In which of the following cases there exist a one one continuous function from S to T, [closed]












0














In which of the following cases there exist a one one continuous function from $S$ to $T$,



(a) $S=[0,1]$ to $T=(0,1)$



(b) $S=Bbb R$ to $T=[0,1]$



(c) $S=Bbb R$ to $T=(0,1)$



(d) $S=(0,1]$ to $T=(0,1)$



(a)I think a) false since continuous function preserves compactness but what about others dont know . Please someone explain.










share|cite|improve this question















closed as off-topic by Steve Kass, user10354138, A. Pongrácz, Kavi Rama Murthy, José Carlos Santos Nov 22 '18 at 8:29


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Steve Kass, user10354138, A. Pongrácz, Kavi Rama Murthy, José Carlos Santos

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


















    0














    In which of the following cases there exist a one one continuous function from $S$ to $T$,



    (a) $S=[0,1]$ to $T=(0,1)$



    (b) $S=Bbb R$ to $T=[0,1]$



    (c) $S=Bbb R$ to $T=(0,1)$



    (d) $S=(0,1]$ to $T=(0,1)$



    (a)I think a) false since continuous function preserves compactness but what about others dont know . Please someone explain.










    share|cite|improve this question















    closed as off-topic by Steve Kass, user10354138, A. Pongrácz, Kavi Rama Murthy, José Carlos Santos Nov 22 '18 at 8:29


    This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


    • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Steve Kass, user10354138, A. Pongrácz, Kavi Rama Murthy, José Carlos Santos

    If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
















      0












      0








      0







      In which of the following cases there exist a one one continuous function from $S$ to $T$,



      (a) $S=[0,1]$ to $T=(0,1)$



      (b) $S=Bbb R$ to $T=[0,1]$



      (c) $S=Bbb R$ to $T=(0,1)$



      (d) $S=(0,1]$ to $T=(0,1)$



      (a)I think a) false since continuous function preserves compactness but what about others dont know . Please someone explain.










      share|cite|improve this question















      In which of the following cases there exist a one one continuous function from $S$ to $T$,



      (a) $S=[0,1]$ to $T=(0,1)$



      (b) $S=Bbb R$ to $T=[0,1]$



      (c) $S=Bbb R$ to $T=(0,1)$



      (d) $S=(0,1]$ to $T=(0,1)$



      (a)I think a) false since continuous function preserves compactness but what about others dont know . Please someone explain.







      real-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 22 '18 at 2:07







      John Nash

















      asked Nov 22 '18 at 1:51









      John NashJohn Nash

      7418




      7418




      closed as off-topic by Steve Kass, user10354138, A. Pongrácz, Kavi Rama Murthy, José Carlos Santos Nov 22 '18 at 8:29


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Steve Kass, user10354138, A. Pongrácz, Kavi Rama Murthy, José Carlos Santos

      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




      closed as off-topic by Steve Kass, user10354138, A. Pongrácz, Kavi Rama Murthy, José Carlos Santos Nov 22 '18 at 8:29


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Steve Kass, user10354138, A. Pongrácz, Kavi Rama Murthy, José Carlos Santos

      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Such a function exists in all four cases. The key idea is that any interval in the real numbers can be continuously mapped into any other interval just by stretching or squashing and then shifting it over.



          For example, in (a), define $f$ by $f(x) = x / 2 + 1/4$. Check that this is continuous as a function $Bbb{R} to Bbb{R}$, that $f(x) in T$ whenever $x in S$, and that $f$ is one-to-one.



          (Note that $f$ is not onto. It is true that because $S$ is compact, the image $f(S)$ must also be compact, but the image is not all of $T$, so the argument you sketched does not work. It's fine for $f$ to map $S$ to a compact subspace of $T$ even though $T$ is not compact.)



          In (b), let's start by defining a function $g: Bbb{R} to Bbb{R}$ whose image is bounded. Define $g(x) = e^x$ (for $x le 0$), $g(x) = 2 - e^{-x}$ (for $x ge 0$). This is clearly continuous on the left side $x le 0$ and on the right side $x ge 0$, and because the two sides agree at $0$, it's continuous on $Bbb{R}$. The image of $g$ is $(0, 2)$, and $g$ is strictly increasing and therefore one-to-one. Now you can easily modify $g$ so that its image is inside $[0, 1]$.



          (c) and (d) are similar, and I'll leave them for you.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • You mean in order to check one one compactness not require
            – John Nash
            Nov 22 '18 at 9:06












          • Whether the spaces are compact and whether the function is one-to-one are two different questions, and they have nothing to do with each other. If the function is required to be onto as well as one-to-one (that is, the function is a bijection), then you might be able to say something about the compactness of the spaces.
            – Hew Wolff
            Nov 23 '18 at 21:28


















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          Such a function exists in all four cases. The key idea is that any interval in the real numbers can be continuously mapped into any other interval just by stretching or squashing and then shifting it over.



          For example, in (a), define $f$ by $f(x) = x / 2 + 1/4$. Check that this is continuous as a function $Bbb{R} to Bbb{R}$, that $f(x) in T$ whenever $x in S$, and that $f$ is one-to-one.



          (Note that $f$ is not onto. It is true that because $S$ is compact, the image $f(S)$ must also be compact, but the image is not all of $T$, so the argument you sketched does not work. It's fine for $f$ to map $S$ to a compact subspace of $T$ even though $T$ is not compact.)



          In (b), let's start by defining a function $g: Bbb{R} to Bbb{R}$ whose image is bounded. Define $g(x) = e^x$ (for $x le 0$), $g(x) = 2 - e^{-x}$ (for $x ge 0$). This is clearly continuous on the left side $x le 0$ and on the right side $x ge 0$, and because the two sides agree at $0$, it's continuous on $Bbb{R}$. The image of $g$ is $(0, 2)$, and $g$ is strictly increasing and therefore one-to-one. Now you can easily modify $g$ so that its image is inside $[0, 1]$.



          (c) and (d) are similar, and I'll leave them for you.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • You mean in order to check one one compactness not require
            – John Nash
            Nov 22 '18 at 9:06












          • Whether the spaces are compact and whether the function is one-to-one are two different questions, and they have nothing to do with each other. If the function is required to be onto as well as one-to-one (that is, the function is a bijection), then you might be able to say something about the compactness of the spaces.
            – Hew Wolff
            Nov 23 '18 at 21:28
















          1














          Such a function exists in all four cases. The key idea is that any interval in the real numbers can be continuously mapped into any other interval just by stretching or squashing and then shifting it over.



          For example, in (a), define $f$ by $f(x) = x / 2 + 1/4$. Check that this is continuous as a function $Bbb{R} to Bbb{R}$, that $f(x) in T$ whenever $x in S$, and that $f$ is one-to-one.



          (Note that $f$ is not onto. It is true that because $S$ is compact, the image $f(S)$ must also be compact, but the image is not all of $T$, so the argument you sketched does not work. It's fine for $f$ to map $S$ to a compact subspace of $T$ even though $T$ is not compact.)



          In (b), let's start by defining a function $g: Bbb{R} to Bbb{R}$ whose image is bounded. Define $g(x) = e^x$ (for $x le 0$), $g(x) = 2 - e^{-x}$ (for $x ge 0$). This is clearly continuous on the left side $x le 0$ and on the right side $x ge 0$, and because the two sides agree at $0$, it's continuous on $Bbb{R}$. The image of $g$ is $(0, 2)$, and $g$ is strictly increasing and therefore one-to-one. Now you can easily modify $g$ so that its image is inside $[0, 1]$.



          (c) and (d) are similar, and I'll leave them for you.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • You mean in order to check one one compactness not require
            – John Nash
            Nov 22 '18 at 9:06












          • Whether the spaces are compact and whether the function is one-to-one are two different questions, and they have nothing to do with each other. If the function is required to be onto as well as one-to-one (that is, the function is a bijection), then you might be able to say something about the compactness of the spaces.
            – Hew Wolff
            Nov 23 '18 at 21:28














          1












          1








          1






          Such a function exists in all four cases. The key idea is that any interval in the real numbers can be continuously mapped into any other interval just by stretching or squashing and then shifting it over.



          For example, in (a), define $f$ by $f(x) = x / 2 + 1/4$. Check that this is continuous as a function $Bbb{R} to Bbb{R}$, that $f(x) in T$ whenever $x in S$, and that $f$ is one-to-one.



          (Note that $f$ is not onto. It is true that because $S$ is compact, the image $f(S)$ must also be compact, but the image is not all of $T$, so the argument you sketched does not work. It's fine for $f$ to map $S$ to a compact subspace of $T$ even though $T$ is not compact.)



          In (b), let's start by defining a function $g: Bbb{R} to Bbb{R}$ whose image is bounded. Define $g(x) = e^x$ (for $x le 0$), $g(x) = 2 - e^{-x}$ (for $x ge 0$). This is clearly continuous on the left side $x le 0$ and on the right side $x ge 0$, and because the two sides agree at $0$, it's continuous on $Bbb{R}$. The image of $g$ is $(0, 2)$, and $g$ is strictly increasing and therefore one-to-one. Now you can easily modify $g$ so that its image is inside $[0, 1]$.



          (c) and (d) are similar, and I'll leave them for you.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Such a function exists in all four cases. The key idea is that any interval in the real numbers can be continuously mapped into any other interval just by stretching or squashing and then shifting it over.



          For example, in (a), define $f$ by $f(x) = x / 2 + 1/4$. Check that this is continuous as a function $Bbb{R} to Bbb{R}$, that $f(x) in T$ whenever $x in S$, and that $f$ is one-to-one.



          (Note that $f$ is not onto. It is true that because $S$ is compact, the image $f(S)$ must also be compact, but the image is not all of $T$, so the argument you sketched does not work. It's fine for $f$ to map $S$ to a compact subspace of $T$ even though $T$ is not compact.)



          In (b), let's start by defining a function $g: Bbb{R} to Bbb{R}$ whose image is bounded. Define $g(x) = e^x$ (for $x le 0$), $g(x) = 2 - e^{-x}$ (for $x ge 0$). This is clearly continuous on the left side $x le 0$ and on the right side $x ge 0$, and because the two sides agree at $0$, it's continuous on $Bbb{R}$. The image of $g$ is $(0, 2)$, and $g$ is strictly increasing and therefore one-to-one. Now you can easily modify $g$ so that its image is inside $[0, 1]$.



          (c) and (d) are similar, and I'll leave them for you.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 22 '18 at 5:14









          Hew WolffHew Wolff

          2,240716




          2,240716












          • You mean in order to check one one compactness not require
            – John Nash
            Nov 22 '18 at 9:06












          • Whether the spaces are compact and whether the function is one-to-one are two different questions, and they have nothing to do with each other. If the function is required to be onto as well as one-to-one (that is, the function is a bijection), then you might be able to say something about the compactness of the spaces.
            – Hew Wolff
            Nov 23 '18 at 21:28


















          • You mean in order to check one one compactness not require
            – John Nash
            Nov 22 '18 at 9:06












          • Whether the spaces are compact and whether the function is one-to-one are two different questions, and they have nothing to do with each other. If the function is required to be onto as well as one-to-one (that is, the function is a bijection), then you might be able to say something about the compactness of the spaces.
            – Hew Wolff
            Nov 23 '18 at 21:28
















          You mean in order to check one one compactness not require
          – John Nash
          Nov 22 '18 at 9:06






          You mean in order to check one one compactness not require
          – John Nash
          Nov 22 '18 at 9:06














          Whether the spaces are compact and whether the function is one-to-one are two different questions, and they have nothing to do with each other. If the function is required to be onto as well as one-to-one (that is, the function is a bijection), then you might be able to say something about the compactness of the spaces.
          – Hew Wolff
          Nov 23 '18 at 21:28




          Whether the spaces are compact and whether the function is one-to-one are two different questions, and they have nothing to do with each other. If the function is required to be onto as well as one-to-one (that is, the function is a bijection), then you might be able to say something about the compactness of the spaces.
          – Hew Wolff
          Nov 23 '18 at 21:28



          Popular posts from this blog

          'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

          android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

          WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]