Explanation required for observations regarding Determinant and Condition Number
$begingroup$
I'm currently working on an eigenvalue problem of the form $$Azeta=lambda Bzeta$$ where all the elements of $A$ and $B$ are only functions of a variable $k$. Now, I can obtain values for $lambda$ using the eig() function in MATLAB, but I wanted to do an arc-length continuation program to plot $lambda$ as a function of $k$, so I needed a function such that $$F(k,lambda(k))=0$$ My initial thought was to use $F=det(A-lambda B)$, but I was surprised to find that this value turned out to be extremely high (I got ~$10^{171}$ for one case) regardless of whether the input value of $lambda$ was correct (i.e. the ones provided by the eig() function) or not. Later I realized that this was because $(A-lambda B)$ was ill-conditioned, but upon further investigation, I found that the correct value of $lambda$ for a given $k$ corresponded to a local maxima in the 1-norm condition number for $(A-lambda B)$. Is there an explanation for this? Is there a different choice of $F(k,lambda(k))$ that would help me out?
Some additional information:
$bullet$ Both $lambda$ and $k$ are positive real numbers.
$bullet$ Both $A$ and $B$ are sparse matrices, and their general form can be seen here (page 54).
linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm currently working on an eigenvalue problem of the form $$Azeta=lambda Bzeta$$ where all the elements of $A$ and $B$ are only functions of a variable $k$. Now, I can obtain values for $lambda$ using the eig() function in MATLAB, but I wanted to do an arc-length continuation program to plot $lambda$ as a function of $k$, so I needed a function such that $$F(k,lambda(k))=0$$ My initial thought was to use $F=det(A-lambda B)$, but I was surprised to find that this value turned out to be extremely high (I got ~$10^{171}$ for one case) regardless of whether the input value of $lambda$ was correct (i.e. the ones provided by the eig() function) or not. Later I realized that this was because $(A-lambda B)$ was ill-conditioned, but upon further investigation, I found that the correct value of $lambda$ for a given $k$ corresponded to a local maxima in the 1-norm condition number for $(A-lambda B)$. Is there an explanation for this? Is there a different choice of $F(k,lambda(k))$ that would help me out?
Some additional information:
$bullet$ Both $lambda$ and $k$ are positive real numbers.
$bullet$ Both $A$ and $B$ are sparse matrices, and their general form can be seen here (page 54).
linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm currently working on an eigenvalue problem of the form $$Azeta=lambda Bzeta$$ where all the elements of $A$ and $B$ are only functions of a variable $k$. Now, I can obtain values for $lambda$ using the eig() function in MATLAB, but I wanted to do an arc-length continuation program to plot $lambda$ as a function of $k$, so I needed a function such that $$F(k,lambda(k))=0$$ My initial thought was to use $F=det(A-lambda B)$, but I was surprised to find that this value turned out to be extremely high (I got ~$10^{171}$ for one case) regardless of whether the input value of $lambda$ was correct (i.e. the ones provided by the eig() function) or not. Later I realized that this was because $(A-lambda B)$ was ill-conditioned, but upon further investigation, I found that the correct value of $lambda$ for a given $k$ corresponded to a local maxima in the 1-norm condition number for $(A-lambda B)$. Is there an explanation for this? Is there a different choice of $F(k,lambda(k))$ that would help me out?
Some additional information:
$bullet$ Both $lambda$ and $k$ are positive real numbers.
$bullet$ Both $A$ and $B$ are sparse matrices, and their general form can be seen here (page 54).
linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors
$endgroup$
I'm currently working on an eigenvalue problem of the form $$Azeta=lambda Bzeta$$ where all the elements of $A$ and $B$ are only functions of a variable $k$. Now, I can obtain values for $lambda$ using the eig() function in MATLAB, but I wanted to do an arc-length continuation program to plot $lambda$ as a function of $k$, so I needed a function such that $$F(k,lambda(k))=0$$ My initial thought was to use $F=det(A-lambda B)$, but I was surprised to find that this value turned out to be extremely high (I got ~$10^{171}$ for one case) regardless of whether the input value of $lambda$ was correct (i.e. the ones provided by the eig() function) or not. Later I realized that this was because $(A-lambda B)$ was ill-conditioned, but upon further investigation, I found that the correct value of $lambda$ for a given $k$ corresponded to a local maxima in the 1-norm condition number for $(A-lambda B)$. Is there an explanation for this? Is there a different choice of $F(k,lambda(k))$ that would help me out?
Some additional information:
$bullet$ Both $lambda$ and $k$ are positive real numbers.
$bullet$ Both $A$ and $B$ are sparse matrices, and their general form can be seen here (page 54).
linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors
linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors
edited Jan 31 at 7:50


YuiTo Cheng
2,2734937
2,2734937
asked Jan 31 at 5:46
Daniel HarperDaniel Harper
155
155
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3094563%2fexplanation-required-for-observations-regarding-determinant-and-condition-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3094563%2fexplanation-required-for-observations-regarding-determinant-and-condition-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown