Writing proofs to show that a set is open, not closed and infinite












0












$begingroup$


I have this problem with my homework




  1. Let $E$ be a non-empty bounded set of real numbers and put $alpha = sup E ,$
    and $beta = inf E$ . Assume that $alpha notin E$ and $beta notin E .$ Which of the following statements
    is true and which is false. In each case justify your answer.


(a) $E$ is an open set.



(b) $E$ is not a closed set.



(c) $E$ is an infinite set.



(d) $( alpha , beta ) subset E$



It's about general topology and inf and sup. We have to state whether each statement is true or false and justify by giving nice proofs. My assumptions are:
1)False
2)True
3)True
4)False



Please, I need help in writing appropriate proofs. I'm new to this course and still don't know how to write proofs. Any help is appreciated. I only have problems proving part d), if anyone can help me. Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE. It is in your best interest that you type your questions (using MathJax) instead of posting links to pictures.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Feb 1 at 16:10










  • $begingroup$
    @YuiTo Cheng: Transcribing an image into text is good; transcribing it into $rmLaTeX$, not as good.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila
    Feb 1 at 16:26
















0












$begingroup$


I have this problem with my homework




  1. Let $E$ be a non-empty bounded set of real numbers and put $alpha = sup E ,$
    and $beta = inf E$ . Assume that $alpha notin E$ and $beta notin E .$ Which of the following statements
    is true and which is false. In each case justify your answer.


(a) $E$ is an open set.



(b) $E$ is not a closed set.



(c) $E$ is an infinite set.



(d) $( alpha , beta ) subset E$



It's about general topology and inf and sup. We have to state whether each statement is true or false and justify by giving nice proofs. My assumptions are:
1)False
2)True
3)True
4)False



Please, I need help in writing appropriate proofs. I'm new to this course and still don't know how to write proofs. Any help is appreciated. I only have problems proving part d), if anyone can help me. Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE. It is in your best interest that you type your questions (using MathJax) instead of posting links to pictures.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Feb 1 at 16:10










  • $begingroup$
    @YuiTo Cheng: Transcribing an image into text is good; transcribing it into $rmLaTeX$, not as good.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila
    Feb 1 at 16:26














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I have this problem with my homework




  1. Let $E$ be a non-empty bounded set of real numbers and put $alpha = sup E ,$
    and $beta = inf E$ . Assume that $alpha notin E$ and $beta notin E .$ Which of the following statements
    is true and which is false. In each case justify your answer.


(a) $E$ is an open set.



(b) $E$ is not a closed set.



(c) $E$ is an infinite set.



(d) $( alpha , beta ) subset E$



It's about general topology and inf and sup. We have to state whether each statement is true or false and justify by giving nice proofs. My assumptions are:
1)False
2)True
3)True
4)False



Please, I need help in writing appropriate proofs. I'm new to this course and still don't know how to write proofs. Any help is appreciated. I only have problems proving part d), if anyone can help me. Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have this problem with my homework




  1. Let $E$ be a non-empty bounded set of real numbers and put $alpha = sup E ,$
    and $beta = inf E$ . Assume that $alpha notin E$ and $beta notin E .$ Which of the following statements
    is true and which is false. In each case justify your answer.


(a) $E$ is an open set.



(b) $E$ is not a closed set.



(c) $E$ is an infinite set.



(d) $( alpha , beta ) subset E$



It's about general topology and inf and sup. We have to state whether each statement is true or false and justify by giving nice proofs. My assumptions are:
1)False
2)True
3)True
4)False



Please, I need help in writing appropriate proofs. I'm new to this course and still don't know how to write proofs. Any help is appreciated. I only have problems proving part d), if anyone can help me. Thank you!







real-analysis general-topology supremum-and-infimum






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 1 at 20:06







PBC

















asked Feb 1 at 16:09









PBCPBC

14




14












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE. It is in your best interest that you type your questions (using MathJax) instead of posting links to pictures.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Feb 1 at 16:10










  • $begingroup$
    @YuiTo Cheng: Transcribing an image into text is good; transcribing it into $rmLaTeX$, not as good.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila
    Feb 1 at 16:26


















  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE. It is in your best interest that you type your questions (using MathJax) instead of posting links to pictures.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Feb 1 at 16:10










  • $begingroup$
    @YuiTo Cheng: Transcribing an image into text is good; transcribing it into $rmLaTeX$, not as good.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila
    Feb 1 at 16:26
















$begingroup$
Welcome to MSE. It is in your best interest that you type your questions (using MathJax) instead of posting links to pictures.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Feb 1 at 16:10




$begingroup$
Welcome to MSE. It is in your best interest that you type your questions (using MathJax) instead of posting links to pictures.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Feb 1 at 16:10












$begingroup$
@YuiTo Cheng: Transcribing an image into text is good; transcribing it into $rmLaTeX$, not as good.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila
Feb 1 at 16:26




$begingroup$
@YuiTo Cheng: Transcribing an image into text is good; transcribing it into $rmLaTeX$, not as good.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila
Feb 1 at 16:26










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

You should do your homework yourself.
But you are right about your decision which is true and false.



If the statement is false, you can give just a simple counterexample.



Hints:



b) Assume $E$ is closed. The limit of each convergent sequence in E is in E. Now, use the property of either infimum or supremum to get a contradition.



c) Assume $E$ is finite. What is the supremum and infimum of a finite set?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the advice! concerning part c, if E is finite then the set E must contain its supremum and infimum, right? but in my case, I'm given that they do not belong to E. Is this a nice counter example?
    $endgroup$
    – PBC
    Feb 1 at 16:34










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, that argument is correct and sufficient.
    $endgroup$
    – Mundron Schmidt
    Feb 1 at 17:08



















0












$begingroup$

The convention is to show that a statement is false by providing a counter-example and to show that it's true by giving a general proof.



$(a)$ Consider the counter-example $E=(0,1]cup[2,3).alpha=3,beta=0$ but $E$ is not open.



$(b)$ A closed set contains all its limit points. Show that $alpha$ is a limit point of $E$ by noting that $N_epsilon(alpha)cap E-{alpha}nephi$. Since $alphanotin E,E$ is not closed.



$(c)$ If $E$ were to be finite, it would be closed. We have just shown that $E$ is not closed.



$(d)$ The same counter-example as in $(a)$ works here too.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you so much, you helped me a lot! Though how did you know that Nϵ(α)∩E−{α}≠ϕ ? Can you please explain this to me.
    $endgroup$
    – PBC
    Feb 1 at 16:41










  • $begingroup$
    @souadbouchahine It was meant to be a clue for you to build on. Anywho, you just have to use the basic properties of supremum. Since $alpha-epsilon$ is not an upper bound of $E,exists xin E|alpha>x>alpha-epsilon$. Thus, $x$ lies in the intersection of $E$ and deleted neighbourhood of $alpha$.
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Feb 1 at 16:46










  • $begingroup$
    Okay, thank you for making this clear!
    $endgroup$
    – PBC
    Feb 1 at 16:52










  • $begingroup$
    But how can the counter example of part a) work in part c) too? if α = 3 and β=0 then (α, β) = (3,0). Is that possible?
    $endgroup$
    – PBC
    Feb 1 at 16:55










  • $begingroup$
    @souadbouchahine For the last option to make sense, it should be $(beta,alpha)$, not the other way round.
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Feb 1 at 20:21












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3096420%2fwriting-proofs-to-show-that-a-set-is-open-not-closed-and-infinite%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

You should do your homework yourself.
But you are right about your decision which is true and false.



If the statement is false, you can give just a simple counterexample.



Hints:



b) Assume $E$ is closed. The limit of each convergent sequence in E is in E. Now, use the property of either infimum or supremum to get a contradition.



c) Assume $E$ is finite. What is the supremum and infimum of a finite set?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the advice! concerning part c, if E is finite then the set E must contain its supremum and infimum, right? but in my case, I'm given that they do not belong to E. Is this a nice counter example?
    $endgroup$
    – PBC
    Feb 1 at 16:34










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, that argument is correct and sufficient.
    $endgroup$
    – Mundron Schmidt
    Feb 1 at 17:08
















0












$begingroup$

You should do your homework yourself.
But you are right about your decision which is true and false.



If the statement is false, you can give just a simple counterexample.



Hints:



b) Assume $E$ is closed. The limit of each convergent sequence in E is in E. Now, use the property of either infimum or supremum to get a contradition.



c) Assume $E$ is finite. What is the supremum and infimum of a finite set?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the advice! concerning part c, if E is finite then the set E must contain its supremum and infimum, right? but in my case, I'm given that they do not belong to E. Is this a nice counter example?
    $endgroup$
    – PBC
    Feb 1 at 16:34










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, that argument is correct and sufficient.
    $endgroup$
    – Mundron Schmidt
    Feb 1 at 17:08














0












0








0





$begingroup$

You should do your homework yourself.
But you are right about your decision which is true and false.



If the statement is false, you can give just a simple counterexample.



Hints:



b) Assume $E$ is closed. The limit of each convergent sequence in E is in E. Now, use the property of either infimum or supremum to get a contradition.



c) Assume $E$ is finite. What is the supremum and infimum of a finite set?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



You should do your homework yourself.
But you are right about your decision which is true and false.



If the statement is false, you can give just a simple counterexample.



Hints:



b) Assume $E$ is closed. The limit of each convergent sequence in E is in E. Now, use the property of either infimum or supremum to get a contradition.



c) Assume $E$ is finite. What is the supremum and infimum of a finite set?







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Feb 1 at 16:18









Mundron SchmidtMundron Schmidt

7,4942729




7,4942729












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the advice! concerning part c, if E is finite then the set E must contain its supremum and infimum, right? but in my case, I'm given that they do not belong to E. Is this a nice counter example?
    $endgroup$
    – PBC
    Feb 1 at 16:34










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, that argument is correct and sufficient.
    $endgroup$
    – Mundron Schmidt
    Feb 1 at 17:08


















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the advice! concerning part c, if E is finite then the set E must contain its supremum and infimum, right? but in my case, I'm given that they do not belong to E. Is this a nice counter example?
    $endgroup$
    – PBC
    Feb 1 at 16:34










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, that argument is correct and sufficient.
    $endgroup$
    – Mundron Schmidt
    Feb 1 at 17:08
















$begingroup$
Thanks for the advice! concerning part c, if E is finite then the set E must contain its supremum and infimum, right? but in my case, I'm given that they do not belong to E. Is this a nice counter example?
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:34




$begingroup$
Thanks for the advice! concerning part c, if E is finite then the set E must contain its supremum and infimum, right? but in my case, I'm given that they do not belong to E. Is this a nice counter example?
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:34












$begingroup$
Yes, that argument is correct and sufficient.
$endgroup$
– Mundron Schmidt
Feb 1 at 17:08




$begingroup$
Yes, that argument is correct and sufficient.
$endgroup$
– Mundron Schmidt
Feb 1 at 17:08











0












$begingroup$

The convention is to show that a statement is false by providing a counter-example and to show that it's true by giving a general proof.



$(a)$ Consider the counter-example $E=(0,1]cup[2,3).alpha=3,beta=0$ but $E$ is not open.



$(b)$ A closed set contains all its limit points. Show that $alpha$ is a limit point of $E$ by noting that $N_epsilon(alpha)cap E-{alpha}nephi$. Since $alphanotin E,E$ is not closed.



$(c)$ If $E$ were to be finite, it would be closed. We have just shown that $E$ is not closed.



$(d)$ The same counter-example as in $(a)$ works here too.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you so much, you helped me a lot! Though how did you know that Nϵ(α)∩E−{α}≠ϕ ? Can you please explain this to me.
    $endgroup$
    – PBC
    Feb 1 at 16:41










  • $begingroup$
    @souadbouchahine It was meant to be a clue for you to build on. Anywho, you just have to use the basic properties of supremum. Since $alpha-epsilon$ is not an upper bound of $E,exists xin E|alpha>x>alpha-epsilon$. Thus, $x$ lies in the intersection of $E$ and deleted neighbourhood of $alpha$.
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Feb 1 at 16:46










  • $begingroup$
    Okay, thank you for making this clear!
    $endgroup$
    – PBC
    Feb 1 at 16:52










  • $begingroup$
    But how can the counter example of part a) work in part c) too? if α = 3 and β=0 then (α, β) = (3,0). Is that possible?
    $endgroup$
    – PBC
    Feb 1 at 16:55










  • $begingroup$
    @souadbouchahine For the last option to make sense, it should be $(beta,alpha)$, not the other way round.
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Feb 1 at 20:21
















0












$begingroup$

The convention is to show that a statement is false by providing a counter-example and to show that it's true by giving a general proof.



$(a)$ Consider the counter-example $E=(0,1]cup[2,3).alpha=3,beta=0$ but $E$ is not open.



$(b)$ A closed set contains all its limit points. Show that $alpha$ is a limit point of $E$ by noting that $N_epsilon(alpha)cap E-{alpha}nephi$. Since $alphanotin E,E$ is not closed.



$(c)$ If $E$ were to be finite, it would be closed. We have just shown that $E$ is not closed.



$(d)$ The same counter-example as in $(a)$ works here too.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you so much, you helped me a lot! Though how did you know that Nϵ(α)∩E−{α}≠ϕ ? Can you please explain this to me.
    $endgroup$
    – PBC
    Feb 1 at 16:41










  • $begingroup$
    @souadbouchahine It was meant to be a clue for you to build on. Anywho, you just have to use the basic properties of supremum. Since $alpha-epsilon$ is not an upper bound of $E,exists xin E|alpha>x>alpha-epsilon$. Thus, $x$ lies in the intersection of $E$ and deleted neighbourhood of $alpha$.
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Feb 1 at 16:46










  • $begingroup$
    Okay, thank you for making this clear!
    $endgroup$
    – PBC
    Feb 1 at 16:52










  • $begingroup$
    But how can the counter example of part a) work in part c) too? if α = 3 and β=0 then (α, β) = (3,0). Is that possible?
    $endgroup$
    – PBC
    Feb 1 at 16:55










  • $begingroup$
    @souadbouchahine For the last option to make sense, it should be $(beta,alpha)$, not the other way round.
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Feb 1 at 20:21














0












0








0





$begingroup$

The convention is to show that a statement is false by providing a counter-example and to show that it's true by giving a general proof.



$(a)$ Consider the counter-example $E=(0,1]cup[2,3).alpha=3,beta=0$ but $E$ is not open.



$(b)$ A closed set contains all its limit points. Show that $alpha$ is a limit point of $E$ by noting that $N_epsilon(alpha)cap E-{alpha}nephi$. Since $alphanotin E,E$ is not closed.



$(c)$ If $E$ were to be finite, it would be closed. We have just shown that $E$ is not closed.



$(d)$ The same counter-example as in $(a)$ works here too.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



The convention is to show that a statement is false by providing a counter-example and to show that it's true by giving a general proof.



$(a)$ Consider the counter-example $E=(0,1]cup[2,3).alpha=3,beta=0$ but $E$ is not open.



$(b)$ A closed set contains all its limit points. Show that $alpha$ is a limit point of $E$ by noting that $N_epsilon(alpha)cap E-{alpha}nephi$. Since $alphanotin E,E$ is not closed.



$(c)$ If $E$ were to be finite, it would be closed. We have just shown that $E$ is not closed.



$(d)$ The same counter-example as in $(a)$ works here too.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Feb 1 at 16:38

























answered Feb 1 at 16:33









Shubham JohriShubham Johri

5,558818




5,558818












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you so much, you helped me a lot! Though how did you know that Nϵ(α)∩E−{α}≠ϕ ? Can you please explain this to me.
    $endgroup$
    – PBC
    Feb 1 at 16:41










  • $begingroup$
    @souadbouchahine It was meant to be a clue for you to build on. Anywho, you just have to use the basic properties of supremum. Since $alpha-epsilon$ is not an upper bound of $E,exists xin E|alpha>x>alpha-epsilon$. Thus, $x$ lies in the intersection of $E$ and deleted neighbourhood of $alpha$.
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Feb 1 at 16:46










  • $begingroup$
    Okay, thank you for making this clear!
    $endgroup$
    – PBC
    Feb 1 at 16:52










  • $begingroup$
    But how can the counter example of part a) work in part c) too? if α = 3 and β=0 then (α, β) = (3,0). Is that possible?
    $endgroup$
    – PBC
    Feb 1 at 16:55










  • $begingroup$
    @souadbouchahine For the last option to make sense, it should be $(beta,alpha)$, not the other way round.
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Feb 1 at 20:21


















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you so much, you helped me a lot! Though how did you know that Nϵ(α)∩E−{α}≠ϕ ? Can you please explain this to me.
    $endgroup$
    – PBC
    Feb 1 at 16:41










  • $begingroup$
    @souadbouchahine It was meant to be a clue for you to build on. Anywho, you just have to use the basic properties of supremum. Since $alpha-epsilon$ is not an upper bound of $E,exists xin E|alpha>x>alpha-epsilon$. Thus, $x$ lies in the intersection of $E$ and deleted neighbourhood of $alpha$.
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Feb 1 at 16:46










  • $begingroup$
    Okay, thank you for making this clear!
    $endgroup$
    – PBC
    Feb 1 at 16:52










  • $begingroup$
    But how can the counter example of part a) work in part c) too? if α = 3 and β=0 then (α, β) = (3,0). Is that possible?
    $endgroup$
    – PBC
    Feb 1 at 16:55










  • $begingroup$
    @souadbouchahine For the last option to make sense, it should be $(beta,alpha)$, not the other way round.
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Feb 1 at 20:21
















$begingroup$
Thank you so much, you helped me a lot! Though how did you know that Nϵ(α)∩E−{α}≠ϕ ? Can you please explain this to me.
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:41




$begingroup$
Thank you so much, you helped me a lot! Though how did you know that Nϵ(α)∩E−{α}≠ϕ ? Can you please explain this to me.
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:41












$begingroup$
@souadbouchahine It was meant to be a clue for you to build on. Anywho, you just have to use the basic properties of supremum. Since $alpha-epsilon$ is not an upper bound of $E,exists xin E|alpha>x>alpha-epsilon$. Thus, $x$ lies in the intersection of $E$ and deleted neighbourhood of $alpha$.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Feb 1 at 16:46




$begingroup$
@souadbouchahine It was meant to be a clue for you to build on. Anywho, you just have to use the basic properties of supremum. Since $alpha-epsilon$ is not an upper bound of $E,exists xin E|alpha>x>alpha-epsilon$. Thus, $x$ lies in the intersection of $E$ and deleted neighbourhood of $alpha$.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Feb 1 at 16:46












$begingroup$
Okay, thank you for making this clear!
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:52




$begingroup$
Okay, thank you for making this clear!
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:52












$begingroup$
But how can the counter example of part a) work in part c) too? if α = 3 and β=0 then (α, β) = (3,0). Is that possible?
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:55




$begingroup$
But how can the counter example of part a) work in part c) too? if α = 3 and β=0 then (α, β) = (3,0). Is that possible?
$endgroup$
– PBC
Feb 1 at 16:55












$begingroup$
@souadbouchahine For the last option to make sense, it should be $(beta,alpha)$, not the other way round.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Feb 1 at 20:21




$begingroup$
@souadbouchahine For the last option to make sense, it should be $(beta,alpha)$, not the other way round.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Feb 1 at 20:21


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3096420%2fwriting-proofs-to-show-that-a-set-is-open-not-closed-and-infinite%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory