage between between "foot" and "feet" at least in British English. In a phrase linked to what it described by the verb "to be," feet is more common than foot - i.e. "The wall was ten feet tall" not "ten foot tall". But if the phrase is acting like an adjective preceding a noun, foot sounds right and feet sounds wrong - "The garden was surrounded by a ten foot [high] wall" not "a ten feet wall". The reason might be that "The garden" is singular, but "feet" is plural and therefore sets the reader off in the wrong direction to understand the whole sentence.
– alephzero
Jan 30 at 17:20
1
@alephzero As an American, I can say that I've heard "a ten foot wall" very often and would consider it correct.
– user45266
Jan 31 at 4:28
|
show 2 more comments
Just as in "ten foot tall" the word tall means "in height", and in the phrase "six feet deep" the word deep means "in depth", in the phrase "an army ten-thousand strong" the word strong means "in strength".
Strong is misused in your second example.
edited Jan 30 at 17:03
Ooker
1,17652142
answered Jan 30 at 16:51
TᴚoɯɐuoTᴚoɯɐuo
114k788182
should it be "ten-thousand people strong"? Btw, why do we have "ten foot tall" but "six feet deep"?
– Ooker
Jan 30 at 16:57
It can also be "six foot deep".
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 30 at 17:04
1
@Ooker "We" are obviously "people" so there is no need to say something obvious by repeating the word in "10,000 people strong".
– alephzero
Jan 30 at 17:14
3
I think there is a difference in usage between between "foot" and "feet" at least in British English. In a phrase linked to what it described by the verb "to be," feet is more common than foot - i.e. "The wall was ten feet tall" not "ten foot tall". But if the phrase is acting like an adjective preceding a noun, foot sounds right and feet sounds wrong - "The garden was surrounded by a ten foot [high] wall" not "a ten feet wall". The reason might be that "The garden" is singular, but "feet" is plural and therefore sets the reader off in the wrong direction to understand the whole sentence.
– alephzero
Jan 30 at 17:20
1
@alephzero As an American, I can say that I've heard "a ten foot wall" very often and would consider it correct.
– user45266
Jan 31 at 4:28
|
show 2 more comments
Just as in "ten foot tall" the word tall means "in height", and in the phrase "six feet deep" the word deep means "in depth", in the phrase "an army ten-thousand strong" the word strong means "in strength".
Strong is misused in your second example.
edited Jan 30 at 17:03
Ooker
1,17652142
answered Jan 30 at 16:51
TᴚoɯɐuoTᴚoɯɐuo
114k788182
Just as in "ten foot tall" the word tall means "in height", and in the phrase "six feet deep" the word deep means "in depth", in the phrase "an army ten-thousand strong" the word strong means "in strength".
Strong is misused in your second example.
edited Jan 30 at 17:03
Ooker
1,17652142
answered Jan 30 at 16:51
TᴚoɯɐuoTᴚoɯɐuo
114k788182
edited Jan 30 at 17:03
Ooker
1,17652142
edited Jan 30 at 17:03
Ooker
1,17652142
edited Jan 30 at 17:03
Ooker
1,17652142
1,17652142
answered Jan 30 at 16:51
TᴚoɯɐuoTᴚoɯɐuo
114k788182
answered Jan 30 at 16:51
TᴚoɯɐuoTᴚoɯɐuo
114k788182
answered Jan 30 at 16:51
TᴚoɯɐuoTᴚoɯɐuo
114k788182
114k788182
should it be "ten-thousand people strong"? Btw, why do we have "ten foot tall" but "six feet deep"?
– Ooker
Jan 30 at 16:57
It can also be "six foot deep".
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 30 at 17:04
1
@Ooker "We" are obviously "people" so there is no need to say something obvious by repeating the word in "10,000 people strong".
– alephzero
Jan 30 at 17:14
3
I think there is a difference in usage between between "foot" and "feet" at least in British English. In a phrase linked to what it described by the verb "to be," feet is more common than foot - i.e. "The wall was ten feet tall" not "ten foot tall". But if the phrase is acting like an adjective preceding a noun, foot sounds right and feet sounds wrong - "The garden was surrounded by a ten foot [high] wall" not "a ten feet wall". The reason might be that "The garden" is singular, but "feet" is plural and therefore sets the reader off in the wrong direction to understand the whole sentence.
– alephzero
Jan 30 at 17:20
1
@alephzero As an American, I can say that I've heard "a ten foot wall" very often and would consider it correct.
– user45266
Jan 31 at 4:28
|
show 2 more comments
should it be "ten-thousand people strong"? Btw, why do we have "ten foot tall" but "six feet deep"?
– Ooker
Jan 30 at 16:57
It can also be "six foot deep".
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 30 at 17:04
1
@Ooker "We" are obviously "people" so there is no need to say something obvious by repeating the word in "10,000 people strong".
– alephzero
Jan 30 at 17:14
3
I think there is a difference in usage between between "foot" and "feet" at least in British English. In a phrase linked to what it described by the verb "to be," feet is more common than foot - i.e. "The wall was ten feet tall" not "ten foot tall". But if the phrase is acting like an adjective preceding a noun, foot sounds right and feet sounds wrong - "The garden was surrounded by a ten foot [high] wall" not "a ten feet wall". The reason might be that "The garden" is singular, but "feet" is plural and therefore sets the reader off in the wrong direction to understand the whole sentence.
– alephzero
Jan 30 at 17:20
1
@alephzero As an American, I can say that I've heard "a ten foot wall" very often and would consider it correct.
– user45266
Jan 31 at 4:28
should it be "ten-thousand people strong"? Btw, why do we have "ten foot tall" but "six feet deep"?
– Ooker
Jan 30 at 16:57
should it be "ten-thousand people strong"? Btw, why do we have "ten foot tall" but "six feet deep"?
– Ooker
Jan 30 at 16:57
It can also be "six foot deep".
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 30 at 17:04
It can also be "six foot deep".
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Jan 30 at 17:04
1
1
@Ooker "We" are obviously "people" so there is no need to say something obvious by repeating the word in "10,000 people strong".
– alephzero
Jan 30 at 17:14
@Ooker "We" are obviously "people" so there is no need to say something obvious by repeating the word in "10,000 people strong".
– alephzero
Jan 30 at 17:14
3
3
I think there is a difference in usage between between "foot" and "feet" at least in British English. In a phrase linked to what it described by the verb "to be," feet is more common than foot - i.e. "The wall was ten feet tall" not "ten foot tall". But if the phrase is acting like an adjective preceding a noun, foot sounds right and feet sounds wrong - "The garden was surrounded by a ten foot [high] wall" not "a ten feet wall". The reason might be that "The garden" is singular, but "feet" is plural and therefore sets the reader off in the wrong direction to understand the whole sentence.
– alephzero
Jan 30 at 17:20
I think there is a difference in usage between between "foot" and "feet" at least in British English. In a phrase linked to what it described by the verb "to be," feet is more common than foot - i.e. "The wall was ten feet tall" not "ten foot tall". But if the phrase is acting like an adjective preceding a noun, foot sounds right and feet sounds wrong - "The garden was surrounded by a ten foot [high] wall" not "a ten feet wall". The reason might be that "The garden" is singular, but "feet" is plural and therefore sets the reader off in the wrong direction to understand the whole sentence.
– alephzero
Jan 30 at 17:20
1
1
@alephzero As an American, I can say that I've heard "a ten foot wall" very often and would consider it correct.
– user45266
Jan 31 at 4:28
@alephzero As an American, I can say that I've heard "a ten foot wall" very often and would consider it correct.
– user45266
Jan 31 at 4:28
|
show 2 more comments
Yes.
It is common for the two halves of the length of a sword's blade to be described as the 'forte' and the 'foible', or the 'strong' and the 'weak'. When parrying, the strong of your own blade should be used against the opponent's weak.
Fencers of all stripes will as happily refer to a sword's 'forte' or 'strong' as an actual thing as they would it's grip or guard. (Grip and guard, interestingly, being both nouns and verbs.)
Use of the English or not depends on whether the individual prefers their turn of phrase at that moment to be functional or flowery. But, yes - if grip, guard, or pommel can be a noun then so can strong.
answered Jan 31 at 11:21
Grimm The OpinerGrimm The Opiner
1304
add a comment |
Yes.
It is common for the two halves of the length of a sword's blade to be described as the 'forte' and the 'foible', or the 'strong' and the 'weak'. When parrying, the strong of your own blade should be used against the opponent's weak.
Fencers of all stripes will as happily refer to a sword's 'forte' or 'strong' as an actual thing as they would it's grip or guard. (Grip and guard, interestingly, being both nouns and verbs.)
Use of the English or not depends on whether the individual prefers their turn of phrase at that moment to be functional or flowery. But, yes - if grip, guard, or pommel can be a noun then so can strong.
answered Jan 31 at 11:21
Grimm The OpinerGrimm The Opiner
1304
add a comment |
Yes.
It is common for the two halves of the length of a sword's blade to be described as the 'forte' and the 'foible', or the 'strong' and the 'weak'. When parrying, the strong of your own blade should be used against the opponent's weak.
Fencers of all stripes will as happily refer to a sword's 'forte' or 'strong' as an actual thing as they would it's grip or guard. (Grip and guard, interestingly, being both nouns and verbs.)
Use of the English or not depends on whether the individual prefers their turn of phrase at that moment to be functional or flowery. But, yes - if grip, guard, or pommel can be a noun then so can strong.
answered Jan 31 at 11:21
Grimm The OpinerGrimm The Opiner
1304
Yes.
It is common for the two halves of the length of a sword's blade to be described as the 'forte' and the 'foible', or the 'strong' and the 'weak'. When parrying, the strong of your own blade should be used against the opponent's weak.
Fencers of all stripes will as happily refer to a sword's 'forte' or 'strong' as an actual thing as they would it's grip or guard. (Grip and guard, interestingly, being both nouns and verbs.)
Use of the English or not depends on whether the individual prefers their turn of phrase at that moment to be functional or flowery. But, yes - if grip, guard, or pommel can be a noun then so can strong.
answered Jan 31 at 11:21
Grimm The OpinerGrimm The Opiner
1304
answered Jan 31 at 11:21
Grimm The OpinerGrimm The Opiner
1304
answered Jan 31 at 11:21
Grimm The OpinerGrimm The Opiner
1304
answered Jan 31 at 11:21
Grimm The OpinerGrimm The Opiner
1304
1304
add a comment |
add a comment |
In the second example, it seems that it is actually "huge drop". The "huge" is stressed so /g/ combines with /d/ to become an /s/. Meanwhile, "drop" is spoken fleetingly, so maybe the /p/ sound is swallowed.
Just my guess.
answered Feb 1 at 3:59
OokerOoker
1,17652142
add a comment |
In the second example, it seems that it is actually "huge drop". The "huge" is stressed so /g/ combines with /d/ to become an /s/. Meanwhile, "drop" is spoken fleetingly, so maybe the /p/ sound is swallowed.
Just my guess.
answered Feb 1 at 3:59
OokerOoker
1,17652142
add a comment |
In the second example, it seems that it is actually "huge drop". The "huge" is stressed so /g/ combines with /d/ to become an /s/. Meanwhile, "drop" is spoken fleetingly, so maybe the /p/ sound is swallowed.
Just my guess.
answered Feb 1 at 3:59
OokerOoker
1,17652142
In the second example, it seems that it is actually "huge drop". The "huge" is stressed so /g/ combines with /d/ to become an /s/. Meanwhile, "drop" is spoken fleetingly, so maybe the /p/ sound is swallowed.
Just my guess.
answered Feb 1 at 3:59
OokerOoker
1,17652142
answered Feb 1 at 3:59
OokerOoker
1,17652142
answered Feb 1 at 3:59
OokerOoker
1,17652142
answered Feb 1 at 3:59
OokerOoker
1,17652142
1,17652142
add a comment |
add a comment |
Yes, it can be used as a noun, but not in the examples you give.
In instances like "the strong eat the weak" or "only the strong survive" it is a nominalized adjective. As wikipedia notes, this is "an adjective that has undergone nominalization, and is thus used as a noun." Nominalized adjectives are commonly used to indicate a specific group of people, such as the rich, the poor, the weak, or the strong.
The entry for nominalization explains a bit about the process and includes more examples if you'd like further reading.
answered Jan 31 at 15:11
Curious_FlyerCurious_Flyer
1565
add a comment |
Yes, it can be used as a noun, but not in the examples you give.
In instances like "the strong eat the weak" or "only the strong survive" it is a nominalized adjective. As wikipedia notes, this is "an adjective that has undergone nominalization, and is thus used as a noun." Nominalized adjectives are commonly used to indicate a specific group of people, such as the rich, the poor, the weak, or the strong.
The entry for nominalization explains a bit about the process and includes more examples if you'd like further reading.
answered Jan 31 at 15:11
Curious_FlyerCurious_Flyer
1565
add a comment |
Yes, it can be used as a noun, but not in the examples you give.
In instances like "the strong eat the weak" or "only the strong survive" it is a nominalized adjective. As wikipedia notes, this is "an adjective that has undergone nominalization, and is thus used as a noun." Nominalized adjectives are commonly used to indicate a specific group of people, such as the rich, the poor, the weak, or the strong.
The entry for nominalization explains a bit about the process and includes more examples if you'd like further reading.
answered Jan 31 at 15:11
Curious_FlyerCurious_Flyer
1565
Yes, it can be used as a noun, but not in the examples you give.
In instances like "the strong eat the weak" or "only the strong survive" it is a nominalized adjective. As wikipedia notes, this is "an adjective that has undergone nominalization, and is thus used as a noun." Nominalized adjectives are commonly used to indicate a specific group of people, such as the rich, the poor, the weak, or the strong.
The entry for nominalization explains a bit about the process and includes more examples if you'd like further reading.
answered Jan 31 at 15:11
Curious_FlyerCurious_Flyer
1565
edited Jan 31 at 15:17
answered Jan 31 at 15:11
Curious_FlyerCurious_Flyer
1565
answered Jan 31 at 15:11
Curious_FlyerCurious_Flyer
1565
answered Jan 31 at 15:11
Curious_FlyerCurious_Flyer
1565
1565
add a comment |
add a comment |
It seems like everyone kind of beat this to the ground.
If you can put 'the' in front of a word, it is a NOUN.
If you can say that he/she/it is ___. Then it is an ADJECTIVE.
answered Jan 31 at 8:30
JamesJames
813
"The bold and the beautiful" Are they nouns or adjectives or both? Have you ever watched the "The bold and the beautiful"? Is "The" a noun then?
– Mari-Lou A
Jan 31 at 12:07
In this case, Bold and Beautiful are used as nouns. 'The' is an article, not a noun.
– James
Jan 31 at 13:05
I'm just saying to be careful about stating things as absolute truths. Add "normally" and no one will mutter a word.
– Mari-Lou A
Jan 31 at 13:16
add a comment |
It seems like everyone kind of beat this to the ground.
If you can put 'the' in front of a word, it is a NOUN.
If you can say that he/she/it is ___. Then it is an ADJECTIVE.
answered Jan 31 at 8:30
JamesJames
813
"The bold and the beautiful" Are they nouns or adjectives or both? Have you ever watched the "The bold and the beautiful"? Is "The" a noun then?
– Mari-Lou A
Jan 31 at 12:07
In this case, Bold and Beautiful are used as nouns. 'The' is an article, not a noun.
– James
Jan 31 at 13:05
I'm just saying to be careful about stating things as absolute truths. Add "normally" and no one will mutter a word.
– Mari-Lou A
Jan 31 at 13:16
add a comment |
It seems like everyone kind of beat this to the ground.
If you can put 'the' in front of a word, it is a NOUN.
If you can say that he/she/it is ___. Then it is an ADJECTIVE.
answered Jan 31 at 8:30
JamesJames
813
It seems like everyone kind of beat this to the ground.
If you can put 'the' in front of a word, it is a NOUN.
If you can say that he/she/it is ___. Then it is an ADJECTIVE.
answered Jan 31 at 8:30
JamesJames
813
answered Jan 31 at 8:30
JamesJames
813
answered Jan 31 at 8:30
JamesJames
813
answered Jan 31 at 8:30
JamesJames
813
813
"The bold and the beautiful" Are they nouns or adjectives or both? Have you ever watched the "The bold and the beautiful"? Is "The" a noun then?
– Mari-Lou A
Jan 31 at 12:07
In this case, Bold and Beautiful are used as nouns. 'The' is an article, not a noun.
– James
Jan 31 at 13:05
I'm just saying to be careful about stating things as absolute truths. Add "normally" and no one will mutter a word.
– Mari-Lou A
Jan 31 at 13:16
add a comment |
"The bold and the beautiful" Are they nouns or adjectives or both? Have you ever watched the "The bold and the beautiful"? Is "The" a noun then?
– Mari-Lou A
Jan 31 at 12:07
In this case, Bold and Beautiful are used as nouns. 'The' is an article, not a noun.
– James
Jan 31 at 13:05
I'm just saying to be careful about stating things as absolute truths. Add "normally" and no one will mutter a word.
– Mari-Lou A
Jan 31 at 13:16
"The bold and the beautiful" Are they nouns or adjectives or both? Have you ever watched the "The bold and the beautiful"? Is "The" a noun then?
– Mari-Lou A
Jan 31 at 12:07
"The bold and the beautiful" Are they nouns or adjectives or both? Have you ever watched the "The bold and the beautiful"? Is "The" a noun then?
– Mari-Lou A
Jan 31 at 12:07
In this case, Bold and Beautiful are used as nouns. 'The' is an article, not a noun.
– James
Jan 31 at 13:05
In this case, Bold and Beautiful are used as nouns. 'The' is an article, not a noun.
– James
Jan 31 at 13:05
I'm just saying to be careful about stating things as absolute truths. Add "normally" and no one will mutter a word.
– Mari-Lou A
Jan 31 at 13:16
I'm just saying to be careful about stating things as absolute truths. Add "normally" and no one will mutter a word.
– Mari-Lou A
Jan 31 at 13:16
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194710%2fcan-strong-be-used-as-a-noun%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
6
You seem to have overlooked something in your Oxford dictionaries link, namely sense four: "Used after a number to indicate the size of a group. ‘a hostile crowd several thousands strong’"
– phoog
Jan 30 at 19:43
At a point prior to the word in question, they are talking about fighting off brute force attacks. In fact, if you go to 38:18 (and look at the closed captioning), what's said is "comes down to fantastic sized storms he might..." It makes more sense that they are continuing to talk about storms but that the word is simply garbled.
– Jason Bassford
Feb 3 at 4:51