Find $P(X_1lt X_2lt X_3)$ and $P(X_1gt X_2|X_2lt X_3)$ for $X_1, X_2, X_3$ i.i.d random variable.
$begingroup$
Find $P(X_1lt X_2lt X_3)$ and $P(X_1gt X_2|X_2lt X_3)$ for $X_1, X_2, X_3$ i.i.d random variable.
For $P(X_1lt X_2lt X_3)$, since there exists six possible orders, $P(X_1lt X_2lt X_3)={1over 6}$. Is this true for any distribution? Can I get $P(X_1lt X_2lt X_3lt...lt X_n)={1over n!}$?
For $P(X_1gt X_2|X_2lt X_3)$, since $X_1gt X_2$ and $X_2lt X_3$ are independent event (am I right?), I just simply get $P(X_1gt X_2|X_2lt X_3)={1over2}$
probability
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Find $P(X_1lt X_2lt X_3)$ and $P(X_1gt X_2|X_2lt X_3)$ for $X_1, X_2, X_3$ i.i.d random variable.
For $P(X_1lt X_2lt X_3)$, since there exists six possible orders, $P(X_1lt X_2lt X_3)={1over 6}$. Is this true for any distribution? Can I get $P(X_1lt X_2lt X_3lt...lt X_n)={1over n!}$?
For $P(X_1gt X_2|X_2lt X_3)$, since $X_1gt X_2$ and $X_2lt X_3$ are independent event (am I right?), I just simply get $P(X_1gt X_2|X_2lt X_3)={1over2}$
probability
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Find $P(X_1lt X_2lt X_3)$ and $P(X_1gt X_2|X_2lt X_3)$ for $X_1, X_2, X_3$ i.i.d random variable.
For $P(X_1lt X_2lt X_3)$, since there exists six possible orders, $P(X_1lt X_2lt X_3)={1over 6}$. Is this true for any distribution? Can I get $P(X_1lt X_2lt X_3lt...lt X_n)={1over n!}$?
For $P(X_1gt X_2|X_2lt X_3)$, since $X_1gt X_2$ and $X_2lt X_3$ are independent event (am I right?), I just simply get $P(X_1gt X_2|X_2lt X_3)={1over2}$
probability
$endgroup$
Find $P(X_1lt X_2lt X_3)$ and $P(X_1gt X_2|X_2lt X_3)$ for $X_1, X_2, X_3$ i.i.d random variable.
For $P(X_1lt X_2lt X_3)$, since there exists six possible orders, $P(X_1lt X_2lt X_3)={1over 6}$. Is this true for any distribution? Can I get $P(X_1lt X_2lt X_3lt...lt X_n)={1over n!}$?
For $P(X_1gt X_2|X_2lt X_3)$, since $X_1gt X_2$ and $X_2lt X_3$ are independent event (am I right?), I just simply get $P(X_1gt X_2|X_2lt X_3)={1over2}$
probability
probability
asked Jan 6 at 3:43


Yibei HeYibei He
2229
2229
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For the first part, this is true for any i.i.d random variables as long as the probabilities of any two being equal is 0. So if they are continuous random variables it is true, if they are discrete then no.
For the second part, you need to consider your $6$ equally likely orderings
$X_1 < X_2 < X_3$, $X_2 < X_1 < X_3$, $X_1 < X_3 < X_2$, $X_3 < X_1 < X_2$, $X_2 < X_3 < X_1$, and $X_3 < X_2 < X_1$. If $X_2 < X_3$ then there are only $3$ of these orderings possible, $X_1 < X_2 < X_3$, $X_2 < X_1 < X_3$, and $X_2 < X_3 < X_1$. Of these $X_1 > X_2$ in $2$ of them, so the probability is actually $frac23$.
Intuitively this is because $X_2 < X_3$ and $X_1 > X_2$ are not independent. If you think about it, $X_2 < X_3$ means that $X_2$ is more likely to be small, and so it is more likely that $X_1$ is greater than it.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
would it be $2over 3$ instead of $1over 3$?
$endgroup$
– Yibei He
Jan 6 at 4:03
$begingroup$
@YibeiHe Good catch! Just fixed it.
$endgroup$
– Erik Parkinson
Jan 6 at 4:05
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063457%2ffind-px-1-lt-x-2-lt-x-3-and-px-1-gt-x-2x-2-lt-x-3-for-x-1-x-2-x-3-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For the first part, this is true for any i.i.d random variables as long as the probabilities of any two being equal is 0. So if they are continuous random variables it is true, if they are discrete then no.
For the second part, you need to consider your $6$ equally likely orderings
$X_1 < X_2 < X_3$, $X_2 < X_1 < X_3$, $X_1 < X_3 < X_2$, $X_3 < X_1 < X_2$, $X_2 < X_3 < X_1$, and $X_3 < X_2 < X_1$. If $X_2 < X_3$ then there are only $3$ of these orderings possible, $X_1 < X_2 < X_3$, $X_2 < X_1 < X_3$, and $X_2 < X_3 < X_1$. Of these $X_1 > X_2$ in $2$ of them, so the probability is actually $frac23$.
Intuitively this is because $X_2 < X_3$ and $X_1 > X_2$ are not independent. If you think about it, $X_2 < X_3$ means that $X_2$ is more likely to be small, and so it is more likely that $X_1$ is greater than it.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
would it be $2over 3$ instead of $1over 3$?
$endgroup$
– Yibei He
Jan 6 at 4:03
$begingroup$
@YibeiHe Good catch! Just fixed it.
$endgroup$
– Erik Parkinson
Jan 6 at 4:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the first part, this is true for any i.i.d random variables as long as the probabilities of any two being equal is 0. So if they are continuous random variables it is true, if they are discrete then no.
For the second part, you need to consider your $6$ equally likely orderings
$X_1 < X_2 < X_3$, $X_2 < X_1 < X_3$, $X_1 < X_3 < X_2$, $X_3 < X_1 < X_2$, $X_2 < X_3 < X_1$, and $X_3 < X_2 < X_1$. If $X_2 < X_3$ then there are only $3$ of these orderings possible, $X_1 < X_2 < X_3$, $X_2 < X_1 < X_3$, and $X_2 < X_3 < X_1$. Of these $X_1 > X_2$ in $2$ of them, so the probability is actually $frac23$.
Intuitively this is because $X_2 < X_3$ and $X_1 > X_2$ are not independent. If you think about it, $X_2 < X_3$ means that $X_2$ is more likely to be small, and so it is more likely that $X_1$ is greater than it.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
would it be $2over 3$ instead of $1over 3$?
$endgroup$
– Yibei He
Jan 6 at 4:03
$begingroup$
@YibeiHe Good catch! Just fixed it.
$endgroup$
– Erik Parkinson
Jan 6 at 4:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the first part, this is true for any i.i.d random variables as long as the probabilities of any two being equal is 0. So if they are continuous random variables it is true, if they are discrete then no.
For the second part, you need to consider your $6$ equally likely orderings
$X_1 < X_2 < X_3$, $X_2 < X_1 < X_3$, $X_1 < X_3 < X_2$, $X_3 < X_1 < X_2$, $X_2 < X_3 < X_1$, and $X_3 < X_2 < X_1$. If $X_2 < X_3$ then there are only $3$ of these orderings possible, $X_1 < X_2 < X_3$, $X_2 < X_1 < X_3$, and $X_2 < X_3 < X_1$. Of these $X_1 > X_2$ in $2$ of them, so the probability is actually $frac23$.
Intuitively this is because $X_2 < X_3$ and $X_1 > X_2$ are not independent. If you think about it, $X_2 < X_3$ means that $X_2$ is more likely to be small, and so it is more likely that $X_1$ is greater than it.
$endgroup$
For the first part, this is true for any i.i.d random variables as long as the probabilities of any two being equal is 0. So if they are continuous random variables it is true, if they are discrete then no.
For the second part, you need to consider your $6$ equally likely orderings
$X_1 < X_2 < X_3$, $X_2 < X_1 < X_3$, $X_1 < X_3 < X_2$, $X_3 < X_1 < X_2$, $X_2 < X_3 < X_1$, and $X_3 < X_2 < X_1$. If $X_2 < X_3$ then there are only $3$ of these orderings possible, $X_1 < X_2 < X_3$, $X_2 < X_1 < X_3$, and $X_2 < X_3 < X_1$. Of these $X_1 > X_2$ in $2$ of them, so the probability is actually $frac23$.
Intuitively this is because $X_2 < X_3$ and $X_1 > X_2$ are not independent. If you think about it, $X_2 < X_3$ means that $X_2$ is more likely to be small, and so it is more likely that $X_1$ is greater than it.
edited Jan 6 at 4:04
answered Jan 6 at 3:52


Erik ParkinsonErik Parkinson
8549
8549
$begingroup$
would it be $2over 3$ instead of $1over 3$?
$endgroup$
– Yibei He
Jan 6 at 4:03
$begingroup$
@YibeiHe Good catch! Just fixed it.
$endgroup$
– Erik Parkinson
Jan 6 at 4:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
would it be $2over 3$ instead of $1over 3$?
$endgroup$
– Yibei He
Jan 6 at 4:03
$begingroup$
@YibeiHe Good catch! Just fixed it.
$endgroup$
– Erik Parkinson
Jan 6 at 4:05
$begingroup$
would it be $2over 3$ instead of $1over 3$?
$endgroup$
– Yibei He
Jan 6 at 4:03
$begingroup$
would it be $2over 3$ instead of $1over 3$?
$endgroup$
– Yibei He
Jan 6 at 4:03
$begingroup$
@YibeiHe Good catch! Just fixed it.
$endgroup$
– Erik Parkinson
Jan 6 at 4:05
$begingroup$
@YibeiHe Good catch! Just fixed it.
$endgroup$
– Erik Parkinson
Jan 6 at 4:05
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063457%2ffind-px-1-lt-x-2-lt-x-3-and-px-1-gt-x-2x-2-lt-x-3-for-x-1-x-2-x-3-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown