A question on the distinguishable colorings of an object in relation to the number of fixed points in a...












1












$begingroup$


Note: the first half of this post is just for clarity , I'm sure most of you here can just skip to the part labelled (my actual question)



In class we were shown Burnsides counting theorem which states:



Let the finite group G act on the finite set $Omega$. Then $Omega/G$, the number of orbits of $G$ on $Omega$ is



$$Omega/G=frac{1}{|G|}sum_{gin G}|operatorname{fix}(g)| .tag{1}$$



This can be simplified (in terms of calculations) by grouping together elements in the same conjugacy class because they will have the same fixed points thus the equation (1) becomes



$$Omega/G=frac{1}{|G|}sum_{r=1}^m|K_r||operatorname{fix}(g_r)|. tag{2}$$



I also know that



$$operatorname{fix}(g)={xin Omega mid x^g=x}.$$



Take the following example: suppose we have a tetrahedron and we have 11 colors.



Then $|operatorname{fix}(1)|=11^4$ (i.e. all possible permutations).



The Question



I have read that in this case (of the tetrahedron) $$|operatorname{fix}(tau)|=|operatorname{fix}(omega)|=|operatorname{fix}(delta)|=11^2,$$



where





  • $tau$ is the rotation by $pi/3$ about a face,


  • $omega$ is the rotation by $-pi/3$ about a face, and


  • $delta$ is the rotation by $pi$ about an edge.


I'm a little confused at how this number is arrived at. Obviously 11 is the number of colors but I don't understand the significance of the exponent 2.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Note: the first half of this post is just for clarity , I'm sure most of you here can just skip to the part labelled (my actual question)



    In class we were shown Burnsides counting theorem which states:



    Let the finite group G act on the finite set $Omega$. Then $Omega/G$, the number of orbits of $G$ on $Omega$ is



    $$Omega/G=frac{1}{|G|}sum_{gin G}|operatorname{fix}(g)| .tag{1}$$



    This can be simplified (in terms of calculations) by grouping together elements in the same conjugacy class because they will have the same fixed points thus the equation (1) becomes



    $$Omega/G=frac{1}{|G|}sum_{r=1}^m|K_r||operatorname{fix}(g_r)|. tag{2}$$



    I also know that



    $$operatorname{fix}(g)={xin Omega mid x^g=x}.$$



    Take the following example: suppose we have a tetrahedron and we have 11 colors.



    Then $|operatorname{fix}(1)|=11^4$ (i.e. all possible permutations).



    The Question



    I have read that in this case (of the tetrahedron) $$|operatorname{fix}(tau)|=|operatorname{fix}(omega)|=|operatorname{fix}(delta)|=11^2,$$



    where





    • $tau$ is the rotation by $pi/3$ about a face,


    • $omega$ is the rotation by $-pi/3$ about a face, and


    • $delta$ is the rotation by $pi$ about an edge.


    I'm a little confused at how this number is arrived at. Obviously 11 is the number of colors but I don't understand the significance of the exponent 2.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Note: the first half of this post is just for clarity , I'm sure most of you here can just skip to the part labelled (my actual question)



      In class we were shown Burnsides counting theorem which states:



      Let the finite group G act on the finite set $Omega$. Then $Omega/G$, the number of orbits of $G$ on $Omega$ is



      $$Omega/G=frac{1}{|G|}sum_{gin G}|operatorname{fix}(g)| .tag{1}$$



      This can be simplified (in terms of calculations) by grouping together elements in the same conjugacy class because they will have the same fixed points thus the equation (1) becomes



      $$Omega/G=frac{1}{|G|}sum_{r=1}^m|K_r||operatorname{fix}(g_r)|. tag{2}$$



      I also know that



      $$operatorname{fix}(g)={xin Omega mid x^g=x}.$$



      Take the following example: suppose we have a tetrahedron and we have 11 colors.



      Then $|operatorname{fix}(1)|=11^4$ (i.e. all possible permutations).



      The Question



      I have read that in this case (of the tetrahedron) $$|operatorname{fix}(tau)|=|operatorname{fix}(omega)|=|operatorname{fix}(delta)|=11^2,$$



      where





      • $tau$ is the rotation by $pi/3$ about a face,


      • $omega$ is the rotation by $-pi/3$ about a face, and


      • $delta$ is the rotation by $pi$ about an edge.


      I'm a little confused at how this number is arrived at. Obviously 11 is the number of colors but I don't understand the significance of the exponent 2.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Note: the first half of this post is just for clarity , I'm sure most of you here can just skip to the part labelled (my actual question)



      In class we were shown Burnsides counting theorem which states:



      Let the finite group G act on the finite set $Omega$. Then $Omega/G$, the number of orbits of $G$ on $Omega$ is



      $$Omega/G=frac{1}{|G|}sum_{gin G}|operatorname{fix}(g)| .tag{1}$$



      This can be simplified (in terms of calculations) by grouping together elements in the same conjugacy class because they will have the same fixed points thus the equation (1) becomes



      $$Omega/G=frac{1}{|G|}sum_{r=1}^m|K_r||operatorname{fix}(g_r)|. tag{2}$$



      I also know that



      $$operatorname{fix}(g)={xin Omega mid x^g=x}.$$



      Take the following example: suppose we have a tetrahedron and we have 11 colors.



      Then $|operatorname{fix}(1)|=11^4$ (i.e. all possible permutations).



      The Question



      I have read that in this case (of the tetrahedron) $$|operatorname{fix}(tau)|=|operatorname{fix}(omega)|=|operatorname{fix}(delta)|=11^2,$$



      where





      • $tau$ is the rotation by $pi/3$ about a face,


      • $omega$ is the rotation by $-pi/3$ about a face, and


      • $delta$ is the rotation by $pi$ about an edge.


      I'm a little confused at how this number is arrived at. Obviously 11 is the number of colors but I don't understand the significance of the exponent 2.







      group-theory coloring






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 7 at 19:15









      Amnotwhy

      283




      283










      asked Dec 8 '18 at 23:00









      can'tcauchycan'tcauchy

      999417




      999417






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          I'll assume you're coloring the faces; when you color the vertices the same thing happens.



          When you rotate about a face, then there are $11$ ways to color that face; the other three faces get permuted, so they have to be the same color if that coloring is fixed, and there are $11$ ways to pick that color. Altogether $11^2$ colorings fixed by the rotation.



          When you rotate about an edge, there are two pairs of faces that get swapped. If the rotation doesn't change the coloring, then each pair of faces must be the same color, so there are $11^2$ colorings ($11$ ways to color each pair).



          In general, when $Omega$ is a set of colorings of some ground set $S$, and $G$ acts on $Omega$ by acting on $S$, then each element of $g$ corresponds to a permutation $sigma_g$ of $S$. If a coloring is fixed by $g$, then the elements of each cycle of $sigma_g$ must all be the same color, so the number of such colorings is $r^k$ when there are $r$ colors and $sigma_g$ has $k$ cycles.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031771%2fa-question-on-the-distinguishable-colorings-of-an-object-in-relation-to-the-numb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            I'll assume you're coloring the faces; when you color the vertices the same thing happens.



            When you rotate about a face, then there are $11$ ways to color that face; the other three faces get permuted, so they have to be the same color if that coloring is fixed, and there are $11$ ways to pick that color. Altogether $11^2$ colorings fixed by the rotation.



            When you rotate about an edge, there are two pairs of faces that get swapped. If the rotation doesn't change the coloring, then each pair of faces must be the same color, so there are $11^2$ colorings ($11$ ways to color each pair).



            In general, when $Omega$ is a set of colorings of some ground set $S$, and $G$ acts on $Omega$ by acting on $S$, then each element of $g$ corresponds to a permutation $sigma_g$ of $S$. If a coloring is fixed by $g$, then the elements of each cycle of $sigma_g$ must all be the same color, so the number of such colorings is $r^k$ when there are $r$ colors and $sigma_g$ has $k$ cycles.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              2












              $begingroup$

              I'll assume you're coloring the faces; when you color the vertices the same thing happens.



              When you rotate about a face, then there are $11$ ways to color that face; the other three faces get permuted, so they have to be the same color if that coloring is fixed, and there are $11$ ways to pick that color. Altogether $11^2$ colorings fixed by the rotation.



              When you rotate about an edge, there are two pairs of faces that get swapped. If the rotation doesn't change the coloring, then each pair of faces must be the same color, so there are $11^2$ colorings ($11$ ways to color each pair).



              In general, when $Omega$ is a set of colorings of some ground set $S$, and $G$ acts on $Omega$ by acting on $S$, then each element of $g$ corresponds to a permutation $sigma_g$ of $S$. If a coloring is fixed by $g$, then the elements of each cycle of $sigma_g$ must all be the same color, so the number of such colorings is $r^k$ when there are $r$ colors and $sigma_g$ has $k$ cycles.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                I'll assume you're coloring the faces; when you color the vertices the same thing happens.



                When you rotate about a face, then there are $11$ ways to color that face; the other three faces get permuted, so they have to be the same color if that coloring is fixed, and there are $11$ ways to pick that color. Altogether $11^2$ colorings fixed by the rotation.



                When you rotate about an edge, there are two pairs of faces that get swapped. If the rotation doesn't change the coloring, then each pair of faces must be the same color, so there are $11^2$ colorings ($11$ ways to color each pair).



                In general, when $Omega$ is a set of colorings of some ground set $S$, and $G$ acts on $Omega$ by acting on $S$, then each element of $g$ corresponds to a permutation $sigma_g$ of $S$. If a coloring is fixed by $g$, then the elements of each cycle of $sigma_g$ must all be the same color, so the number of such colorings is $r^k$ when there are $r$ colors and $sigma_g$ has $k$ cycles.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                I'll assume you're coloring the faces; when you color the vertices the same thing happens.



                When you rotate about a face, then there are $11$ ways to color that face; the other three faces get permuted, so they have to be the same color if that coloring is fixed, and there are $11$ ways to pick that color. Altogether $11^2$ colorings fixed by the rotation.



                When you rotate about an edge, there are two pairs of faces that get swapped. If the rotation doesn't change the coloring, then each pair of faces must be the same color, so there are $11^2$ colorings ($11$ ways to color each pair).



                In general, when $Omega$ is a set of colorings of some ground set $S$, and $G$ acts on $Omega$ by acting on $S$, then each element of $g$ corresponds to a permutation $sigma_g$ of $S$. If a coloring is fixed by $g$, then the elements of each cycle of $sigma_g$ must all be the same color, so the number of such colorings is $r^k$ when there are $r$ colors and $sigma_g$ has $k$ cycles.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 9 '18 at 0:34









                Misha LavrovMisha Lavrov

                45.7k656107




                45.7k656107






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031771%2fa-question-on-the-distinguishable-colorings-of-an-object-in-relation-to-the-numb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

                    android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

                    WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]