Symmetric Algebra over Tensor Product
Let $k$ be a field. I am interested in the symmetric algebra functor $S : k text{-vect} rightarrow k text{-alg}$ taking a $k$-vector space $V$ to the symmetric algebra $S(V)$ over $V$, which is a quotient of the tensor algebra $T(V) / I$, where $I$ consists of the ideal generated by tensors of the form $x otimes y - y otimes x$ for $x, y in V$. $S$ is a left adjoint functor.
$S(V)$ is sort of like an exponential map, in my intuition. I have far reaching but informal reasons for saying this. For the space I'm given it's hard to develop the analogy, though maybe someone here can make this formal.
1) $S$ sends $0$ to $k$. (like how the exponential map sends $0$ to $1$.)
2) $S$ sends $k$ to $k(x)$. (like how the exponential map sends $0$ to $e$).
3) $S$ sends $k^n$ to $k(x_1) otimes_k cdots otimes_k k(x_n)$. (like how the exponential map sends $n$ to $e^n$).
4) $S$ sends $V oplus W$ to $S(V) otimes_k S(W)$ (like how the exponential map sends $a+b$ to $e^a cdot e^b$).
Now my question:
5) $S$ sends $V otimes_k W$ to what? In other words, what is a natural choice of a functor $k text{-alg} times k text{-alg} rightarrow k text{-alg}$ sends $(S(V) ,S(W))$ to $S(V otimes W)$. This would sort of be analogous to $(e^a, e^b) mapsto e^{ab}$. We know to define it on free algebras. Maybe that means we can define it on quotients of free algebras using this formula.
tensor-products algebras
add a comment |
Let $k$ be a field. I am interested in the symmetric algebra functor $S : k text{-vect} rightarrow k text{-alg}$ taking a $k$-vector space $V$ to the symmetric algebra $S(V)$ over $V$, which is a quotient of the tensor algebra $T(V) / I$, where $I$ consists of the ideal generated by tensors of the form $x otimes y - y otimes x$ for $x, y in V$. $S$ is a left adjoint functor.
$S(V)$ is sort of like an exponential map, in my intuition. I have far reaching but informal reasons for saying this. For the space I'm given it's hard to develop the analogy, though maybe someone here can make this formal.
1) $S$ sends $0$ to $k$. (like how the exponential map sends $0$ to $1$.)
2) $S$ sends $k$ to $k(x)$. (like how the exponential map sends $0$ to $e$).
3) $S$ sends $k^n$ to $k(x_1) otimes_k cdots otimes_k k(x_n)$. (like how the exponential map sends $n$ to $e^n$).
4) $S$ sends $V oplus W$ to $S(V) otimes_k S(W)$ (like how the exponential map sends $a+b$ to $e^a cdot e^b$).
Now my question:
5) $S$ sends $V otimes_k W$ to what? In other words, what is a natural choice of a functor $k text{-alg} times k text{-alg} rightarrow k text{-alg}$ sends $(S(V) ,S(W))$ to $S(V otimes W)$. This would sort of be analogous to $(e^a, e^b) mapsto e^{ab}$. We know to define it on free algebras. Maybe that means we can define it on quotients of free algebras using this formula.
tensor-products algebras
If $mathrm{dim}(V) = n$ and $mathrm{dim}(W) = m$, then $S(V otimes W)$ is a polynomial ring in $nm$ variables, because $mathrm{dim}(V otimes W) = nm$.
– Nick
Nov 21 '18 at 23:08
Yes, but of course this is not the complete picture since not all $k$-algebras are free. i.e. we want a natural choice of functor whose domain is $k text{-alg} times k text{-alg}$ and whose codomain is $k text{-alg}$.
– Dean Young
Nov 21 '18 at 23:19
add a comment |
Let $k$ be a field. I am interested in the symmetric algebra functor $S : k text{-vect} rightarrow k text{-alg}$ taking a $k$-vector space $V$ to the symmetric algebra $S(V)$ over $V$, which is a quotient of the tensor algebra $T(V) / I$, where $I$ consists of the ideal generated by tensors of the form $x otimes y - y otimes x$ for $x, y in V$. $S$ is a left adjoint functor.
$S(V)$ is sort of like an exponential map, in my intuition. I have far reaching but informal reasons for saying this. For the space I'm given it's hard to develop the analogy, though maybe someone here can make this formal.
1) $S$ sends $0$ to $k$. (like how the exponential map sends $0$ to $1$.)
2) $S$ sends $k$ to $k(x)$. (like how the exponential map sends $0$ to $e$).
3) $S$ sends $k^n$ to $k(x_1) otimes_k cdots otimes_k k(x_n)$. (like how the exponential map sends $n$ to $e^n$).
4) $S$ sends $V oplus W$ to $S(V) otimes_k S(W)$ (like how the exponential map sends $a+b$ to $e^a cdot e^b$).
Now my question:
5) $S$ sends $V otimes_k W$ to what? In other words, what is a natural choice of a functor $k text{-alg} times k text{-alg} rightarrow k text{-alg}$ sends $(S(V) ,S(W))$ to $S(V otimes W)$. This would sort of be analogous to $(e^a, e^b) mapsto e^{ab}$. We know to define it on free algebras. Maybe that means we can define it on quotients of free algebras using this formula.
tensor-products algebras
Let $k$ be a field. I am interested in the symmetric algebra functor $S : k text{-vect} rightarrow k text{-alg}$ taking a $k$-vector space $V$ to the symmetric algebra $S(V)$ over $V$, which is a quotient of the tensor algebra $T(V) / I$, where $I$ consists of the ideal generated by tensors of the form $x otimes y - y otimes x$ for $x, y in V$. $S$ is a left adjoint functor.
$S(V)$ is sort of like an exponential map, in my intuition. I have far reaching but informal reasons for saying this. For the space I'm given it's hard to develop the analogy, though maybe someone here can make this formal.
1) $S$ sends $0$ to $k$. (like how the exponential map sends $0$ to $1$.)
2) $S$ sends $k$ to $k(x)$. (like how the exponential map sends $0$ to $e$).
3) $S$ sends $k^n$ to $k(x_1) otimes_k cdots otimes_k k(x_n)$. (like how the exponential map sends $n$ to $e^n$).
4) $S$ sends $V oplus W$ to $S(V) otimes_k S(W)$ (like how the exponential map sends $a+b$ to $e^a cdot e^b$).
Now my question:
5) $S$ sends $V otimes_k W$ to what? In other words, what is a natural choice of a functor $k text{-alg} times k text{-alg} rightarrow k text{-alg}$ sends $(S(V) ,S(W))$ to $S(V otimes W)$. This would sort of be analogous to $(e^a, e^b) mapsto e^{ab}$. We know to define it on free algebras. Maybe that means we can define it on quotients of free algebras using this formula.
tensor-products algebras
tensor-products algebras
asked Nov 21 '18 at 22:04


Dean YoungDean Young
1,474720
1,474720
If $mathrm{dim}(V) = n$ and $mathrm{dim}(W) = m$, then $S(V otimes W)$ is a polynomial ring in $nm$ variables, because $mathrm{dim}(V otimes W) = nm$.
– Nick
Nov 21 '18 at 23:08
Yes, but of course this is not the complete picture since not all $k$-algebras are free. i.e. we want a natural choice of functor whose domain is $k text{-alg} times k text{-alg}$ and whose codomain is $k text{-alg}$.
– Dean Young
Nov 21 '18 at 23:19
add a comment |
If $mathrm{dim}(V) = n$ and $mathrm{dim}(W) = m$, then $S(V otimes W)$ is a polynomial ring in $nm$ variables, because $mathrm{dim}(V otimes W) = nm$.
– Nick
Nov 21 '18 at 23:08
Yes, but of course this is not the complete picture since not all $k$-algebras are free. i.e. we want a natural choice of functor whose domain is $k text{-alg} times k text{-alg}$ and whose codomain is $k text{-alg}$.
– Dean Young
Nov 21 '18 at 23:19
If $mathrm{dim}(V) = n$ and $mathrm{dim}(W) = m$, then $S(V otimes W)$ is a polynomial ring in $nm$ variables, because $mathrm{dim}(V otimes W) = nm$.
– Nick
Nov 21 '18 at 23:08
If $mathrm{dim}(V) = n$ and $mathrm{dim}(W) = m$, then $S(V otimes W)$ is a polynomial ring in $nm$ variables, because $mathrm{dim}(V otimes W) = nm$.
– Nick
Nov 21 '18 at 23:08
Yes, but of course this is not the complete picture since not all $k$-algebras are free. i.e. we want a natural choice of functor whose domain is $k text{-alg} times k text{-alg}$ and whose codomain is $k text{-alg}$.
– Dean Young
Nov 21 '18 at 23:19
Yes, but of course this is not the complete picture since not all $k$-algebras are free. i.e. we want a natural choice of functor whose domain is $k text{-alg} times k text{-alg}$ and whose codomain is $k text{-alg}$.
– Dean Young
Nov 21 '18 at 23:19
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3008449%2fsymmetric-algebra-over-tensor-product%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3008449%2fsymmetric-algebra-over-tensor-product%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
If $mathrm{dim}(V) = n$ and $mathrm{dim}(W) = m$, then $S(V otimes W)$ is a polynomial ring in $nm$ variables, because $mathrm{dim}(V otimes W) = nm$.
– Nick
Nov 21 '18 at 23:08
Yes, but of course this is not the complete picture since not all $k$-algebras are free. i.e. we want a natural choice of functor whose domain is $k text{-alg} times k text{-alg}$ and whose codomain is $k text{-alg}$.
– Dean Young
Nov 21 '18 at 23:19