Mixing
Executing buildsteps in buildbot on other clients
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I am trying to find out if I can execute certain buildsteps on another machine than the build client in the same build. For instance, one path of the build process includes that the final zip should just be packaged if 2 other machines did run successfully a unit test. Can someone point me to a link or explain how that could be possible with buildbot?
(client3) ↗ unittest ↘
(client2) ↗ other tests ↘
(client1) → git sync → compile → sign executables → zip → publish
python buildbot build-system
asked Dec 21 '18 at 23:33
Daniel StephensDaniel Stephens
7711
add a comment |
I am trying to find out if I can execute certain buildsteps on another machine than the build client in the same build. For instance, one path of the build process includes that the final zip should just be packaged if 2 other machines did run successfully a unit test. Can someone point me to a link or explain how that could be possible with buildbot?
(client3) ↗ unittest ↘
(client2) ↗ other tests ↘
(client1) → git sync → compile → sign executables → zip → publish
python buildbot build-system
asked Dec 21 '18 at 23:33
Daniel StephensDaniel Stephens
7711
add a comment |
I am trying to find out if I can execute certain buildsteps on another machine than the build client in the same build. For instance, one path of the build process includes that the final zip should just be packaged if 2 other machines did run successfully a unit test. Can someone point me to a link or explain how that could be possible with buildbot?
(client3) ↗ unittest ↘
(client2) ↗ other tests ↘
(client1) → git sync → compile → sign executables → zip → publish
python buildbot build-system
asked Dec 21 '18 at 23:33
Daniel StephensDaniel Stephens
7711
I am trying to find out if I can execute certain buildsteps on another machine than the build client in the same build. For instance, one path of the build process includes that the final zip should just be packaged if 2 other machines did run successfully a unit test. Can someone point me to a link or explain how that could be possible with buildbot?
(client3) ↗ unittest ↘
(client2) ↗ other tests ↘
(client1) → git sync → compile → sign executables → zip → publish
python buildbot build-system
python buildbot build-system
asked Dec 21 '18 at 23:33
Daniel StephensDaniel Stephens
7711
asked Dec 21 '18 at 23:33
Daniel StephensDaniel Stephens
7711
edited Dec 22 '18 at 1:03
Daniel Stephens
asked Dec 21 '18 at 23:33
Daniel StephensDaniel Stephens
7711
asked Dec 21 '18 at 23:33
Daniel StephensDaniel Stephens
7711
asked Dec 21 '18 at 23:33
Daniel StephensDaniel Stephens
7711
7711
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Mozilla made a useful presentation about this topic in 2013. To me it seems that controlling build is the term you are looking for.
Buildbot best practice: manage parallel execution from a controlling
build.
http://releng.polymtl.ca/RELENG2013/html/slides/buildbot-talk/index.html?full#release-process-lines
Personally I like the flock concept. That was a proposal a few years ago where a build job could have several 'starting points'. But I am not sure what the progress is on this
answered Jan 3 at 15:34
seb-mtlseb-mtl
2,57411139
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53891872%2fexecuting-buildsteps-in-buildbot-on-other-clients%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Mozilla made a useful presentation about this topic in 2013. To me it seems that controlling build is the term you are looking for.
Buildbot best practice: manage parallel execution from a controlling
build.
http://releng.polymtl.ca/RELENG2013/html/slides/buildbot-talk/index.html?full#release-process-lines
Personally I like the flock concept. That was a proposal a few years ago where a build job could have several 'starting points'. But I am not sure what the progress is on this
answered Jan 3 at 15:34
seb-mtlseb-mtl
2,57411139
add a comment |
Mozilla made a useful presentation about this topic in 2013. To me it seems that controlling build is the term you are looking for.
Buildbot best practice: manage parallel execution from a controlling
build.
http://releng.polymtl.ca/RELENG2013/html/slides/buildbot-talk/index.html?full#release-process-lines
Personally I like the flock concept. That was a proposal a few years ago where a build job could have several 'starting points'. But I am not sure what the progress is on this
answered Jan 3 at 15:34
seb-mtlseb-mtl
2,57411139
add a comment |
Mozilla made a useful presentation about this topic in 2013. To me it seems that controlling build is the term you are looking for.
Buildbot best practice: manage parallel execution from a controlling
build.
http://releng.polymtl.ca/RELENG2013/html/slides/buildbot-talk/index.html?full#release-process-lines
Personally I like the flock concept. That was a proposal a few years ago where a build job could have several 'starting points'. But I am not sure what the progress is on this
answered Jan 3 at 15:34
seb-mtlseb-mtl
2,57411139
Mozilla made a useful presentation about this topic in 2013. To me it seems that controlling build is the term you are looking for.
Buildbot best practice: manage parallel execution from a controlling
build.
http://releng.polymtl.ca/RELENG2013/html/slides/buildbot-talk/index.html?full#release-process-lines
Personally I like the flock concept. That was a proposal a few years ago where a build job could have several 'starting points'. But I am not sure what the progress is on this
answered Jan 3 at 15:34
seb-mtlseb-mtl
2,57411139
edited Jan 7 at 1:22
answered Jan 3 at 15:34
seb-mtlseb-mtl
2,57411139
answered Jan 3 at 15:34
seb-mtlseb-mtl
2,57411139
answered Jan 3 at 15:34
seb-mtlseb-mtl
2,57411139
2,57411139
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53891872%2fexecuting-buildsteps-in-buildbot-on-other-clients%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
