Is there a way to be explicit on .select() columns when using .includes() in Rails?












0














I am trying to optimize my query for RAM usage and a table that is in the .includes(:ocr) has too many columns on it (and also a large-sized column). Is there a way that I can still utilize Rails' .includes() but pick out explicit .select() columns from the includes() tables?



ie.



User.select(:email).includes(:ocr => select(:small_value_only))









share|improve this question






















  • What is the current RAM usage by selecting all columns?
    – Lenin Raj Rajasekaran
    Nov 19 '18 at 22:25










  • 350MB, the column i'm trying to remove is a text column that is sometimes 2-3MB large.
    – Kamilski81
    Dec 3 '18 at 21:52










  • You could batch the records using one of the batch AR methods.
    – Lenin Raj Rajasekaran
    Dec 3 '18 at 22:07
















0














I am trying to optimize my query for RAM usage and a table that is in the .includes(:ocr) has too many columns on it (and also a large-sized column). Is there a way that I can still utilize Rails' .includes() but pick out explicit .select() columns from the includes() tables?



ie.



User.select(:email).includes(:ocr => select(:small_value_only))









share|improve this question






















  • What is the current RAM usage by selecting all columns?
    – Lenin Raj Rajasekaran
    Nov 19 '18 at 22:25










  • 350MB, the column i'm trying to remove is a text column that is sometimes 2-3MB large.
    – Kamilski81
    Dec 3 '18 at 21:52










  • You could batch the records using one of the batch AR methods.
    – Lenin Raj Rajasekaran
    Dec 3 '18 at 22:07














0












0








0







I am trying to optimize my query for RAM usage and a table that is in the .includes(:ocr) has too many columns on it (and also a large-sized column). Is there a way that I can still utilize Rails' .includes() but pick out explicit .select() columns from the includes() tables?



ie.



User.select(:email).includes(:ocr => select(:small_value_only))









share|improve this question













I am trying to optimize my query for RAM usage and a table that is in the .includes(:ocr) has too many columns on it (and also a large-sized column). Is there a way that I can still utilize Rails' .includes() but pick out explicit .select() columns from the includes() tables?



ie.



User.select(:email).includes(:ocr => select(:small_value_only))






ruby-on-rails






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 19 '18 at 19:00









Kamilski81Kamilski81

5,5962078125




5,5962078125












  • What is the current RAM usage by selecting all columns?
    – Lenin Raj Rajasekaran
    Nov 19 '18 at 22:25










  • 350MB, the column i'm trying to remove is a text column that is sometimes 2-3MB large.
    – Kamilski81
    Dec 3 '18 at 21:52










  • You could batch the records using one of the batch AR methods.
    – Lenin Raj Rajasekaran
    Dec 3 '18 at 22:07


















  • What is the current RAM usage by selecting all columns?
    – Lenin Raj Rajasekaran
    Nov 19 '18 at 22:25










  • 350MB, the column i'm trying to remove is a text column that is sometimes 2-3MB large.
    – Kamilski81
    Dec 3 '18 at 21:52










  • You could batch the records using one of the batch AR methods.
    – Lenin Raj Rajasekaran
    Dec 3 '18 at 22:07
















What is the current RAM usage by selecting all columns?
– Lenin Raj Rajasekaran
Nov 19 '18 at 22:25




What is the current RAM usage by selecting all columns?
– Lenin Raj Rajasekaran
Nov 19 '18 at 22:25












350MB, the column i'm trying to remove is a text column that is sometimes 2-3MB large.
– Kamilski81
Dec 3 '18 at 21:52




350MB, the column i'm trying to remove is a text column that is sometimes 2-3MB large.
– Kamilski81
Dec 3 '18 at 21:52












You could batch the records using one of the batch AR methods.
– Lenin Raj Rajasekaran
Dec 3 '18 at 22:07




You could batch the records using one of the batch AR methods.
– Lenin Raj Rajasekaran
Dec 3 '18 at 22:07












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53381034%2fis-there-a-way-to-be-explicit-on-select-columns-when-using-includes-in-rai%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53381034%2fis-there-a-way-to-be-explicit-on-select-columns-when-using-includes-in-rai%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]