Lower bound $mathcal{K}$-class function












0












$begingroup$


Let $alpha_0: mathbb{R}_{geq 0} to mathbb{R}_{geq 0}$ be a $mathcal{K}$-function, i.e., a strictly increasing function such that $alpha_0(0) = 0$, and $b geq 0$ a given constant. Is there any way to lower bound what follow



$$
alpha_0(x) + b geq alpha(x + b)
$$



with a $mathcal{K}$-function $alpha$? I guess this should be a well-known result, any suggestions for some related theorems?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Let $alpha_0: mathbb{R}_{geq 0} to mathbb{R}_{geq 0}$ be a $mathcal{K}$-function, i.e., a strictly increasing function such that $alpha_0(0) = 0$, and $b geq 0$ a given constant. Is there any way to lower bound what follow



    $$
    alpha_0(x) + b geq alpha(x + b)
    $$



    with a $mathcal{K}$-function $alpha$? I guess this should be a well-known result, any suggestions for some related theorems?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0


      0



      $begingroup$


      Let $alpha_0: mathbb{R}_{geq 0} to mathbb{R}_{geq 0}$ be a $mathcal{K}$-function, i.e., a strictly increasing function such that $alpha_0(0) = 0$, and $b geq 0$ a given constant. Is there any way to lower bound what follow



      $$
      alpha_0(x) + b geq alpha(x + b)
      $$



      with a $mathcal{K}$-function $alpha$? I guess this should be a well-known result, any suggestions for some related theorems?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $alpha_0: mathbb{R}_{geq 0} to mathbb{R}_{geq 0}$ be a $mathcal{K}$-function, i.e., a strictly increasing function such that $alpha_0(0) = 0$, and $b geq 0$ a given constant. Is there any way to lower bound what follow



      $$
      alpha_0(x) + b geq alpha(x + b)
      $$



      with a $mathcal{K}$-function $alpha$? I guess this should be a well-known result, any suggestions for some related theorems?







      real-analysis functional-analysis monotone-functions






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 30 at 14:23









      Scientifica

      6,80941335




      6,80941335










      asked Jan 30 at 13:37









      GuidoLaremiGuidoLaremi

      145




      145






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          You're looking for a $mathcal K$-function $alpha$ such that $alpha(x+b)lealpha_0(x)+b$.



          Notice that $alpha_0(x)+b$ is a strictly increasing function. So one would think of letting $alpha(x+b)=alpha_0(x)+b$. In other words, we take $alpha(x)=alpha_0(x-b)+b$ for $xge b$.



          We need to define $alpha$ on $[0,b]$ as well! Well notice that $alpha(b)=b$, so any strictly increasing function such that $alpha(0)=0$ and $alpha(b)=b$ will do.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Exactly, I was passing by a change of variables and I was getting the same result. It seems work,
            $endgroup$
            – GuidoLaremi
            Jan 30 at 15:19










          • $begingroup$
            Yep it works :)
            $endgroup$
            – Scientifica
            Jan 30 at 15:21










          • $begingroup$
            I'm trying to figure out if it works also for some given $b<0$.
            $endgroup$
            – GuidoLaremi
            Jan 30 at 15:35










          • $begingroup$
            Well pay attention $mathcal K$-functions are defined on the nonegative real numbers.
            $endgroup$
            – Scientifica
            Jan 30 at 16:05










          • $begingroup$
            Yes I know. Unfortunately, the same procedure does not apply.
            $endgroup$
            – GuidoLaremi
            Jan 30 at 16:10












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3093532%2flower-bound-mathcalk-class-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          You're looking for a $mathcal K$-function $alpha$ such that $alpha(x+b)lealpha_0(x)+b$.



          Notice that $alpha_0(x)+b$ is a strictly increasing function. So one would think of letting $alpha(x+b)=alpha_0(x)+b$. In other words, we take $alpha(x)=alpha_0(x-b)+b$ for $xge b$.



          We need to define $alpha$ on $[0,b]$ as well! Well notice that $alpha(b)=b$, so any strictly increasing function such that $alpha(0)=0$ and $alpha(b)=b$ will do.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Exactly, I was passing by a change of variables and I was getting the same result. It seems work,
            $endgroup$
            – GuidoLaremi
            Jan 30 at 15:19










          • $begingroup$
            Yep it works :)
            $endgroup$
            – Scientifica
            Jan 30 at 15:21










          • $begingroup$
            I'm trying to figure out if it works also for some given $b<0$.
            $endgroup$
            – GuidoLaremi
            Jan 30 at 15:35










          • $begingroup$
            Well pay attention $mathcal K$-functions are defined on the nonegative real numbers.
            $endgroup$
            – Scientifica
            Jan 30 at 16:05










          • $begingroup$
            Yes I know. Unfortunately, the same procedure does not apply.
            $endgroup$
            – GuidoLaremi
            Jan 30 at 16:10
















          0












          $begingroup$

          You're looking for a $mathcal K$-function $alpha$ such that $alpha(x+b)lealpha_0(x)+b$.



          Notice that $alpha_0(x)+b$ is a strictly increasing function. So one would think of letting $alpha(x+b)=alpha_0(x)+b$. In other words, we take $alpha(x)=alpha_0(x-b)+b$ for $xge b$.



          We need to define $alpha$ on $[0,b]$ as well! Well notice that $alpha(b)=b$, so any strictly increasing function such that $alpha(0)=0$ and $alpha(b)=b$ will do.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Exactly, I was passing by a change of variables and I was getting the same result. It seems work,
            $endgroup$
            – GuidoLaremi
            Jan 30 at 15:19










          • $begingroup$
            Yep it works :)
            $endgroup$
            – Scientifica
            Jan 30 at 15:21










          • $begingroup$
            I'm trying to figure out if it works also for some given $b<0$.
            $endgroup$
            – GuidoLaremi
            Jan 30 at 15:35










          • $begingroup$
            Well pay attention $mathcal K$-functions are defined on the nonegative real numbers.
            $endgroup$
            – Scientifica
            Jan 30 at 16:05










          • $begingroup$
            Yes I know. Unfortunately, the same procedure does not apply.
            $endgroup$
            – GuidoLaremi
            Jan 30 at 16:10














          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          You're looking for a $mathcal K$-function $alpha$ such that $alpha(x+b)lealpha_0(x)+b$.



          Notice that $alpha_0(x)+b$ is a strictly increasing function. So one would think of letting $alpha(x+b)=alpha_0(x)+b$. In other words, we take $alpha(x)=alpha_0(x-b)+b$ for $xge b$.



          We need to define $alpha$ on $[0,b]$ as well! Well notice that $alpha(b)=b$, so any strictly increasing function such that $alpha(0)=0$ and $alpha(b)=b$ will do.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          You're looking for a $mathcal K$-function $alpha$ such that $alpha(x+b)lealpha_0(x)+b$.



          Notice that $alpha_0(x)+b$ is a strictly increasing function. So one would think of letting $alpha(x+b)=alpha_0(x)+b$. In other words, we take $alpha(x)=alpha_0(x-b)+b$ for $xge b$.



          We need to define $alpha$ on $[0,b]$ as well! Well notice that $alpha(b)=b$, so any strictly increasing function such that $alpha(0)=0$ and $alpha(b)=b$ will do.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 30 at 15:11









          ScientificaScientifica

          6,80941335




          6,80941335












          • $begingroup$
            Exactly, I was passing by a change of variables and I was getting the same result. It seems work,
            $endgroup$
            – GuidoLaremi
            Jan 30 at 15:19










          • $begingroup$
            Yep it works :)
            $endgroup$
            – Scientifica
            Jan 30 at 15:21










          • $begingroup$
            I'm trying to figure out if it works also for some given $b<0$.
            $endgroup$
            – GuidoLaremi
            Jan 30 at 15:35










          • $begingroup$
            Well pay attention $mathcal K$-functions are defined on the nonegative real numbers.
            $endgroup$
            – Scientifica
            Jan 30 at 16:05










          • $begingroup$
            Yes I know. Unfortunately, the same procedure does not apply.
            $endgroup$
            – GuidoLaremi
            Jan 30 at 16:10


















          • $begingroup$
            Exactly, I was passing by a change of variables and I was getting the same result. It seems work,
            $endgroup$
            – GuidoLaremi
            Jan 30 at 15:19










          • $begingroup$
            Yep it works :)
            $endgroup$
            – Scientifica
            Jan 30 at 15:21










          • $begingroup$
            I'm trying to figure out if it works also for some given $b<0$.
            $endgroup$
            – GuidoLaremi
            Jan 30 at 15:35










          • $begingroup$
            Well pay attention $mathcal K$-functions are defined on the nonegative real numbers.
            $endgroup$
            – Scientifica
            Jan 30 at 16:05










          • $begingroup$
            Yes I know. Unfortunately, the same procedure does not apply.
            $endgroup$
            – GuidoLaremi
            Jan 30 at 16:10
















          $begingroup$
          Exactly, I was passing by a change of variables and I was getting the same result. It seems work,
          $endgroup$
          – GuidoLaremi
          Jan 30 at 15:19




          $begingroup$
          Exactly, I was passing by a change of variables and I was getting the same result. It seems work,
          $endgroup$
          – GuidoLaremi
          Jan 30 at 15:19












          $begingroup$
          Yep it works :)
          $endgroup$
          – Scientifica
          Jan 30 at 15:21




          $begingroup$
          Yep it works :)
          $endgroup$
          – Scientifica
          Jan 30 at 15:21












          $begingroup$
          I'm trying to figure out if it works also for some given $b<0$.
          $endgroup$
          – GuidoLaremi
          Jan 30 at 15:35




          $begingroup$
          I'm trying to figure out if it works also for some given $b<0$.
          $endgroup$
          – GuidoLaremi
          Jan 30 at 15:35












          $begingroup$
          Well pay attention $mathcal K$-functions are defined on the nonegative real numbers.
          $endgroup$
          – Scientifica
          Jan 30 at 16:05




          $begingroup$
          Well pay attention $mathcal K$-functions are defined on the nonegative real numbers.
          $endgroup$
          – Scientifica
          Jan 30 at 16:05












          $begingroup$
          Yes I know. Unfortunately, the same procedure does not apply.
          $endgroup$
          – GuidoLaremi
          Jan 30 at 16:10




          $begingroup$
          Yes I know. Unfortunately, the same procedure does not apply.
          $endgroup$
          – GuidoLaremi
          Jan 30 at 16:10


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3093532%2flower-bound-mathcalk-class-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

          How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

          in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith