spark 2.3.1 insertinto remove value of fields and change it to null
I just upgrade my spark cluster from 2.2.1 to 2.3.1 in order to enjoy the feature of overwrite specific partitions. see link.
But ....
From some reason when I am testing it I get a very strange behavior see code:
import org.apache.spark.SparkConf
import org.apache.spark.sql.{SaveMode, SparkSession}
case class MyRow(partitionField: Int, someId: Int, someText: String)
object ExampleForStack2 extends App{
val sparkConf = new SparkConf()
sparkConf.set("spark.sql.sources.partitionOverwriteMode","dynamic")
sparkConf.setMaster(s"local[2]")
val spark = SparkSession.builder().config(sparkConf).getOrCreate()
val list1 = List(
MyRow(1, 1, "someText")
,MyRow(2, 2, "someText2")
)
val list2 = List(
MyRow(1, 1, "someText modified")
,MyRow(3, 3, "someText3")
)
val df = spark.createDataFrame(list1)
val df2 = spark.createDataFrame(list2)
df2.show(false)
df.write.partitionBy("partitionField").option("path","/tmp/tables/").saveAsTable("my_table")
df2.write.mode(SaveMode.Overwrite).insertInto("my_table")
spark.sql("select * from my_table").show(false)
}
And output:
+--------------+------+-----------------+
|partitionField|someId|someText |
+--------------+------+-----------------+
|1 |1 |someText modified|
|3 |3 |someText3 |
+--------------+------+-----------------+
+------+---------+--------------+
|someId|someText |partitionField|
+------+---------+--------------+
|2 |someText2|2 |
|1 |someText |1 |
|3 |3 |null |
|1 |1 |null |
+------+---------+--------------+
Why I get those nulls ?
It seems that fields were moved ? but why?
Thanks
scala apache-spark
add a comment |
I just upgrade my spark cluster from 2.2.1 to 2.3.1 in order to enjoy the feature of overwrite specific partitions. see link.
But ....
From some reason when I am testing it I get a very strange behavior see code:
import org.apache.spark.SparkConf
import org.apache.spark.sql.{SaveMode, SparkSession}
case class MyRow(partitionField: Int, someId: Int, someText: String)
object ExampleForStack2 extends App{
val sparkConf = new SparkConf()
sparkConf.set("spark.sql.sources.partitionOverwriteMode","dynamic")
sparkConf.setMaster(s"local[2]")
val spark = SparkSession.builder().config(sparkConf).getOrCreate()
val list1 = List(
MyRow(1, 1, "someText")
,MyRow(2, 2, "someText2")
)
val list2 = List(
MyRow(1, 1, "someText modified")
,MyRow(3, 3, "someText3")
)
val df = spark.createDataFrame(list1)
val df2 = spark.createDataFrame(list2)
df2.show(false)
df.write.partitionBy("partitionField").option("path","/tmp/tables/").saveAsTable("my_table")
df2.write.mode(SaveMode.Overwrite).insertInto("my_table")
spark.sql("select * from my_table").show(false)
}
And output:
+--------------+------+-----------------+
|partitionField|someId|someText |
+--------------+------+-----------------+
|1 |1 |someText modified|
|3 |3 |someText3 |
+--------------+------+-----------------+
+------+---------+--------------+
|someId|someText |partitionField|
+------+---------+--------------+
|2 |someText2|2 |
|1 |someText |1 |
|3 |3 |null |
|1 |1 |null |
+------+---------+--------------+
Why I get those nulls ?
It seems that fields were moved ? but why?
Thanks
scala apache-spark
add a comment |
I just upgrade my spark cluster from 2.2.1 to 2.3.1 in order to enjoy the feature of overwrite specific partitions. see link.
But ....
From some reason when I am testing it I get a very strange behavior see code:
import org.apache.spark.SparkConf
import org.apache.spark.sql.{SaveMode, SparkSession}
case class MyRow(partitionField: Int, someId: Int, someText: String)
object ExampleForStack2 extends App{
val sparkConf = new SparkConf()
sparkConf.set("spark.sql.sources.partitionOverwriteMode","dynamic")
sparkConf.setMaster(s"local[2]")
val spark = SparkSession.builder().config(sparkConf).getOrCreate()
val list1 = List(
MyRow(1, 1, "someText")
,MyRow(2, 2, "someText2")
)
val list2 = List(
MyRow(1, 1, "someText modified")
,MyRow(3, 3, "someText3")
)
val df = spark.createDataFrame(list1)
val df2 = spark.createDataFrame(list2)
df2.show(false)
df.write.partitionBy("partitionField").option("path","/tmp/tables/").saveAsTable("my_table")
df2.write.mode(SaveMode.Overwrite).insertInto("my_table")
spark.sql("select * from my_table").show(false)
}
And output:
+--------------+------+-----------------+
|partitionField|someId|someText |
+--------------+------+-----------------+
|1 |1 |someText modified|
|3 |3 |someText3 |
+--------------+------+-----------------+
+------+---------+--------------+
|someId|someText |partitionField|
+------+---------+--------------+
|2 |someText2|2 |
|1 |someText |1 |
|3 |3 |null |
|1 |1 |null |
+------+---------+--------------+
Why I get those nulls ?
It seems that fields were moved ? but why?
Thanks
scala apache-spark
I just upgrade my spark cluster from 2.2.1 to 2.3.1 in order to enjoy the feature of overwrite specific partitions. see link.
But ....
From some reason when I am testing it I get a very strange behavior see code:
import org.apache.spark.SparkConf
import org.apache.spark.sql.{SaveMode, SparkSession}
case class MyRow(partitionField: Int, someId: Int, someText: String)
object ExampleForStack2 extends App{
val sparkConf = new SparkConf()
sparkConf.set("spark.sql.sources.partitionOverwriteMode","dynamic")
sparkConf.setMaster(s"local[2]")
val spark = SparkSession.builder().config(sparkConf).getOrCreate()
val list1 = List(
MyRow(1, 1, "someText")
,MyRow(2, 2, "someText2")
)
val list2 = List(
MyRow(1, 1, "someText modified")
,MyRow(3, 3, "someText3")
)
val df = spark.createDataFrame(list1)
val df2 = spark.createDataFrame(list2)
df2.show(false)
df.write.partitionBy("partitionField").option("path","/tmp/tables/").saveAsTable("my_table")
df2.write.mode(SaveMode.Overwrite).insertInto("my_table")
spark.sql("select * from my_table").show(false)
}
And output:
+--------------+------+-----------------+
|partitionField|someId|someText |
+--------------+------+-----------------+
|1 |1 |someText modified|
|3 |3 |someText3 |
+--------------+------+-----------------+
+------+---------+--------------+
|someId|someText |partitionField|
+------+---------+--------------+
|2 |someText2|2 |
|1 |someText |1 |
|3 |3 |null |
|1 |1 |null |
+------+---------+--------------+
Why I get those nulls ?
It seems that fields were moved ? but why?
Thanks
scala apache-spark
scala apache-spark
asked Jan 2 at 21:32


Ehud LevEhud Lev
8381017
8381017
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Ok found it, insert into is based on fields position. see documentation
Unlike saveAsTable, insertInto ignores the column names and just uses position-based resolution. For example:
scala> Seq((1, 2)).toDF("i", "j").write.mode("overwrite").saveAsTable("t1")
scala> Seq((3, 4)).toDF("j", "i").write.insertInto("t1")
scala> Seq((5, 6)).toDF("a", "b").write.insertInto("t1")
scala> sql("select * from t1").show
+---+---+
| i| j|
+---+---+
| 5| 6|
| 3| 4|
| 1| 2|
+---+---+
Because it inserts data to an existing table, format or options will
be ignored.
Moreover I am using dynamic partition which should appear as the last field. So the solution is to move the dynamic partitions to the end of the dataframe, which means in my case:
df2.select("someId", "someText","partitionField").write.mode(SaveMode.Overwrite).insertInto("my_table")
add a comment |
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54013434%2fspark-2-3-1-insertinto-remove-value-of-fields-and-change-it-to-null%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Ok found it, insert into is based on fields position. see documentation
Unlike saveAsTable, insertInto ignores the column names and just uses position-based resolution. For example:
scala> Seq((1, 2)).toDF("i", "j").write.mode("overwrite").saveAsTable("t1")
scala> Seq((3, 4)).toDF("j", "i").write.insertInto("t1")
scala> Seq((5, 6)).toDF("a", "b").write.insertInto("t1")
scala> sql("select * from t1").show
+---+---+
| i| j|
+---+---+
| 5| 6|
| 3| 4|
| 1| 2|
+---+---+
Because it inserts data to an existing table, format or options will
be ignored.
Moreover I am using dynamic partition which should appear as the last field. So the solution is to move the dynamic partitions to the end of the dataframe, which means in my case:
df2.select("someId", "someText","partitionField").write.mode(SaveMode.Overwrite).insertInto("my_table")
add a comment |
Ok found it, insert into is based on fields position. see documentation
Unlike saveAsTable, insertInto ignores the column names and just uses position-based resolution. For example:
scala> Seq((1, 2)).toDF("i", "j").write.mode("overwrite").saveAsTable("t1")
scala> Seq((3, 4)).toDF("j", "i").write.insertInto("t1")
scala> Seq((5, 6)).toDF("a", "b").write.insertInto("t1")
scala> sql("select * from t1").show
+---+---+
| i| j|
+---+---+
| 5| 6|
| 3| 4|
| 1| 2|
+---+---+
Because it inserts data to an existing table, format or options will
be ignored.
Moreover I am using dynamic partition which should appear as the last field. So the solution is to move the dynamic partitions to the end of the dataframe, which means in my case:
df2.select("someId", "someText","partitionField").write.mode(SaveMode.Overwrite).insertInto("my_table")
add a comment |
Ok found it, insert into is based on fields position. see documentation
Unlike saveAsTable, insertInto ignores the column names and just uses position-based resolution. For example:
scala> Seq((1, 2)).toDF("i", "j").write.mode("overwrite").saveAsTable("t1")
scala> Seq((3, 4)).toDF("j", "i").write.insertInto("t1")
scala> Seq((5, 6)).toDF("a", "b").write.insertInto("t1")
scala> sql("select * from t1").show
+---+---+
| i| j|
+---+---+
| 5| 6|
| 3| 4|
| 1| 2|
+---+---+
Because it inserts data to an existing table, format or options will
be ignored.
Moreover I am using dynamic partition which should appear as the last field. So the solution is to move the dynamic partitions to the end of the dataframe, which means in my case:
df2.select("someId", "someText","partitionField").write.mode(SaveMode.Overwrite).insertInto("my_table")
Ok found it, insert into is based on fields position. see documentation
Unlike saveAsTable, insertInto ignores the column names and just uses position-based resolution. For example:
scala> Seq((1, 2)).toDF("i", "j").write.mode("overwrite").saveAsTable("t1")
scala> Seq((3, 4)).toDF("j", "i").write.insertInto("t1")
scala> Seq((5, 6)).toDF("a", "b").write.insertInto("t1")
scala> sql("select * from t1").show
+---+---+
| i| j|
+---+---+
| 5| 6|
| 3| 4|
| 1| 2|
+---+---+
Because it inserts data to an existing table, format or options will
be ignored.
Moreover I am using dynamic partition which should appear as the last field. So the solution is to move the dynamic partitions to the end of the dataframe, which means in my case:
df2.select("someId", "someText","partitionField").write.mode(SaveMode.Overwrite).insertInto("my_table")
answered Jan 2 at 21:51


Ehud LevEhud Lev
8381017
8381017
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54013434%2fspark-2-3-1-insertinto-remove-value-of-fields-and-change-it-to-null%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown