Reduce EMI generated by old AC motor from an electric knife





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







10












$begingroup$


I have an old electric knife (220V 50Hz) which seems to produce a lot of EMI.
Some clues on that were a "bzzzz" noise from PC speaker I noticed sometimes when someone use it.



Recently I bought a device which has touch-buttons and I noticed when the knife is in use the device detect false touch. So at this point I think that knife produce a lot of EMI (maybe due to it is an old model?)



So, I would ask: is there any way to reduce them (capacitor on AC motor,..)?



Or can I make a sort of shield?
(eg. whith alluminium sheets glued inside the plastic cover).



Please don't suggest to replace it :) the question is just to know something more about EMI, shielding, etc..










share|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    A straight X-capacitor over the motor like you suggest would be a good start if there isn't one already. Remeber to place an R in parallel if not built in. In the EU you would be required to bleed down to some voltage (~50 V) within one second or you will get nasty shocks from the plug if you toutch it once unplugged. How eager/knowledgable are you in this feild? Aluminium foil won't do crap here.
    $endgroup$
    – winny
    Jan 30 at 12:00








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    The motors in most counter-top and hand-hand, AC appliances and tools are universal motors. A universal motor is a DC motor with a commutator that has been adapted to operate on either AC or DC. It is the sparking from the commutator that causes the EMI.
    $endgroup$
    – Charles Cowie
    Jan 30 at 12:20






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @CharlesCowie yep, I also supposed the sparks generated by brushed motors may be the cause... in that case there's no filtering circuit which can avoid that, right?
    $endgroup$
    – Noisemaker
    Jan 30 at 12:37










  • $begingroup$
    electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/274991/… electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/237209/…
    $endgroup$
    – Charles Cowie
    Jan 30 at 12:53










  • $begingroup$
    Given the motor's age, the amount of EMI could be a symptom of severely worn brushes. I would check them ASAP and replace them if needed. Severely worn, lose, or depleted, brushes can permanently damage the motor.
    $endgroup$
    – Brock Adams
    Jan 31 at 6:34


















10












$begingroup$


I have an old electric knife (220V 50Hz) which seems to produce a lot of EMI.
Some clues on that were a "bzzzz" noise from PC speaker I noticed sometimes when someone use it.



Recently I bought a device which has touch-buttons and I noticed when the knife is in use the device detect false touch. So at this point I think that knife produce a lot of EMI (maybe due to it is an old model?)



So, I would ask: is there any way to reduce them (capacitor on AC motor,..)?



Or can I make a sort of shield?
(eg. whith alluminium sheets glued inside the plastic cover).



Please don't suggest to replace it :) the question is just to know something more about EMI, shielding, etc..










share|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    A straight X-capacitor over the motor like you suggest would be a good start if there isn't one already. Remeber to place an R in parallel if not built in. In the EU you would be required to bleed down to some voltage (~50 V) within one second or you will get nasty shocks from the plug if you toutch it once unplugged. How eager/knowledgable are you in this feild? Aluminium foil won't do crap here.
    $endgroup$
    – winny
    Jan 30 at 12:00








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    The motors in most counter-top and hand-hand, AC appliances and tools are universal motors. A universal motor is a DC motor with a commutator that has been adapted to operate on either AC or DC. It is the sparking from the commutator that causes the EMI.
    $endgroup$
    – Charles Cowie
    Jan 30 at 12:20






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @CharlesCowie yep, I also supposed the sparks generated by brushed motors may be the cause... in that case there's no filtering circuit which can avoid that, right?
    $endgroup$
    – Noisemaker
    Jan 30 at 12:37










  • $begingroup$
    electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/274991/… electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/237209/…
    $endgroup$
    – Charles Cowie
    Jan 30 at 12:53










  • $begingroup$
    Given the motor's age, the amount of EMI could be a symptom of severely worn brushes. I would check them ASAP and replace them if needed. Severely worn, lose, or depleted, brushes can permanently damage the motor.
    $endgroup$
    – Brock Adams
    Jan 31 at 6:34














10












10








10


2



$begingroup$


I have an old electric knife (220V 50Hz) which seems to produce a lot of EMI.
Some clues on that were a "bzzzz" noise from PC speaker I noticed sometimes when someone use it.



Recently I bought a device which has touch-buttons and I noticed when the knife is in use the device detect false touch. So at this point I think that knife produce a lot of EMI (maybe due to it is an old model?)



So, I would ask: is there any way to reduce them (capacitor on AC motor,..)?



Or can I make a sort of shield?
(eg. whith alluminium sheets glued inside the plastic cover).



Please don't suggest to replace it :) the question is just to know something more about EMI, shielding, etc..










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




I have an old electric knife (220V 50Hz) which seems to produce a lot of EMI.
Some clues on that were a "bzzzz" noise from PC speaker I noticed sometimes when someone use it.



Recently I bought a device which has touch-buttons and I noticed when the knife is in use the device detect false touch. So at this point I think that knife produce a lot of EMI (maybe due to it is an old model?)



So, I would ask: is there any way to reduce them (capacitor on AC motor,..)?



Or can I make a sort of shield?
(eg. whith alluminium sheets glued inside the plastic cover).



Please don't suggest to replace it :) the question is just to know something more about EMI, shielding, etc..







motor emi-filtering






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jan 30 at 11:51









NoisemakerNoisemaker

163116




163116








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    A straight X-capacitor over the motor like you suggest would be a good start if there isn't one already. Remeber to place an R in parallel if not built in. In the EU you would be required to bleed down to some voltage (~50 V) within one second or you will get nasty shocks from the plug if you toutch it once unplugged. How eager/knowledgable are you in this feild? Aluminium foil won't do crap here.
    $endgroup$
    – winny
    Jan 30 at 12:00








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    The motors in most counter-top and hand-hand, AC appliances and tools are universal motors. A universal motor is a DC motor with a commutator that has been adapted to operate on either AC or DC. It is the sparking from the commutator that causes the EMI.
    $endgroup$
    – Charles Cowie
    Jan 30 at 12:20






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @CharlesCowie yep, I also supposed the sparks generated by brushed motors may be the cause... in that case there's no filtering circuit which can avoid that, right?
    $endgroup$
    – Noisemaker
    Jan 30 at 12:37










  • $begingroup$
    electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/274991/… electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/237209/…
    $endgroup$
    – Charles Cowie
    Jan 30 at 12:53










  • $begingroup$
    Given the motor's age, the amount of EMI could be a symptom of severely worn brushes. I would check them ASAP and replace them if needed. Severely worn, lose, or depleted, brushes can permanently damage the motor.
    $endgroup$
    – Brock Adams
    Jan 31 at 6:34














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    A straight X-capacitor over the motor like you suggest would be a good start if there isn't one already. Remeber to place an R in parallel if not built in. In the EU you would be required to bleed down to some voltage (~50 V) within one second or you will get nasty shocks from the plug if you toutch it once unplugged. How eager/knowledgable are you in this feild? Aluminium foil won't do crap here.
    $endgroup$
    – winny
    Jan 30 at 12:00








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    The motors in most counter-top and hand-hand, AC appliances and tools are universal motors. A universal motor is a DC motor with a commutator that has been adapted to operate on either AC or DC. It is the sparking from the commutator that causes the EMI.
    $endgroup$
    – Charles Cowie
    Jan 30 at 12:20






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @CharlesCowie yep, I also supposed the sparks generated by brushed motors may be the cause... in that case there's no filtering circuit which can avoid that, right?
    $endgroup$
    – Noisemaker
    Jan 30 at 12:37










  • $begingroup$
    electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/274991/… electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/237209/…
    $endgroup$
    – Charles Cowie
    Jan 30 at 12:53










  • $begingroup$
    Given the motor's age, the amount of EMI could be a symptom of severely worn brushes. I would check them ASAP and replace them if needed. Severely worn, lose, or depleted, brushes can permanently damage the motor.
    $endgroup$
    – Brock Adams
    Jan 31 at 6:34








3




3




$begingroup$
A straight X-capacitor over the motor like you suggest would be a good start if there isn't one already. Remeber to place an R in parallel if not built in. In the EU you would be required to bleed down to some voltage (~50 V) within one second or you will get nasty shocks from the plug if you toutch it once unplugged. How eager/knowledgable are you in this feild? Aluminium foil won't do crap here.
$endgroup$
– winny
Jan 30 at 12:00






$begingroup$
A straight X-capacitor over the motor like you suggest would be a good start if there isn't one already. Remeber to place an R in parallel if not built in. In the EU you would be required to bleed down to some voltage (~50 V) within one second or you will get nasty shocks from the plug if you toutch it once unplugged. How eager/knowledgable are you in this feild? Aluminium foil won't do crap here.
$endgroup$
– winny
Jan 30 at 12:00






4




4




$begingroup$
The motors in most counter-top and hand-hand, AC appliances and tools are universal motors. A universal motor is a DC motor with a commutator that has been adapted to operate on either AC or DC. It is the sparking from the commutator that causes the EMI.
$endgroup$
– Charles Cowie
Jan 30 at 12:20




$begingroup$
The motors in most counter-top and hand-hand, AC appliances and tools are universal motors. A universal motor is a DC motor with a commutator that has been adapted to operate on either AC or DC. It is the sparking from the commutator that causes the EMI.
$endgroup$
– Charles Cowie
Jan 30 at 12:20




1




1




$begingroup$
@CharlesCowie yep, I also supposed the sparks generated by brushed motors may be the cause... in that case there's no filtering circuit which can avoid that, right?
$endgroup$
– Noisemaker
Jan 30 at 12:37




$begingroup$
@CharlesCowie yep, I also supposed the sparks generated by brushed motors may be the cause... in that case there's no filtering circuit which can avoid that, right?
$endgroup$
– Noisemaker
Jan 30 at 12:37












$begingroup$
electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/274991/… electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/237209/…
$endgroup$
– Charles Cowie
Jan 30 at 12:53




$begingroup$
electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/274991/… electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/237209/…
$endgroup$
– Charles Cowie
Jan 30 at 12:53












$begingroup$
Given the motor's age, the amount of EMI could be a symptom of severely worn brushes. I would check them ASAP and replace them if needed. Severely worn, lose, or depleted, brushes can permanently damage the motor.
$endgroup$
– Brock Adams
Jan 31 at 6:34




$begingroup$
Given the motor's age, the amount of EMI could be a symptom of severely worn brushes. I would check them ASAP and replace them if needed. Severely worn, lose, or depleted, brushes can permanently damage the motor.
$endgroup$
– Brock Adams
Jan 31 at 6:34










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















13












$begingroup$

Sounds like you have low frequency conducted EMI. An X-capacitor straight over the motor would be the first order of business, but I've included the steps I would have taken down the line (litterally).





schematic





simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



Couldn't find a symbol for you motor, nor lines to draw a correct CM choke.



More luck with LTspice:
enter image description here



All values are estimations, but at least not several orders of magnitude off.



To be compliant, your capacitor needs to be at least X2-rated. The R in parallel would be required in the EU to bleed down to 60 V (thanks Martin Bonner!) within one second or you will get nasty shocks from the plug if you toutch it once unplugged. There are special X-rated capacitors with this resistor built-in. This is called a bleeder resistor. There is a tradeoff between time and power dissipation when plugged in so make sure you have sufficient voltage and power rating on it.



Your suggestion of aluminium foil wrapping won't do crap here due to too low frequency and conducted emission as opposed to radiated emission, where alumimium foil might have worked.



If you don't want to dissassemble your device, at low frequencies there is a fairly low penalty in placing the filer down the cable instead. Probably measureable, but managable.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If you live inside the EU and don't fit the bleed resistor, nobody will ever know unless someone gets badly hurt. If you live outside the EU, adding the bleed resistor is still an excellent idea.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Bonner
    Jan 30 at 16:50










  • $begingroup$
    @MartinBonner Indeed! Do you remember the exact voltage? It was something uneven like 47 or 52 V IIRC.
    $endgroup$
    – winny
    Jan 30 at 16:58










  • $begingroup$
    I found: "IEC 60204 and EN 50178 require that active parts must be discharged within a period of 5 s to a voltage below 60 V (or 50 µC). If this requirement cannot be observed in view of the operating mode, the hazardous site must be permanently marked in a clearly visible way. This must be done by means of an appropriate text as well as by graphical symbols, such as "Hazardous electrical voltage" (417-IEC-5036) and "Caution" (7000-ISO-0434). Exposed cables of connectors must have a discharge time of 1 s, or else degree of protection IP2X or IPXXB (IEC 60529) must be ensured."
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Bonner
    Jan 31 at 8:11












  • $begingroup$
    That was from: tdk-electronics.tdk.com/download/528632/…
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Bonner
    Jan 31 at 8:12










  • $begingroup$
    @MartinBonner Thank you very much! I'll update my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – winny
    Jan 31 at 8:24



















6












$begingroup$

One easy way would be to put a toroid or ferrite on the cable, they increase the inductance on the cable for high frequency signals and prevent conducted emissions.



I've had success with a radio and blocking emissions from a PC with the mains cable from the radio wrapped around a ferrite toroid. You can also get clamp on ferrites almost everywhere.



This will work if it is conducted emissions from the knife, if it's radiated emissions (radio waves) then your best bet would be to shield the speakers. It might be good to put a ferrite on the speakers AC mains cable too.



enter image description here

Source: https://palomar-engineers.com/ferrite-products/ferrite-cores/ferrite-ring-toroid-combo-pack



This is what a clamp on ferrite looks like:



enter image description here

Source:https://www.argentdata.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=44






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    5












    $begingroup$

    You can also tear down the machine and make sure the commutator and brushes are tip-top. The source of the EMI may not be the machine itself, but defects or wear in the machine.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
      StackExchange.schematics.init();
      });
      }, "cicuitlab");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "135"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f419640%2freduce-emi-generated-by-old-ac-motor-from-an-electric-knife%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      13












      $begingroup$

      Sounds like you have low frequency conducted EMI. An X-capacitor straight over the motor would be the first order of business, but I've included the steps I would have taken down the line (litterally).





      schematic





      simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



      Couldn't find a symbol for you motor, nor lines to draw a correct CM choke.



      More luck with LTspice:
      enter image description here



      All values are estimations, but at least not several orders of magnitude off.



      To be compliant, your capacitor needs to be at least X2-rated. The R in parallel would be required in the EU to bleed down to 60 V (thanks Martin Bonner!) within one second or you will get nasty shocks from the plug if you toutch it once unplugged. There are special X-rated capacitors with this resistor built-in. This is called a bleeder resistor. There is a tradeoff between time and power dissipation when plugged in so make sure you have sufficient voltage and power rating on it.



      Your suggestion of aluminium foil wrapping won't do crap here due to too low frequency and conducted emission as opposed to radiated emission, where alumimium foil might have worked.



      If you don't want to dissassemble your device, at low frequencies there is a fairly low penalty in placing the filer down the cable instead. Probably measureable, but managable.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$









      • 2




        $begingroup$
        If you live inside the EU and don't fit the bleed resistor, nobody will ever know unless someone gets badly hurt. If you live outside the EU, adding the bleed resistor is still an excellent idea.
        $endgroup$
        – Martin Bonner
        Jan 30 at 16:50










      • $begingroup$
        @MartinBonner Indeed! Do you remember the exact voltage? It was something uneven like 47 or 52 V IIRC.
        $endgroup$
        – winny
        Jan 30 at 16:58










      • $begingroup$
        I found: "IEC 60204 and EN 50178 require that active parts must be discharged within a period of 5 s to a voltage below 60 V (or 50 µC). If this requirement cannot be observed in view of the operating mode, the hazardous site must be permanently marked in a clearly visible way. This must be done by means of an appropriate text as well as by graphical symbols, such as "Hazardous electrical voltage" (417-IEC-5036) and "Caution" (7000-ISO-0434). Exposed cables of connectors must have a discharge time of 1 s, or else degree of protection IP2X or IPXXB (IEC 60529) must be ensured."
        $endgroup$
        – Martin Bonner
        Jan 31 at 8:11












      • $begingroup$
        That was from: tdk-electronics.tdk.com/download/528632/…
        $endgroup$
        – Martin Bonner
        Jan 31 at 8:12










      • $begingroup$
        @MartinBonner Thank you very much! I'll update my answer.
        $endgroup$
        – winny
        Jan 31 at 8:24
















      13












      $begingroup$

      Sounds like you have low frequency conducted EMI. An X-capacitor straight over the motor would be the first order of business, but I've included the steps I would have taken down the line (litterally).





      schematic





      simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



      Couldn't find a symbol for you motor, nor lines to draw a correct CM choke.



      More luck with LTspice:
      enter image description here



      All values are estimations, but at least not several orders of magnitude off.



      To be compliant, your capacitor needs to be at least X2-rated. The R in parallel would be required in the EU to bleed down to 60 V (thanks Martin Bonner!) within one second or you will get nasty shocks from the plug if you toutch it once unplugged. There are special X-rated capacitors with this resistor built-in. This is called a bleeder resistor. There is a tradeoff between time and power dissipation when plugged in so make sure you have sufficient voltage and power rating on it.



      Your suggestion of aluminium foil wrapping won't do crap here due to too low frequency and conducted emission as opposed to radiated emission, where alumimium foil might have worked.



      If you don't want to dissassemble your device, at low frequencies there is a fairly low penalty in placing the filer down the cable instead. Probably measureable, but managable.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$









      • 2




        $begingroup$
        If you live inside the EU and don't fit the bleed resistor, nobody will ever know unless someone gets badly hurt. If you live outside the EU, adding the bleed resistor is still an excellent idea.
        $endgroup$
        – Martin Bonner
        Jan 30 at 16:50










      • $begingroup$
        @MartinBonner Indeed! Do you remember the exact voltage? It was something uneven like 47 or 52 V IIRC.
        $endgroup$
        – winny
        Jan 30 at 16:58










      • $begingroup$
        I found: "IEC 60204 and EN 50178 require that active parts must be discharged within a period of 5 s to a voltage below 60 V (or 50 µC). If this requirement cannot be observed in view of the operating mode, the hazardous site must be permanently marked in a clearly visible way. This must be done by means of an appropriate text as well as by graphical symbols, such as "Hazardous electrical voltage" (417-IEC-5036) and "Caution" (7000-ISO-0434). Exposed cables of connectors must have a discharge time of 1 s, or else degree of protection IP2X or IPXXB (IEC 60529) must be ensured."
        $endgroup$
        – Martin Bonner
        Jan 31 at 8:11












      • $begingroup$
        That was from: tdk-electronics.tdk.com/download/528632/…
        $endgroup$
        – Martin Bonner
        Jan 31 at 8:12










      • $begingroup$
        @MartinBonner Thank you very much! I'll update my answer.
        $endgroup$
        – winny
        Jan 31 at 8:24














      13












      13








      13





      $begingroup$

      Sounds like you have low frequency conducted EMI. An X-capacitor straight over the motor would be the first order of business, but I've included the steps I would have taken down the line (litterally).





      schematic





      simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



      Couldn't find a symbol for you motor, nor lines to draw a correct CM choke.



      More luck with LTspice:
      enter image description here



      All values are estimations, but at least not several orders of magnitude off.



      To be compliant, your capacitor needs to be at least X2-rated. The R in parallel would be required in the EU to bleed down to 60 V (thanks Martin Bonner!) within one second or you will get nasty shocks from the plug if you toutch it once unplugged. There are special X-rated capacitors with this resistor built-in. This is called a bleeder resistor. There is a tradeoff between time and power dissipation when plugged in so make sure you have sufficient voltage and power rating on it.



      Your suggestion of aluminium foil wrapping won't do crap here due to too low frequency and conducted emission as opposed to radiated emission, where alumimium foil might have worked.



      If you don't want to dissassemble your device, at low frequencies there is a fairly low penalty in placing the filer down the cable instead. Probably measureable, but managable.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      Sounds like you have low frequency conducted EMI. An X-capacitor straight over the motor would be the first order of business, but I've included the steps I would have taken down the line (litterally).





      schematic





      simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



      Couldn't find a symbol for you motor, nor lines to draw a correct CM choke.



      More luck with LTspice:
      enter image description here



      All values are estimations, but at least not several orders of magnitude off.



      To be compliant, your capacitor needs to be at least X2-rated. The R in parallel would be required in the EU to bleed down to 60 V (thanks Martin Bonner!) within one second or you will get nasty shocks from the plug if you toutch it once unplugged. There are special X-rated capacitors with this resistor built-in. This is called a bleeder resistor. There is a tradeoff between time and power dissipation when plugged in so make sure you have sufficient voltage and power rating on it.



      Your suggestion of aluminium foil wrapping won't do crap here due to too low frequency and conducted emission as opposed to radiated emission, where alumimium foil might have worked.



      If you don't want to dissassemble your device, at low frequencies there is a fairly low penalty in placing the filer down the cable instead. Probably measureable, but managable.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Jan 31 at 8:25

























      answered Jan 30 at 12:14









      winnywinny

      4,85641933




      4,85641933








      • 2




        $begingroup$
        If you live inside the EU and don't fit the bleed resistor, nobody will ever know unless someone gets badly hurt. If you live outside the EU, adding the bleed resistor is still an excellent idea.
        $endgroup$
        – Martin Bonner
        Jan 30 at 16:50










      • $begingroup$
        @MartinBonner Indeed! Do you remember the exact voltage? It was something uneven like 47 or 52 V IIRC.
        $endgroup$
        – winny
        Jan 30 at 16:58










      • $begingroup$
        I found: "IEC 60204 and EN 50178 require that active parts must be discharged within a period of 5 s to a voltage below 60 V (or 50 µC). If this requirement cannot be observed in view of the operating mode, the hazardous site must be permanently marked in a clearly visible way. This must be done by means of an appropriate text as well as by graphical symbols, such as "Hazardous electrical voltage" (417-IEC-5036) and "Caution" (7000-ISO-0434). Exposed cables of connectors must have a discharge time of 1 s, or else degree of protection IP2X or IPXXB (IEC 60529) must be ensured."
        $endgroup$
        – Martin Bonner
        Jan 31 at 8:11












      • $begingroup$
        That was from: tdk-electronics.tdk.com/download/528632/…
        $endgroup$
        – Martin Bonner
        Jan 31 at 8:12










      • $begingroup$
        @MartinBonner Thank you very much! I'll update my answer.
        $endgroup$
        – winny
        Jan 31 at 8:24














      • 2




        $begingroup$
        If you live inside the EU and don't fit the bleed resistor, nobody will ever know unless someone gets badly hurt. If you live outside the EU, adding the bleed resistor is still an excellent idea.
        $endgroup$
        – Martin Bonner
        Jan 30 at 16:50










      • $begingroup$
        @MartinBonner Indeed! Do you remember the exact voltage? It was something uneven like 47 or 52 V IIRC.
        $endgroup$
        – winny
        Jan 30 at 16:58










      • $begingroup$
        I found: "IEC 60204 and EN 50178 require that active parts must be discharged within a period of 5 s to a voltage below 60 V (or 50 µC). If this requirement cannot be observed in view of the operating mode, the hazardous site must be permanently marked in a clearly visible way. This must be done by means of an appropriate text as well as by graphical symbols, such as "Hazardous electrical voltage" (417-IEC-5036) and "Caution" (7000-ISO-0434). Exposed cables of connectors must have a discharge time of 1 s, or else degree of protection IP2X or IPXXB (IEC 60529) must be ensured."
        $endgroup$
        – Martin Bonner
        Jan 31 at 8:11












      • $begingroup$
        That was from: tdk-electronics.tdk.com/download/528632/…
        $endgroup$
        – Martin Bonner
        Jan 31 at 8:12










      • $begingroup$
        @MartinBonner Thank you very much! I'll update my answer.
        $endgroup$
        – winny
        Jan 31 at 8:24








      2




      2




      $begingroup$
      If you live inside the EU and don't fit the bleed resistor, nobody will ever know unless someone gets badly hurt. If you live outside the EU, adding the bleed resistor is still an excellent idea.
      $endgroup$
      – Martin Bonner
      Jan 30 at 16:50




      $begingroup$
      If you live inside the EU and don't fit the bleed resistor, nobody will ever know unless someone gets badly hurt. If you live outside the EU, adding the bleed resistor is still an excellent idea.
      $endgroup$
      – Martin Bonner
      Jan 30 at 16:50












      $begingroup$
      @MartinBonner Indeed! Do you remember the exact voltage? It was something uneven like 47 or 52 V IIRC.
      $endgroup$
      – winny
      Jan 30 at 16:58




      $begingroup$
      @MartinBonner Indeed! Do you remember the exact voltage? It was something uneven like 47 or 52 V IIRC.
      $endgroup$
      – winny
      Jan 30 at 16:58












      $begingroup$
      I found: "IEC 60204 and EN 50178 require that active parts must be discharged within a period of 5 s to a voltage below 60 V (or 50 µC). If this requirement cannot be observed in view of the operating mode, the hazardous site must be permanently marked in a clearly visible way. This must be done by means of an appropriate text as well as by graphical symbols, such as "Hazardous electrical voltage" (417-IEC-5036) and "Caution" (7000-ISO-0434). Exposed cables of connectors must have a discharge time of 1 s, or else degree of protection IP2X or IPXXB (IEC 60529) must be ensured."
      $endgroup$
      – Martin Bonner
      Jan 31 at 8:11






      $begingroup$
      I found: "IEC 60204 and EN 50178 require that active parts must be discharged within a period of 5 s to a voltage below 60 V (or 50 µC). If this requirement cannot be observed in view of the operating mode, the hazardous site must be permanently marked in a clearly visible way. This must be done by means of an appropriate text as well as by graphical symbols, such as "Hazardous electrical voltage" (417-IEC-5036) and "Caution" (7000-ISO-0434). Exposed cables of connectors must have a discharge time of 1 s, or else degree of protection IP2X or IPXXB (IEC 60529) must be ensured."
      $endgroup$
      – Martin Bonner
      Jan 31 at 8:11














      $begingroup$
      That was from: tdk-electronics.tdk.com/download/528632/…
      $endgroup$
      – Martin Bonner
      Jan 31 at 8:12




      $begingroup$
      That was from: tdk-electronics.tdk.com/download/528632/…
      $endgroup$
      – Martin Bonner
      Jan 31 at 8:12












      $begingroup$
      @MartinBonner Thank you very much! I'll update my answer.
      $endgroup$
      – winny
      Jan 31 at 8:24




      $begingroup$
      @MartinBonner Thank you very much! I'll update my answer.
      $endgroup$
      – winny
      Jan 31 at 8:24













      6












      $begingroup$

      One easy way would be to put a toroid or ferrite on the cable, they increase the inductance on the cable for high frequency signals and prevent conducted emissions.



      I've had success with a radio and blocking emissions from a PC with the mains cable from the radio wrapped around a ferrite toroid. You can also get clamp on ferrites almost everywhere.



      This will work if it is conducted emissions from the knife, if it's radiated emissions (radio waves) then your best bet would be to shield the speakers. It might be good to put a ferrite on the speakers AC mains cable too.



      enter image description here

      Source: https://palomar-engineers.com/ferrite-products/ferrite-cores/ferrite-ring-toroid-combo-pack



      This is what a clamp on ferrite looks like:



      enter image description here

      Source:https://www.argentdata.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=44






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        6












        $begingroup$

        One easy way would be to put a toroid or ferrite on the cable, they increase the inductance on the cable for high frequency signals and prevent conducted emissions.



        I've had success with a radio and blocking emissions from a PC with the mains cable from the radio wrapped around a ferrite toroid. You can also get clamp on ferrites almost everywhere.



        This will work if it is conducted emissions from the knife, if it's radiated emissions (radio waves) then your best bet would be to shield the speakers. It might be good to put a ferrite on the speakers AC mains cable too.



        enter image description here

        Source: https://palomar-engineers.com/ferrite-products/ferrite-cores/ferrite-ring-toroid-combo-pack



        This is what a clamp on ferrite looks like:



        enter image description here

        Source:https://www.argentdata.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=44






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          6












          6








          6





          $begingroup$

          One easy way would be to put a toroid or ferrite on the cable, they increase the inductance on the cable for high frequency signals and prevent conducted emissions.



          I've had success with a radio and blocking emissions from a PC with the mains cable from the radio wrapped around a ferrite toroid. You can also get clamp on ferrites almost everywhere.



          This will work if it is conducted emissions from the knife, if it's radiated emissions (radio waves) then your best bet would be to shield the speakers. It might be good to put a ferrite on the speakers AC mains cable too.



          enter image description here

          Source: https://palomar-engineers.com/ferrite-products/ferrite-cores/ferrite-ring-toroid-combo-pack



          This is what a clamp on ferrite looks like:



          enter image description here

          Source:https://www.argentdata.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=44






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          One easy way would be to put a toroid or ferrite on the cable, they increase the inductance on the cable for high frequency signals and prevent conducted emissions.



          I've had success with a radio and blocking emissions from a PC with the mains cable from the radio wrapped around a ferrite toroid. You can also get clamp on ferrites almost everywhere.



          This will work if it is conducted emissions from the knife, if it's radiated emissions (radio waves) then your best bet would be to shield the speakers. It might be good to put a ferrite on the speakers AC mains cable too.



          enter image description here

          Source: https://palomar-engineers.com/ferrite-products/ferrite-cores/ferrite-ring-toroid-combo-pack



          This is what a clamp on ferrite looks like:



          enter image description here

          Source:https://www.argentdata.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=44







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Jan 30 at 17:05

























          answered Jan 30 at 16:59









          laptop2dlaptop2d

          27.3k123585




          27.3k123585























              5












              $begingroup$

              You can also tear down the machine and make sure the commutator and brushes are tip-top. The source of the EMI may not be the machine itself, but defects or wear in the machine.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                5












                $begingroup$

                You can also tear down the machine and make sure the commutator and brushes are tip-top. The source of the EMI may not be the machine itself, but defects or wear in the machine.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  5












                  5








                  5





                  $begingroup$

                  You can also tear down the machine and make sure the commutator and brushes are tip-top. The source of the EMI may not be the machine itself, but defects or wear in the machine.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  You can also tear down the machine and make sure the commutator and brushes are tip-top. The source of the EMI may not be the machine itself, but defects or wear in the machine.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 30 at 20:51









                  HarperHarper

                  6,417826




                  6,417826






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f419640%2freduce-emi-generated-by-old-ac-motor-from-an-electric-knife%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                      How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                      in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith