How to prove that a vector space homomorphism $phi$ is injective if and only if $ker (phi)={0}$?












0












$begingroup$


A vector space homomorphism $$phi: Vrightarrow W$$ is a map between two vector spaces which satisfies the rule



$$phi(lambda v + mu v')=lambdaphi(v)+muphi(v').$$



Injectivity means



$$forall {x,x'in V}phi(x)=phi(x')Rightarrow x=x'.$$



I have already proved the statement for group homomorphisms.



And $phi$ is a group homomorphism under addition, i.e.,



$$phi(v+w)=phi(v)+phi(w).$$



How can I make the transition to vector spaces; I hope it is clear what I am asking for.



I am confused because there are two operations under $phi$: the scalar multiplication and the addition.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The definition of the kernel is the same in both cases, though.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Jan 30 at 18:58










  • $begingroup$
    A vector space is an abelian group (plus an additional structure)., so already proved.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    Jan 30 at 19:45
















0












$begingroup$


A vector space homomorphism $$phi: Vrightarrow W$$ is a map between two vector spaces which satisfies the rule



$$phi(lambda v + mu v')=lambdaphi(v)+muphi(v').$$



Injectivity means



$$forall {x,x'in V}phi(x)=phi(x')Rightarrow x=x'.$$



I have already proved the statement for group homomorphisms.



And $phi$ is a group homomorphism under addition, i.e.,



$$phi(v+w)=phi(v)+phi(w).$$



How can I make the transition to vector spaces; I hope it is clear what I am asking for.



I am confused because there are two operations under $phi$: the scalar multiplication and the addition.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The definition of the kernel is the same in both cases, though.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Jan 30 at 18:58










  • $begingroup$
    A vector space is an abelian group (plus an additional structure)., so already proved.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    Jan 30 at 19:45














0












0








0


1



$begingroup$


A vector space homomorphism $$phi: Vrightarrow W$$ is a map between two vector spaces which satisfies the rule



$$phi(lambda v + mu v')=lambdaphi(v)+muphi(v').$$



Injectivity means



$$forall {x,x'in V}phi(x)=phi(x')Rightarrow x=x'.$$



I have already proved the statement for group homomorphisms.



And $phi$ is a group homomorphism under addition, i.e.,



$$phi(v+w)=phi(v)+phi(w).$$



How can I make the transition to vector spaces; I hope it is clear what I am asking for.



I am confused because there are two operations under $phi$: the scalar multiplication and the addition.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




A vector space homomorphism $$phi: Vrightarrow W$$ is a map between two vector spaces which satisfies the rule



$$phi(lambda v + mu v')=lambdaphi(v)+muphi(v').$$



Injectivity means



$$forall {x,x'in V}phi(x)=phi(x')Rightarrow x=x'.$$



I have already proved the statement for group homomorphisms.



And $phi$ is a group homomorphism under addition, i.e.,



$$phi(v+w)=phi(v)+phi(w).$$



How can I make the transition to vector spaces; I hope it is clear what I am asking for.



I am confused because there are two operations under $phi$: the scalar multiplication and the addition.







linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 30 at 19:15









J. W. Tanner

4,4691320




4,4691320










asked Jan 30 at 18:56









New2MathNew2Math

16715




16715








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The definition of the kernel is the same in both cases, though.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Jan 30 at 18:58










  • $begingroup$
    A vector space is an abelian group (plus an additional structure)., so already proved.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    Jan 30 at 19:45














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The definition of the kernel is the same in both cases, though.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Jan 30 at 18:58










  • $begingroup$
    A vector space is an abelian group (plus an additional structure)., so already proved.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    Jan 30 at 19:45








1




1




$begingroup$
The definition of the kernel is the same in both cases, though.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Jan 30 at 18:58




$begingroup$
The definition of the kernel is the same in both cases, though.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Jan 30 at 18:58












$begingroup$
A vector space is an abelian group (plus an additional structure)., so already proved.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 30 at 19:45




$begingroup$
A vector space is an abelian group (plus an additional structure)., so already proved.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 30 at 19:45










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

The proof is the same. A vector space is a group wrt the internal operation (i.e. $(V,+)$ is a group) and a vector space homomorphism is, in particular, a group homomorphism.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    The proof should look very similar to the one for group homomorphisms.



    If $phi$ is injective, then $phi(x)=0=phi(0)$ implies that $x=0$, so the kernel is ${0}$. Conversely, suppose the kernel is ${0}$ and that $phi(x)=phi(y)$.
    Then $phi(x)-phi(y)=0$. Using homomorphism property, this means $phi(x-y)=0$ so that $x-y$ is in the kernel, which only consists of $0$. Thus $x-y=0$, or $x=y$, proving injectivity.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      0












      $begingroup$

      As you observed, if you take in your definition of $phi$, $lambda=mu=1$, it follows that, in particular:
      $$phi(x+y)=phi(x)+phi(y), forall x,yin V.$$
      Therefore $phi:Vto W$ is, in particular, a morphism between the groups $V$ and $W$. Applying your result for groups, it follows that $ker(phi)$ (seen as the kernel of the group morphism is $0$).
      The external operation does not intervene in this statement.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$














        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3093961%2fhow-to-prove-that-a-vector-space-homomorphism-phi-is-injective-if-and-only-if%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        2












        $begingroup$

        The proof is the same. A vector space is a group wrt the internal operation (i.e. $(V,+)$ is a group) and a vector space homomorphism is, in particular, a group homomorphism.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$


















          2












          $begingroup$

          The proof is the same. A vector space is a group wrt the internal operation (i.e. $(V,+)$ is a group) and a vector space homomorphism is, in particular, a group homomorphism.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$
















            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            The proof is the same. A vector space is a group wrt the internal operation (i.e. $(V,+)$ is a group) and a vector space homomorphism is, in particular, a group homomorphism.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            The proof is the same. A vector space is a group wrt the internal operation (i.e. $(V,+)$ is a group) and a vector space homomorphism is, in particular, a group homomorphism.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Jan 31 at 9:36

























            answered Jan 30 at 19:04









            HarnakHarnak

            1,369512




            1,369512























                0












                $begingroup$

                The proof should look very similar to the one for group homomorphisms.



                If $phi$ is injective, then $phi(x)=0=phi(0)$ implies that $x=0$, so the kernel is ${0}$. Conversely, suppose the kernel is ${0}$ and that $phi(x)=phi(y)$.
                Then $phi(x)-phi(y)=0$. Using homomorphism property, this means $phi(x-y)=0$ so that $x-y$ is in the kernel, which only consists of $0$. Thus $x-y=0$, or $x=y$, proving injectivity.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  0












                  $begingroup$

                  The proof should look very similar to the one for group homomorphisms.



                  If $phi$ is injective, then $phi(x)=0=phi(0)$ implies that $x=0$, so the kernel is ${0}$. Conversely, suppose the kernel is ${0}$ and that $phi(x)=phi(y)$.
                  Then $phi(x)-phi(y)=0$. Using homomorphism property, this means $phi(x-y)=0$ so that $x-y$ is in the kernel, which only consists of $0$. Thus $x-y=0$, or $x=y$, proving injectivity.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    0












                    0








                    0





                    $begingroup$

                    The proof should look very similar to the one for group homomorphisms.



                    If $phi$ is injective, then $phi(x)=0=phi(0)$ implies that $x=0$, so the kernel is ${0}$. Conversely, suppose the kernel is ${0}$ and that $phi(x)=phi(y)$.
                    Then $phi(x)-phi(y)=0$. Using homomorphism property, this means $phi(x-y)=0$ so that $x-y$ is in the kernel, which only consists of $0$. Thus $x-y=0$, or $x=y$, proving injectivity.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    The proof should look very similar to the one for group homomorphisms.



                    If $phi$ is injective, then $phi(x)=0=phi(0)$ implies that $x=0$, so the kernel is ${0}$. Conversely, suppose the kernel is ${0}$ and that $phi(x)=phi(y)$.
                    Then $phi(x)-phi(y)=0$. Using homomorphism property, this means $phi(x-y)=0$ so that $x-y$ is in the kernel, which only consists of $0$. Thus $x-y=0$, or $x=y$, proving injectivity.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Jan 30 at 19:03









                    pwerthpwerth

                    3,310417




                    3,310417























                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        As you observed, if you take in your definition of $phi$, $lambda=mu=1$, it follows that, in particular:
                        $$phi(x+y)=phi(x)+phi(y), forall x,yin V.$$
                        Therefore $phi:Vto W$ is, in particular, a morphism between the groups $V$ and $W$. Applying your result for groups, it follows that $ker(phi)$ (seen as the kernel of the group morphism is $0$).
                        The external operation does not intervene in this statement.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          As you observed, if you take in your definition of $phi$, $lambda=mu=1$, it follows that, in particular:
                          $$phi(x+y)=phi(x)+phi(y), forall x,yin V.$$
                          Therefore $phi:Vto W$ is, in particular, a morphism between the groups $V$ and $W$. Applying your result for groups, it follows that $ker(phi)$ (seen as the kernel of the group morphism is $0$).
                          The external operation does not intervene in this statement.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            As you observed, if you take in your definition of $phi$, $lambda=mu=1$, it follows that, in particular:
                            $$phi(x+y)=phi(x)+phi(y), forall x,yin V.$$
                            Therefore $phi:Vto W$ is, in particular, a morphism between the groups $V$ and $W$. Applying your result for groups, it follows that $ker(phi)$ (seen as the kernel of the group morphism is $0$).
                            The external operation does not intervene in this statement.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            As you observed, if you take in your definition of $phi$, $lambda=mu=1$, it follows that, in particular:
                            $$phi(x+y)=phi(x)+phi(y), forall x,yin V.$$
                            Therefore $phi:Vto W$ is, in particular, a morphism between the groups $V$ and $W$. Applying your result for groups, it follows that $ker(phi)$ (seen as the kernel of the group morphism is $0$).
                            The external operation does not intervene in this statement.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Jan 30 at 21:41









                            IuliaIulia

                            1,025415




                            1,025415






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3093961%2fhow-to-prove-that-a-vector-space-homomorphism-phi-is-injective-if-and-only-if%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                                How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                                in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith