Mixing
Git - Shortcut for Branch Off from Another Branch
Are the following two command blocks equivalent?
$ git checkout -b myfeature develop
and second command block.
$ git checkout develop
$ git checkout -b myfeature
git version-control
asked Jan 2 at 21:18
SadatSadat
14116
add a comment |
Are the following two command blocks equivalent?
$ git checkout -b myfeature develop
and second command block.
$ git checkout develop
$ git checkout -b myfeature
git version-control
asked Jan 2 at 21:18
SadatSadat
14116
Those two command blocks are not equivalent.
– evolutionxbox
Jan 2 at 22:19
@evolutionxbox what's the difference?
– Sadat
Jan 2 at 22:22
Forgive me. They are. I didn’t noticedevelopin the first command block.
– evolutionxbox
Jan 2 at 22:26
@evolutionxbox no worries :)
– Sadat
Jan 2 at 22:37
add a comment |
Are the following two command blocks equivalent?
$ git checkout -b myfeature develop
and second command block.
$ git checkout develop
$ git checkout -b myfeature
git version-control
asked Jan 2 at 21:18
SadatSadat
14116
Are the following two command blocks equivalent?
$ git checkout -b myfeature develop
and second command block.
$ git checkout develop
$ git checkout -b myfeature
git version-control
git version-control
asked Jan 2 at 21:18
SadatSadat
14116
asked Jan 2 at 21:18
SadatSadat
14116
asked Jan 2 at 21:18
SadatSadat
14116
asked Jan 2 at 21:18
SadatSadat
14116
asked Jan 2 at 21:18
SadatSadat
14116
14116
Those two command blocks are not equivalent.
– evolutionxbox
Jan 2 at 22:19
@evolutionxbox what's the difference?
– Sadat
Jan 2 at 22:22
Forgive me. They are. I didn’t noticedevelopin the first command block.
– evolutionxbox
Jan 2 at 22:26
@evolutionxbox no worries :)
– Sadat
Jan 2 at 22:37
add a comment |
Those two command blocks are not equivalent.
– evolutionxbox
Jan 2 at 22:19
@evolutionxbox what's the difference?
– Sadat
Jan 2 at 22:22
Forgive me. They are. I didn’t noticedevelopin the first command block.
– evolutionxbox
Jan 2 at 22:26
@evolutionxbox no worries :)
– Sadat
Jan 2 at 22:37
Those two command blocks are not equivalent.
– evolutionxbox
Jan 2 at 22:19
Those two command blocks are not equivalent.
– evolutionxbox
Jan 2 at 22:19
@evolutionxbox what's the difference?
– Sadat
Jan 2 at 22:22
@evolutionxbox what's the difference?
– Sadat
Jan 2 at 22:22
Forgive me. They are. I didn’t notice
develop in the first command block.– evolutionxbox
Jan 2 at 22:26
Forgive me. They are. I didn’t notice
develop in the first command block.– evolutionxbox
Jan 2 at 22:26
@evolutionxbox no worries :)
– Sadat
Jan 2 at 22:37
@evolutionxbox no worries :)
– Sadat
Jan 2 at 22:37
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Yes, but one-line command is faster — it does 1 checkout instead of 2. Also there could be difference due to a post-checkout hook.
Another set of equivalent commands are:
git branch myfeature develop
git checkout myfeature
answered Jan 2 at 21:33
phdphd
24.1k52646
add a comment |
You can use the git checkout -b <new_branch> command, this will create a new branch based on the current branch you are located.
So if your current branch is named develop you can create a new branch named feature based on the branch develop like this: git branch -b feature
answered Jan 2 at 22:00
Dimitri AcostaDimitri Acosta
1,217810
add a comment |
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54013322%2fgit-shortcut-for-branch-off-from-another-branch%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes, but one-line command is faster — it does 1 checkout instead of 2. Also there could be difference due to a post-checkout hook.
Another set of equivalent commands are:
git branch myfeature develop
git checkout myfeature
answered Jan 2 at 21:33
phdphd
24.1k52646
add a comment |
Yes, but one-line command is faster — it does 1 checkout instead of 2. Also there could be difference due to a post-checkout hook.
Another set of equivalent commands are:
git branch myfeature develop
git checkout myfeature
answered Jan 2 at 21:33
phdphd
24.1k52646
add a comment |
Yes, but one-line command is faster — it does 1 checkout instead of 2. Also there could be difference due to a post-checkout hook.
Another set of equivalent commands are:
git branch myfeature develop
git checkout myfeature
answered Jan 2 at 21:33
phdphd
24.1k52646
Yes, but one-line command is faster — it does 1 checkout instead of 2. Also there could be difference due to a post-checkout hook.
Another set of equivalent commands are:
git branch myfeature develop
git checkout myfeature
answered Jan 2 at 21:33
phdphd
24.1k52646
answered Jan 2 at 21:33
phdphd
24.1k52646
answered Jan 2 at 21:33
phdphd
24.1k52646
answered Jan 2 at 21:33
phdphd
24.1k52646
24.1k52646
add a comment |
add a comment |
You can use the git checkout -b <new_branch> command, this will create a new branch based on the current branch you are located.
So if your current branch is named develop you can create a new branch named feature based on the branch develop like this: git branch -b feature
answered Jan 2 at 22:00
Dimitri AcostaDimitri Acosta
1,217810
add a comment |
You can use the git checkout -b <new_branch> command, this will create a new branch based on the current branch you are located.
So if your current branch is named develop you can create a new branch named feature based on the branch develop like this: git branch -b feature
answered Jan 2 at 22:00
Dimitri AcostaDimitri Acosta
1,217810
add a comment |
You can use the git checkout -b <new_branch> command, this will create a new branch based on the current branch you are located.
So if your current branch is named develop you can create a new branch named feature based on the branch develop like this: git branch -b feature
answered Jan 2 at 22:00
Dimitri AcostaDimitri Acosta
1,217810
You can use the git checkout -b <new_branch> command, this will create a new branch based on the current branch you are located.
So if your current branch is named develop you can create a new branch named feature based on the branch develop like this: git branch -b feature
answered Jan 2 at 22:00
Dimitri AcostaDimitri Acosta
1,217810
answered Jan 2 at 22:00
Dimitri AcostaDimitri Acosta
1,217810
answered Jan 2 at 22:00
Dimitri AcostaDimitri Acosta
1,217810
answered Jan 2 at 22:00
Dimitri AcostaDimitri Acosta
1,217810
1,217810
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54013322%2fgit-shortcut-for-branch-off-from-another-branch%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Those two command blocks are not equivalent.
– evolutionxbox
Jan 2 at 22:19
@evolutionxbox what's the difference?
– Sadat
Jan 2 at 22:22
Forgive me. They are. I didn’t notice
developin the first command block.– evolutionxbox
Jan 2 at 22:26
@evolutionxbox no worries :)
– Sadat
Jan 2 at 22:37