Lower bound $mathcal{K}$-class function
$begingroup$
Let $alpha_0: mathbb{R}_{geq 0} to mathbb{R}_{geq 0}$ be a $mathcal{K}$-function, i.e., a strictly increasing function such that $alpha_0(0) = 0$, and $b geq 0$ a given constant. Is there any way to lower bound what follow
$$
alpha_0(x) + b geq alpha(x + b)
$$
with a $mathcal{K}$-function $alpha$? I guess this should be a well-known result, any suggestions for some related theorems?
real-analysis functional-analysis monotone-functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $alpha_0: mathbb{R}_{geq 0} to mathbb{R}_{geq 0}$ be a $mathcal{K}$-function, i.e., a strictly increasing function such that $alpha_0(0) = 0$, and $b geq 0$ a given constant. Is there any way to lower bound what follow
$$
alpha_0(x) + b geq alpha(x + b)
$$
with a $mathcal{K}$-function $alpha$? I guess this should be a well-known result, any suggestions for some related theorems?
real-analysis functional-analysis monotone-functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $alpha_0: mathbb{R}_{geq 0} to mathbb{R}_{geq 0}$ be a $mathcal{K}$-function, i.e., a strictly increasing function such that $alpha_0(0) = 0$, and $b geq 0$ a given constant. Is there any way to lower bound what follow
$$
alpha_0(x) + b geq alpha(x + b)
$$
with a $mathcal{K}$-function $alpha$? I guess this should be a well-known result, any suggestions for some related theorems?
real-analysis functional-analysis monotone-functions
$endgroup$
Let $alpha_0: mathbb{R}_{geq 0} to mathbb{R}_{geq 0}$ be a $mathcal{K}$-function, i.e., a strictly increasing function such that $alpha_0(0) = 0$, and $b geq 0$ a given constant. Is there any way to lower bound what follow
$$
alpha_0(x) + b geq alpha(x + b)
$$
with a $mathcal{K}$-function $alpha$? I guess this should be a well-known result, any suggestions for some related theorems?
real-analysis functional-analysis monotone-functions
real-analysis functional-analysis monotone-functions
edited Jan 30 at 14:23


Scientifica
6,80941335
6,80941335
asked Jan 30 at 13:37
GuidoLaremiGuidoLaremi
145
145
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You're looking for a $mathcal K$-function $alpha$ such that $alpha(x+b)lealpha_0(x)+b$.
Notice that $alpha_0(x)+b$ is a strictly increasing function. So one would think of letting $alpha(x+b)=alpha_0(x)+b$. In other words, we take $alpha(x)=alpha_0(x-b)+b$ for $xge b$.
We need to define $alpha$ on $[0,b]$ as well! Well notice that $alpha(b)=b$, so any strictly increasing function such that $alpha(0)=0$ and $alpha(b)=b$ will do.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Exactly, I was passing by a change of variables and I was getting the same result. It seems work,
$endgroup$
– GuidoLaremi
Jan 30 at 15:19
$begingroup$
Yep it works :)
$endgroup$
– Scientifica
Jan 30 at 15:21
$begingroup$
I'm trying to figure out if it works also for some given $b<0$.
$endgroup$
– GuidoLaremi
Jan 30 at 15:35
$begingroup$
Well pay attention $mathcal K$-functions are defined on the nonegative real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Scientifica
Jan 30 at 16:05
$begingroup$
Yes I know. Unfortunately, the same procedure does not apply.
$endgroup$
– GuidoLaremi
Jan 30 at 16:10
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3093532%2flower-bound-mathcalk-class-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You're looking for a $mathcal K$-function $alpha$ such that $alpha(x+b)lealpha_0(x)+b$.
Notice that $alpha_0(x)+b$ is a strictly increasing function. So one would think of letting $alpha(x+b)=alpha_0(x)+b$. In other words, we take $alpha(x)=alpha_0(x-b)+b$ for $xge b$.
We need to define $alpha$ on $[0,b]$ as well! Well notice that $alpha(b)=b$, so any strictly increasing function such that $alpha(0)=0$ and $alpha(b)=b$ will do.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Exactly, I was passing by a change of variables and I was getting the same result. It seems work,
$endgroup$
– GuidoLaremi
Jan 30 at 15:19
$begingroup$
Yep it works :)
$endgroup$
– Scientifica
Jan 30 at 15:21
$begingroup$
I'm trying to figure out if it works also for some given $b<0$.
$endgroup$
– GuidoLaremi
Jan 30 at 15:35
$begingroup$
Well pay attention $mathcal K$-functions are defined on the nonegative real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Scientifica
Jan 30 at 16:05
$begingroup$
Yes I know. Unfortunately, the same procedure does not apply.
$endgroup$
– GuidoLaremi
Jan 30 at 16:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You're looking for a $mathcal K$-function $alpha$ such that $alpha(x+b)lealpha_0(x)+b$.
Notice that $alpha_0(x)+b$ is a strictly increasing function. So one would think of letting $alpha(x+b)=alpha_0(x)+b$. In other words, we take $alpha(x)=alpha_0(x-b)+b$ for $xge b$.
We need to define $alpha$ on $[0,b]$ as well! Well notice that $alpha(b)=b$, so any strictly increasing function such that $alpha(0)=0$ and $alpha(b)=b$ will do.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Exactly, I was passing by a change of variables and I was getting the same result. It seems work,
$endgroup$
– GuidoLaremi
Jan 30 at 15:19
$begingroup$
Yep it works :)
$endgroup$
– Scientifica
Jan 30 at 15:21
$begingroup$
I'm trying to figure out if it works also for some given $b<0$.
$endgroup$
– GuidoLaremi
Jan 30 at 15:35
$begingroup$
Well pay attention $mathcal K$-functions are defined on the nonegative real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Scientifica
Jan 30 at 16:05
$begingroup$
Yes I know. Unfortunately, the same procedure does not apply.
$endgroup$
– GuidoLaremi
Jan 30 at 16:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You're looking for a $mathcal K$-function $alpha$ such that $alpha(x+b)lealpha_0(x)+b$.
Notice that $alpha_0(x)+b$ is a strictly increasing function. So one would think of letting $alpha(x+b)=alpha_0(x)+b$. In other words, we take $alpha(x)=alpha_0(x-b)+b$ for $xge b$.
We need to define $alpha$ on $[0,b]$ as well! Well notice that $alpha(b)=b$, so any strictly increasing function such that $alpha(0)=0$ and $alpha(b)=b$ will do.
$endgroup$
You're looking for a $mathcal K$-function $alpha$ such that $alpha(x+b)lealpha_0(x)+b$.
Notice that $alpha_0(x)+b$ is a strictly increasing function. So one would think of letting $alpha(x+b)=alpha_0(x)+b$. In other words, we take $alpha(x)=alpha_0(x-b)+b$ for $xge b$.
We need to define $alpha$ on $[0,b]$ as well! Well notice that $alpha(b)=b$, so any strictly increasing function such that $alpha(0)=0$ and $alpha(b)=b$ will do.
answered Jan 30 at 15:11


ScientificaScientifica
6,80941335
6,80941335
$begingroup$
Exactly, I was passing by a change of variables and I was getting the same result. It seems work,
$endgroup$
– GuidoLaremi
Jan 30 at 15:19
$begingroup$
Yep it works :)
$endgroup$
– Scientifica
Jan 30 at 15:21
$begingroup$
I'm trying to figure out if it works also for some given $b<0$.
$endgroup$
– GuidoLaremi
Jan 30 at 15:35
$begingroup$
Well pay attention $mathcal K$-functions are defined on the nonegative real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Scientifica
Jan 30 at 16:05
$begingroup$
Yes I know. Unfortunately, the same procedure does not apply.
$endgroup$
– GuidoLaremi
Jan 30 at 16:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Exactly, I was passing by a change of variables and I was getting the same result. It seems work,
$endgroup$
– GuidoLaremi
Jan 30 at 15:19
$begingroup$
Yep it works :)
$endgroup$
– Scientifica
Jan 30 at 15:21
$begingroup$
I'm trying to figure out if it works also for some given $b<0$.
$endgroup$
– GuidoLaremi
Jan 30 at 15:35
$begingroup$
Well pay attention $mathcal K$-functions are defined on the nonegative real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Scientifica
Jan 30 at 16:05
$begingroup$
Yes I know. Unfortunately, the same procedure does not apply.
$endgroup$
– GuidoLaremi
Jan 30 at 16:10
$begingroup$
Exactly, I was passing by a change of variables and I was getting the same result. It seems work,
$endgroup$
– GuidoLaremi
Jan 30 at 15:19
$begingroup$
Exactly, I was passing by a change of variables and I was getting the same result. It seems work,
$endgroup$
– GuidoLaremi
Jan 30 at 15:19
$begingroup$
Yep it works :)
$endgroup$
– Scientifica
Jan 30 at 15:21
$begingroup$
Yep it works :)
$endgroup$
– Scientifica
Jan 30 at 15:21
$begingroup$
I'm trying to figure out if it works also for some given $b<0$.
$endgroup$
– GuidoLaremi
Jan 30 at 15:35
$begingroup$
I'm trying to figure out if it works also for some given $b<0$.
$endgroup$
– GuidoLaremi
Jan 30 at 15:35
$begingroup$
Well pay attention $mathcal K$-functions are defined on the nonegative real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Scientifica
Jan 30 at 16:05
$begingroup$
Well pay attention $mathcal K$-functions are defined on the nonegative real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Scientifica
Jan 30 at 16:05
$begingroup$
Yes I know. Unfortunately, the same procedure does not apply.
$endgroup$
– GuidoLaremi
Jan 30 at 16:10
$begingroup$
Yes I know. Unfortunately, the same procedure does not apply.
$endgroup$
– GuidoLaremi
Jan 30 at 16:10
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3093532%2flower-bound-mathcalk-class-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown