$sumlimits_{n=1}^infty frac{n^n}{n!}$ converges or diverges?
$begingroup$
$$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{n^n}{n!}$$
It is a convergent or divergent series? Explain how.
I am getting infinite value as $n$ tends to infinity. I have applied the ratio test and higher ratio test.
calculus sequences-and-series convergence
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
$$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{n^n}{n!}$$
It is a convergent or divergent series? Explain how.
I am getting infinite value as $n$ tends to infinity. I have applied the ratio test and higher ratio test.
calculus sequences-and-series convergence
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The ratio test is overkill. This series doesn't even get past the divergence test.
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
Sep 5 '17 at 2:37
$begingroup$
Using no tests whatsoever, you can tell that it will diverge just by plugging in values for $n>1$. The numerator will always be $n*n*cdots$ while the denominator will always be smaller: $n(n-1)(n-2)cdots$.
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Sep 5 '17 at 2:42
1
$begingroup$
@WaveX Technically, that is an application of the divergence test. :P
$endgroup$
– Xander Henderson
Sep 5 '17 at 2:56
$begingroup$
@Xander Henderson Yea I guess that's true, it has been well over a year since I've last looked at infinite series :)
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Sep 5 '17 at 3:03
1
$begingroup$
Phrasing? :) Any question of the form "Is it convergent or divergent?" can be answered immediately with a resounding "yes."
$endgroup$
– Clement C.
Sep 5 '17 at 3:09
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
$$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{n^n}{n!}$$
It is a convergent or divergent series? Explain how.
I am getting infinite value as $n$ tends to infinity. I have applied the ratio test and higher ratio test.
calculus sequences-and-series convergence
$endgroup$
$$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{n^n}{n!}$$
It is a convergent or divergent series? Explain how.
I am getting infinite value as $n$ tends to infinity. I have applied the ratio test and higher ratio test.
calculus sequences-and-series convergence
calculus sequences-and-series convergence
edited Sep 5 '17 at 3:10
J. M. is not a mathematician
61.1k5152290
61.1k5152290
asked Sep 5 '17 at 2:30
sammy asammy a
41
41
1
$begingroup$
The ratio test is overkill. This series doesn't even get past the divergence test.
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
Sep 5 '17 at 2:37
$begingroup$
Using no tests whatsoever, you can tell that it will diverge just by plugging in values for $n>1$. The numerator will always be $n*n*cdots$ while the denominator will always be smaller: $n(n-1)(n-2)cdots$.
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Sep 5 '17 at 2:42
1
$begingroup$
@WaveX Technically, that is an application of the divergence test. :P
$endgroup$
– Xander Henderson
Sep 5 '17 at 2:56
$begingroup$
@Xander Henderson Yea I guess that's true, it has been well over a year since I've last looked at infinite series :)
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Sep 5 '17 at 3:03
1
$begingroup$
Phrasing? :) Any question of the form "Is it convergent or divergent?" can be answered immediately with a resounding "yes."
$endgroup$
– Clement C.
Sep 5 '17 at 3:09
|
show 1 more comment
1
$begingroup$
The ratio test is overkill. This series doesn't even get past the divergence test.
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
Sep 5 '17 at 2:37
$begingroup$
Using no tests whatsoever, you can tell that it will diverge just by plugging in values for $n>1$. The numerator will always be $n*n*cdots$ while the denominator will always be smaller: $n(n-1)(n-2)cdots$.
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Sep 5 '17 at 2:42
1
$begingroup$
@WaveX Technically, that is an application of the divergence test. :P
$endgroup$
– Xander Henderson
Sep 5 '17 at 2:56
$begingroup$
@Xander Henderson Yea I guess that's true, it has been well over a year since I've last looked at infinite series :)
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Sep 5 '17 at 3:03
1
$begingroup$
Phrasing? :) Any question of the form "Is it convergent or divergent?" can be answered immediately with a resounding "yes."
$endgroup$
– Clement C.
Sep 5 '17 at 3:09
1
1
$begingroup$
The ratio test is overkill. This series doesn't even get past the divergence test.
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
Sep 5 '17 at 2:37
$begingroup$
The ratio test is overkill. This series doesn't even get past the divergence test.
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
Sep 5 '17 at 2:37
$begingroup$
Using no tests whatsoever, you can tell that it will diverge just by plugging in values for $n>1$. The numerator will always be $n*n*cdots$ while the denominator will always be smaller: $n(n-1)(n-2)cdots$.
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Sep 5 '17 at 2:42
$begingroup$
Using no tests whatsoever, you can tell that it will diverge just by plugging in values for $n>1$. The numerator will always be $n*n*cdots$ while the denominator will always be smaller: $n(n-1)(n-2)cdots$.
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Sep 5 '17 at 2:42
1
1
$begingroup$
@WaveX Technically, that is an application of the divergence test. :P
$endgroup$
– Xander Henderson
Sep 5 '17 at 2:56
$begingroup$
@WaveX Technically, that is an application of the divergence test. :P
$endgroup$
– Xander Henderson
Sep 5 '17 at 2:56
$begingroup$
@Xander Henderson Yea I guess that's true, it has been well over a year since I've last looked at infinite series :)
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Sep 5 '17 at 3:03
$begingroup$
@Xander Henderson Yea I guess that's true, it has been well over a year since I've last looked at infinite series :)
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Sep 5 '17 at 3:03
1
1
$begingroup$
Phrasing? :) Any question of the form "Is it convergent or divergent?" can be answered immediately with a resounding "yes."
$endgroup$
– Clement C.
Sep 5 '17 at 3:09
$begingroup$
Phrasing? :) Any question of the form "Is it convergent or divergent?" can be answered immediately with a resounding "yes."
$endgroup$
– Clement C.
Sep 5 '17 at 3:09
|
show 1 more comment
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint: Note that
$$frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}=frac{frac{(n+1)^{n+1}}{(n+1)!}}{frac{n^n}{n!}}=frac{(n+1)^{n+1}n!}{n^n(n+1)!}=frac{(n+1)^{n+1}}{n^n(n+1)}=left(frac{n+1}nright)^n;.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The numerator grows faster than the denominator. For any value of $n>1$, we have $$n^n>n!$$ because they are both products of $n$ factors, but on the LHS, each factor equals $n$, and on the RHS, every factor but one is smaller than $n$. Therefore, for $n>1$, we have $a_n=frac{n^n}{n!}>1$. Since $a_nnotto 0$, the series cannot converge, by the divergence test.
In fact, the terms in this sum grow without bound, but even without that, we have shown that the series diverges.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
It is enough to argue that $n^n>n!$ implies that $frac{n^n}{n!}>1$ cannot converge to zero.
$endgroup$
– lhf
Sep 5 '17 at 2:38
$begingroup$
True. Are you saying I should edit my answer?
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
Sep 5 '17 at 2:38
$begingroup$
No, unless you feel it makes the answer clearer.
$endgroup$
– lhf
Sep 5 '17 at 2:39
$begingroup$
Yes, the terms are greater than $1$ for $n>1,$ but this does not imply they grow without bound. (They do grow without bound, but you did not show it, and you don't need it.)
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Sep 5 '17 at 3:07
$begingroup$
Of course it doesn't imply that they grow without bound, but nobody said it does.
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
Sep 5 '17 at 3:53
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This series is diverge since $lim_inftydfrac{n^n}{n!}=infty$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To expand on Wen's answer,
$$rho=lim_{nrightarrowinfty}bigg(frac{n+1}{n}bigg)^n = lim_{nrightarrowinfty}bigg(1 + frac{1}{n}bigg)^n = e $$
and since $e > 1$, the series diverges by the ratio test.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2417127%2fsum-limits-n-1-infty-fracnnn-converges-or-diverges%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint: Note that
$$frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}=frac{frac{(n+1)^{n+1}}{(n+1)!}}{frac{n^n}{n!}}=frac{(n+1)^{n+1}n!}{n^n(n+1)!}=frac{(n+1)^{n+1}}{n^n(n+1)}=left(frac{n+1}nright)^n;.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: Note that
$$frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}=frac{frac{(n+1)^{n+1}}{(n+1)!}}{frac{n^n}{n!}}=frac{(n+1)^{n+1}n!}{n^n(n+1)!}=frac{(n+1)^{n+1}}{n^n(n+1)}=left(frac{n+1}nright)^n;.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: Note that
$$frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}=frac{frac{(n+1)^{n+1}}{(n+1)!}}{frac{n^n}{n!}}=frac{(n+1)^{n+1}n!}{n^n(n+1)!}=frac{(n+1)^{n+1}}{n^n(n+1)}=left(frac{n+1}nright)^n;.$$
$endgroup$
Hint: Note that
$$frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}=frac{frac{(n+1)^{n+1}}{(n+1)!}}{frac{n^n}{n!}}=frac{(n+1)^{n+1}n!}{n^n(n+1)!}=frac{(n+1)^{n+1}}{n^n(n+1)}=left(frac{n+1}nright)^n;.$$
answered Sep 5 '17 at 2:35


WenWen
1,633417
1,633417
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The numerator grows faster than the denominator. For any value of $n>1$, we have $$n^n>n!$$ because they are both products of $n$ factors, but on the LHS, each factor equals $n$, and on the RHS, every factor but one is smaller than $n$. Therefore, for $n>1$, we have $a_n=frac{n^n}{n!}>1$. Since $a_nnotto 0$, the series cannot converge, by the divergence test.
In fact, the terms in this sum grow without bound, but even without that, we have shown that the series diverges.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
It is enough to argue that $n^n>n!$ implies that $frac{n^n}{n!}>1$ cannot converge to zero.
$endgroup$
– lhf
Sep 5 '17 at 2:38
$begingroup$
True. Are you saying I should edit my answer?
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
Sep 5 '17 at 2:38
$begingroup$
No, unless you feel it makes the answer clearer.
$endgroup$
– lhf
Sep 5 '17 at 2:39
$begingroup$
Yes, the terms are greater than $1$ for $n>1,$ but this does not imply they grow without bound. (They do grow without bound, but you did not show it, and you don't need it.)
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Sep 5 '17 at 3:07
$begingroup$
Of course it doesn't imply that they grow without bound, but nobody said it does.
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
Sep 5 '17 at 3:53
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The numerator grows faster than the denominator. For any value of $n>1$, we have $$n^n>n!$$ because they are both products of $n$ factors, but on the LHS, each factor equals $n$, and on the RHS, every factor but one is smaller than $n$. Therefore, for $n>1$, we have $a_n=frac{n^n}{n!}>1$. Since $a_nnotto 0$, the series cannot converge, by the divergence test.
In fact, the terms in this sum grow without bound, but even without that, we have shown that the series diverges.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
It is enough to argue that $n^n>n!$ implies that $frac{n^n}{n!}>1$ cannot converge to zero.
$endgroup$
– lhf
Sep 5 '17 at 2:38
$begingroup$
True. Are you saying I should edit my answer?
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
Sep 5 '17 at 2:38
$begingroup$
No, unless you feel it makes the answer clearer.
$endgroup$
– lhf
Sep 5 '17 at 2:39
$begingroup$
Yes, the terms are greater than $1$ for $n>1,$ but this does not imply they grow without bound. (They do grow without bound, but you did not show it, and you don't need it.)
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Sep 5 '17 at 3:07
$begingroup$
Of course it doesn't imply that they grow without bound, but nobody said it does.
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
Sep 5 '17 at 3:53
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The numerator grows faster than the denominator. For any value of $n>1$, we have $$n^n>n!$$ because they are both products of $n$ factors, but on the LHS, each factor equals $n$, and on the RHS, every factor but one is smaller than $n$. Therefore, for $n>1$, we have $a_n=frac{n^n}{n!}>1$. Since $a_nnotto 0$, the series cannot converge, by the divergence test.
In fact, the terms in this sum grow without bound, but even without that, we have shown that the series diverges.
$endgroup$
The numerator grows faster than the denominator. For any value of $n>1$, we have $$n^n>n!$$ because they are both products of $n$ factors, but on the LHS, each factor equals $n$, and on the RHS, every factor but one is smaller than $n$. Therefore, for $n>1$, we have $a_n=frac{n^n}{n!}>1$. Since $a_nnotto 0$, the series cannot converge, by the divergence test.
In fact, the terms in this sum grow without bound, but even without that, we have shown that the series diverges.
edited Sep 5 '17 at 3:55
answered Sep 5 '17 at 2:35
G Tony JacobsG Tony Jacobs
25.9k43686
25.9k43686
2
$begingroup$
It is enough to argue that $n^n>n!$ implies that $frac{n^n}{n!}>1$ cannot converge to zero.
$endgroup$
– lhf
Sep 5 '17 at 2:38
$begingroup$
True. Are you saying I should edit my answer?
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
Sep 5 '17 at 2:38
$begingroup$
No, unless you feel it makes the answer clearer.
$endgroup$
– lhf
Sep 5 '17 at 2:39
$begingroup$
Yes, the terms are greater than $1$ for $n>1,$ but this does not imply they grow without bound. (They do grow without bound, but you did not show it, and you don't need it.)
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Sep 5 '17 at 3:07
$begingroup$
Of course it doesn't imply that they grow without bound, but nobody said it does.
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
Sep 5 '17 at 3:53
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
It is enough to argue that $n^n>n!$ implies that $frac{n^n}{n!}>1$ cannot converge to zero.
$endgroup$
– lhf
Sep 5 '17 at 2:38
$begingroup$
True. Are you saying I should edit my answer?
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
Sep 5 '17 at 2:38
$begingroup$
No, unless you feel it makes the answer clearer.
$endgroup$
– lhf
Sep 5 '17 at 2:39
$begingroup$
Yes, the terms are greater than $1$ for $n>1,$ but this does not imply they grow without bound. (They do grow without bound, but you did not show it, and you don't need it.)
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Sep 5 '17 at 3:07
$begingroup$
Of course it doesn't imply that they grow without bound, but nobody said it does.
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
Sep 5 '17 at 3:53
2
2
$begingroup$
It is enough to argue that $n^n>n!$ implies that $frac{n^n}{n!}>1$ cannot converge to zero.
$endgroup$
– lhf
Sep 5 '17 at 2:38
$begingroup$
It is enough to argue that $n^n>n!$ implies that $frac{n^n}{n!}>1$ cannot converge to zero.
$endgroup$
– lhf
Sep 5 '17 at 2:38
$begingroup$
True. Are you saying I should edit my answer?
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
Sep 5 '17 at 2:38
$begingroup$
True. Are you saying I should edit my answer?
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
Sep 5 '17 at 2:38
$begingroup$
No, unless you feel it makes the answer clearer.
$endgroup$
– lhf
Sep 5 '17 at 2:39
$begingroup$
No, unless you feel it makes the answer clearer.
$endgroup$
– lhf
Sep 5 '17 at 2:39
$begingroup$
Yes, the terms are greater than $1$ for $n>1,$ but this does not imply they grow without bound. (They do grow without bound, but you did not show it, and you don't need it.)
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Sep 5 '17 at 3:07
$begingroup$
Yes, the terms are greater than $1$ for $n>1,$ but this does not imply they grow without bound. (They do grow without bound, but you did not show it, and you don't need it.)
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Sep 5 '17 at 3:07
$begingroup$
Of course it doesn't imply that they grow without bound, but nobody said it does.
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
Sep 5 '17 at 3:53
$begingroup$
Of course it doesn't imply that they grow without bound, but nobody said it does.
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
Sep 5 '17 at 3:53
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This series is diverge since $lim_inftydfrac{n^n}{n!}=infty$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This series is diverge since $lim_inftydfrac{n^n}{n!}=infty$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This series is diverge since $lim_inftydfrac{n^n}{n!}=infty$.
$endgroup$
This series is diverge since $lim_inftydfrac{n^n}{n!}=infty$.
answered Sep 5 '17 at 2:43


NosratiNosrati
26.5k62354
26.5k62354
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To expand on Wen's answer,
$$rho=lim_{nrightarrowinfty}bigg(frac{n+1}{n}bigg)^n = lim_{nrightarrowinfty}bigg(1 + frac{1}{n}bigg)^n = e $$
and since $e > 1$, the series diverges by the ratio test.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To expand on Wen's answer,
$$rho=lim_{nrightarrowinfty}bigg(frac{n+1}{n}bigg)^n = lim_{nrightarrowinfty}bigg(1 + frac{1}{n}bigg)^n = e $$
and since $e > 1$, the series diverges by the ratio test.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To expand on Wen's answer,
$$rho=lim_{nrightarrowinfty}bigg(frac{n+1}{n}bigg)^n = lim_{nrightarrowinfty}bigg(1 + frac{1}{n}bigg)^n = e $$
and since $e > 1$, the series diverges by the ratio test.
$endgroup$
To expand on Wen's answer,
$$rho=lim_{nrightarrowinfty}bigg(frac{n+1}{n}bigg)^n = lim_{nrightarrowinfty}bigg(1 + frac{1}{n}bigg)^n = e $$
and since $e > 1$, the series diverges by the ratio test.
answered Sep 5 '17 at 2:48
R.EvetR.Evet
908
908
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2417127%2fsum-limits-n-1-infty-fracnnn-converges-or-diverges%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
The ratio test is overkill. This series doesn't even get past the divergence test.
$endgroup$
– G Tony Jacobs
Sep 5 '17 at 2:37
$begingroup$
Using no tests whatsoever, you can tell that it will diverge just by plugging in values for $n>1$. The numerator will always be $n*n*cdots$ while the denominator will always be smaller: $n(n-1)(n-2)cdots$.
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Sep 5 '17 at 2:42
1
$begingroup$
@WaveX Technically, that is an application of the divergence test. :P
$endgroup$
– Xander Henderson
Sep 5 '17 at 2:56
$begingroup$
@Xander Henderson Yea I guess that's true, it has been well over a year since I've last looked at infinite series :)
$endgroup$
– WaveX
Sep 5 '17 at 3:03
1
$begingroup$
Phrasing? :) Any question of the form "Is it convergent or divergent?" can be answered immediately with a resounding "yes."
$endgroup$
– Clement C.
Sep 5 '17 at 3:09