Explanation required for observations regarding Determinant and Condition Number












0












$begingroup$


I'm currently working on an eigenvalue problem of the form $$Azeta=lambda Bzeta$$ where all the elements of $A$ and $B$ are only functions of a variable $k$. Now, I can obtain values for $lambda$ using the eig() function in MATLAB, but I wanted to do an arc-length continuation program to plot $lambda$ as a function of $k$, so I needed a function such that $$F(k,lambda(k))=0$$ My initial thought was to use $F=det(A-lambda B)$, but I was surprised to find that this value turned out to be extremely high (I got ~$10^{171}$ for one case) regardless of whether the input value of $lambda$ was correct (i.e. the ones provided by the eig() function) or not. Later I realized that this was because $(A-lambda B)$ was ill-conditioned, but upon further investigation, I found that the correct value of $lambda$ for a given $k$ corresponded to a local maxima in the 1-norm condition number for $(A-lambda B)$. Is there an explanation for this? Is there a different choice of $F(k,lambda(k))$ that would help me out?



Some additional information:



$bullet$ Both $lambda$ and $k$ are positive real numbers.



$bullet$ Both $A$ and $B$ are sparse matrices, and their general form can be seen here (page 54).










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I'm currently working on an eigenvalue problem of the form $$Azeta=lambda Bzeta$$ where all the elements of $A$ and $B$ are only functions of a variable $k$. Now, I can obtain values for $lambda$ using the eig() function in MATLAB, but I wanted to do an arc-length continuation program to plot $lambda$ as a function of $k$, so I needed a function such that $$F(k,lambda(k))=0$$ My initial thought was to use $F=det(A-lambda B)$, but I was surprised to find that this value turned out to be extremely high (I got ~$10^{171}$ for one case) regardless of whether the input value of $lambda$ was correct (i.e. the ones provided by the eig() function) or not. Later I realized that this was because $(A-lambda B)$ was ill-conditioned, but upon further investigation, I found that the correct value of $lambda$ for a given $k$ corresponded to a local maxima in the 1-norm condition number for $(A-lambda B)$. Is there an explanation for this? Is there a different choice of $F(k,lambda(k))$ that would help me out?



    Some additional information:



    $bullet$ Both $lambda$ and $k$ are positive real numbers.



    $bullet$ Both $A$ and $B$ are sparse matrices, and their general form can be seen here (page 54).










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I'm currently working on an eigenvalue problem of the form $$Azeta=lambda Bzeta$$ where all the elements of $A$ and $B$ are only functions of a variable $k$. Now, I can obtain values for $lambda$ using the eig() function in MATLAB, but I wanted to do an arc-length continuation program to plot $lambda$ as a function of $k$, so I needed a function such that $$F(k,lambda(k))=0$$ My initial thought was to use $F=det(A-lambda B)$, but I was surprised to find that this value turned out to be extremely high (I got ~$10^{171}$ for one case) regardless of whether the input value of $lambda$ was correct (i.e. the ones provided by the eig() function) or not. Later I realized that this was because $(A-lambda B)$ was ill-conditioned, but upon further investigation, I found that the correct value of $lambda$ for a given $k$ corresponded to a local maxima in the 1-norm condition number for $(A-lambda B)$. Is there an explanation for this? Is there a different choice of $F(k,lambda(k))$ that would help me out?



      Some additional information:



      $bullet$ Both $lambda$ and $k$ are positive real numbers.



      $bullet$ Both $A$ and $B$ are sparse matrices, and their general form can be seen here (page 54).










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I'm currently working on an eigenvalue problem of the form $$Azeta=lambda Bzeta$$ where all the elements of $A$ and $B$ are only functions of a variable $k$. Now, I can obtain values for $lambda$ using the eig() function in MATLAB, but I wanted to do an arc-length continuation program to plot $lambda$ as a function of $k$, so I needed a function such that $$F(k,lambda(k))=0$$ My initial thought was to use $F=det(A-lambda B)$, but I was surprised to find that this value turned out to be extremely high (I got ~$10^{171}$ for one case) regardless of whether the input value of $lambda$ was correct (i.e. the ones provided by the eig() function) or not. Later I realized that this was because $(A-lambda B)$ was ill-conditioned, but upon further investigation, I found that the correct value of $lambda$ for a given $k$ corresponded to a local maxima in the 1-norm condition number for $(A-lambda B)$. Is there an explanation for this? Is there a different choice of $F(k,lambda(k))$ that would help me out?



      Some additional information:



      $bullet$ Both $lambda$ and $k$ are positive real numbers.



      $bullet$ Both $A$ and $B$ are sparse matrices, and their general form can be seen here (page 54).







      linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 31 at 7:50









      YuiTo Cheng

      2,2734937




      2,2734937










      asked Jan 31 at 5:46









      Daniel HarperDaniel Harper

      155




      155






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3094563%2fexplanation-required-for-observations-regarding-determinant-and-condition-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3094563%2fexplanation-required-for-observations-regarding-determinant-and-condition-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

          in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

          Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory