Prove that the semi Latus rectum of an ellipse is the harmonic mean of the segments of focal chord.
$begingroup$
I am a 12th student. I found this property in a reference book, without its proof.
So i tried to prove this myself but got stuck. Here's my attempt at the problem:
Basically the question is to prove $$frac{1}{AC} + frac{1}{AB} = frac{2a}{b^2}$$
Where $mathsf a$ and $mathsf b$ are semi-major and semi-minor axes, $mathsf CAB$ is the focal chord, $mathsf A $ is the focus and $mathsf AC$ and $mathsf AB$ are its segments.
I took parametric form for $mathsf B$ and $mathsf C$ as:
$$mathsf B (acosalpha, bsinalpha ) mathsf C (acosbeta, bsinbeta )$$
Where $alpha$ and $beta$ are eccentric angles of $mathsf B$ and $mathsf C$.
I found the length of segments of focal chord as:
$$AB = a(1 -ecosalpha )$$ and $$AC = a(1 -ecosbeta )$$ Where $A$ is $(ae, 0)$ and $e$ is the eccentricity.
After that i tried to apply harmonic mean but wasn't able to simplify the equation.
conic-sections coordinate-systems
$endgroup$
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
I am a 12th student. I found this property in a reference book, without its proof.
So i tried to prove this myself but got stuck. Here's my attempt at the problem:
Basically the question is to prove $$frac{1}{AC} + frac{1}{AB} = frac{2a}{b^2}$$
Where $mathsf a$ and $mathsf b$ are semi-major and semi-minor axes, $mathsf CAB$ is the focal chord, $mathsf A $ is the focus and $mathsf AC$ and $mathsf AB$ are its segments.
I took parametric form for $mathsf B$ and $mathsf C$ as:
$$mathsf B (acosalpha, bsinalpha ) mathsf C (acosbeta, bsinbeta )$$
Where $alpha$ and $beta$ are eccentric angles of $mathsf B$ and $mathsf C$.
I found the length of segments of focal chord as:
$$AB = a(1 -ecosalpha )$$ and $$AC = a(1 -ecosbeta )$$ Where $A$ is $(ae, 0)$ and $e$ is the eccentricity.
After that i tried to apply harmonic mean but wasn't able to simplify the equation.
conic-sections coordinate-systems
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Your Question would be greatly improved by including some details of your understanding of the problem. As it currently reads, it raises a suspicion that you do not make much sense of the terms used in the terse statement and are hoping someone will not only solve but explain for you what the terms mean.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Aug 4 '18 at 17:14
$begingroup$
This is my first time asking a question. So forgive me for not being descriptive.I have edited my question accordingly.
$endgroup$
– Pranav Raj
Aug 5 '18 at 5:23
$begingroup$
how can i add a graph from geogebra to my post?
$endgroup$
– Pranav Raj
Aug 5 '18 at 5:27
1
$begingroup$
If you are familiar with polar equations, a solution is fairly immediate using the "polar form relative to a focus" equation. Wikipedia writes it in terms of the major axis and eccentricity, but it's a little cleaner (and more-relevant here) to use the semi-latus rectum, which I'll denote $ell$: $$r = frac{ell}{1+ecostheta}$$ (I've also somewhat arbitrarily chosen "$pm$" to be "$+$" in the denominator. This corresponds to putting the right-hand focus at the origin.)
$endgroup$
– Blue
Aug 5 '18 at 5:40
1
$begingroup$
See this answer, which addresses a separate question, but includes —in its "EDIT"— a nice proof of the harmonic mean property you seek. No coordinates (Cartesian or polar) needed, although the proof relies on the focus-directrix definition of a conic section.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Aug 5 '18 at 7:02
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
I am a 12th student. I found this property in a reference book, without its proof.
So i tried to prove this myself but got stuck. Here's my attempt at the problem:
Basically the question is to prove $$frac{1}{AC} + frac{1}{AB} = frac{2a}{b^2}$$
Where $mathsf a$ and $mathsf b$ are semi-major and semi-minor axes, $mathsf CAB$ is the focal chord, $mathsf A $ is the focus and $mathsf AC$ and $mathsf AB$ are its segments.
I took parametric form for $mathsf B$ and $mathsf C$ as:
$$mathsf B (acosalpha, bsinalpha ) mathsf C (acosbeta, bsinbeta )$$
Where $alpha$ and $beta$ are eccentric angles of $mathsf B$ and $mathsf C$.
I found the length of segments of focal chord as:
$$AB = a(1 -ecosalpha )$$ and $$AC = a(1 -ecosbeta )$$ Where $A$ is $(ae, 0)$ and $e$ is the eccentricity.
After that i tried to apply harmonic mean but wasn't able to simplify the equation.
conic-sections coordinate-systems
$endgroup$
I am a 12th student. I found this property in a reference book, without its proof.
So i tried to prove this myself but got stuck. Here's my attempt at the problem:
Basically the question is to prove $$frac{1}{AC} + frac{1}{AB} = frac{2a}{b^2}$$
Where $mathsf a$ and $mathsf b$ are semi-major and semi-minor axes, $mathsf CAB$ is the focal chord, $mathsf A $ is the focus and $mathsf AC$ and $mathsf AB$ are its segments.
I took parametric form for $mathsf B$ and $mathsf C$ as:
$$mathsf B (acosalpha, bsinalpha ) mathsf C (acosbeta, bsinbeta )$$
Where $alpha$ and $beta$ are eccentric angles of $mathsf B$ and $mathsf C$.
I found the length of segments of focal chord as:
$$AB = a(1 -ecosalpha )$$ and $$AC = a(1 -ecosbeta )$$ Where $A$ is $(ae, 0)$ and $e$ is the eccentricity.
After that i tried to apply harmonic mean but wasn't able to simplify the equation.
conic-sections coordinate-systems
conic-sections coordinate-systems
edited Aug 5 '18 at 5:21
Pranav Raj
asked Aug 4 '18 at 15:04


Pranav RajPranav Raj
63
63
$begingroup$
Your Question would be greatly improved by including some details of your understanding of the problem. As it currently reads, it raises a suspicion that you do not make much sense of the terms used in the terse statement and are hoping someone will not only solve but explain for you what the terms mean.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Aug 4 '18 at 17:14
$begingroup$
This is my first time asking a question. So forgive me for not being descriptive.I have edited my question accordingly.
$endgroup$
– Pranav Raj
Aug 5 '18 at 5:23
$begingroup$
how can i add a graph from geogebra to my post?
$endgroup$
– Pranav Raj
Aug 5 '18 at 5:27
1
$begingroup$
If you are familiar with polar equations, a solution is fairly immediate using the "polar form relative to a focus" equation. Wikipedia writes it in terms of the major axis and eccentricity, but it's a little cleaner (and more-relevant here) to use the semi-latus rectum, which I'll denote $ell$: $$r = frac{ell}{1+ecostheta}$$ (I've also somewhat arbitrarily chosen "$pm$" to be "$+$" in the denominator. This corresponds to putting the right-hand focus at the origin.)
$endgroup$
– Blue
Aug 5 '18 at 5:40
1
$begingroup$
See this answer, which addresses a separate question, but includes —in its "EDIT"— a nice proof of the harmonic mean property you seek. No coordinates (Cartesian or polar) needed, although the proof relies on the focus-directrix definition of a conic section.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Aug 5 '18 at 7:02
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Your Question would be greatly improved by including some details of your understanding of the problem. As it currently reads, it raises a suspicion that you do not make much sense of the terms used in the terse statement and are hoping someone will not only solve but explain for you what the terms mean.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Aug 4 '18 at 17:14
$begingroup$
This is my first time asking a question. So forgive me for not being descriptive.I have edited my question accordingly.
$endgroup$
– Pranav Raj
Aug 5 '18 at 5:23
$begingroup$
how can i add a graph from geogebra to my post?
$endgroup$
– Pranav Raj
Aug 5 '18 at 5:27
1
$begingroup$
If you are familiar with polar equations, a solution is fairly immediate using the "polar form relative to a focus" equation. Wikipedia writes it in terms of the major axis and eccentricity, but it's a little cleaner (and more-relevant here) to use the semi-latus rectum, which I'll denote $ell$: $$r = frac{ell}{1+ecostheta}$$ (I've also somewhat arbitrarily chosen "$pm$" to be "$+$" in the denominator. This corresponds to putting the right-hand focus at the origin.)
$endgroup$
– Blue
Aug 5 '18 at 5:40
1
$begingroup$
See this answer, which addresses a separate question, but includes —in its "EDIT"— a nice proof of the harmonic mean property you seek. No coordinates (Cartesian or polar) needed, although the proof relies on the focus-directrix definition of a conic section.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Aug 5 '18 at 7:02
$begingroup$
Your Question would be greatly improved by including some details of your understanding of the problem. As it currently reads, it raises a suspicion that you do not make much sense of the terms used in the terse statement and are hoping someone will not only solve but explain for you what the terms mean.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Aug 4 '18 at 17:14
$begingroup$
Your Question would be greatly improved by including some details of your understanding of the problem. As it currently reads, it raises a suspicion that you do not make much sense of the terms used in the terse statement and are hoping someone will not only solve but explain for you what the terms mean.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Aug 4 '18 at 17:14
$begingroup$
This is my first time asking a question. So forgive me for not being descriptive.I have edited my question accordingly.
$endgroup$
– Pranav Raj
Aug 5 '18 at 5:23
$begingroup$
This is my first time asking a question. So forgive me for not being descriptive.I have edited my question accordingly.
$endgroup$
– Pranav Raj
Aug 5 '18 at 5:23
$begingroup$
how can i add a graph from geogebra to my post?
$endgroup$
– Pranav Raj
Aug 5 '18 at 5:27
$begingroup$
how can i add a graph from geogebra to my post?
$endgroup$
– Pranav Raj
Aug 5 '18 at 5:27
1
1
$begingroup$
If you are familiar with polar equations, a solution is fairly immediate using the "polar form relative to a focus" equation. Wikipedia writes it in terms of the major axis and eccentricity, but it's a little cleaner (and more-relevant here) to use the semi-latus rectum, which I'll denote $ell$: $$r = frac{ell}{1+ecostheta}$$ (I've also somewhat arbitrarily chosen "$pm$" to be "$+$" in the denominator. This corresponds to putting the right-hand focus at the origin.)
$endgroup$
– Blue
Aug 5 '18 at 5:40
$begingroup$
If you are familiar with polar equations, a solution is fairly immediate using the "polar form relative to a focus" equation. Wikipedia writes it in terms of the major axis and eccentricity, but it's a little cleaner (and more-relevant here) to use the semi-latus rectum, which I'll denote $ell$: $$r = frac{ell}{1+ecostheta}$$ (I've also somewhat arbitrarily chosen "$pm$" to be "$+$" in the denominator. This corresponds to putting the right-hand focus at the origin.)
$endgroup$
– Blue
Aug 5 '18 at 5:40
1
1
$begingroup$
See this answer, which addresses a separate question, but includes —in its "EDIT"— a nice proof of the harmonic mean property you seek. No coordinates (Cartesian or polar) needed, although the proof relies on the focus-directrix definition of a conic section.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Aug 5 '18 at 7:02
$begingroup$
See this answer, which addresses a separate question, but includes —in its "EDIT"— a nice proof of the harmonic mean property you seek. No coordinates (Cartesian or polar) needed, although the proof relies on the focus-directrix definition of a conic section.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Aug 5 '18 at 7:02
|
show 3 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $O$ be a focus of a non-circle conic, let $overline{OR}$ be a semi-latus rectum, and let $overline{PQ}$ be a focal chord not containing $R$. Let $O^prime$, $P^prime$, $Q^prime$, $R^prime$ be the projections of $O$, $P$, $Q$, $R$, respectively, onto the directrix associated with $O$. Note that, by the focus-directrix property of a conic with eccentricity $eneq 0$,
$$e,|OX|=|XX^prime| quadtext{for}quad X=P, Q, R tag{1}$$
Defining $p:=|OP|$, $q:=|OQ|$, $r:=|OR|$, we have, by obvious similar triangles in the figure,
$$frac{(p-r)/e}{p} = frac{(r-q)/e}{q} qquadtoqquad r = frac{2pq}{p+q} = frac{2}{dfrac{1}{p}+dfrac{1}{q}} tag{$star$}$$
proving the result. $square$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2872078%2fprove-that-the-semi-latus-rectum-of-an-ellipse-is-the-harmonic-mean-of-the-segme%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $O$ be a focus of a non-circle conic, let $overline{OR}$ be a semi-latus rectum, and let $overline{PQ}$ be a focal chord not containing $R$. Let $O^prime$, $P^prime$, $Q^prime$, $R^prime$ be the projections of $O$, $P$, $Q$, $R$, respectively, onto the directrix associated with $O$. Note that, by the focus-directrix property of a conic with eccentricity $eneq 0$,
$$e,|OX|=|XX^prime| quadtext{for}quad X=P, Q, R tag{1}$$
Defining $p:=|OP|$, $q:=|OQ|$, $r:=|OR|$, we have, by obvious similar triangles in the figure,
$$frac{(p-r)/e}{p} = frac{(r-q)/e}{q} qquadtoqquad r = frac{2pq}{p+q} = frac{2}{dfrac{1}{p}+dfrac{1}{q}} tag{$star$}$$
proving the result. $square$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $O$ be a focus of a non-circle conic, let $overline{OR}$ be a semi-latus rectum, and let $overline{PQ}$ be a focal chord not containing $R$. Let $O^prime$, $P^prime$, $Q^prime$, $R^prime$ be the projections of $O$, $P$, $Q$, $R$, respectively, onto the directrix associated with $O$. Note that, by the focus-directrix property of a conic with eccentricity $eneq 0$,
$$e,|OX|=|XX^prime| quadtext{for}quad X=P, Q, R tag{1}$$
Defining $p:=|OP|$, $q:=|OQ|$, $r:=|OR|$, we have, by obvious similar triangles in the figure,
$$frac{(p-r)/e}{p} = frac{(r-q)/e}{q} qquadtoqquad r = frac{2pq}{p+q} = frac{2}{dfrac{1}{p}+dfrac{1}{q}} tag{$star$}$$
proving the result. $square$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $O$ be a focus of a non-circle conic, let $overline{OR}$ be a semi-latus rectum, and let $overline{PQ}$ be a focal chord not containing $R$. Let $O^prime$, $P^prime$, $Q^prime$, $R^prime$ be the projections of $O$, $P$, $Q$, $R$, respectively, onto the directrix associated with $O$. Note that, by the focus-directrix property of a conic with eccentricity $eneq 0$,
$$e,|OX|=|XX^prime| quadtext{for}quad X=P, Q, R tag{1}$$
Defining $p:=|OP|$, $q:=|OQ|$, $r:=|OR|$, we have, by obvious similar triangles in the figure,
$$frac{(p-r)/e}{p} = frac{(r-q)/e}{q} qquadtoqquad r = frac{2pq}{p+q} = frac{2}{dfrac{1}{p}+dfrac{1}{q}} tag{$star$}$$
proving the result. $square$
$endgroup$
Let $O$ be a focus of a non-circle conic, let $overline{OR}$ be a semi-latus rectum, and let $overline{PQ}$ be a focal chord not containing $R$. Let $O^prime$, $P^prime$, $Q^prime$, $R^prime$ be the projections of $O$, $P$, $Q$, $R$, respectively, onto the directrix associated with $O$. Note that, by the focus-directrix property of a conic with eccentricity $eneq 0$,
$$e,|OX|=|XX^prime| quadtext{for}quad X=P, Q, R tag{1}$$
Defining $p:=|OP|$, $q:=|OQ|$, $r:=|OR|$, we have, by obvious similar triangles in the figure,
$$frac{(p-r)/e}{p} = frac{(r-q)/e}{q} qquadtoqquad r = frac{2pq}{p+q} = frac{2}{dfrac{1}{p}+dfrac{1}{q}} tag{$star$}$$
proving the result. $square$
answered Jan 1 at 16:09


BlueBlue
47.7k870151
47.7k870151
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2872078%2fprove-that-the-semi-latus-rectum-of-an-ellipse-is-the-harmonic-mean-of-the-segme%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Your Question would be greatly improved by including some details of your understanding of the problem. As it currently reads, it raises a suspicion that you do not make much sense of the terms used in the terse statement and are hoping someone will not only solve but explain for you what the terms mean.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Aug 4 '18 at 17:14
$begingroup$
This is my first time asking a question. So forgive me for not being descriptive.I have edited my question accordingly.
$endgroup$
– Pranav Raj
Aug 5 '18 at 5:23
$begingroup$
how can i add a graph from geogebra to my post?
$endgroup$
– Pranav Raj
Aug 5 '18 at 5:27
1
$begingroup$
If you are familiar with polar equations, a solution is fairly immediate using the "polar form relative to a focus" equation. Wikipedia writes it in terms of the major axis and eccentricity, but it's a little cleaner (and more-relevant here) to use the semi-latus rectum, which I'll denote $ell$: $$r = frac{ell}{1+ecostheta}$$ (I've also somewhat arbitrarily chosen "$pm$" to be "$+$" in the denominator. This corresponds to putting the right-hand focus at the origin.)
$endgroup$
– Blue
Aug 5 '18 at 5:40
1
$begingroup$
See this answer, which addresses a separate question, but includes —in its "EDIT"— a nice proof of the harmonic mean property you seek. No coordinates (Cartesian or polar) needed, although the proof relies on the focus-directrix definition of a conic section.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Aug 5 '18 at 7:02