What does “TPR” mean in chess tournament reports?
I usually find in reports like this (and many others) something like:
... with a TPR of 2551 ...
I would like to know its meaning, and also what it stands for.
rules tournament
add a comment |
I usually find in reports like this (and many others) something like:
... with a TPR of 2551 ...
I would like to know its meaning, and also what it stands for.
rules tournament
add a comment |
I usually find in reports like this (and many others) something like:
... with a TPR of 2551 ...
I would like to know its meaning, and also what it stands for.
rules tournament
I usually find in reports like this (and many others) something like:
... with a TPR of 2551 ...
I would like to know its meaning, and also what it stands for.
rules tournament
rules tournament
edited Jan 29 at 13:48


Wais Kamal
1,660430
1,660430
asked Jan 29 at 13:23


Daniel Alfredo SottileDaniel Alfredo Sottile
848317
848317
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
It means Tournament Performance Rating.
Very roughly a TPR of 2551 means that the results this player has achieved in this tournament would have been expected of a player rated 2551.
That's always a bit problematic. Say you scored 100% against a group of 1500 players, what kind of player would have expected to score that? Well, a 1900 player probably, but also a 2800 player. And many methods make your TPR go down if you win against a much lower rated player, because they are based on the average rating of your opponents. But it's a rough measure of how well a player did.
There exist various methods to calculate it that I don't have time now to go into now.
1
The more varied the people in the tournament were, and the more varied your results were, the less reliable a metric it will be. And like all metrics (including, quite honestly, the typical rating) they should be taken with a grain of salt.
– corsiKa
Jan 29 at 17:48
A 1900 player actually has a 92% expected performance against a group of 1500 players, so if there is enough 1500 players the 1900 is not high enough.
– blues
Jan 30 at 16:53
add a comment |
"Tournament performance rating". An approximate measure of the strength that a player performed/played at in the tournament.
The calculation of such a performance rating varies, but one method is as follows:
- If you beat someone at rating X, your performance for that game is X + 400.
- If you lose to this person, your performance for that game is X - 400.
- If you draw this game, your performance for that game is X.
Then the tournament performance rating is calculated by taking the average performance out of all your games.
1
Can this be summarized by this formula:avg. opponent rating + 400 * (number of wins - number of losses) / number of games
?
– Akavall
Jan 29 at 20:05
3
@Akavall Yes, but that looks much more mysterious than the explanation given in the answer.
– David Richerby
Jan 29 at 20:26
add a comment |
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "435"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f23625%2fwhat-does-tpr-mean-in-chess-tournament-reports%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It means Tournament Performance Rating.
Very roughly a TPR of 2551 means that the results this player has achieved in this tournament would have been expected of a player rated 2551.
That's always a bit problematic. Say you scored 100% against a group of 1500 players, what kind of player would have expected to score that? Well, a 1900 player probably, but also a 2800 player. And many methods make your TPR go down if you win against a much lower rated player, because they are based on the average rating of your opponents. But it's a rough measure of how well a player did.
There exist various methods to calculate it that I don't have time now to go into now.
1
The more varied the people in the tournament were, and the more varied your results were, the less reliable a metric it will be. And like all metrics (including, quite honestly, the typical rating) they should be taken with a grain of salt.
– corsiKa
Jan 29 at 17:48
A 1900 player actually has a 92% expected performance against a group of 1500 players, so if there is enough 1500 players the 1900 is not high enough.
– blues
Jan 30 at 16:53
add a comment |
It means Tournament Performance Rating.
Very roughly a TPR of 2551 means that the results this player has achieved in this tournament would have been expected of a player rated 2551.
That's always a bit problematic. Say you scored 100% against a group of 1500 players, what kind of player would have expected to score that? Well, a 1900 player probably, but also a 2800 player. And many methods make your TPR go down if you win against a much lower rated player, because they are based on the average rating of your opponents. But it's a rough measure of how well a player did.
There exist various methods to calculate it that I don't have time now to go into now.
1
The more varied the people in the tournament were, and the more varied your results were, the less reliable a metric it will be. And like all metrics (including, quite honestly, the typical rating) they should be taken with a grain of salt.
– corsiKa
Jan 29 at 17:48
A 1900 player actually has a 92% expected performance against a group of 1500 players, so if there is enough 1500 players the 1900 is not high enough.
– blues
Jan 30 at 16:53
add a comment |
It means Tournament Performance Rating.
Very roughly a TPR of 2551 means that the results this player has achieved in this tournament would have been expected of a player rated 2551.
That's always a bit problematic. Say you scored 100% against a group of 1500 players, what kind of player would have expected to score that? Well, a 1900 player probably, but also a 2800 player. And many methods make your TPR go down if you win against a much lower rated player, because they are based on the average rating of your opponents. But it's a rough measure of how well a player did.
There exist various methods to calculate it that I don't have time now to go into now.
It means Tournament Performance Rating.
Very roughly a TPR of 2551 means that the results this player has achieved in this tournament would have been expected of a player rated 2551.
That's always a bit problematic. Say you scored 100% against a group of 1500 players, what kind of player would have expected to score that? Well, a 1900 player probably, but also a 2800 player. And many methods make your TPR go down if you win against a much lower rated player, because they are based on the average rating of your opponents. But it's a rough measure of how well a player did.
There exist various methods to calculate it that I don't have time now to go into now.
answered Jan 29 at 13:31


RemcoGerlichRemcoGerlich
14.5k4366
14.5k4366
1
The more varied the people in the tournament were, and the more varied your results were, the less reliable a metric it will be. And like all metrics (including, quite honestly, the typical rating) they should be taken with a grain of salt.
– corsiKa
Jan 29 at 17:48
A 1900 player actually has a 92% expected performance against a group of 1500 players, so if there is enough 1500 players the 1900 is not high enough.
– blues
Jan 30 at 16:53
add a comment |
1
The more varied the people in the tournament were, and the more varied your results were, the less reliable a metric it will be. And like all metrics (including, quite honestly, the typical rating) they should be taken with a grain of salt.
– corsiKa
Jan 29 at 17:48
A 1900 player actually has a 92% expected performance against a group of 1500 players, so if there is enough 1500 players the 1900 is not high enough.
– blues
Jan 30 at 16:53
1
1
The more varied the people in the tournament were, and the more varied your results were, the less reliable a metric it will be. And like all metrics (including, quite honestly, the typical rating) they should be taken with a grain of salt.
– corsiKa
Jan 29 at 17:48
The more varied the people in the tournament were, and the more varied your results were, the less reliable a metric it will be. And like all metrics (including, quite honestly, the typical rating) they should be taken with a grain of salt.
– corsiKa
Jan 29 at 17:48
A 1900 player actually has a 92% expected performance against a group of 1500 players, so if there is enough 1500 players the 1900 is not high enough.
– blues
Jan 30 at 16:53
A 1900 player actually has a 92% expected performance against a group of 1500 players, so if there is enough 1500 players the 1900 is not high enough.
– blues
Jan 30 at 16:53
add a comment |
"Tournament performance rating". An approximate measure of the strength that a player performed/played at in the tournament.
The calculation of such a performance rating varies, but one method is as follows:
- If you beat someone at rating X, your performance for that game is X + 400.
- If you lose to this person, your performance for that game is X - 400.
- If you draw this game, your performance for that game is X.
Then the tournament performance rating is calculated by taking the average performance out of all your games.
1
Can this be summarized by this formula:avg. opponent rating + 400 * (number of wins - number of losses) / number of games
?
– Akavall
Jan 29 at 20:05
3
@Akavall Yes, but that looks much more mysterious than the explanation given in the answer.
– David Richerby
Jan 29 at 20:26
add a comment |
"Tournament performance rating". An approximate measure of the strength that a player performed/played at in the tournament.
The calculation of such a performance rating varies, but one method is as follows:
- If you beat someone at rating X, your performance for that game is X + 400.
- If you lose to this person, your performance for that game is X - 400.
- If you draw this game, your performance for that game is X.
Then the tournament performance rating is calculated by taking the average performance out of all your games.
1
Can this be summarized by this formula:avg. opponent rating + 400 * (number of wins - number of losses) / number of games
?
– Akavall
Jan 29 at 20:05
3
@Akavall Yes, but that looks much more mysterious than the explanation given in the answer.
– David Richerby
Jan 29 at 20:26
add a comment |
"Tournament performance rating". An approximate measure of the strength that a player performed/played at in the tournament.
The calculation of such a performance rating varies, but one method is as follows:
- If you beat someone at rating X, your performance for that game is X + 400.
- If you lose to this person, your performance for that game is X - 400.
- If you draw this game, your performance for that game is X.
Then the tournament performance rating is calculated by taking the average performance out of all your games.
"Tournament performance rating". An approximate measure of the strength that a player performed/played at in the tournament.
The calculation of such a performance rating varies, but one method is as follows:
- If you beat someone at rating X, your performance for that game is X + 400.
- If you lose to this person, your performance for that game is X - 400.
- If you draw this game, your performance for that game is X.
Then the tournament performance rating is calculated by taking the average performance out of all your games.
answered Jan 29 at 18:50
Inertial IgnoranceInertial Ignorance
5,217513
5,217513
1
Can this be summarized by this formula:avg. opponent rating + 400 * (number of wins - number of losses) / number of games
?
– Akavall
Jan 29 at 20:05
3
@Akavall Yes, but that looks much more mysterious than the explanation given in the answer.
– David Richerby
Jan 29 at 20:26
add a comment |
1
Can this be summarized by this formula:avg. opponent rating + 400 * (number of wins - number of losses) / number of games
?
– Akavall
Jan 29 at 20:05
3
@Akavall Yes, but that looks much more mysterious than the explanation given in the answer.
– David Richerby
Jan 29 at 20:26
1
1
Can this be summarized by this formula:
avg. opponent rating + 400 * (number of wins - number of losses) / number of games
?– Akavall
Jan 29 at 20:05
Can this be summarized by this formula:
avg. opponent rating + 400 * (number of wins - number of losses) / number of games
?– Akavall
Jan 29 at 20:05
3
3
@Akavall Yes, but that looks much more mysterious than the explanation given in the answer.
– David Richerby
Jan 29 at 20:26
@Akavall Yes, but that looks much more mysterious than the explanation given in the answer.
– David Richerby
Jan 29 at 20:26
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chess Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f23625%2fwhat-does-tpr-mean-in-chess-tournament-reports%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown