Bifurcation points of differential equation (example)
$begingroup$
Assume the differential equation:
$$
x'=lambda^2-8alambda x+2x^2, quad ain mathbb{R}.
$$
The critical points are the solutions to the equation:
$$
x'=0 iff 2x^2-8alambda x +lambda^2=0tag{1}
$$
which admits solutions:
$$
x=lambda cdot frac{8a pm sqrt{64a^2-8}}{2}
$$
Now, having in mind that by bifurcation point, we mean a point where change of the number of equilibrium points occur, it seems to me that the number of $(1)$'s solutions depends only on $a$ and not on $lambda$. Is this the case or did I get something wrong?
ordinary-differential-equations dynamical-systems stability-in-odes bifurcation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assume the differential equation:
$$
x'=lambda^2-8alambda x+2x^2, quad ain mathbb{R}.
$$
The critical points are the solutions to the equation:
$$
x'=0 iff 2x^2-8alambda x +lambda^2=0tag{1}
$$
which admits solutions:
$$
x=lambda cdot frac{8a pm sqrt{64a^2-8}}{2}
$$
Now, having in mind that by bifurcation point, we mean a point where change of the number of equilibrium points occur, it seems to me that the number of $(1)$'s solutions depends only on $a$ and not on $lambda$. Is this the case or did I get something wrong?
ordinary-differential-equations dynamical-systems stability-in-odes bifurcation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assume the differential equation:
$$
x'=lambda^2-8alambda x+2x^2, quad ain mathbb{R}.
$$
The critical points are the solutions to the equation:
$$
x'=0 iff 2x^2-8alambda x +lambda^2=0tag{1}
$$
which admits solutions:
$$
x=lambda cdot frac{8a pm sqrt{64a^2-8}}{2}
$$
Now, having in mind that by bifurcation point, we mean a point where change of the number of equilibrium points occur, it seems to me that the number of $(1)$'s solutions depends only on $a$ and not on $lambda$. Is this the case or did I get something wrong?
ordinary-differential-equations dynamical-systems stability-in-odes bifurcation
$endgroup$
Assume the differential equation:
$$
x'=lambda^2-8alambda x+2x^2, quad ain mathbb{R}.
$$
The critical points are the solutions to the equation:
$$
x'=0 iff 2x^2-8alambda x +lambda^2=0tag{1}
$$
which admits solutions:
$$
x=lambda cdot frac{8a pm sqrt{64a^2-8}}{2}
$$
Now, having in mind that by bifurcation point, we mean a point where change of the number of equilibrium points occur, it seems to me that the number of $(1)$'s solutions depends only on $a$ and not on $lambda$. Is this the case or did I get something wrong?
ordinary-differential-equations dynamical-systems stability-in-odes bifurcation
ordinary-differential-equations dynamical-systems stability-in-odes bifurcation
asked Jan 7 at 19:29
LoneBoneLoneBone
888
888
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
To study bifurcation points for
$$
x'=lambda^2-8alambda x+2x^2, quad ain mathbb{R},
$$
we see that $x'=0$ implies that
$$
x = frac{lambda}{2}left(4a pm sqrt{2(8a^2-1)}right).
$$
$textbf{Case 1}$. If $8a^2 < 1$, then the expression in the radical is a negative (real) number. So there are no bifurcation points, i.e., there doesn't exist an $xin mathbb{R}$ that will give $x'=0$.
$textbf{Case 2}$. If $8a^2 = 1 $, then $x^*=2alambda$, which is a fixed point (it is a double root). If you plug in values of $x< 2alambda$ into $x'$, then $x'>0$. You also see that if you plug in values of $x > 2alambda$, then $x'>0$. So if you perturb the fixed point $x^*$ a little to the left, it appears to be an attractor. But if you perturb $x^*$ a little to the right, it appears to be a repeller. So $x^*$ is neither an attractor nor a repeller; it is a semistable point.
$textbf{Case 3}$. If $8a^2 > 1$, then there are two subcases to consider.
$color{green}{textbf{Subcase 1}}$. If $lambdanot=0$, then there are two fixed points:
$$
x_1^* = frac{lambda}{2}left(4a - sqrt{2(8a^2-1)}right),
quad
x_2^* = frac{lambda}{2}left(4a + sqrt{2(8a^2-1)}right).
$$
We can use a similar analysis as in $textbf{Case 2}$, or we can plot the differential equation on a planar graph to see that $x_1^*$ is an attracting (stable) fixed point, while $x_2^*$ is a repelling (unstable) fixed point.
$color{green}{textbf{Subcase 2}}$. If $lambda=0$, then $x^*=0$ is a (double) fixed point, which is analogous to $textbf{Case 2}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
But isn't $a$ a fixed constant? I thought only $lambda$ was a bifurcation parameter and it seems that it doesn't affect how many equilibrium points there are.
$endgroup$
– LoneBone
Jan 8 at 14:27
$begingroup$
@LoneBone Yes, $a$ is a fixed constant. But your solution set depends on the value of $a$ as you can see from above. I'm considering all possible values of $a$ and giving a complete set of solutions.
$endgroup$
– Mee Seong Im
Jan 8 at 15:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It appears to me our OP LoneBone is correct; I can find no errors in his/her logic.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Does this mean that there are no bifurcation points?
$endgroup$
– LoneBone
Jan 7 at 19:50
1
$begingroup$
Also will it make sense to consider cases for $a=const.$?
$endgroup$
– LoneBone
Jan 7 at 19:51
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065395%2fbifurcation-points-of-differential-equation-example%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
To study bifurcation points for
$$
x'=lambda^2-8alambda x+2x^2, quad ain mathbb{R},
$$
we see that $x'=0$ implies that
$$
x = frac{lambda}{2}left(4a pm sqrt{2(8a^2-1)}right).
$$
$textbf{Case 1}$. If $8a^2 < 1$, then the expression in the radical is a negative (real) number. So there are no bifurcation points, i.e., there doesn't exist an $xin mathbb{R}$ that will give $x'=0$.
$textbf{Case 2}$. If $8a^2 = 1 $, then $x^*=2alambda$, which is a fixed point (it is a double root). If you plug in values of $x< 2alambda$ into $x'$, then $x'>0$. You also see that if you plug in values of $x > 2alambda$, then $x'>0$. So if you perturb the fixed point $x^*$ a little to the left, it appears to be an attractor. But if you perturb $x^*$ a little to the right, it appears to be a repeller. So $x^*$ is neither an attractor nor a repeller; it is a semistable point.
$textbf{Case 3}$. If $8a^2 > 1$, then there are two subcases to consider.
$color{green}{textbf{Subcase 1}}$. If $lambdanot=0$, then there are two fixed points:
$$
x_1^* = frac{lambda}{2}left(4a - sqrt{2(8a^2-1)}right),
quad
x_2^* = frac{lambda}{2}left(4a + sqrt{2(8a^2-1)}right).
$$
We can use a similar analysis as in $textbf{Case 2}$, or we can plot the differential equation on a planar graph to see that $x_1^*$ is an attracting (stable) fixed point, while $x_2^*$ is a repelling (unstable) fixed point.
$color{green}{textbf{Subcase 2}}$. If $lambda=0$, then $x^*=0$ is a (double) fixed point, which is analogous to $textbf{Case 2}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
But isn't $a$ a fixed constant? I thought only $lambda$ was a bifurcation parameter and it seems that it doesn't affect how many equilibrium points there are.
$endgroup$
– LoneBone
Jan 8 at 14:27
$begingroup$
@LoneBone Yes, $a$ is a fixed constant. But your solution set depends on the value of $a$ as you can see from above. I'm considering all possible values of $a$ and giving a complete set of solutions.
$endgroup$
– Mee Seong Im
Jan 8 at 15:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To study bifurcation points for
$$
x'=lambda^2-8alambda x+2x^2, quad ain mathbb{R},
$$
we see that $x'=0$ implies that
$$
x = frac{lambda}{2}left(4a pm sqrt{2(8a^2-1)}right).
$$
$textbf{Case 1}$. If $8a^2 < 1$, then the expression in the radical is a negative (real) number. So there are no bifurcation points, i.e., there doesn't exist an $xin mathbb{R}$ that will give $x'=0$.
$textbf{Case 2}$. If $8a^2 = 1 $, then $x^*=2alambda$, which is a fixed point (it is a double root). If you plug in values of $x< 2alambda$ into $x'$, then $x'>0$. You also see that if you plug in values of $x > 2alambda$, then $x'>0$. So if you perturb the fixed point $x^*$ a little to the left, it appears to be an attractor. But if you perturb $x^*$ a little to the right, it appears to be a repeller. So $x^*$ is neither an attractor nor a repeller; it is a semistable point.
$textbf{Case 3}$. If $8a^2 > 1$, then there are two subcases to consider.
$color{green}{textbf{Subcase 1}}$. If $lambdanot=0$, then there are two fixed points:
$$
x_1^* = frac{lambda}{2}left(4a - sqrt{2(8a^2-1)}right),
quad
x_2^* = frac{lambda}{2}left(4a + sqrt{2(8a^2-1)}right).
$$
We can use a similar analysis as in $textbf{Case 2}$, or we can plot the differential equation on a planar graph to see that $x_1^*$ is an attracting (stable) fixed point, while $x_2^*$ is a repelling (unstable) fixed point.
$color{green}{textbf{Subcase 2}}$. If $lambda=0$, then $x^*=0$ is a (double) fixed point, which is analogous to $textbf{Case 2}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
But isn't $a$ a fixed constant? I thought only $lambda$ was a bifurcation parameter and it seems that it doesn't affect how many equilibrium points there are.
$endgroup$
– LoneBone
Jan 8 at 14:27
$begingroup$
@LoneBone Yes, $a$ is a fixed constant. But your solution set depends on the value of $a$ as you can see from above. I'm considering all possible values of $a$ and giving a complete set of solutions.
$endgroup$
– Mee Seong Im
Jan 8 at 15:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To study bifurcation points for
$$
x'=lambda^2-8alambda x+2x^2, quad ain mathbb{R},
$$
we see that $x'=0$ implies that
$$
x = frac{lambda}{2}left(4a pm sqrt{2(8a^2-1)}right).
$$
$textbf{Case 1}$. If $8a^2 < 1$, then the expression in the radical is a negative (real) number. So there are no bifurcation points, i.e., there doesn't exist an $xin mathbb{R}$ that will give $x'=0$.
$textbf{Case 2}$. If $8a^2 = 1 $, then $x^*=2alambda$, which is a fixed point (it is a double root). If you plug in values of $x< 2alambda$ into $x'$, then $x'>0$. You also see that if you plug in values of $x > 2alambda$, then $x'>0$. So if you perturb the fixed point $x^*$ a little to the left, it appears to be an attractor. But if you perturb $x^*$ a little to the right, it appears to be a repeller. So $x^*$ is neither an attractor nor a repeller; it is a semistable point.
$textbf{Case 3}$. If $8a^2 > 1$, then there are two subcases to consider.
$color{green}{textbf{Subcase 1}}$. If $lambdanot=0$, then there are two fixed points:
$$
x_1^* = frac{lambda}{2}left(4a - sqrt{2(8a^2-1)}right),
quad
x_2^* = frac{lambda}{2}left(4a + sqrt{2(8a^2-1)}right).
$$
We can use a similar analysis as in $textbf{Case 2}$, or we can plot the differential equation on a planar graph to see that $x_1^*$ is an attracting (stable) fixed point, while $x_2^*$ is a repelling (unstable) fixed point.
$color{green}{textbf{Subcase 2}}$. If $lambda=0$, then $x^*=0$ is a (double) fixed point, which is analogous to $textbf{Case 2}$.
$endgroup$
To study bifurcation points for
$$
x'=lambda^2-8alambda x+2x^2, quad ain mathbb{R},
$$
we see that $x'=0$ implies that
$$
x = frac{lambda}{2}left(4a pm sqrt{2(8a^2-1)}right).
$$
$textbf{Case 1}$. If $8a^2 < 1$, then the expression in the radical is a negative (real) number. So there are no bifurcation points, i.e., there doesn't exist an $xin mathbb{R}$ that will give $x'=0$.
$textbf{Case 2}$. If $8a^2 = 1 $, then $x^*=2alambda$, which is a fixed point (it is a double root). If you plug in values of $x< 2alambda$ into $x'$, then $x'>0$. You also see that if you plug in values of $x > 2alambda$, then $x'>0$. So if you perturb the fixed point $x^*$ a little to the left, it appears to be an attractor. But if you perturb $x^*$ a little to the right, it appears to be a repeller. So $x^*$ is neither an attractor nor a repeller; it is a semistable point.
$textbf{Case 3}$. If $8a^2 > 1$, then there are two subcases to consider.
$color{green}{textbf{Subcase 1}}$. If $lambdanot=0$, then there are two fixed points:
$$
x_1^* = frac{lambda}{2}left(4a - sqrt{2(8a^2-1)}right),
quad
x_2^* = frac{lambda}{2}left(4a + sqrt{2(8a^2-1)}right).
$$
We can use a similar analysis as in $textbf{Case 2}$, or we can plot the differential equation on a planar graph to see that $x_1^*$ is an attracting (stable) fixed point, while $x_2^*$ is a repelling (unstable) fixed point.
$color{green}{textbf{Subcase 2}}$. If $lambda=0$, then $x^*=0$ is a (double) fixed point, which is analogous to $textbf{Case 2}$.
edited Jan 8 at 6:09
answered Jan 8 at 5:55


Mee Seong ImMee Seong Im
2,8051617
2,8051617
$begingroup$
But isn't $a$ a fixed constant? I thought only $lambda$ was a bifurcation parameter and it seems that it doesn't affect how many equilibrium points there are.
$endgroup$
– LoneBone
Jan 8 at 14:27
$begingroup$
@LoneBone Yes, $a$ is a fixed constant. But your solution set depends on the value of $a$ as you can see from above. I'm considering all possible values of $a$ and giving a complete set of solutions.
$endgroup$
– Mee Seong Im
Jan 8 at 15:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
But isn't $a$ a fixed constant? I thought only $lambda$ was a bifurcation parameter and it seems that it doesn't affect how many equilibrium points there are.
$endgroup$
– LoneBone
Jan 8 at 14:27
$begingroup$
@LoneBone Yes, $a$ is a fixed constant. But your solution set depends on the value of $a$ as you can see from above. I'm considering all possible values of $a$ and giving a complete set of solutions.
$endgroup$
– Mee Seong Im
Jan 8 at 15:32
$begingroup$
But isn't $a$ a fixed constant? I thought only $lambda$ was a bifurcation parameter and it seems that it doesn't affect how many equilibrium points there are.
$endgroup$
– LoneBone
Jan 8 at 14:27
$begingroup$
But isn't $a$ a fixed constant? I thought only $lambda$ was a bifurcation parameter and it seems that it doesn't affect how many equilibrium points there are.
$endgroup$
– LoneBone
Jan 8 at 14:27
$begingroup$
@LoneBone Yes, $a$ is a fixed constant. But your solution set depends on the value of $a$ as you can see from above. I'm considering all possible values of $a$ and giving a complete set of solutions.
$endgroup$
– Mee Seong Im
Jan 8 at 15:32
$begingroup$
@LoneBone Yes, $a$ is a fixed constant. But your solution set depends on the value of $a$ as you can see from above. I'm considering all possible values of $a$ and giving a complete set of solutions.
$endgroup$
– Mee Seong Im
Jan 8 at 15:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It appears to me our OP LoneBone is correct; I can find no errors in his/her logic.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Does this mean that there are no bifurcation points?
$endgroup$
– LoneBone
Jan 7 at 19:50
1
$begingroup$
Also will it make sense to consider cases for $a=const.$?
$endgroup$
– LoneBone
Jan 7 at 19:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It appears to me our OP LoneBone is correct; I can find no errors in his/her logic.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Does this mean that there are no bifurcation points?
$endgroup$
– LoneBone
Jan 7 at 19:50
1
$begingroup$
Also will it make sense to consider cases for $a=const.$?
$endgroup$
– LoneBone
Jan 7 at 19:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It appears to me our OP LoneBone is correct; I can find no errors in his/her logic.
$endgroup$
It appears to me our OP LoneBone is correct; I can find no errors in his/her logic.
answered Jan 7 at 19:48


Robert LewisRobert Lewis
45.4k23065
45.4k23065
1
$begingroup$
Does this mean that there are no bifurcation points?
$endgroup$
– LoneBone
Jan 7 at 19:50
1
$begingroup$
Also will it make sense to consider cases for $a=const.$?
$endgroup$
– LoneBone
Jan 7 at 19:51
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Does this mean that there are no bifurcation points?
$endgroup$
– LoneBone
Jan 7 at 19:50
1
$begingroup$
Also will it make sense to consider cases for $a=const.$?
$endgroup$
– LoneBone
Jan 7 at 19:51
1
1
$begingroup$
Does this mean that there are no bifurcation points?
$endgroup$
– LoneBone
Jan 7 at 19:50
$begingroup$
Does this mean that there are no bifurcation points?
$endgroup$
– LoneBone
Jan 7 at 19:50
1
1
$begingroup$
Also will it make sense to consider cases for $a=const.$?
$endgroup$
– LoneBone
Jan 7 at 19:51
$begingroup$
Also will it make sense to consider cases for $a=const.$?
$endgroup$
– LoneBone
Jan 7 at 19:51
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065395%2fbifurcation-points-of-differential-equation-example%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown