Markov's Inequality and Probability distribution?












0














I know that Markov's inequality provides an upper bound for probability of a random variable being greater than a certain value, but in what instances/distributions would the upper bound be the exact probability?










share|cite|improve this question



























    0














    I know that Markov's inequality provides an upper bound for probability of a random variable being greater than a certain value, but in what instances/distributions would the upper bound be the exact probability?










    share|cite|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0


      1





      I know that Markov's inequality provides an upper bound for probability of a random variable being greater than a certain value, but in what instances/distributions would the upper bound be the exact probability?










      share|cite|improve this question













      I know that Markov's inequality provides an upper bound for probability of a random variable being greater than a certain value, but in what instances/distributions would the upper bound be the exact probability?







      probability probability-distributions random-variables






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 20 '18 at 5:57









      Justin Dee

      615




      615






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Markov's inequality says $EX geq aP{Xgeq a}$ for any non-negative random variablse $X$ and any $a geq 0$. Equality holds iff $X$ is equal to the constant $a$ with probability $1$. To see this assume that $EX = aP{Xgeq a}$. Then $aP{Xgeq a} =EX= EXI_{Xgeq a} +EXI_{X<a} geq aP{Xgeq a}+ EXI_{X<a}$ so $EXI_{X<a}=0$. This implies that $X geq a$ almost surely. Now $E(X-a)=aP{Xgeq a}-a=0$ and $X-a$ is non-negative, so $X=a$ almost surely.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005998%2fmarkovs-inequality-and-probability-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            Markov's inequality says $EX geq aP{Xgeq a}$ for any non-negative random variablse $X$ and any $a geq 0$. Equality holds iff $X$ is equal to the constant $a$ with probability $1$. To see this assume that $EX = aP{Xgeq a}$. Then $aP{Xgeq a} =EX= EXI_{Xgeq a} +EXI_{X<a} geq aP{Xgeq a}+ EXI_{X<a}$ so $EXI_{X<a}=0$. This implies that $X geq a$ almost surely. Now $E(X-a)=aP{Xgeq a}-a=0$ and $X-a$ is non-negative, so $X=a$ almost surely.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              1














              Markov's inequality says $EX geq aP{Xgeq a}$ for any non-negative random variablse $X$ and any $a geq 0$. Equality holds iff $X$ is equal to the constant $a$ with probability $1$. To see this assume that $EX = aP{Xgeq a}$. Then $aP{Xgeq a} =EX= EXI_{Xgeq a} +EXI_{X<a} geq aP{Xgeq a}+ EXI_{X<a}$ so $EXI_{X<a}=0$. This implies that $X geq a$ almost surely. Now $E(X-a)=aP{Xgeq a}-a=0$ and $X-a$ is non-negative, so $X=a$ almost surely.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                1












                1








                1






                Markov's inequality says $EX geq aP{Xgeq a}$ for any non-negative random variablse $X$ and any $a geq 0$. Equality holds iff $X$ is equal to the constant $a$ with probability $1$. To see this assume that $EX = aP{Xgeq a}$. Then $aP{Xgeq a} =EX= EXI_{Xgeq a} +EXI_{X<a} geq aP{Xgeq a}+ EXI_{X<a}$ so $EXI_{X<a}=0$. This implies that $X geq a$ almost surely. Now $E(X-a)=aP{Xgeq a}-a=0$ and $X-a$ is non-negative, so $X=a$ almost surely.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Markov's inequality says $EX geq aP{Xgeq a}$ for any non-negative random variablse $X$ and any $a geq 0$. Equality holds iff $X$ is equal to the constant $a$ with probability $1$. To see this assume that $EX = aP{Xgeq a}$. Then $aP{Xgeq a} =EX= EXI_{Xgeq a} +EXI_{X<a} geq aP{Xgeq a}+ EXI_{X<a}$ so $EXI_{X<a}=0$. This implies that $X geq a$ almost surely. Now $E(X-a)=aP{Xgeq a}-a=0$ and $X-a$ is non-negative, so $X=a$ almost surely.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 20 '18 at 7:32









                Kavi Rama Murthy

                50.4k31854




                50.4k31854






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005998%2fmarkovs-inequality-and-probability-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                    How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                    in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith