align optimization problem with multiple conditions

2

I am using the following environment to align optimization problem statements from Typesetting an optimisation problem

documentclass{report}

usepackage{amsmath}



newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}



begin{document}



    begin{subequations}

        begin{alignat}{2}

        &!min_{x}        &qquad& norm{f(x)}^2label{eq:optProb}\

        &text{subject to} &      & alpha + (beta*gamma)geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\

        &                  &      & beta geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}

        end{alignat}

    end{subequations}



end{document}

How can I additionally align the "condition" at the geq sign such that it looks like this:

math-mode align amsmath

share|improve this question

asked Jan 15 at 16:26

Manuel SchmidtManuel Schmidt

1,5431918

add a comment | 

2

I am using the following environment to align optimization problem statements from Typesetting an optimisation problem

documentclass{report}

usepackage{amsmath}



newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}



begin{document}



    begin{subequations}

        begin{alignat}{2}

        &!min_{x}        &qquad& norm{f(x)}^2label{eq:optProb}\

        &text{subject to} &      & alpha + (beta*gamma)geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\

        &                  &      & beta geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}

        end{alignat}

    end{subequations}



end{document}

How can I additionally align the "condition" at the geq sign such that it looks like this:

math-mode align amsmath

share|improve this question

asked Jan 15 at 16:26

Manuel SchmidtManuel Schmidt

1,5431918

add a comment | 

2

2

2

I am using the following environment to align optimization problem statements from Typesetting an optimisation problem

documentclass{report}

usepackage{amsmath}



newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}



begin{document}



    begin{subequations}

        begin{alignat}{2}

        &!min_{x}        &qquad& norm{f(x)}^2label{eq:optProb}\

        &text{subject to} &      & alpha + (beta*gamma)geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\

        &                  &      & beta geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}

        end{alignat}

    end{subequations}



end{document}

How can I additionally align the "condition" at the geq sign such that it looks like this:

math-mode align amsmath

share|improve this question

asked Jan 15 at 16:26

Manuel SchmidtManuel Schmidt

1,5431918

I am using the following environment to align optimization problem statements from Typesetting an optimisation problem

documentclass{report}

usepackage{amsmath}



newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}



begin{document}



    begin{subequations}

        begin{alignat}{2}

        &!min_{x}        &qquad& norm{f(x)}^2label{eq:optProb}\

        &text{subject to} &      & alpha + (beta*gamma)geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\

        &                  &      & beta geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}

        end{alignat}

    end{subequations}



end{document}

How can I additionally align the "condition" at the geq sign such that it looks like this:

math-mode align amsmath

math-mode align amsmath

share|improve this question

asked Jan 15 at 16:26

Manuel SchmidtManuel Schmidt

1,5431918

share|improve this question

asked Jan 15 at 16:26

Manuel SchmidtManuel Schmidt

1,5431918

share|improve this question

share|improve this question

asked Jan 15 at 16:26

Manuel SchmidtManuel Schmidt

1,5431918

asked Jan 15 at 16:26

Manuel SchmidtManuel Schmidt

1,5431918

asked Jan 15 at 16:26

Manuel SchmidtManuel Schmidt

1,5431918

1,5431918

add a comment | 

add a comment | 

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

5

I suggest using the optidef package instead, which is done for the layout of optimisation problems, and has several variants:

documentclass{report}

usepackage{amsmath, optidef}



newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}



begin{document}



begin{mini!}

  {x}{ norm{f(x)}^2 label{eq:optProb}}{}{}

addConstraint{alpha + (beta*gamma)}{ geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}}

addConstraint{beta}{geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}}

end{mini!}



end{document} 

share|improve this answer

edited Jan 15 at 18:35

answered Jan 15 at 17:07

BernardBernard

170k773200

add a comment | 

2

I changed the alignat parameter and added some &

documentclass{report}

usepackage{amsmath}



newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}



begin{document}



    begin{subequations}

        begin{alignat}{3}

        &!min_{x}        &qquad& norm{f(x)}^2           & label{eq:optProb}\

        &text{subject to} &      & alpha + (beta*gamma) & geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\

        &                  &      & beta                   &geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}

        end{alignat}

    end{subequations}



    % edit

    begin{subequations}

        begin{alignat}{3}

        &!min_{x}        &qquad&& norm{f(x)}^2           & label{eq:optProb}\

        &text{subject to} &      && alpha + (beta*gamma) & geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\

        &                  &      && beta                   &geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}

        end{alignat}

    end{subequations}



end{document}

See, for instance, this post for details.

share|improve this answer

edited Jan 15 at 17:24

answered Jan 15 at 16:39

NBurNBur

1,400214

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Thanks, this looks better. However the beta parameter is not at the geq sign.
  
  – Manuel Schmidt
  Jan 15 at 17:03
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Sorry. See the edit: I added &
  
  – NBur
  Jan 15 at 17:25
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!

• Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …

• Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.


• Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470262%2falign-optimization-problem-with-multiple-conditions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

active

oldest

votes

active

oldest

votes

5

I suggest using the optidef package instead, which is done for the layout of optimisation problems, and has several variants:

documentclass{report}

usepackage{amsmath, optidef}



newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}



begin{document}



begin{mini!}

  {x}{ norm{f(x)}^2 label{eq:optProb}}{}{}

addConstraint{alpha + (beta*gamma)}{ geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}}

addConstraint{beta}{geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}}

end{mini!}



end{document} 

share|improve this answer

edited Jan 15 at 18:35

answered Jan 15 at 17:07

BernardBernard

170k773200

add a comment | 

5

I suggest using the optidef package instead, which is done for the layout of optimisation problems, and has several variants:

documentclass{report}

usepackage{amsmath, optidef}



newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}



begin{document}



begin{mini!}

  {x}{ norm{f(x)}^2 label{eq:optProb}}{}{}

addConstraint{alpha + (beta*gamma)}{ geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}}

addConstraint{beta}{geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}}

end{mini!}



end{document} 

share|improve this answer

edited Jan 15 at 18:35

answered Jan 15 at 17:07

BernardBernard

170k773200

add a comment | 

5

5

5

I suggest using the optidef package instead, which is done for the layout of optimisation problems, and has several variants:

documentclass{report}

usepackage{amsmath, optidef}



newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}



begin{document}



begin{mini!}

  {x}{ norm{f(x)}^2 label{eq:optProb}}{}{}

addConstraint{alpha + (beta*gamma)}{ geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}}

addConstraint{beta}{geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}}

end{mini!}



end{document} 

share|improve this answer

edited Jan 15 at 18:35

answered Jan 15 at 17:07

BernardBernard

170k773200

I suggest using the optidef package instead, which is done for the layout of optimisation problems, and has several variants:

documentclass{report}

usepackage{amsmath, optidef}



newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}



begin{document}



begin{mini!}

  {x}{ norm{f(x)}^2 label{eq:optProb}}{}{}

addConstraint{alpha + (beta*gamma)}{ geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}}

addConstraint{beta}{geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}}

end{mini!}



end{document} 

share|improve this answer

edited Jan 15 at 18:35

answered Jan 15 at 17:07

BernardBernard

170k773200

share|improve this answer

share|improve this answer

edited Jan 15 at 18:35

edited Jan 15 at 18:35

edited Jan 15 at 18:35

answered Jan 15 at 17:07

BernardBernard

170k773200

answered Jan 15 at 17:07

BernardBernard

170k773200

answered Jan 15 at 17:07

BernardBernard

170k773200

170k773200

add a comment | 

add a comment | 

2

I changed the alignat parameter and added some &

documentclass{report}

usepackage{amsmath}



newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}



begin{document}



    begin{subequations}

        begin{alignat}{3}

        &!min_{x}        &qquad& norm{f(x)}^2           & label{eq:optProb}\

        &text{subject to} &      & alpha + (beta*gamma) & geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\

        &                  &      & beta                   &geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}

        end{alignat}

    end{subequations}



    % edit

    begin{subequations}

        begin{alignat}{3}

        &!min_{x}        &qquad&& norm{f(x)}^2           & label{eq:optProb}\

        &text{subject to} &      && alpha + (beta*gamma) & geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\

        &                  &      && beta                   &geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}

        end{alignat}

    end{subequations}



end{document}

See, for instance, this post for details.

share|improve this answer

edited Jan 15 at 17:24

answered Jan 15 at 16:39

NBurNBur

1,400214

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Thanks, this looks better. However the beta parameter is not at the geq sign.
  
