Mixing
Gershgorin Circle theorem- implications
(I am considering only real matrices)
Does only hold that if the area of all Gershgorin Circles is positiv $Rightarrow$ the Matrix is positiv definit (trivial)
or does also follow the vice versa
the Matrix is positiv definit $Rightarrow$ the area of all Gershgorin Circles is positiv
matrices gershgorin-sets
asked Nov 20 '18 at 9:59
baxbear
398
add a comment |
(I am considering only real matrices)
Does only hold that if the area of all Gershgorin Circles is positiv $Rightarrow$ the Matrix is positiv definit (trivial)
or does also follow the vice versa
the Matrix is positiv definit $Rightarrow$ the area of all Gershgorin Circles is positiv
matrices gershgorin-sets
asked Nov 20 '18 at 9:59
baxbear
398
add a comment |
(I am considering only real matrices)
Does only hold that if the area of all Gershgorin Circles is positiv $Rightarrow$ the Matrix is positiv definit (trivial)
or does also follow the vice versa
the Matrix is positiv definit $Rightarrow$ the area of all Gershgorin Circles is positiv
matrices gershgorin-sets
asked Nov 20 '18 at 9:59
baxbear
398
(I am considering only real matrices)
Does only hold that if the area of all Gershgorin Circles is positiv $Rightarrow$ the Matrix is positiv definit (trivial)
or does also follow the vice versa
the Matrix is positiv definit $Rightarrow$ the area of all Gershgorin Circles is positiv
matrices gershgorin-sets
matrices gershgorin-sets
asked Nov 20 '18 at 9:59
baxbear
398
asked Nov 20 '18 at 9:59
baxbear
398
asked Nov 20 '18 at 9:59
baxbear
398
asked Nov 20 '18 at 9:59
baxbear
398
asked Nov 20 '18 at 9:59
baxbear
398
398
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The reverse direction does not hold:
$$
A=pmatrix{ 1 & 2\ 2 & 10}
$$
is positive definite, but the Gershgorin circle for the first row contains numbers with negative real part.
answered Nov 20 '18 at 10:13
daw
24k1544
Thanks, I found something like it for special matrices in my old exercise papers and was wondering if I can use it to check if a $LL^T$ Cholesky decomposition is possible, seems it is not the case, thanks
– baxbear
Nov 20 '18 at 10:17
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006129%2fgershgorin-circle-theorem-implications%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The reverse direction does not hold:
$$
A=pmatrix{ 1 & 2\ 2 & 10}
$$
is positive definite, but the Gershgorin circle for the first row contains numbers with negative real part.
answered Nov 20 '18 at 10:13
daw
24k1544
Thanks, I found something like it for special matrices in my old exercise papers and was wondering if I can use it to check if a $LL^T$ Cholesky decomposition is possible, seems it is not the case, thanks
– baxbear
Nov 20 '18 at 10:17
add a comment |
The reverse direction does not hold:
$$
A=pmatrix{ 1 & 2\ 2 & 10}
$$
is positive definite, but the Gershgorin circle for the first row contains numbers with negative real part.
answered Nov 20 '18 at 10:13
daw
24k1544
Thanks, I found something like it for special matrices in my old exercise papers and was wondering if I can use it to check if a $LL^T$ Cholesky decomposition is possible, seems it is not the case, thanks
– baxbear
Nov 20 '18 at 10:17
add a comment |
The reverse direction does not hold:
$$
A=pmatrix{ 1 & 2\ 2 & 10}
$$
is positive definite, but the Gershgorin circle for the first row contains numbers with negative real part.
answered Nov 20 '18 at 10:13
daw
24k1544
The reverse direction does not hold:
$$
A=pmatrix{ 1 & 2\ 2 & 10}
$$
is positive definite, but the Gershgorin circle for the first row contains numbers with negative real part.
answered Nov 20 '18 at 10:13
daw
24k1544
answered Nov 20 '18 at 10:13
daw
24k1544
answered Nov 20 '18 at 10:13
daw
24k1544
answered Nov 20 '18 at 10:13
daw
24k1544
24k1544
Thanks, I found something like it for special matrices in my old exercise papers and was wondering if I can use it to check if a $LL^T$ Cholesky decomposition is possible, seems it is not the case, thanks
– baxbear
Nov 20 '18 at 10:17
add a comment |
Thanks, I found something like it for special matrices in my old exercise papers and was wondering if I can use it to check if a $LL^T$ Cholesky decomposition is possible, seems it is not the case, thanks
– baxbear
Nov 20 '18 at 10:17
Thanks, I found something like it for special matrices in my old exercise papers and was wondering if I can use it to check if a $LL^T$ Cholesky decomposition is possible, seems it is not the case, thanks
– baxbear
Nov 20 '18 at 10:17
Thanks, I found something like it for special matrices in my old exercise papers and was wondering if I can use it to check if a $LL^T$ Cholesky decomposition is possible, seems it is not the case, thanks
– baxbear
Nov 20 '18 at 10:17
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006129%2fgershgorin-circle-theorem-implications%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
