Mixing
Onclick in HTML with custom language
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I've made my own minimal language similar to Javascript, and have it functioning in an html file. I have my my-lang code (I'll call the language "my-lang") in between script tags, with the script type property set to "my-lang". Another JS file reads all the code in my-lang, then runs it. Say I had an anchor tag like this:
<a onclick="someJSfunction();">Text text text</a>
In the onclick property it runs some JS code. I want it to run code in my-lang. I had a few ideas, but none of them are ideal. Here are a few:
In my JS parser which is at the bottom of the HTML file, I have a function that just runs code in my-lang, like a my-lang eval() written in JavaScript. Then in HTML, you can do
<a onclick='run_my_lang("code in my-lang as a string")'>Text text text</a>I saw a bunch of devs prefacing the onclick text with a label "javascript:". I thought that was for something else, but I'm not sure. I dont know if this will work, but maybe something like
onclick="my-lang:code"
Any ideas on how to do this without the prefixes?
In my-lang I have event handlers working, I just would also like to be able to do it in line.
javascript html
asked Jan 3 at 2:26
Jaden BaptistaJaden Baptista
758
add a comment |
I've made my own minimal language similar to Javascript, and have it functioning in an html file. I have my my-lang code (I'll call the language "my-lang") in between script tags, with the script type property set to "my-lang". Another JS file reads all the code in my-lang, then runs it. Say I had an anchor tag like this:
<a onclick="someJSfunction();">Text text text</a>
In the onclick property it runs some JS code. I want it to run code in my-lang. I had a few ideas, but none of them are ideal. Here are a few:
In my JS parser which is at the bottom of the HTML file, I have a function that just runs code in my-lang, like a my-lang eval() written in JavaScript. Then in HTML, you can do
<a onclick='run_my_lang("code in my-lang as a string")'>Text text text</a>I saw a bunch of devs prefacing the onclick text with a label "javascript:". I thought that was for something else, but I'm not sure. I dont know if this will work, but maybe something like
onclick="my-lang:code"
Any ideas on how to do this without the prefixes?
In my-lang I have event handlers working, I just would also like to be able to do it in line.
javascript html
asked Jan 3 at 2:26
Jaden BaptistaJaden Baptista
758
first one (damn that rule of 15 signs min in comment ^_^).
– 2oppin
Jan 3 at 6:37
@2oppin Why? I've been doing that so far but it's not ideal since the people writing in my-lang will have to run a javascript function to run my-lang code. That doesn't make any sense, plus, it adds an extra set of quotes, which makes things harder since if they have any quotes in the my-lang code, they'll have to escape some quotes. Is there some setting, maybe a meta-tag they can use to change the programming language?
– Jaden Baptista
Jan 3 at 17:32
now I hit the max limit) so put it to an answer, hope it helps)
– 2oppin
Jan 4 at 7:20
add a comment |
I've made my own minimal language similar to Javascript, and have it functioning in an html file. I have my my-lang code (I'll call the language "my-lang") in between script tags, with the script type property set to "my-lang". Another JS file reads all the code in my-lang, then runs it. Say I had an anchor tag like this:
<a onclick="someJSfunction();">Text text text</a>
In the onclick property it runs some JS code. I want it to run code in my-lang. I had a few ideas, but none of them are ideal. Here are a few:
In my JS parser which is at the bottom of the HTML file, I have a function that just runs code in my-lang, like a my-lang eval() written in JavaScript. Then in HTML, you can do
<a onclick='run_my_lang("code in my-lang as a string")'>Text text text</a>I saw a bunch of devs prefacing the onclick text with a label "javascript:". I thought that was for something else, but I'm not sure. I dont know if this will work, but maybe something like
onclick="my-lang:code"
Any ideas on how to do this without the prefixes?
In my-lang I have event handlers working, I just would also like to be able to do it in line.
javascript html
asked Jan 3 at 2:26
Jaden BaptistaJaden Baptista
758
I've made my own minimal language similar to Javascript, and have it functioning in an html file. I have my my-lang code (I'll call the language "my-lang") in between script tags, with the script type property set to "my-lang". Another JS file reads all the code in my-lang, then runs it. Say I had an anchor tag like this:
<a onclick="someJSfunction();">Text text text</a>
In the onclick property it runs some JS code. I want it to run code in my-lang. I had a few ideas, but none of them are ideal. Here are a few:
In my JS parser which is at the bottom of the HTML file, I have a function that just runs code in my-lang, like a my-lang eval() written in JavaScript. Then in HTML, you can do
<a onclick='run_my_lang("code in my-lang as a string")'>Text text text</a>I saw a bunch of devs prefacing the onclick text with a label "javascript:". I thought that was for something else, but I'm not sure. I dont know if this will work, but maybe something like
onclick="my-lang:code"
Any ideas on how to do this without the prefixes?
In my-lang I have event handlers working, I just would also like to be able to do it in line.
javascript html
javascript html
asked Jan 3 at 2:26
Jaden BaptistaJaden Baptista
758
asked Jan 3 at 2:26
Jaden BaptistaJaden Baptista
758
asked Jan 3 at 2:26
Jaden BaptistaJaden Baptista
758
asked Jan 3 at 2:26
Jaden BaptistaJaden Baptista
758
asked Jan 3 at 2:26
Jaden BaptistaJaden Baptista
758
758
first one (damn that rule of 15 signs min in comment ^_^).
– 2oppin
Jan 3 at 6:37
@2oppin Why? I've been doing that so far but it's not ideal since the people writing in my-lang will have to run a javascript function to run my-lang code. That doesn't make any sense, plus, it adds an extra set of quotes, which makes things harder since if they have any quotes in the my-lang code, they'll have to escape some quotes. Is there some setting, maybe a meta-tag they can use to change the programming language?
– Jaden Baptista
Jan 3 at 17:32
now I hit the max limit) so put it to an answer, hope it helps)
– 2oppin
Jan 4 at 7:20
add a comment |
first one (damn that rule of 15 signs min in comment ^_^).
– 2oppin
Jan 3 at 6:37
@2oppin Why? I've been doing that so far but it's not ideal since the people writing in my-lang will have to run a javascript function to run my-lang code. That doesn't make any sense, plus, it adds an extra set of quotes, which makes things harder since if they have any quotes in the my-lang code, they'll have to escape some quotes. Is there some setting, maybe a meta-tag they can use to change the programming language?
– Jaden Baptista
Jan 3 at 17:32
now I hit the max limit) so put it to an answer, hope it helps)
– 2oppin
Jan 4 at 7:20
first one (damn that rule of 15 signs min in comment ^_^).
– 2oppin
Jan 3 at 6:37
first one (damn that rule of 15 signs min in comment ^_^).
– 2oppin
Jan 3 at 6:37
@2oppin Why? I've been doing that so far but it's not ideal since the people writing in my-lang will have to run a javascript function to run my-lang code. That doesn't make any sense, plus, it adds an extra set of quotes, which makes things harder since if they have any quotes in the my-lang code, they'll have to escape some quotes. Is there some setting, maybe a meta-tag they can use to change the programming language?
– Jaden Baptista
Jan 3 at 17:32
@2oppin Why? I've been doing that so far but it's not ideal since the people writing in my-lang will have to run a javascript function to run my-lang code. That doesn't make any sense, plus, it adds an extra set of quotes, which makes things harder since if they have any quotes in the my-lang code, they'll have to escape some quotes. Is there some setting, maybe a meta-tag they can use to change the programming language?
– Jaden Baptista
Jan 3 at 17:32
now I hit the max limit) so put it to an answer, hope it helps)
– 2oppin
Jan 4 at 7:20
now I hit the max limit) so put it to an answer, hope it helps)
– 2oppin
Jan 4 at 7:20
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
As I wrote in the comment, the solution would be the 1st (onclick='run_my_lang("code")') if you already can do it than it's totally cool, really.
If you are able to process on-click then your lang should be run on
client (so in a browser), and the only lang available in browser is
JS.
(You can't enforce Chrome or Safari to process construction "my-lang:code").
If you can solve it via 2nd option, then it means you should have a some compiler that would translate your template with "my-lang: code" into "javascript: code" or "run_my_lang('code')", so you still will need to implement 1st.
Oh, ok you have no need to use "my-lang" in Chrome|FF|Safari|Whatever, you have your own "WhateverBrowser" that can process "my-lang: code" (alongside with HTML, CSS and bunch of other things (and not to forget same Javascript)) in the received from the server HTML, and maybe your "WhateverBrowser" even written in "my-lang", that would be cool (but I doubt you have "WhateverBrowser" or ready to compete with Chrome|FF|Safari|Whatever)
Or (maybe) you would have some specific "browser" that browse specific pages, can process mouse events and pass it to your lang.
And now to the main point, what is "my-lang"?
Unless it's 3rd (specific browser) your lang in one or another way is written in JS, so in the end it's JS lib:
window.myLang = function(code) {
let [,func,arg] = code.match(/^myLang:([a-zA-Z]+)((.*)?)$/);
if (myLangFunctions[func])
myLangFunctions[func](arg);
return this;
};
let myLangFunctions = {
sound: (arg) => {
switch(arg) {
case 'dog': alert('bark-bark');break;
case 'cat': alert('meow-meow');break;
case 'frog': alert('kero-kero');break;
default: alert('u-u-u-u-u');
}
}
}div {
width: 70px;
height: 70px;
border: double 3px;
float: left;
margin: 5px;
line-height: 70px;
text-align: center;
}<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(dog)')">dog</div>
<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(cat)')">cat</div>
<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(frog)')">frog</div>
<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(whatever)')">whatever</div>And to solve it via 2nd option you will just need pre-compiler that will translate your template into some JS or HTML code (like JSX), so it would be just an extension of your 1st solution.
PS: I really think that your question purely theoretical, or even (maybe) one of your probable questions on some exams, but still wrote it for fun )) and hope it helps to you in your future path :)
answered Jan 4 at 7:28
2oppin2oppin
1,4811427
Awesome answer, thanks! And it's not purely hypothetical. Theres a couple other questions I asked here about it, and it is in development. I don't have my own browser. I guess I'll go ahead with the function route then. By the way, this is a small piece of a larger project. I'm not just making a bad alternative of JS.
– Jaden Baptista
Jan 4 at 13:30
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54015579%2fonclick-in-html-with-custom-language%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
As I wrote in the comment, the solution would be the 1st (onclick='run_my_lang("code")') if you already can do it than it's totally cool, really.
If you are able to process on-click then your lang should be run on
client (so in a browser), and the only lang available in browser is
JS.
(You can't enforce Chrome or Safari to process construction "my-lang:code").
If you can solve it via 2nd option, then it means you should have a some compiler that would translate your template with "my-lang: code" into "javascript: code" or "run_my_lang('code')", so you still will need to implement 1st.
Oh, ok you have no need to use "my-lang" in Chrome|FF|Safari|Whatever, you have your own "WhateverBrowser" that can process "my-lang: code" (alongside with HTML, CSS and bunch of other things (and not to forget same Javascript)) in the received from the server HTML, and maybe your "WhateverBrowser" even written in "my-lang", that would be cool (but I doubt you have "WhateverBrowser" or ready to compete with Chrome|FF|Safari|Whatever)
Or (maybe) you would have some specific "browser" that browse specific pages, can process mouse events and pass it to your lang.
And now to the main point, what is "my-lang"?
Unless it's 3rd (specific browser) your lang in one or another way is written in JS, so in the end it's JS lib:
window.myLang = function(code) {
let [,func,arg] = code.match(/^myLang:([a-zA-Z]+)((.*)?)$/);
if (myLangFunctions[func])
myLangFunctions[func](arg);
return this;
};
let myLangFunctions = {
sound: (arg) => {
switch(arg) {
case 'dog': alert('bark-bark');break;
case 'cat': alert('meow-meow');break;
case 'frog': alert('kero-kero');break;
default: alert('u-u-u-u-u');
}
}
}div {
width: 70px;
height: 70px;
border: double 3px;
float: left;
margin: 5px;
line-height: 70px;
text-align: center;
}<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(dog)')">dog</div>
<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(cat)')">cat</div>
<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(frog)')">frog</div>
<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(whatever)')">whatever</div>And to solve it via 2nd option you will just need pre-compiler that will translate your template into some JS or HTML code (like JSX), so it would be just an extension of your 1st solution.
PS: I really think that your question purely theoretical, or even (maybe) one of your probable questions on some exams, but still wrote it for fun )) and hope it helps to you in your future path :)
answered Jan 4 at 7:28
2oppin2oppin
1,4811427
Awesome answer, thanks! And it's not purely hypothetical. Theres a couple other questions I asked here about it, and it is in development. I don't have my own browser. I guess I'll go ahead with the function route then. By the way, this is a small piece of a larger project. I'm not just making a bad alternative of JS.
– Jaden Baptista
Jan 4 at 13:30
add a comment |
As I wrote in the comment, the solution would be the 1st (onclick='run_my_lang("code")') if you already can do it than it's totally cool, really.
If you are able to process on-click then your lang should be run on
client (so in a browser), and the only lang available in browser is
JS.
(You can't enforce Chrome or Safari to process construction "my-lang:code").
If you can solve it via 2nd option, then it means you should have a some compiler that would translate your template with "my-lang: code" into "javascript: code" or "run_my_lang('code')", so you still will need to implement 1st.
Oh, ok you have no need to use "my-lang" in Chrome|FF|Safari|Whatever, you have your own "WhateverBrowser" that can process "my-lang: code" (alongside with HTML, CSS and bunch of other things (and not to forget same Javascript)) in the received from the server HTML, and maybe your "WhateverBrowser" even written in "my-lang", that would be cool (but I doubt you have "WhateverBrowser" or ready to compete with Chrome|FF|Safari|Whatever)
Or (maybe) you would have some specific "browser" that browse specific pages, can process mouse events and pass it to your lang.
And now to the main point, what is "my-lang"?
Unless it's 3rd (specific browser) your lang in one or another way is written in JS, so in the end it's JS lib:
window.myLang = function(code) {
let [,func,arg] = code.match(/^myLang:([a-zA-Z]+)((.*)?)$/);
if (myLangFunctions[func])
myLangFunctions[func](arg);
return this;
};
let myLangFunctions = {
sound: (arg) => {
switch(arg) {
case 'dog': alert('bark-bark');break;
case 'cat': alert('meow-meow');break;
case 'frog': alert('kero-kero');break;
default: alert('u-u-u-u-u');
}
}
}div {
width: 70px;
height: 70px;
border: double 3px;
float: left;
margin: 5px;
line-height: 70px;
text-align: center;
}<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(dog)')">dog</div>
<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(cat)')">cat</div>
<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(frog)')">frog</div>
<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(whatever)')">whatever</div>And to solve it via 2nd option you will just need pre-compiler that will translate your template into some JS or HTML code (like JSX), so it would be just an extension of your 1st solution.
PS: I really think that your question purely theoretical, or even (maybe) one of your probable questions on some exams, but still wrote it for fun )) and hope it helps to you in your future path :)
answered Jan 4 at 7:28
2oppin2oppin
1,4811427
Awesome answer, thanks! And it's not purely hypothetical. Theres a couple other questions I asked here about it, and it is in development. I don't have my own browser. I guess I'll go ahead with the function route then. By the way, this is a small piece of a larger project. I'm not just making a bad alternative of JS.
– Jaden Baptista
Jan 4 at 13:30
add a comment |
As I wrote in the comment, the solution would be the 1st (onclick='run_my_lang("code")') if you already can do it than it's totally cool, really.
If you are able to process on-click then your lang should be run on
client (so in a browser), and the only lang available in browser is
JS.
(You can't enforce Chrome or Safari to process construction "my-lang:code").
If you can solve it via 2nd option, then it means you should have a some compiler that would translate your template with "my-lang: code" into "javascript: code" or "run_my_lang('code')", so you still will need to implement 1st.
Oh, ok you have no need to use "my-lang" in Chrome|FF|Safari|Whatever, you have your own "WhateverBrowser" that can process "my-lang: code" (alongside with HTML, CSS and bunch of other things (and not to forget same Javascript)) in the received from the server HTML, and maybe your "WhateverBrowser" even written in "my-lang", that would be cool (but I doubt you have "WhateverBrowser" or ready to compete with Chrome|FF|Safari|Whatever)
Or (maybe) you would have some specific "browser" that browse specific pages, can process mouse events and pass it to your lang.
And now to the main point, what is "my-lang"?
Unless it's 3rd (specific browser) your lang in one or another way is written in JS, so in the end it's JS lib:
window.myLang = function(code) {
let [,func,arg] = code.match(/^myLang:([a-zA-Z]+)((.*)?)$/);
if (myLangFunctions[func])
myLangFunctions[func](arg);
return this;
};
let myLangFunctions = {
sound: (arg) => {
switch(arg) {
case 'dog': alert('bark-bark');break;
case 'cat': alert('meow-meow');break;
case 'frog': alert('kero-kero');break;
default: alert('u-u-u-u-u');
}
}
}div {
width: 70px;
height: 70px;
border: double 3px;
float: left;
margin: 5px;
line-height: 70px;
text-align: center;
}<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(dog)')">dog</div>
<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(cat)')">cat</div>
<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(frog)')">frog</div>
<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(whatever)')">whatever</div>And to solve it via 2nd option you will just need pre-compiler that will translate your template into some JS or HTML code (like JSX), so it would be just an extension of your 1st solution.
PS: I really think that your question purely theoretical, or even (maybe) one of your probable questions on some exams, but still wrote it for fun )) and hope it helps to you in your future path :)
answered Jan 4 at 7:28
2oppin2oppin
1,4811427
As I wrote in the comment, the solution would be the 1st (onclick='run_my_lang("code")') if you already can do it than it's totally cool, really.
If you are able to process on-click then your lang should be run on
client (so in a browser), and the only lang available in browser is
JS.
(You can't enforce Chrome or Safari to process construction "my-lang:code").
If you can solve it via 2nd option, then it means you should have a some compiler that would translate your template with "my-lang: code" into "javascript: code" or "run_my_lang('code')", so you still will need to implement 1st.
Oh, ok you have no need to use "my-lang" in Chrome|FF|Safari|Whatever, you have your own "WhateverBrowser" that can process "my-lang: code" (alongside with HTML, CSS and bunch of other things (and not to forget same Javascript)) in the received from the server HTML, and maybe your "WhateverBrowser" even written in "my-lang", that would be cool (but I doubt you have "WhateverBrowser" or ready to compete with Chrome|FF|Safari|Whatever)
Or (maybe) you would have some specific "browser" that browse specific pages, can process mouse events and pass it to your lang.
And now to the main point, what is "my-lang"?
Unless it's 3rd (specific browser) your lang in one or another way is written in JS, so in the end it's JS lib:
window.myLang = function(code) {
let [,func,arg] = code.match(/^myLang:([a-zA-Z]+)((.*)?)$/);
if (myLangFunctions[func])
myLangFunctions[func](arg);
return this;
};
let myLangFunctions = {
sound: (arg) => {
switch(arg) {
case 'dog': alert('bark-bark');break;
case 'cat': alert('meow-meow');break;
case 'frog': alert('kero-kero');break;
default: alert('u-u-u-u-u');
}
}
}div {
width: 70px;
height: 70px;
border: double 3px;
float: left;
margin: 5px;
line-height: 70px;
text-align: center;
}<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(dog)')">dog</div>
<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(cat)')">cat</div>
<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(frog)')">frog</div>
<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(whatever)')">whatever</div>And to solve it via 2nd option you will just need pre-compiler that will translate your template into some JS or HTML code (like JSX), so it would be just an extension of your 1st solution.
PS: I really think that your question purely theoretical, or even (maybe) one of your probable questions on some exams, but still wrote it for fun )) and hope it helps to you in your future path :)
window.myLang = function(code) {
let [,func,arg] = code.match(/^myLang:([a-zA-Z]+)((.*)?)$/);
if (myLangFunctions[func])
myLangFunctions[func](arg);
return this;
};
let myLangFunctions = {
sound: (arg) => {
switch(arg) {
case 'dog': alert('bark-bark');break;
case 'cat': alert('meow-meow');break;
case 'frog': alert('kero-kero');break;
default: alert('u-u-u-u-u');
}
}
}div {
width: 70px;
height: 70px;
border: double 3px;
float: left;
margin: 5px;
line-height: 70px;
text-align: center;
}<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(dog)')">dog</div>
<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(cat)')">cat</div>
<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(frog)')">frog</div>
<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(whatever)')">whatever</div>window.myLang = function(code) {
let [,func,arg] = code.match(/^myLang:([a-zA-Z]+)((.*)?)$/);
if (myLangFunctions[func])
myLangFunctions[func](arg);
return this;
};
let myLangFunctions = {
sound: (arg) => {
switch(arg) {
case 'dog': alert('bark-bark');break;
case 'cat': alert('meow-meow');break;
case 'frog': alert('kero-kero');break;
default: alert('u-u-u-u-u');
}
}
}div {
width: 70px;
height: 70px;
border: double 3px;
float: left;
margin: 5px;
line-height: 70px;
text-align: center;
}<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(dog)')">dog</div>
<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(cat)')">cat</div>
<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(frog)')">frog</div>
<div onclick="myLang('myLang:sound(whatever)')">whatever</div>answered Jan 4 at 7:28
2oppin2oppin
1,4811427
answered Jan 4 at 7:28
2oppin2oppin
1,4811427
answered Jan 4 at 7:28
2oppin2oppin
1,4811427
answered Jan 4 at 7:28
2oppin2oppin
1,4811427
1,4811427
Awesome answer, thanks! And it's not purely hypothetical. Theres a couple other questions I asked here about it, and it is in development. I don't have my own browser. I guess I'll go ahead with the function route then. By the way, this is a small piece of a larger project. I'm not just making a bad alternative of JS.
– Jaden Baptista
Jan 4 at 13:30
add a comment |
Awesome answer, thanks! And it's not purely hypothetical. Theres a couple other questions I asked here about it, and it is in development. I don't have my own browser. I guess I'll go ahead with the function route then. By the way, this is a small piece of a larger project. I'm not just making a bad alternative of JS.
– Jaden Baptista
Jan 4 at 13:30
Awesome answer, thanks! And it's not purely hypothetical. Theres a couple other questions I asked here about it, and it is in development. I don't have my own browser. I guess I'll go ahead with the function route then. By the way, this is a small piece of a larger project. I'm not just making a bad alternative of JS.
– Jaden Baptista
Jan 4 at 13:30
Awesome answer, thanks! And it's not purely hypothetical. Theres a couple other questions I asked here about it, and it is in development. I don't have my own browser. I guess I'll go ahead with the function route then. By the way, this is a small piece of a larger project. I'm not just making a bad alternative of JS.
– Jaden Baptista
Jan 4 at 13:30
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54015579%2fonclick-in-html-with-custom-language%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
first one (damn that rule of 15 signs min in comment ^_^).
– 2oppin
Jan 3 at 6:37
@2oppin Why? I've been doing that so far but it's not ideal since the people writing in my-lang will have to run a javascript function to run my-lang code. That doesn't make any sense, plus, it adds an extra set of quotes, which makes things harder since if they have any quotes in the my-lang code, they'll have to escape some quotes. Is there some setting, maybe a meta-tag they can use to change the programming language?
– Jaden Baptista
Jan 3 at 17:32
now I hit the max limit) so put it to an answer, hope it helps)
– 2oppin
Jan 4 at 7:20