  – Manuel Schmidt
  Jan 15 at 17:03
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Sorry. See the edit: I added &
  
  – NBur
  Jan 15 at 17:25
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

2

I changed the alignat parameter and added some &

documentclass{report}

usepackage{amsmath}



newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}



begin{document}



    begin{subequations}

        begin{alignat}{3}

        &!min_{x}        &qquad& norm{f(x)}^2           & label{eq:optProb}\

        &text{subject to} &      & alpha + (beta*gamma) & geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\

        &                  &      & beta                   &geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}

        end{alignat}

    end{subequations}



    % edit

    begin{subequations}

        begin{alignat}{3}

        &!min_{x}        &qquad&& norm{f(x)}^2           & label{eq:optProb}\

        &text{subject to} &      && alpha + (beta*gamma) & geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\

        &                  &      && beta                   &geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}

        end{alignat}

    end{subequations}



end{document}

See, for instance, this post for details.

share|improve this answer

edited Jan 15 at 17:24

answered Jan 15 at 16:39

NBurNBur

1,400214

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Thanks, this looks better. However the beta parameter is not at the geq sign.
  
  – Manuel Schmidt
  Jan 15 at 17:03
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Sorry. See the edit: I added &
  
  – NBur
  Jan 15 at 17:25
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

2

2

2

I changed the alignat parameter and added some &

documentclass{report}

usepackage{amsmath}



newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}



begin{document}



    begin{subequations}

        begin{alignat}{3}

        &!min_{x}        &qquad& norm{f(x)}^2           & label{eq:optProb}\

        &text{subject to} &      & alpha + (beta*gamma) & geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\

        &                  &      & beta                   &geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}

        end{alignat}

    end{subequations}



    % edit

    begin{subequations}

        begin{alignat}{3}

        &!min_{x}        &qquad&& norm{f(x)}^2           & label{eq:optProb}\

        &text{subject to} &      && alpha + (beta*gamma) & geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\

        &                  &      && beta                   &geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}

        end{alignat}

    end{subequations}



end{document}

See, for instance, this post for details.

share|improve this answer

edited Jan 15 at 17:24

answered Jan 15 at 16:39

NBurNBur

1,400214

I changed the alignat parameter and added some &

documentclass{report}

usepackage{amsmath}



newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}



begin{document}



    begin{subequations}

        begin{alignat}{3}

        &!min_{x}        &qquad& norm{f(x)}^2           & label{eq:optProb}\

        &text{subject to} &      & alpha + (beta*gamma) & geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\

        &                  &      & beta                   &geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}

        end{alignat}

    end{subequations}



    % edit

    begin{subequations}

        begin{alignat}{3}

        &!min_{x}        &qquad&& norm{f(x)}^2           & label{eq:optProb}\

        &text{subject to} &      && alpha + (beta*gamma) & geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\

        &                  &      && beta                   &geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}

        end{alignat}

    end{subequations}



end{document}

See, for instance, this post for details.

share|improve this answer

edited Jan 15 at 17:24

answered Jan 15 at 16:39

NBurNBur

1,400214

share|improve this answer

share|improve this answer

edited Jan 15 at 17:24

edited Jan 15 at 17:24

edited Jan 15 at 17:24

answered Jan 15 at 16:39

NBurNBur

1,400214

answered Jan 15 at 16:39

NBurNBur

1,400214

answered Jan 15 at 16:39

NBurNBur

1,400214

1,400214

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Thanks, this looks better. However the beta parameter is not at the geq sign.
  
  – Manuel Schmidt
  Jan 15 at 17:03
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Sorry. See the edit: I added &
  
  – NBur
  Jan 15 at 17:25
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Thanks, this looks better. However the beta parameter is not at the geq sign.
  
  – Manuel Schmidt
  Jan 15 at 17:03
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Sorry. See the edit: I added &
  
  – NBur
  Jan 15 at 17:25
  

  
  
  
  

Thanks, this looks better. However the beta parameter is not at the geq sign.

– Manuel Schmidt
Jan 15 at 17:03

Thanks, this looks better. However the beta parameter is not at the geq sign.

– Manuel Schmidt
Jan 15 at 17:03

Sorry. See the edit: I added &

– NBur
Jan 15 at 17:25

Sorry. See the edit: I added &

– NBur
Jan 15 at 17:25

add a comment | 

Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!

• Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …

• Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.


• Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.

draft saved

draft discarded

Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!

• Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …

• Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.


• Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470262%2falign-optimization-problem-with-multiple-conditions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

Name

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

Email

Required, but never shown

Email

Required, but never shown

Email

Required, but never shown

Name

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

Email

Required, but never shown

Email

Required, but never shown

Email

Required, but never shown

This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here