How to prove that convolution is associative and distributive with “plus”












1














The convolution is defined as:
$$int_{-infty}^{+infty}f(x-t)g(t)dt=f*g(x)$$
I want to prove the associativity and distributivity of it:$$f*(g*h)=(f*g)*h$$
$$f*(g+h)=f*g+f*h$$



I expand them but I find that it seems difficult to process especially how to change the order of integration.



Thank you a lot!










share|cite|improve this question



























    1














    The convolution is defined as:
    $$int_{-infty}^{+infty}f(x-t)g(t)dt=f*g(x)$$
    I want to prove the associativity and distributivity of it:$$f*(g*h)=(f*g)*h$$
    $$f*(g+h)=f*g+f*h$$



    I expand them but I find that it seems difficult to process especially how to change the order of integration.



    Thank you a lot!










    share|cite|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1







      The convolution is defined as:
      $$int_{-infty}^{+infty}f(x-t)g(t)dt=f*g(x)$$
      I want to prove the associativity and distributivity of it:$$f*(g*h)=(f*g)*h$$
      $$f*(g+h)=f*g+f*h$$



      I expand them but I find that it seems difficult to process especially how to change the order of integration.



      Thank you a lot!










      share|cite|improve this question













      The convolution is defined as:
      $$int_{-infty}^{+infty}f(x-t)g(t)dt=f*g(x)$$
      I want to prove the associativity and distributivity of it:$$f*(g*h)=(f*g)*h$$
      $$f*(g+h)=f*g+f*h$$



      I expand them but I find that it seems difficult to process especially how to change the order of integration.



      Thank you a lot!







      calculus integration






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jul 1 '14 at 7:30









      zgzhen

      1013




      1013






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          Hint:

          For the first try writing out the integral then using a simple substitution like $u=x-t$



          The second one follows from the fact that the integral is a linear operator. So,
          begin{align*}
          f*(g+h) &= int_{-infty}^infty f(x-t)(g(t)+h(t)),dt\
          &=int_{-infty}^infty f(x-t) g(t) , dt +int_{-infty}^infty f(x-t)h(t) ,dt
          end{align*}






          share|cite|improve this answer























            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f852982%2fhow-to-prove-that-convolution-is-associative-and-distributive-with-plus%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4














            Hint:

            For the first try writing out the integral then using a simple substitution like $u=x-t$



            The second one follows from the fact that the integral is a linear operator. So,
            begin{align*}
            f*(g+h) &= int_{-infty}^infty f(x-t)(g(t)+h(t)),dt\
            &=int_{-infty}^infty f(x-t) g(t) , dt +int_{-infty}^infty f(x-t)h(t) ,dt
            end{align*}






            share|cite|improve this answer




























              4














              Hint:

              For the first try writing out the integral then using a simple substitution like $u=x-t$



              The second one follows from the fact that the integral is a linear operator. So,
              begin{align*}
              f*(g+h) &= int_{-infty}^infty f(x-t)(g(t)+h(t)),dt\
              &=int_{-infty}^infty f(x-t) g(t) , dt +int_{-infty}^infty f(x-t)h(t) ,dt
              end{align*}






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                4












                4








                4






                Hint:

                For the first try writing out the integral then using a simple substitution like $u=x-t$



                The second one follows from the fact that the integral is a linear operator. So,
                begin{align*}
                f*(g+h) &= int_{-infty}^infty f(x-t)(g(t)+h(t)),dt\
                &=int_{-infty}^infty f(x-t) g(t) , dt +int_{-infty}^infty f(x-t)h(t) ,dt
                end{align*}






                share|cite|improve this answer














                Hint:

                For the first try writing out the integral then using a simple substitution like $u=x-t$



                The second one follows from the fact that the integral is a linear operator. So,
                begin{align*}
                f*(g+h) &= int_{-infty}^infty f(x-t)(g(t)+h(t)),dt\
                &=int_{-infty}^infty f(x-t) g(t) , dt +int_{-infty}^infty f(x-t)h(t) ,dt
                end{align*}







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Nov 20 '18 at 7:40









                Kei

                347




                347










                answered Jul 1 '14 at 7:39









                Millardo Peacecraft

                9101619




                9101619






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f852982%2fhow-to-prove-that-convolution-is-associative-and-distributive-with-plus%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

                    android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

                    WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]