Writing proofs to show that a set is open, not closed and infinite
$begingroup$
I have this problem with my homework
- Let $E$ be a non-empty bounded set of real numbers and put $alpha = sup E ,$
and $beta = inf E$ . Assume that $alpha notin E$ and $beta notin E .$ Which of the following statements
is true and which is false. In each case justify your answer.
(a) $E$ is an open set.
(b) $E$ is not a closed set.
(c) $E$ is an infinite set.
(d) $( alpha , beta ) subset E$
It's about general topology and inf and sup. We have to state whether each statement is true or false and justify by giving nice proofs. My assumptions are:
1)False
2)True
3)True
4)False
Please, I need help in writing appropriate proofs. I'm new to this course and still don't know how to write proofs. Any help is appreciated. I only have problems proving part d), if anyone can help me. Thank you!
real-analysis general-topology supremum-and-infimum
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have this problem with my homework
- Let $E$ be a non-empty bounded set of real numbers and put $alpha = sup E ,$
and $beta = inf E$ . Assume that $alpha notin E$ and $beta notin E .$ Which of the following statements
is true and which is false. In each case justify your answer.
(a) $E$ is an open set.
(b) $E$ is not a closed set.
(c) $E$ is an infinite set.
(d) $( alpha , beta ) subset E$
It's about general topology and inf and sup. We have to state whether each statement is true or false and justify by giving nice proofs. My assumptions are:
1)False
2)True
3)True
4)False
Please, I need help in writing appropriate proofs. I'm new to this course and still don't know how to write proofs. Any help is appreciated. I only have problems proving part d), if anyone can help me. Thank you!
real-analysis general-topology supremum-and-infimum
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Welcome to MSE. It is in your best interest that you type your questions (using MathJax) instead of posting links to pictures.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Feb 1 at 16:10
$begingroup$
@YuiTo Cheng: Transcribing an image into text is good; transcribing it into $rmLaTeX$, not as good.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Feb 1 at 16:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have this problem with my homework
- Let $E$ be a non-empty bounded set of real numbers and put $alpha = sup E ,$
and $beta = inf E$ . Assume that $alpha notin E$ and $beta notin E .$ Which of the following statements
is true and which is false. In each case justify your answer.
(a) $E$ is an open set.
(b) $E$ is not a closed set.
(c) $E$ is an infinite set.
(d) $( alpha , beta ) subset E$
It's about general topology and inf and sup. We have to state whether each statement is true or false and justify by giving nice proofs. My assumptions are:
1)False
2)True
3)True
4)False
Please, I need help in writing appropriate proofs. I'm new to this course and still don't know how to write proofs. Any help is appreciated. I only have problems proving part d), if anyone can help me. Thank you!
real-analysis general-topology supremum-and-infimum
$endgroup$
I have this problem with my homework
- Let $E$ be a non-empty bounded set of real numbers and put $alpha = sup E ,$
and $beta = inf E$ . Assume that $alpha notin E$ and $beta notin E .$ Which of the following statements
is true and which is false. In each case justify your answer.
(a) $E$ is an open set.
(b) $E$ is not a closed set.
(c) $E$ is an infinite set.
(d) $( alpha , beta ) subset E$
It's about general topology and inf and sup. We have to state whether each statement is true or false and justify by giving nice proofs. My assumptions are:
1)False
2)True
3)True
4)False
Please, I need help in writing appropriate proofs. I'm new to this course and still don't know how to write proofs. Any help is appreciated. I only have problems proving part d), if anyone can help me. Thank you!
real-analysis general-topology supremum-and-infimum
real-analysis general-topology supremum-and-infimum
edited Feb 1 at 20:06
PBC
asked Feb 1 at 16:09


PBCPBC
14
14
$begingroup$
Welcome to MSE. It is in your best interest that you type your questions (using MathJax) instead of posting links to pictures.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Feb 1 at 16:10
$begingroup$
@YuiTo Cheng: Transcribing an image into text is good; transcribing it into $rmLaTeX$, not as good.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Feb 1 at 16:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Welcome to MSE. It is in your best interest that you type your questions (using MathJax) instead of posting links to pictures.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Feb 1 at 16:10
$begingroup$
@YuiTo Cheng: Transcribing an image into text is good; transcribing it into $rmLaTeX$, not as good.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Feb 1 at 16:26
$begingroup$
Welcome to MSE. It is in your best interest that you type your questions (using MathJax) instead of posting links to pictures.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Feb 1 at 16:10
$begingroup$
Welcome to MSE. It is in your best interest that you type your questions (using MathJax) instead of posting links to pictures.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Feb 1 at 16:10
$begingroup$
@YuiTo Cheng: Transcribing an image into text is good; transcribing it into $rmLaTeX$, not as good.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Feb 1 at 16:26
$begingroup$
@YuiTo Cheng: Transcribing an image into text is good; transcribing it into $rmLaTeX$, not as good.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Feb 1 at 16:26
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You should do your homework yourself.
But you are right about your decision which is true and false.
If the statement is false, you can give just a simple counterexample.
Hints:
b) Assume $E$ is closed. The limit of each convergent sequence in E is in E. Now, use the property of either infimum or supremum to get a contradition.
c) Assume $E$ is finite. What is the supremum and infimum of a finite set?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for the advice! concerning part c, if E is finite then the set E must contain its supremum and infimum, right? but in my case, I'm given that they do not belong to E. Is this a nice counter example?
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:34
$begingroup$
Yes, that argument is correct and sufficient.
$endgroup$
– Mundron Schmidt
Feb 1 at 17:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The convention is to show that a statement is false by providing a counter-example and to show that it's true by giving a general proof.
$(a)$ Consider the counter-example $E=(0,1]cup[2,3).alpha=3,beta=0$ but $E$ is not open.
$(b)$ A closed set contains all its limit points. Show that $alpha$ is a limit point of $E$ by noting that $N_epsilon(alpha)cap E-{alpha}nephi$. Since $alphanotin E,E$ is not closed.
$(c)$ If $E$ were to be finite, it would be closed. We have just shown that $E$ is not closed.
$(d)$ The same counter-example as in $(a)$ works here too.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you so much, you helped me a lot! Though how did you know that Nϵ(α)∩E−{α}≠ϕ ? Can you please explain this to me.
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:41
$begingroup$
@souadbouchahine It was meant to be a clue for you to build on. Anywho, you just have to use the basic properties of supremum. Since $alpha-epsilon$ is not an upper bound of $E,exists xin E|alpha>x>alpha-epsilon$. Thus, $x$ lies in the intersection of $E$ and deleted neighbourhood of $alpha$.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Feb 1 at 16:46
$begingroup$
Okay, thank you for making this clear!
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:52
$begingroup$
But how can the counter example of part a) work in part c) too? if α = 3 and β=0 then (α, β) = (3,0). Is that possible?
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:55
$begingroup$
@souadbouchahine For the last option to make sense, it should be $(beta,alpha)$, not the other way round.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Feb 1 at 20:21
|
show 7 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3096420%2fwriting-proofs-to-show-that-a-set-is-open-not-closed-and-infinite%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You should do your homework yourself.
But you are right about your decision which is true and false.
If the statement is false, you can give just a simple counterexample.
Hints:
b) Assume $E$ is closed. The limit of each convergent sequence in E is in E. Now, use the property of either infimum or supremum to get a contradition.
c) Assume $E$ is finite. What is the supremum and infimum of a finite set?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for the advice! concerning part c, if E is finite then the set E must contain its supremum and infimum, right? but in my case, I'm given that they do not belong to E. Is this a nice counter example?
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:34
$begingroup$
Yes, that argument is correct and sufficient.
$endgroup$
– Mundron Schmidt
Feb 1 at 17:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You should do your homework yourself.
But you are right about your decision which is true and false.
If the statement is false, you can give just a simple counterexample.
Hints:
b) Assume $E$ is closed. The limit of each convergent sequence in E is in E. Now, use the property of either infimum or supremum to get a contradition.
c) Assume $E$ is finite. What is the supremum and infimum of a finite set?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for the advice! concerning part c, if E is finite then the set E must contain its supremum and infimum, right? but in my case, I'm given that they do not belong to E. Is this a nice counter example?
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:34
$begingroup$
Yes, that argument is correct and sufficient.
$endgroup$
– Mundron Schmidt
Feb 1 at 17:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You should do your homework yourself.
But you are right about your decision which is true and false.
If the statement is false, you can give just a simple counterexample.
Hints:
b) Assume $E$ is closed. The limit of each convergent sequence in E is in E. Now, use the property of either infimum or supremum to get a contradition.
c) Assume $E$ is finite. What is the supremum and infimum of a finite set?
$endgroup$
You should do your homework yourself.
But you are right about your decision which is true and false.
If the statement is false, you can give just a simple counterexample.
Hints:
b) Assume $E$ is closed. The limit of each convergent sequence in E is in E. Now, use the property of either infimum or supremum to get a contradition.
c) Assume $E$ is finite. What is the supremum and infimum of a finite set?
answered Feb 1 at 16:18
Mundron SchmidtMundron Schmidt
7,4942729
7,4942729
$begingroup$
Thanks for the advice! concerning part c, if E is finite then the set E must contain its supremum and infimum, right? but in my case, I'm given that they do not belong to E. Is this a nice counter example?
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:34
$begingroup$
Yes, that argument is correct and sufficient.
$endgroup$
– Mundron Schmidt
Feb 1 at 17:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks for the advice! concerning part c, if E is finite then the set E must contain its supremum and infimum, right? but in my case, I'm given that they do not belong to E. Is this a nice counter example?
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:34
$begingroup$
Yes, that argument is correct and sufficient.
$endgroup$
– Mundron Schmidt
Feb 1 at 17:08
$begingroup$
Thanks for the advice! concerning part c, if E is finite then the set E must contain its supremum and infimum, right? but in my case, I'm given that they do not belong to E. Is this a nice counter example?
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:34
$begingroup$
Thanks for the advice! concerning part c, if E is finite then the set E must contain its supremum and infimum, right? but in my case, I'm given that they do not belong to E. Is this a nice counter example?
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:34
$begingroup$
Yes, that argument is correct and sufficient.
$endgroup$
– Mundron Schmidt
Feb 1 at 17:08
$begingroup$
Yes, that argument is correct and sufficient.
$endgroup$
– Mundron Schmidt
Feb 1 at 17:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The convention is to show that a statement is false by providing a counter-example and to show that it's true by giving a general proof.
$(a)$ Consider the counter-example $E=(0,1]cup[2,3).alpha=3,beta=0$ but $E$ is not open.
$(b)$ A closed set contains all its limit points. Show that $alpha$ is a limit point of $E$ by noting that $N_epsilon(alpha)cap E-{alpha}nephi$. Since $alphanotin E,E$ is not closed.
$(c)$ If $E$ were to be finite, it would be closed. We have just shown that $E$ is not closed.
$(d)$ The same counter-example as in $(a)$ works here too.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you so much, you helped me a lot! Though how did you know that Nϵ(α)∩E−{α}≠ϕ ? Can you please explain this to me.
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:41
$begingroup$
@souadbouchahine It was meant to be a clue for you to build on. Anywho, you just have to use the basic properties of supremum. Since $alpha-epsilon$ is not an upper bound of $E,exists xin E|alpha>x>alpha-epsilon$. Thus, $x$ lies in the intersection of $E$ and deleted neighbourhood of $alpha$.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Feb 1 at 16:46
$begingroup$
Okay, thank you for making this clear!
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:52
$begingroup$
But how can the counter example of part a) work in part c) too? if α = 3 and β=0 then (α, β) = (3,0). Is that possible?
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:55
$begingroup$
@souadbouchahine For the last option to make sense, it should be $(beta,alpha)$, not the other way round.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Feb 1 at 20:21
|
show 7 more comments
$begingroup$
The convention is to show that a statement is false by providing a counter-example and to show that it's true by giving a general proof.
$(a)$ Consider the counter-example $E=(0,1]cup[2,3).alpha=3,beta=0$ but $E$ is not open.
$(b)$ A closed set contains all its limit points. Show that $alpha$ is a limit point of $E$ by noting that $N_epsilon(alpha)cap E-{alpha}nephi$. Since $alphanotin E,E$ is not closed.
$(c)$ If $E$ were to be finite, it would be closed. We have just shown that $E$ is not closed.
$(d)$ The same counter-example as in $(a)$ works here too.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you so much, you helped me a lot! Though how did you know that Nϵ(α)∩E−{α}≠ϕ ? Can you please explain this to me.
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:41
$begingroup$
@souadbouchahine It was meant to be a clue for you to build on. Anywho, you just have to use the basic properties of supremum. Since $alpha-epsilon$ is not an upper bound of $E,exists xin E|alpha>x>alpha-epsilon$. Thus, $x$ lies in the intersection of $E$ and deleted neighbourhood of $alpha$.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Feb 1 at 16:46
$begingroup$
Okay, thank you for making this clear!
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:52
$begingroup$
But how can the counter example of part a) work in part c) too? if α = 3 and β=0 then (α, β) = (3,0). Is that possible?
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:55
$begingroup$
@souadbouchahine For the last option to make sense, it should be $(beta,alpha)$, not the other way round.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Feb 1 at 20:21
|
show 7 more comments
$begingroup$
The convention is to show that a statement is false by providing a counter-example and to show that it's true by giving a general proof.
$(a)$ Consider the counter-example $E=(0,1]cup[2,3).alpha=3,beta=0$ but $E$ is not open.
$(b)$ A closed set contains all its limit points. Show that $alpha$ is a limit point of $E$ by noting that $N_epsilon(alpha)cap E-{alpha}nephi$. Since $alphanotin E,E$ is not closed.
$(c)$ If $E$ were to be finite, it would be closed. We have just shown that $E$ is not closed.
$(d)$ The same counter-example as in $(a)$ works here too.
$endgroup$
The convention is to show that a statement is false by providing a counter-example and to show that it's true by giving a general proof.
$(a)$ Consider the counter-example $E=(0,1]cup[2,3).alpha=3,beta=0$ but $E$ is not open.
$(b)$ A closed set contains all its limit points. Show that $alpha$ is a limit point of $E$ by noting that $N_epsilon(alpha)cap E-{alpha}nephi$. Since $alphanotin E,E$ is not closed.
$(c)$ If $E$ were to be finite, it would be closed. We have just shown that $E$ is not closed.
$(d)$ The same counter-example as in $(a)$ works here too.
edited Feb 1 at 16:38
answered Feb 1 at 16:33


Shubham JohriShubham Johri
5,558818
5,558818
$begingroup$
Thank you so much, you helped me a lot! Though how did you know that Nϵ(α)∩E−{α}≠ϕ ? Can you please explain this to me.
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:41
$begingroup$
@souadbouchahine It was meant to be a clue for you to build on. Anywho, you just have to use the basic properties of supremum. Since $alpha-epsilon$ is not an upper bound of $E,exists xin E|alpha>x>alpha-epsilon$. Thus, $x$ lies in the intersection of $E$ and deleted neighbourhood of $alpha$.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Feb 1 at 16:46
$begingroup$
Okay, thank you for making this clear!
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:52
$begingroup$
But how can the counter example of part a) work in part c) too? if α = 3 and β=0 then (α, β) = (3,0). Is that possible?
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:55
$begingroup$
@souadbouchahine For the last option to make sense, it should be $(beta,alpha)$, not the other way round.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Feb 1 at 20:21
|
show 7 more comments
$begingroup$
Thank you so much, you helped me a lot! Though how did you know that Nϵ(α)∩E−{α}≠ϕ ? Can you please explain this to me.
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:41
$begingroup$
@souadbouchahine It was meant to be a clue for you to build on. Anywho, you just have to use the basic properties of supremum. Since $alpha-epsilon$ is not an upper bound of $E,exists xin E|alpha>x>alpha-epsilon$. Thus, $x$ lies in the intersection of $E$ and deleted neighbourhood of $alpha$.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Feb 1 at 16:46
$begingroup$
Okay, thank you for making this clear!
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:52
$begingroup$
But how can the counter example of part a) work in part c) too? if α = 3 and β=0 then (α, β) = (3,0). Is that possible?
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:55
$begingroup$
@souadbouchahine For the last option to make sense, it should be $(beta,alpha)$, not the other way round.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Feb 1 at 20:21
$begingroup$
Thank you so much, you helped me a lot! Though how did you know that Nϵ(α)∩E−{α}≠ϕ ? Can you please explain this to me.
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:41
$begingroup$
Thank you so much, you helped me a lot! Though how did you know that Nϵ(α)∩E−{α}≠ϕ ? Can you please explain this to me.
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:41
$begingroup$
@souadbouchahine It was meant to be a clue for you to build on. Anywho, you just have to use the basic properties of supremum. Since $alpha-epsilon$ is not an upper bound of $E,exists xin E|alpha>x>alpha-epsilon$. Thus, $x$ lies in the intersection of $E$ and deleted neighbourhood of $alpha$.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Feb 1 at 16:46
$begingroup$
@souadbouchahine It was meant to be a clue for you to build on. Anywho, you just have to use the basic properties of supremum. Since $alpha-epsilon$ is not an upper bound of $E,exists xin E|alpha>x>alpha-epsilon$. Thus, $x$ lies in the intersection of $E$ and deleted neighbourhood of $alpha$.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Feb 1 at 16:46
$begingroup$
Okay, thank you for making this clear!
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:52
$begingroup$
Okay, thank you for making this clear!
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:52
$begingroup$
But how can the counter example of part a) work in part c) too? if α = 3 and β=0 then (α, β) = (3,0). Is that possible?
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:55
$begingroup$
But how can the counter example of part a) work in part c) too? if α = 3 and β=0 then (α, β) = (3,0). Is that possible?
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:55
$begingroup$
@souadbouchahine For the last option to make sense, it should be $(beta,alpha)$, not the other way round.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Feb 1 at 20:21
$begingroup$
@souadbouchahine For the last option to make sense, it should be $(beta,alpha)$, not the other way round.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Feb 1 at 20:21
|
show 7 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3096420%2fwriting-proofs-to-show-that-a-set-is-open-not-closed-and-infinite%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Welcome to MSE. It is in your best interest that you type your questions (using MathJax) instead of posting links to pictures.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Feb 1 at 16:10
$begingroup$
@YuiTo Cheng: Transcribing an image into text is good; transcribing it into $rmLaTeX$, not as good.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Feb 1 at 16:26