Intersect in JpaRepository












0















I have SQL query like below. I'd like to take the common product_id,authorization_ids for certain merchantIds.
In this example merchant 20000 has product1,authorization1 and product2, authorization1 whereas the other merchants only have product1, authorization1.



SELECT product_id,authorization_id  FROM ACQ_MERCHANT_PRODUCT_AUTH  WHERE merchant_Id = 20000
Intersect
SELECT product_id,authorization_id FROM ACQ_MERCHANT_PRODUCT_AUTH WHERE merchant_Id = 20001
Intersect
SELECT product_id,authorization_id FROM ACQ_MERCHANT_PRODUCT_AUTH WHERE merchant_Id = 20002


The query above gives the right result which is product1, authorization1.
I am trying to implement that in jpa:



@Repository
public interface MerchantProductAuthorizationRepository extends
JpaRepository<MerchantProductAuthorizationEntity, Long> {

@Query("SELECT new com.ykb.acq.application.sweep.util.ProductAuthMap(m.product.id, m.authorization.id) FROM MerchantProductAuthorizationEntity m WHERE m.merchantId IN (:merchants) GROUP BY m.product.id, m.authorization.id")
List<ProductAuthMap> findIntersactionOfProductAndAuthorizations(@Param("merchants") Set<Long> merchants);

}


But this gives me more lines than the intersect. ( product1, authorization1 and product2, authorization2)



How do I get the same result?










share|improve this question





























    0















    I have SQL query like below. I'd like to take the common product_id,authorization_ids for certain merchantIds.
    In this example merchant 20000 has product1,authorization1 and product2, authorization1 whereas the other merchants only have product1, authorization1.



    SELECT product_id,authorization_id  FROM ACQ_MERCHANT_PRODUCT_AUTH  WHERE merchant_Id = 20000
    Intersect
    SELECT product_id,authorization_id FROM ACQ_MERCHANT_PRODUCT_AUTH WHERE merchant_Id = 20001
    Intersect
    SELECT product_id,authorization_id FROM ACQ_MERCHANT_PRODUCT_AUTH WHERE merchant_Id = 20002


    The query above gives the right result which is product1, authorization1.
    I am trying to implement that in jpa:



    @Repository
    public interface MerchantProductAuthorizationRepository extends
    JpaRepository<MerchantProductAuthorizationEntity, Long> {

    @Query("SELECT new com.ykb.acq.application.sweep.util.ProductAuthMap(m.product.id, m.authorization.id) FROM MerchantProductAuthorizationEntity m WHERE m.merchantId IN (:merchants) GROUP BY m.product.id, m.authorization.id")
    List<ProductAuthMap> findIntersactionOfProductAndAuthorizations(@Param("merchants") Set<Long> merchants);

    }


    But this gives me more lines than the intersect. ( product1, authorization1 and product2, authorization2)



    How do I get the same result?










    share|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0








      I have SQL query like below. I'd like to take the common product_id,authorization_ids for certain merchantIds.
      In this example merchant 20000 has product1,authorization1 and product2, authorization1 whereas the other merchants only have product1, authorization1.



      SELECT product_id,authorization_id  FROM ACQ_MERCHANT_PRODUCT_AUTH  WHERE merchant_Id = 20000
      Intersect
      SELECT product_id,authorization_id FROM ACQ_MERCHANT_PRODUCT_AUTH WHERE merchant_Id = 20001
      Intersect
      SELECT product_id,authorization_id FROM ACQ_MERCHANT_PRODUCT_AUTH WHERE merchant_Id = 20002


      The query above gives the right result which is product1, authorization1.
      I am trying to implement that in jpa:



      @Repository
      public interface MerchantProductAuthorizationRepository extends
      JpaRepository<MerchantProductAuthorizationEntity, Long> {

      @Query("SELECT new com.ykb.acq.application.sweep.util.ProductAuthMap(m.product.id, m.authorization.id) FROM MerchantProductAuthorizationEntity m WHERE m.merchantId IN (:merchants) GROUP BY m.product.id, m.authorization.id")
      List<ProductAuthMap> findIntersactionOfProductAndAuthorizations(@Param("merchants") Set<Long> merchants);

      }


      But this gives me more lines than the intersect. ( product1, authorization1 and product2, authorization2)



      How do I get the same result?










      share|improve this question
















      I have SQL query like below. I'd like to take the common product_id,authorization_ids for certain merchantIds.
      In this example merchant 20000 has product1,authorization1 and product2, authorization1 whereas the other merchants only have product1, authorization1.



      SELECT product_id,authorization_id  FROM ACQ_MERCHANT_PRODUCT_AUTH  WHERE merchant_Id = 20000
      Intersect
      SELECT product_id,authorization_id FROM ACQ_MERCHANT_PRODUCT_AUTH WHERE merchant_Id = 20001
      Intersect
      SELECT product_id,authorization_id FROM ACQ_MERCHANT_PRODUCT_AUTH WHERE merchant_Id = 20002


      The query above gives the right result which is product1, authorization1.
      I am trying to implement that in jpa:



      @Repository
      public interface MerchantProductAuthorizationRepository extends
      JpaRepository<MerchantProductAuthorizationEntity, Long> {

      @Query("SELECT new com.ykb.acq.application.sweep.util.ProductAuthMap(m.product.id, m.authorization.id) FROM MerchantProductAuthorizationEntity m WHERE m.merchantId IN (:merchants) GROUP BY m.product.id, m.authorization.id")
      List<ProductAuthMap> findIntersactionOfProductAndAuthorizations(@Param("merchants") Set<Long> merchants);

      }


      But this gives me more lines than the intersect. ( product1, authorization1 and product2, authorization2)



      How do I get the same result?







      spring spring-data-jpa jpql






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 22 '18 at 7:52









      Billy Frost

      1,799198




      1,799198










      asked Nov 21 '18 at 20:38









      EgeEge

      4161929




      4161929
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          Your HQL not had intersect logic by merchantIds. In this, I count merchant_id groupped by (m.product.id, m.authorization.id) and if the count is equal the merchants count, then this pair(m.product.id, m.authorization.id) is in all merchant's Set.



          SELECT new com.ykb.acq.application.sweep.util.ProductAuthMap(m.product.id, m.authorization.id) FROM MerchantProductAuthorizationEntity m WHERE m.merchantId IN (:merchants) GROUP BY  m.product.id, m.authorization.id having count(distinct m.merchantId) =:merchantsCount





          share|improve this answer
























          • This worked thanks :)

            – Ege
            Nov 22 '18 at 6:44











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53420139%2fintersect-in-jparepository%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          Your HQL not had intersect logic by merchantIds. In this, I count merchant_id groupped by (m.product.id, m.authorization.id) and if the count is equal the merchants count, then this pair(m.product.id, m.authorization.id) is in all merchant's Set.



          SELECT new com.ykb.acq.application.sweep.util.ProductAuthMap(m.product.id, m.authorization.id) FROM MerchantProductAuthorizationEntity m WHERE m.merchantId IN (:merchants) GROUP BY  m.product.id, m.authorization.id having count(distinct m.merchantId) =:merchantsCount





          share|improve this answer
























          • This worked thanks :)

            – Ege
            Nov 22 '18 at 6:44
















          0














          Your HQL not had intersect logic by merchantIds. In this, I count merchant_id groupped by (m.product.id, m.authorization.id) and if the count is equal the merchants count, then this pair(m.product.id, m.authorization.id) is in all merchant's Set.



          SELECT new com.ykb.acq.application.sweep.util.ProductAuthMap(m.product.id, m.authorization.id) FROM MerchantProductAuthorizationEntity m WHERE m.merchantId IN (:merchants) GROUP BY  m.product.id, m.authorization.id having count(distinct m.merchantId) =:merchantsCount





          share|improve this answer
























          • This worked thanks :)

            – Ege
            Nov 22 '18 at 6:44














          0












          0








          0







          Your HQL not had intersect logic by merchantIds. In this, I count merchant_id groupped by (m.product.id, m.authorization.id) and if the count is equal the merchants count, then this pair(m.product.id, m.authorization.id) is in all merchant's Set.



          SELECT new com.ykb.acq.application.sweep.util.ProductAuthMap(m.product.id, m.authorization.id) FROM MerchantProductAuthorizationEntity m WHERE m.merchantId IN (:merchants) GROUP BY  m.product.id, m.authorization.id having count(distinct m.merchantId) =:merchantsCount





          share|improve this answer













          Your HQL not had intersect logic by merchantIds. In this, I count merchant_id groupped by (m.product.id, m.authorization.id) and if the count is equal the merchants count, then this pair(m.product.id, m.authorization.id) is in all merchant's Set.



          SELECT new com.ykb.acq.application.sweep.util.ProductAuthMap(m.product.id, m.authorization.id) FROM MerchantProductAuthorizationEntity m WHERE m.merchantId IN (:merchants) GROUP BY  m.product.id, m.authorization.id having count(distinct m.merchantId) =:merchantsCount






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 21 '18 at 21:22









          László TóthLászló Tóth

          765




          765













          • This worked thanks :)

            – Ege
            Nov 22 '18 at 6:44



















          • This worked thanks :)

            – Ege
            Nov 22 '18 at 6:44

















          This worked thanks :)

          – Ege
          Nov 22 '18 at 6:44





          This worked thanks :)

          – Ege
          Nov 22 '18 at 6:44




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53420139%2fintersect-in-jparepository%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

          Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

          A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$