How to prove that a vector space homomorphism $phi$ is injective if and only if $ker (phi)={0}$?
$begingroup$
A vector space homomorphism $$phi: Vrightarrow W$$ is a map between two vector spaces which satisfies the rule
$$phi(lambda v + mu v')=lambdaphi(v)+muphi(v').$$
Injectivity means
$$forall {x,x'in V}phi(x)=phi(x')Rightarrow x=x'.$$
I have already proved the statement for group homomorphisms.
And $phi$ is a group homomorphism under addition, i.e.,
$$phi(v+w)=phi(v)+phi(w).$$
How can I make the transition to vector spaces; I hope it is clear what I am asking for.
I am confused because there are two operations under $phi$: the scalar multiplication and the addition.
linear-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A vector space homomorphism $$phi: Vrightarrow W$$ is a map between two vector spaces which satisfies the rule
$$phi(lambda v + mu v')=lambdaphi(v)+muphi(v').$$
Injectivity means
$$forall {x,x'in V}phi(x)=phi(x')Rightarrow x=x'.$$
I have already proved the statement for group homomorphisms.
And $phi$ is a group homomorphism under addition, i.e.,
$$phi(v+w)=phi(v)+phi(w).$$
How can I make the transition to vector spaces; I hope it is clear what I am asking for.
I am confused because there are two operations under $phi$: the scalar multiplication and the addition.
linear-algebra
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The definition of the kernel is the same in both cases, though.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Jan 30 at 18:58
$begingroup$
A vector space is an abelian group (plus an additional structure)., so already proved.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 30 at 19:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A vector space homomorphism $$phi: Vrightarrow W$$ is a map between two vector spaces which satisfies the rule
$$phi(lambda v + mu v')=lambdaphi(v)+muphi(v').$$
Injectivity means
$$forall {x,x'in V}phi(x)=phi(x')Rightarrow x=x'.$$
I have already proved the statement for group homomorphisms.
And $phi$ is a group homomorphism under addition, i.e.,
$$phi(v+w)=phi(v)+phi(w).$$
How can I make the transition to vector spaces; I hope it is clear what I am asking for.
I am confused because there are two operations under $phi$: the scalar multiplication and the addition.
linear-algebra
$endgroup$
A vector space homomorphism $$phi: Vrightarrow W$$ is a map between two vector spaces which satisfies the rule
$$phi(lambda v + mu v')=lambdaphi(v)+muphi(v').$$
Injectivity means
$$forall {x,x'in V}phi(x)=phi(x')Rightarrow x=x'.$$
I have already proved the statement for group homomorphisms.
And $phi$ is a group homomorphism under addition, i.e.,
$$phi(v+w)=phi(v)+phi(w).$$
How can I make the transition to vector spaces; I hope it is clear what I am asking for.
I am confused because there are two operations under $phi$: the scalar multiplication and the addition.
linear-algebra
linear-algebra
edited Jan 30 at 19:15
J. W. Tanner
4,4691320
4,4691320
asked Jan 30 at 18:56
New2MathNew2Math
16715
16715
1
$begingroup$
The definition of the kernel is the same in both cases, though.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Jan 30 at 18:58
$begingroup$
A vector space is an abelian group (plus an additional structure)., so already proved.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 30 at 19:45
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
The definition of the kernel is the same in both cases, though.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Jan 30 at 18:58
$begingroup$
A vector space is an abelian group (plus an additional structure)., so already proved.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 30 at 19:45
1
1
$begingroup$
The definition of the kernel is the same in both cases, though.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Jan 30 at 18:58
$begingroup$
The definition of the kernel is the same in both cases, though.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Jan 30 at 18:58
$begingroup$
A vector space is an abelian group (plus an additional structure)., so already proved.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 30 at 19:45
$begingroup$
A vector space is an abelian group (plus an additional structure)., so already proved.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 30 at 19:45
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The proof is the same. A vector space is a group wrt the internal operation (i.e. $(V,+)$ is a group) and a vector space homomorphism is, in particular, a group homomorphism.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The proof should look very similar to the one for group homomorphisms.
If $phi$ is injective, then $phi(x)=0=phi(0)$ implies that $x=0$, so the kernel is ${0}$. Conversely, suppose the kernel is ${0}$ and that $phi(x)=phi(y)$.
Then $phi(x)-phi(y)=0$. Using homomorphism property, this means $phi(x-y)=0$ so that $x-y$ is in the kernel, which only consists of $0$. Thus $x-y=0$, or $x=y$, proving injectivity.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As you observed, if you take in your definition of $phi$, $lambda=mu=1$, it follows that, in particular:
$$phi(x+y)=phi(x)+phi(y), forall x,yin V.$$
Therefore $phi:Vto W$ is, in particular, a morphism between the groups $V$ and $W$. Applying your result for groups, it follows that $ker(phi)$ (seen as the kernel of the group morphism is $0$).
The external operation does not intervene in this statement.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3093961%2fhow-to-prove-that-a-vector-space-homomorphism-phi-is-injective-if-and-only-if%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The proof is the same. A vector space is a group wrt the internal operation (i.e. $(V,+)$ is a group) and a vector space homomorphism is, in particular, a group homomorphism.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The proof is the same. A vector space is a group wrt the internal operation (i.e. $(V,+)$ is a group) and a vector space homomorphism is, in particular, a group homomorphism.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The proof is the same. A vector space is a group wrt the internal operation (i.e. $(V,+)$ is a group) and a vector space homomorphism is, in particular, a group homomorphism.
$endgroup$
The proof is the same. A vector space is a group wrt the internal operation (i.e. $(V,+)$ is a group) and a vector space homomorphism is, in particular, a group homomorphism.
edited Jan 31 at 9:36
answered Jan 30 at 19:04
HarnakHarnak
1,369512
1,369512
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The proof should look very similar to the one for group homomorphisms.
If $phi$ is injective, then $phi(x)=0=phi(0)$ implies that $x=0$, so the kernel is ${0}$. Conversely, suppose the kernel is ${0}$ and that $phi(x)=phi(y)$.
Then $phi(x)-phi(y)=0$. Using homomorphism property, this means $phi(x-y)=0$ so that $x-y$ is in the kernel, which only consists of $0$. Thus $x-y=0$, or $x=y$, proving injectivity.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The proof should look very similar to the one for group homomorphisms.
If $phi$ is injective, then $phi(x)=0=phi(0)$ implies that $x=0$, so the kernel is ${0}$. Conversely, suppose the kernel is ${0}$ and that $phi(x)=phi(y)$.
Then $phi(x)-phi(y)=0$. Using homomorphism property, this means $phi(x-y)=0$ so that $x-y$ is in the kernel, which only consists of $0$. Thus $x-y=0$, or $x=y$, proving injectivity.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The proof should look very similar to the one for group homomorphisms.
If $phi$ is injective, then $phi(x)=0=phi(0)$ implies that $x=0$, so the kernel is ${0}$. Conversely, suppose the kernel is ${0}$ and that $phi(x)=phi(y)$.
Then $phi(x)-phi(y)=0$. Using homomorphism property, this means $phi(x-y)=0$ so that $x-y$ is in the kernel, which only consists of $0$. Thus $x-y=0$, or $x=y$, proving injectivity.
$endgroup$
The proof should look very similar to the one for group homomorphisms.
If $phi$ is injective, then $phi(x)=0=phi(0)$ implies that $x=0$, so the kernel is ${0}$. Conversely, suppose the kernel is ${0}$ and that $phi(x)=phi(y)$.
Then $phi(x)-phi(y)=0$. Using homomorphism property, this means $phi(x-y)=0$ so that $x-y$ is in the kernel, which only consists of $0$. Thus $x-y=0$, or $x=y$, proving injectivity.
answered Jan 30 at 19:03
pwerthpwerth
3,310417
3,310417
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As you observed, if you take in your definition of $phi$, $lambda=mu=1$, it follows that, in particular:
$$phi(x+y)=phi(x)+phi(y), forall x,yin V.$$
Therefore $phi:Vto W$ is, in particular, a morphism between the groups $V$ and $W$. Applying your result for groups, it follows that $ker(phi)$ (seen as the kernel of the group morphism is $0$).
The external operation does not intervene in this statement.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As you observed, if you take in your definition of $phi$, $lambda=mu=1$, it follows that, in particular:
$$phi(x+y)=phi(x)+phi(y), forall x,yin V.$$
Therefore $phi:Vto W$ is, in particular, a morphism between the groups $V$ and $W$. Applying your result for groups, it follows that $ker(phi)$ (seen as the kernel of the group morphism is $0$).
The external operation does not intervene in this statement.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As you observed, if you take in your definition of $phi$, $lambda=mu=1$, it follows that, in particular:
$$phi(x+y)=phi(x)+phi(y), forall x,yin V.$$
Therefore $phi:Vto W$ is, in particular, a morphism between the groups $V$ and $W$. Applying your result for groups, it follows that $ker(phi)$ (seen as the kernel of the group morphism is $0$).
The external operation does not intervene in this statement.
$endgroup$
As you observed, if you take in your definition of $phi$, $lambda=mu=1$, it follows that, in particular:
$$phi(x+y)=phi(x)+phi(y), forall x,yin V.$$
Therefore $phi:Vto W$ is, in particular, a morphism between the groups $V$ and $W$. Applying your result for groups, it follows that $ker(phi)$ (seen as the kernel of the group morphism is $0$).
The external operation does not intervene in this statement.
answered Jan 30 at 21:41
IuliaIulia
1,025415
1,025415
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3093961%2fhow-to-prove-that-a-vector-space-homomorphism-phi-is-injective-if-and-only-if%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
The definition of the kernel is the same in both cases, though.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Jan 30 at 18:58
$begingroup$
A vector space is an abelian group (plus an additional structure)., so already proved.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 30 at 19:45