Recursion through Nat-kinds





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







1















This question is a sequel to the following question. Refer to it first:
Overlapping instances via Nat-kind



Now it's time to make the instance of Group Symmetric. After some savage math, I've come up to an instance that works in principle, but actually doesn't:



sIndex :: forall n. KnownNat n => Symmetric n -> Integer -> Integer
sIndex xs m = sIndex_ xs (m `mod` n)
where
n = toInteger (natVal (Proxy :: Proxy n))
sIndex_ :: Symmetric m -> Integer -> Integer
sIndex_ S1 _ = 0
sIndex_ (x :. _) 0 = cIndex x
sIndex_ (x :. xs) m = let
i = cIndex x + sIndex_ xs (m-1)
in if i < n then i else i - n

instance KnownNat n => Semigroup (Symmetric n) where
x <> y = go n where
n = toInteger (natVal (Proxy :: Proxy n))
go :: forall m. [(Integer,Integer)] -> Integer -> Symmetric m
go j m
| 0 == m = S1
| otherwise = let
i = sIndex y (sIndex x (n-m))
ix = foldr f i j
in cyclic ix :. go ((ix,m) :j) (m-1)
f (j,m) i = (i - j) `mod` m - 1


The go function inside the Semigroup instance should build the result by having recursion though Symmetric n, Symmetric (n-1), and so on until Symmetric 1. But GHC doesn't know how to do it and outputs the following error message:



Group_Symmetric.hs:89:24: error:
• Couldn't match type ‘m’ with ‘1’
‘m’ is a rigid type variable bound by
the type signature for:
go :: forall (m :: Nat).
[(Integer, Integer)] -> Integer -> Symmetric m
at Group_Symmetric.hs:87:9-69
Expected type: Symmetric m
Actual type: Symmetric 1


So what would the workaround be? Is it possible for go to be able to return any instantation of Symmetric m (m from 1 to n)?










share|improve this question































    1















    This question is a sequel to the following question. Refer to it first:
    Overlapping instances via Nat-kind



    Now it's time to make the instance of Group Symmetric. After some savage math, I've come up to an instance that works in principle, but actually doesn't:



    sIndex :: forall n. KnownNat n => Symmetric n -> Integer -> Integer
    sIndex xs m = sIndex_ xs (m `mod` n)
    where
    n = toInteger (natVal (Proxy :: Proxy n))
    sIndex_ :: Symmetric m -> Integer -> Integer
    sIndex_ S1 _ = 0
    sIndex_ (x :. _) 0 = cIndex x
    sIndex_ (x :. xs) m = let
    i = cIndex x + sIndex_ xs (m-1)
    in if i < n then i else i - n

    instance KnownNat n => Semigroup (Symmetric n) where
    x <> y = go n where
    n = toInteger (natVal (Proxy :: Proxy n))
    go :: forall m. [(Integer,Integer)] -> Integer -> Symmetric m
    go j m
    | 0 == m = S1
    | otherwise = let
    i = sIndex y (sIndex x (n-m))
    ix = foldr f i j
    in cyclic ix :. go ((ix,m) :j) (m-1)
    f (j,m) i = (i - j) `mod` m - 1


    The go function inside the Semigroup instance should build the result by having recursion though Symmetric n, Symmetric (n-1), and so on until Symmetric 1. But GHC doesn't know how to do it and outputs the following error message:



    Group_Symmetric.hs:89:24: error:
    • Couldn't match type ‘m’ with ‘1’
    ‘m’ is a rigid type variable bound by
    the type signature for:
    go :: forall (m :: Nat).
    [(Integer, Integer)] -> Integer -> Symmetric m
    at Group_Symmetric.hs:87:9-69
    Expected type: Symmetric m
    Actual type: Symmetric 1


    So what would the workaround be? Is it possible for go to be able to return any instantation of Symmetric m (m from 1 to n)?










    share|improve this question



























      1












      1








      1








      This question is a sequel to the following question. Refer to it first:
      Overlapping instances via Nat-kind



      Now it's time to make the instance of Group Symmetric. After some savage math, I've come up to an instance that works in principle, but actually doesn't:



      sIndex :: forall n. KnownNat n => Symmetric n -> Integer -> Integer
      sIndex xs m = sIndex_ xs (m `mod` n)
      where
      n = toInteger (natVal (Proxy :: Proxy n))
      sIndex_ :: Symmetric m -> Integer -> Integer
      sIndex_ S1 _ = 0
      sIndex_ (x :. _) 0 = cIndex x
      sIndex_ (x :. xs) m = let
      i = cIndex x + sIndex_ xs (m-1)
      in if i < n then i else i - n

      instance KnownNat n => Semigroup (Symmetric n) where
      x <> y = go n where
      n = toInteger (natVal (Proxy :: Proxy n))
      go :: forall m. [(Integer,Integer)] -> Integer -> Symmetric m
      go j m
      | 0 == m = S1
      | otherwise = let
      i = sIndex y (sIndex x (n-m))
      ix = foldr f i j
      in cyclic ix :. go ((ix,m) :j) (m-1)
      f (j,m) i = (i - j) `mod` m - 1


      The go function inside the Semigroup instance should build the result by having recursion though Symmetric n, Symmetric (n-1), and so on until Symmetric 1. But GHC doesn't know how to do it and outputs the following error message:



      Group_Symmetric.hs:89:24: error:
      • Couldn't match type ‘m’ with ‘1’
      ‘m’ is a rigid type variable bound by
      the type signature for:
      go :: forall (m :: Nat).
      [(Integer, Integer)] -> Integer -> Symmetric m
      at Group_Symmetric.hs:87:9-69
      Expected type: Symmetric m
      Actual type: Symmetric 1


      So what would the workaround be? Is it possible for go to be able to return any instantation of Symmetric m (m from 1 to n)?










      share|improve this question
















      This question is a sequel to the following question. Refer to it first:
      Overlapping instances via Nat-kind



      Now it's time to make the instance of Group Symmetric. After some savage math, I've come up to an instance that works in principle, but actually doesn't:



      sIndex :: forall n. KnownNat n => Symmetric n -> Integer -> Integer
      sIndex xs m = sIndex_ xs (m `mod` n)
      where
      n = toInteger (natVal (Proxy :: Proxy n))
      sIndex_ :: Symmetric m -> Integer -> Integer
      sIndex_ S1 _ = 0
      sIndex_ (x :. _) 0 = cIndex x
      sIndex_ (x :. xs) m = let
      i = cIndex x + sIndex_ xs (m-1)
      in if i < n then i else i - n

      instance KnownNat n => Semigroup (Symmetric n) where
      x <> y = go n where
      n = toInteger (natVal (Proxy :: Proxy n))
      go :: forall m. [(Integer,Integer)] -> Integer -> Symmetric m
      go j m
      | 0 == m = S1
      | otherwise = let
      i = sIndex y (sIndex x (n-m))
      ix = foldr f i j
      in cyclic ix :. go ((ix,m) :j) (m-1)
      f (j,m) i = (i - j) `mod` m - 1


      The go function inside the Semigroup instance should build the result by having recursion though Symmetric n, Symmetric (n-1), and so on until Symmetric 1. But GHC doesn't know how to do it and outputs the following error message:



      Group_Symmetric.hs:89:24: error:
      • Couldn't match type ‘m’ with ‘1’
      ‘m’ is a rigid type variable bound by
      the type signature for:
      go :: forall (m :: Nat).
      [(Integer, Integer)] -> Integer -> Symmetric m
      at Group_Symmetric.hs:87:9-69
      Expected type: Symmetric m
      Actual type: Symmetric 1


      So what would the workaround be? Is it possible for go to be able to return any instantation of Symmetric m (m from 1 to n)?







      haskell recursion math gadt data-kinds






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jan 3 at 7:43







      Dannyu NDos

















      asked Jan 3 at 4:50









      Dannyu NDosDannyu NDos

      1,015723




      1,015723
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          A slight change of go and f solved the problem:



          instance KnownNat n => Semigroup (Symmetric n) where
          x <> y = go x n where
          n = toInteger (natVal (Proxy :: Proxy n))
          go :: forall m. Symmetric m -> [(Integer,Integer)] -> Integer -> Symmetric m
          go S1 _ _ = S1
          go (_ :. xs) j m = let
          i = sIndex x (sIndex y (n-m))
          ix = foldr f i j
          in Cyclic ix :. go xs ((ix,m) :j) (m-1)
          f (j,m) i = let
          ix = (i - j) `mod` m - 1
          in if 0 <= ix then ix else ix + m


          The key idea is to introduce a dummy parameter. Also note that Cyclic was used instead of cyclic.



          Unfortunately, it turns out that I did some math wrong. It is to be corrected.



          EDIT: Here is the corrected sIndex, which completes the instance:



          sIndex :: forall n. KnownNat n => Symmetric n -> Integer -> Integer
          sIndex xs m = let
          n = toInteger (natVal (Proxy :: Proxy n))
          in sIndex_ xs (m `mod` n) n
          where
          sIndex_ :: Symmetric m -> Integer -> Integer -> Integer
          sIndex_ S1 _ _ = 0
          sIndex_ (x :. _) 0 _ = cIndex x
          sIndex_ (x :. xs) m n = let
          i = cIndex x + sIndex_ xs (m-1) (n-1) + 1
          in if n <= i then i - n else i


          I also noticed that x and y were swapped in the definition of <>, which is then corrected above.






          share|improve this answer


























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54016517%2frecursion-through-nat-kinds%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            A slight change of go and f solved the problem:



            instance KnownNat n => Semigroup (Symmetric n) where
            x <> y = go x n where
            n = toInteger (natVal (Proxy :: Proxy n))
            go :: forall m. Symmetric m -> [(Integer,Integer)] -> Integer -> Symmetric m
            go S1 _ _ = S1
            go (_ :. xs) j m = let
            i = sIndex x (sIndex y (n-m))
            ix = foldr f i j
            in Cyclic ix :. go xs ((ix,m) :j) (m-1)
            f (j,m) i = let
            ix = (i - j) `mod` m - 1
            in if 0 <= ix then ix else ix + m


            The key idea is to introduce a dummy parameter. Also note that Cyclic was used instead of cyclic.



            Unfortunately, it turns out that I did some math wrong. It is to be corrected.



            EDIT: Here is the corrected sIndex, which completes the instance:



            sIndex :: forall n. KnownNat n => Symmetric n -> Integer -> Integer
            sIndex xs m = let
            n = toInteger (natVal (Proxy :: Proxy n))
            in sIndex_ xs (m `mod` n) n
            where
            sIndex_ :: Symmetric m -> Integer -> Integer -> Integer
            sIndex_ S1 _ _ = 0
            sIndex_ (x :. _) 0 _ = cIndex x
            sIndex_ (x :. xs) m n = let
            i = cIndex x + sIndex_ xs (m-1) (n-1) + 1
            in if n <= i then i - n else i


            I also noticed that x and y were swapped in the definition of <>, which is then corrected above.






            share|improve this answer






























              1














              A slight change of go and f solved the problem:



              instance KnownNat n => Semigroup (Symmetric n) where
              x <> y = go x n where
              n = toInteger (natVal (Proxy :: Proxy n))
              go :: forall m. Symmetric m -> [(Integer,Integer)] -> Integer -> Symmetric m
              go S1 _ _ = S1
              go (_ :. xs) j m = let
              i = sIndex x (sIndex y (n-m))
              ix = foldr f i j
              in Cyclic ix :. go xs ((ix,m) :j) (m-1)
              f (j,m) i = let
              ix = (i - j) `mod` m - 1
              in if 0 <= ix then ix else ix + m


              The key idea is to introduce a dummy parameter. Also note that Cyclic was used instead of cyclic.



              Unfortunately, it turns out that I did some math wrong. It is to be corrected.



              EDIT: Here is the corrected sIndex, which completes the instance:



              sIndex :: forall n. KnownNat n => Symmetric n -> Integer -> Integer
              sIndex xs m = let
              n = toInteger (natVal (Proxy :: Proxy n))
              in sIndex_ xs (m `mod` n) n
              where
              sIndex_ :: Symmetric m -> Integer -> Integer -> Integer
              sIndex_ S1 _ _ = 0
              sIndex_ (x :. _) 0 _ = cIndex x
              sIndex_ (x :. xs) m n = let
              i = cIndex x + sIndex_ xs (m-1) (n-1) + 1
              in if n <= i then i - n else i


              I also noticed that x and y were swapped in the definition of <>, which is then corrected above.






              share|improve this answer




























                1












                1








                1







                A slight change of go and f solved the problem:



                instance KnownNat n => Semigroup (Symmetric n) where
                x <> y = go x n where
                n = toInteger (natVal (Proxy :: Proxy n))
                go :: forall m. Symmetric m -> [(Integer,Integer)] -> Integer -> Symmetric m
                go S1 _ _ = S1
                go (_ :. xs) j m = let
                i = sIndex x (sIndex y (n-m))
                ix = foldr f i j
                in Cyclic ix :. go xs ((ix,m) :j) (m-1)
                f (j,m) i = let
                ix = (i - j) `mod` m - 1
                in if 0 <= ix then ix else ix + m


                The key idea is to introduce a dummy parameter. Also note that Cyclic was used instead of cyclic.



                Unfortunately, it turns out that I did some math wrong. It is to be corrected.



                EDIT: Here is the corrected sIndex, which completes the instance:



                sIndex :: forall n. KnownNat n => Symmetric n -> Integer -> Integer
                sIndex xs m = let
                n = toInteger (natVal (Proxy :: Proxy n))
                in sIndex_ xs (m `mod` n) n
                where
                sIndex_ :: Symmetric m -> Integer -> Integer -> Integer
                sIndex_ S1 _ _ = 0
                sIndex_ (x :. _) 0 _ = cIndex x
                sIndex_ (x :. xs) m n = let
                i = cIndex x + sIndex_ xs (m-1) (n-1) + 1
                in if n <= i then i - n else i


                I also noticed that x and y were swapped in the definition of <>, which is then corrected above.






                share|improve this answer















                A slight change of go and f solved the problem:



                instance KnownNat n => Semigroup (Symmetric n) where
                x <> y = go x n where
                n = toInteger (natVal (Proxy :: Proxy n))
                go :: forall m. Symmetric m -> [(Integer,Integer)] -> Integer -> Symmetric m
                go S1 _ _ = S1
                go (_ :. xs) j m = let
                i = sIndex x (sIndex y (n-m))
                ix = foldr f i j
                in Cyclic ix :. go xs ((ix,m) :j) (m-1)
                f (j,m) i = let
                ix = (i - j) `mod` m - 1
                in if 0 <= ix then ix else ix + m


                The key idea is to introduce a dummy parameter. Also note that Cyclic was used instead of cyclic.



                Unfortunately, it turns out that I did some math wrong. It is to be corrected.



                EDIT: Here is the corrected sIndex, which completes the instance:



                sIndex :: forall n. KnownNat n => Symmetric n -> Integer -> Integer
                sIndex xs m = let
                n = toInteger (natVal (Proxy :: Proxy n))
                in sIndex_ xs (m `mod` n) n
                where
                sIndex_ :: Symmetric m -> Integer -> Integer -> Integer
                sIndex_ S1 _ _ = 0
                sIndex_ (x :. _) 0 _ = cIndex x
                sIndex_ (x :. xs) m n = let
                i = cIndex x + sIndex_ xs (m-1) (n-1) + 1
                in if n <= i then i - n else i


                I also noticed that x and y were swapped in the definition of <>, which is then corrected above.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Jan 3 at 8:18

























                answered Jan 3 at 7:45









                Dannyu NDosDannyu NDos

                1,015723




                1,015723
































                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54016517%2frecursion-through-nat-kinds%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                    How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                    in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith